
by Sam Juliano
I am leaving behind me fifty years of memory. Memory…..Who shall say what is real and what is not? Can I believe my friends all gone when their voices are a glory in my ears? No. And I will stand to say no and no again, for they remain a living truth within my mind. There is no fence nor hedge around time that is gone. You can say go back and have what you like of it…So I can close my eyes on my valley as it was…….-Huw Morgan
The legacy of John Ford’s coal-mining saga, How Green Was My Valley, based on Richard Llewelyn’s novel, is mired in a negative statistic in Oscar history. It’s is always maligned as the film that beat out the most influential and celebrated film in the history of American cinema – Orson Welles’ Citizen Kane – for the Best Picture prize. And as such, it is a film that seems to always get the short end of the stick from film historians and some classic films buffs. Releasing a year after Ford’s masterful The Grapes of Wrath(1940) the film was looked on by skeptics as a glossy Hollywood tearjerker that disavowed important social and political issues in favor of melodrama. A few modern critics have derided the film’s sentimental story, with one even calling it “a monstrous slurry of tears and coal dust.” Even a close friend and colleague takes strong issue with what he calls “phony Welsh accents” and the film’s preponderance of tears.
By and large, though, these negative opinions have been avalanched in true coal miner fashion by contemporary critics, film historians and audiences who now see How Green Was My Valley as a film about ‘disintegration of family’ and of a culture due in large measure to economic depression, that still evinces its ideological world view that boasts an indominability of the human spirit and a deep nostalgia for the past and of familial bonds and sibling love.
The film is told from the point-of-view of the youngest son of a large coal-mining Welsh family led by a stern traditionalist patriarch and an affectionate but strong-willed mother, the latter of whom favors established work ethic over progressive notions of breaking family traditions to persue an education. Llewellyn’s famous novel, a revered work of literature focuses on the change in the valley as opposed to Ford’s view in the film where Huw never changes, and becomes in essence a kind of specter, viewing events that will permanently alter the mining valley forever, laying waste to a culture no longer tenable. In Huw’s statement at the outset of this review, his gaze looks out his window at the desolute slum his valley is today only to dissolve into his imagination’s images of the lush valley of his childhood, which includes the church, the candy shop where he spends his allowance, and the daily and weekly ‘domestic’ rituals of mining families. The lyrical narration doesn’t hide the literary origins nor the script, which follows Llewellyn’s book closely (some say word-for-word), and this makes for tightening of time and telescoping of events. It is unavoidable that the long novel needed to be compromised or suppressed for this roughly two-hour film, and the sexual affairs of Hew’s brothers. Ford’s own especially vital ‘addition’ to Dunne’s script was the film’s coda, in which “idyllic memory” triumphs over “tragic actuality.” This allows this often downbeat film to wind down on a happy note. However, looking back, to experience the movie only as a celebration of Huw’s dreamy myopia, denial of reality and adhesion to tradition is to experience only Huw’s point of view, not Ford’s view of him. The novel was more concerned about changes in the valley.
The visual style and design of How Green Was My Valley is such that most of the film occurs in flashback. Huw’s adult off-camera voice narrates, scenes are shot from the visual point of view, scenes frame Huw at their compositional focal point.
Getting back to the crucial opening narration, as the adult Huw surveys the desolation his valley has become, he resorts to ‘memory’ and harsh reality is swept up for a dream, a dream he will no doubt experience for all eternity.
How Green Was My Valley is actually a succession of frightening tragedies, failures and oppressions. Of course, the rather puritanical and closed-minded Morgan family stifled discussion and even discussion among family members and close friends was often accomplished in secrecy, like the taboo divorce of Huw’s sister Bronwyn. (Earlier on in the opening monologue, Huw relates the very moment he falls in love with while as a child, “seeing her coming around the corner with basket and bonnet.) The scenes in the film that seem to be the most fondly remembered are the ones involving family loyalty, sicknesses and tragedies. In one such scene – my favorite – the mother (Sara Allgood) comes downstairs after a long recuperation and is reunited with son, still restricted to his own bed, but so overwhelmed by the mother’s sudden appearance, he places his hand over his heart. Assisting mightily here is the beautiful score by Alfred Newman, which culls every extra bit of emotion from these already stirring segments. The mother and son were taken ill after joining the unions in fighting the strangling tactics of the mine owners, who were cutting wagers to allow the cheapest men to come over to the mines, replacing those who knew no other line of work. Their simultaneously recovery after a close call, and their first glimpses of one another would melt the hardest of hearts, but it’s a scene of deep sociological significance within the framework of the inherent strength of working-class families.
Says Tag Gallagher in his volume John Ford, “More sociology would scarcely make How Green Was My Valley better, for it is not at all trying to be a movie about labor or even about coal, but rather about psychosis and the dialectics of individuality within family and social change.”
Arthur Miller’s poetic black and white cinematography makes phony Hollywood sets (Wales is brought to California) gleam, and the picture has a lovely painterly feel, that beautifully evokes time and place, and its often a visual feast.
The best performance in the film was given by Donald Crisp as the unstinting patriarch, who would rather see some of his sons leave the house rather than to be questioned over a miner’s strike that turns violent. I am told Crisp’s accent is right and his charismatic performance conjures up all we can imagine or remember of this moral and hard-working man, who valued discipline above everything else. Sara Allgood his wife is effective as a wife who will stand by her husband through thick and thin, and young Roddy McDowall makes a lasting impression as the impressionable young Huw. Both Maureen O’Hara and Walter Pidgeon share more conventional roles, but they have their effective moments.
The false happy ending of course is preceeded by the deeply-moving narration (by Hew), as Donald Crisp’s body is raised from a mine collapse through an elevator. He says “People like my father can never die…they’ll be loved forever” How Green Was My Valley was a film that as a teenager or older, I always looked for on television for endless repeats. Perhaps, as a result of its literary source, its episodic structure and its emotional content, it always was appealing. It’s a masterpiece of American cinema.







Everyone knows what I think of this travesty, so I’ll waste no more time other than to say if you want to see a proper version of the novel – with a real insight into a Welsh mining village – check out the 1975 BBC TV version. Ford’s is as close to capturing a Welsh mining village as Carry on Henry was to capturing life at the Tudor court. For a better mining film, check out Carol Reed’s excellent The Stars Look Down from 1939 which may be dated in its romance, but has a grit that Ford’s sickening Oirish whimsy – Wales was Ireland to him, hence he populated it with all his cronies making no attempt to be Welsh – Rhys Williams and Donald Crisp excepted – totally dissipated.
To look on the bright side, it’s a lot better than the following year’s best picture winner, Mrs Miniver. Valley at least was well enough made, Miniver was a travesty and was also mind-numbingly awful.
An honest and deeply felt appraisal Sam. I share your feelings for the film.
Allan, I am not defending Sam here (who can capably deal with your response as he wishes), but my listing of How Green Was My Valley and Mrs Miniver in my top 25 movies of the 1940s. I must ask why so much spleen? Surely, each of us has a right to our sentiments and the belief that our emotional responses are real and deserving of respect – especially by our friends. All that you say may be correct, but hey, who gives a toss?
These two films have meaning and force for me because I can relate to the issues of family, and how economic conditions and social change impact the lives of those affected – whether they understand or are blind to these forces or not. If there is sentimentality and nostalgia for a felt loss by the film-maker, who am I to quibble? A life without either emotion is sadly wanting.
Thanks for all that Tony. I have loved the Ford film throughout my life in large measure for the reasons you expound on.
The BBC film lacks Ford’s poetry and emotional intensity and resonance, therefore it’s vastly inferior. Similarly, the Reed film, while a minor classic, doesn’t have anything on the Ford masterpiece.
A beautiful review of a timeless classic Sam. I am saddened that Mr. Fish would have anything disparaging to say about this, and I tend to think that the BBC version is a pale imitation of it.
This will doubtless annoy all three members of the Sam-Allan-Tony triumvirate but, alas… I myself fall somewhere between Sam and Tony’s sentiments for the Ford picture, and Allan’s admittedly resolute rejection of same. By which I mean, like Sam and Tony, I enjoy How Green Was My Valley, and respect it as a particularly lyrical piece of the Ford canon, but I do not have the sheer (wonderful) affection for it that Sam and Tony do, and I can certainly see Allan’s points. That said, I ironically find pleasure in it for some of the very reasons Allan condemns it–”Wales was Ireland to him, hence he populated it with all his cronies making no attempt to be Welsh.” This is true. The film is about as Welsh as Tokyo Story; as Allan scathingly remarks, “Ford’s [film] is as close to capturing a Welsh mining village as Carry on Henry was to capturing life at the Tudor court.” (That is funny, Allan!)
Yet Ford’s very personal reading of Richard Llewellyn’s novel and Philip Dunne’s screenplay is what makes the film most memorable for me. I completely respect the 1975 BBC television version (which is rather entertaining in its own right) for its greater authenticity and fidelity to Llewellyn’s novel, but I ultimately give Ford a major pass for making Wales, by way of California, Ireland.
I suggest that Sam’s quoting of Gallagher’s volume on Ford hits the proverbial nail on the head; the issues of mining, and more broadly, of labor, serves as the framing device for Ford’s more mythical excavation of that which animates his work–family, and Ford’s sweeping treatment of the habitation of such. (The more roundly celebrated adaptation of Steinbeck from the previous year is not dissimilar.) Ford’s cinema, even at its grittiest, is fundamentally chimerical.
Ford’s nostalgic sentimentality is often knocked today, but I believe Dunne’s screenplay would have not been as well-served by any other filmmaker. And Donald Crisp is truly wonderful in this movie.
(Here I must admit that William Wyler’s Mrs. Miniver almost puts me to sleep.)
Finally, this is a tremendously intelligent and passionate review, Sam. I would say it’s your finest piece, especially as it is formed by a deep, abiding fervor for How Green Was My Valley.
I always found the sets on the phony side. And Walter Pigeon and Maureen O’Hara weren’t very convincing. But the moving human story played out here–I agree its is poetic–is undeniably moving in the strongest terms. This is an outstanding revisitation of the film, impressively informed.
It is a strong piece of writing, Sam; be proud! I think I’m probably with Alexander on the film. I saw it early last year for the first time, knowing its Oscar rep and not exactly on the edge of my seat to see it, but I could see why people were so taken with it. I have not read the book and have not seen the 1975 version to compare them, but the film really does convey that bucolic lyricism and melodramatic (in the good sense) struggle of the working class. I enjoyed it much more than I had imagined I would. Masterful camerawork, too. I don’t know that I would watch it again and again like you, Sam, but I’m glad it has such a champion.
And yeah, How Green Was My Valley totally kicks Mrs. Miniver’s skinny butt.
Alexander, I’m particularly smitten with your phrase “mythical excavation.” I am so going to steal that sometime.
I placed this film #15 on my 40′s list, so you know well where I stand here.
The ‘cycle of life’ has rarely been presented more movingly, and as a study of families being gutted by social upheavals it’s peerless. I must say, a great review.
Bill: Allan and I have locked horns on this one for several years now. Thanks very much for the kind words.
Alexander: You know me better than that. I could never take issue with you beautifully-enunciated position here, nor with your unfailing reasoning and fantastic insight into this (and any film for that matter). The entire paragraph which includes “mythical excavation–as so rightly noted by Jenny Bee–is brilliant criticism in and of itself. In fact your entire response is better than my review–I am floored by it! I know and understand that there is a valid position about the Welsh fraudulence, and what Allan insists are “phony accents” Donald Crisp aside.
But as you youself admitted early in your resonse, if there is a strong and lasting emotional connection with the material (that scene where young Hew and matriarch Sara Allgood see each other for the first time after their lengthy illness has stayed with me my entire life since I first saw this film as a 12 year-old, subsequently watching it over 60 times since) one will celebrate this film on the highest level.
That’s an excellent point you make there about Dunne’s screenplay being served best by Ford above all others, a result of his heritage and ‘tasteful’ sentimentality.
I am simply overwhelmed by your entire comment and I am quite grateful my friend.
Jenny Bee: Likewise Jenny Bee, I can’t express enough how grateful I am for your stellar contribution here.
“I have not read the book and have not seen the 1975 version to compare them, but the film really does convey that bucolic lyricism and melodramatic (in the good sense) struggle of the working class.”
Wonderful, wonderful observation there! I am very happy at your own happy response to the film, and I agree it definitely “Kick’s Mrs. Miniver’s butt.” LOL!!!
Thanks again Jenny Bee!
That is quite the eloquent comment there Bob, I agree the film does present a most haunting ‘cycle of life.’ I have known for the longest time of your passion for this film. Thank You again for your kindness.
Your “love” for this one really shines through here Sam. I am not surprised at all that you saw it over 60 times. What struck me most about this one was that cinematography and Donald Crisp’s performance.
Sam, this is as good a piece on the film and as good a defense of it as any I have come across. In fact I doubt there’s a better piece anywhere on the film.
On Allan’s point (which we have argued about many times before) to suggest that this film isn’t good because of the inauthenticity of the Welsh representation is like saying all films about India should be instantly dismissed (none of these can meet the same standards) or for that matter representations of the American South in Hollywood. So on and so forth. One could create an encyclopedia of examples.
Allan has a point if he is willing to do the rest as well but as I know in many discussions with him, he isn’t. Why the Ford should then be singled out I don’t know.
Leaving this aside one could argue that there’s a little Ireland even in Ford’s Westerns! The point of How Green… isn’t to represent Welsh life but to indulge in a nostalgia of the ‘family’.
Kaleem, your baiting of Allan is becoming very tiresome.
Tony: there’s some history here (though I am not the only guilty party even on this blog)! But I am around rarely so there shouldn’t be a problem putting up with it!
Yes, there is history, just thank whatever deity you care to name there’s no present or future. If I want to hear the same old record over and over, I have plenty to listen to that are a pleasure to hear.
Fine piece on a classic film, Sam. For what it’s worth, I tend to agree with those who say it should be taken on its own terms, from its own era in filmmaking. It’s a very entertaining film.
Thanks much for that Rick. I understand the reservations of those who take issue with its unabashed sentimentality, but like you say in more ways than one it’s a product of its time. It is entertaining for sure, and I have a strong nostalgic connection to it.
Kaleem, your praise is over the top but deeply appreciated and your onservations are quite sound. Thank you sir.
And Joe, again thanks for your uplift here, and yes those two components you mention are unassailable.
This is one of your finest pieces Sam, as you inject your own personal feelings into your great love for it. I appreciated the use of that opening narration as it sets the tone for the rest of the essay.
Time to back up my hatred of the film. Here’s David Thomson’s take – remember he’s British born…not blinded by American ignorance of the subject.
The film that resulted is not just esteemed. It won Best Picture in the year of Citizen Kane, and it collected several other Oscars. I have to say that no-one who knows Wales has ever had this respect for the film. Day’s large set was pretty to its tiptoes, idyllic and breathing with the proper nostalgia (it won an Oscar). But in no way did it resemble a Welsh mining cimmunity, places where the weather, the overcast, and the poverty have done so much to take away the prettiness.
But the inner prettiness – the sentimentality – of the family story is every bit as big a problem. This is a weepie with coal dust in your eyes, as well as an uplifting but distant view of mining that is not willing to examine the economics closely for fear of giving offence. Yes, the family life was strong, but the truth in many places (and it’s a truth written on headstones since 1941) is that the nation exploited coal and its workers heartlessly and left a place of poverty and eyesore. To the prettiness of the film’s village, I would just respond “Aberfan” – a place of disaster unknown in most American minds.
So it’s coherent and touching, but shot through with a fatal wrongness – the fact that almost all the cast are from everywhere but Wales is part of this. Roddy McDowall is excellent as the child, and he was bold casting at the time. The cast also included Walter Pidgeon (Canadian), Maureen O’Hara (Irish), Donald Crisp (Scottish), Anna Lee (English), Sara Allgood (Irish), Barry Fitzgerald (Irish), and Rhys Williams (Welsh!). It’s said that the film cost $1.25 million and it had first run domestic rentals of $2.8 million. So it worked – but, of course, next to Kane, it looks like Victorian homily.
The 1975 TV version was shot on location in a Welsh mining village, starred Stanley Baker (Welsh), Sian Phillips (Welsh), and numerous other Welsh actors. It was authentic, something Ford’s film wouldn’t know if it came up behind it and nipped it on its patently false backside.
David Thomson could be an impossible guy. He mostly hates Kubrick and Ford.
Why don’t you tell everyone here that your hero Leslie Halliwell, absolutely loved HOW GREEN WAS MY VALLEY, and gave it three stars, which coming from him is quite the achievement.
You always bring that up…but he didn’t have it in either selection of 100 of his favourite films (Halliwell’s Hundred and Harvest), in which he picked his favourites. Wonder why?
The fact is, it does well from non British audiences who wouldn’t know Wales or a coal mine from a boil on their arse. Hell, Sam, you think they speak Welch (sic).
As for Halliwell’s *** films, that places it with My Girl Tisa.
Allan, I am not interested in lingo and accents–if I were I would take issue here. I am interested in strong characters, familial fortitude, impassioned, poetic and personal filmmaking and valid emotions.
In your mocking glee to dismiss Halliwell’s three-star rating for HGWMV (which for him is a show of spectacular support, as three-star films are rare for Leslie and four are almost unheard of) by naming “My Girl Tisa” you conveniently forget that Mr. Halliwell also gave your beloved THE LIFE AND DEATH OF COLONEL BLIMP three-stars!!!
So, the esteemed Leslie Halliwell, the most “British” of the “guide authors” basically rates the Ford the same as he rates the Powell.
That’s enough for me.
Fair enough, live in fantasy land if you wish…Ford sure as hell did.