
by Allan Fish
(France/Italy 1953 148m) DVD1/2
Aka. Le Salaire de la Peur
Waltz of death
p Henri-Georges Clouzot d Henri-Georges Clouzot w Henri-Georges Clouzot, Jerome Geronimi novel Georges Arnaud ph Armand Thirard ed Henri Rust, Madeleine Gug, Etiennette Muse m Georges Auric art René Renoux
Yves Montand (Mario), Charles Vanel (Jo), Peter Van Eyck (Bimba), Folco Lulli (Luigi), Vera Clouzot (Linda), William Tubbs (Bill O’Brien), Dario Moreno (Hernandez), Jo Dest (Smerloff), Antonio Centa (camp chief), Luis de Lima (Bernardo),
If you asked your average filmgoer which film comes to mind when he hears Strauss’ immortal ‘Blue Danube Waltz’, you can be fairly safe in your assumption that about 90% of them would pick Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey. The odd buff who may be old Hollywood minded might recall the background music in Grand Hotel, or even, for those with a real memory, Cukor’s Holiday. Yet I, though occasionally thinking of Kubrick or Grant and Hepburn’s slow music-box waltz at New Year, generally think of this, Clouzot’s masterpiece of tension from the early fifties.
In the Central American outpost of Las Pedras, drop-outs of assorted nationalities congregate on a crossroads to nowhere. Italians, French, Spanish, Mexican, German, English or American, it matters little here. The only nationality of note is that of anonymity, of hitting rock bottom. However, a pay out opportunity comes when an oilfield disaster occurs that requires desperate remedies. $2,000 is put up as payment for those willing to take the chance. The downside is that the job is driving trucks over 300 miles of rough roads to the oilfields with nothing less than nitro-glycerine onboard (uncannily recalling Richard Barthelmess’ flight in Only Angels Have Wings in a not too dissimilar location). Of a handful who take driving tests to prove their worthiness, four eventually make the journey; an Italian, a German, and two Frenchmen – one older Parisian and a younger Corsican.
Certainly such a mixing of cultures and languages hadn’t been seen in mainstream cinema since Renoir’s La Grande Illusion (whose star Jean Gabin refused the Vanel role). Yet if it reminds one of anything, at least in its opening scenes, it’s Huston’s The Treasure of the Sierra Madre. One could see Huston’s tourist in Las Pedras. Yet the greed here isn’t for golden glory, but rather for hard cash. The chances of success are that much smaller, so the greed becomes greater. Certainly one would rather be in the company of Huston’s characters than Clouzot’s. Clouzot’s men are anything but heroes, just nasty people out to make a buck at anyone’s expense. “Fear is catching, like smallpox. And once you get it, it’s for life” one of the fellows says prior to turning down the job. But these men know no fear where money is concerned. They are little more than insects, just like the beetles toyed with by the boy in the opening shots (a sequence perhaps homaged by Sam Peckinpah in The Wild Bunch).
Yet in spite of the characters’ inherent feral nature, we feel every danger. After all, there is tension, there is Hitchcockian tension and there is Clouzotian tension. He may not have had the long career and subtle undertones of Hitch, but for sheer nail-biting tension, Clouzot was the man. Indeed, it would perhaps be even better regarded, were it not for the fact that it is soooooo cynical and populated by people for whom we have little empathy. Finally, when Montand (magnificent in a star-making role) makes it to the oilfields, we breathe a sigh of relief. But Clouzot tricks us again and has him drive his truck too recklessly on the way back and go over a cliff as the soundtrack blares out Strauss’ immortal piece. Cut to him holding his last link to the old world, a ticket to the Pigalle, an area more associated with Melvillian cool. Far from cool, Clouzot presents a sweltering world of parasites. “I smell like a corpse” Jo (the great Charles Vanel, equally memorable in the director’s Les Diaboliques and La Vérité) says at the end. I wouldn’t blame anyone for cleansing themselves in a hot bath after seeing this.






Allan, you are bit tough on the protagonists. They are desperate men wanting to escape hell on earth. The job is a way out, and while greed has its role, I wouldn’t call these guys ‘nasty’. If we didn’t have some empathy, I doubt the tension would be sustained nor would the final irony be so affecting. They are men, no better and no worse than the rest of us, and insects are we all. Also, there is a noir atmosphere – ‘but by the grace of God go I’ – which forestalls judgment and gives the retribution of fate a tragic element. There are traces of existentialism too – the amorality of L’Etranger. This movie has one of the great scenes of male bonding – the joyous liberation of pissing together of a cliff…
This film proceeeds with breakneck speed, with danger lurking at every turn. It is, as has been suggested above, also a trenchant character study.
A masterpiece of tension indeed! Few people could watch this film without total and complete immersion. It’s a technical knockout, and I agree with Tony that the characters are ‘men’, no more, no less. It views with DIABOLIQUE as it’s director’s masterwork, methinks.
Very fine review here.
One of my favorite films.
Pierre, I’m not surprised at all!
I own this original DVD set, and I have watched this film a number of times. It is cumpulsive, and I’d say it’s one of the most “cumulative” films in memory. Do you see what I’m saying there Mr. Fish?
Yeeeeeessss, I think I get you, Joe…
As Pierre has stated, this is one of my favorite films as well. And as Tony writes, these men are desperate. The empathy the film conjures is one of its great strengths. Fine review, Allan.
“It’s compulsive.”
Are you suggesting, Joe, that fans of the film are compulsive?
I really need to know.
Joe, I really really need to know this.
Joe — I’m still waiting. . . .
Please, Joe. Pleez!
Just for the record, I’m joking .
A compulsive jokester.
Seriously Joe I don’t get it… Perhaps Allan can ecplain?
OK, point conceeded to a point, Tony, but they’re hardly heroic, they’re like ants trying desperately to survive. Human, just not the sort of guys you’d necessarily like to meet down the pub…
Pierre:
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!
that is a great one!!!!!!!!!!
I will reach out to Joe later tonite in yours and Tony’s behalf!!!
Ok Allan, perhaps in my penchant for hyperbole, I want too far the other way. Btw, you ‘local’ must be very genteel…
Maybe it’s compulsively watchable?
Great review, Allan. I’ll always have a soft spot for “Wages”: I acquainted myself with Clouzot during the same golden, collegiate summer that I first saw Powell and Pressburger, Jacques Tati, and early David Lean, mostly by sneaking film breaks in between job sessions at the UC Berkeley tutor lab. Watching the film is indeed quite an experience, and I actually think the debate that’s occurred in this thread here in regards to the protagonists’ empathic potential is part of the accomplishment. I’m still not totally certain the film works as a political allegory, if it was intended as such (I admit it’s been a few years since I screened it), but the fact that we both obliquely sympathize with the characters and devilishly long to see them explode with their precarious cargo is the hinge on which the leg-cramping tension pivots. The nitroglycerine is quite a palpable Freudian set piece as well — the capricious, irascible spirit within that possesses the ability to redeem as well as destroy.
It’s certainly compulsively watchable, Jon, no arguments there. Not for one with short nails either.
ha Pierre!
What I meant to say, both Tony and pierre is that this film is cumulative, meaning that it’s structure is built on small incidents, all dependent on what happened before. While this is true in a sense with almost any film, I do feel this one is reliant on this progression.
Thanks, Joe. My initial impression was that you were referring to the steady, unrelenting crescendo of suspense that did not disappoint at film’s end. I think that’s pretty close (i.e., looking at the same thing from two different directons).
Thanks Joe.
Once again Jon Lanthier has graced our threads with fecund interpretations like:
“The nitroglycerine is quite a palpable Freudian set piece as well — the capricious, irascible spirit within that possesses the ability to redeem as well as destroy.”
Great stuff John, and loved reading about your discovery of this director along with Lean, Tati and Powell and Pressburger at the USCS Tutor lab.
What strikes me about both the post and the above comments is that while everyone’s in agreement as to just how great a suspense film this is (myself included), no one’s mentioned the fact that the suspense doesn’t begin until they start the engines of their trucks, which is about an hour into the film. Prior to that the film is all about setup, getting to know the principals, their plight, their personalities and their behavior. I find the first hour is often funny, a group of men acting like pathetic idiots because they’re unable to find anything constructive to do with themselves, with the exception of Luigi maybe, even though he has dust in his lungs from his profession as a laborer. By the way, anyone catch that two of the principals are named Mario and Luigi? Weren’t they the stars of a popular video game some years back? Sort of like Bert and Ernie in It’s A Wonderful Life. Could just be coincidence though.
Guy: That is an excellent point and one that I really wanted to broach when Allan first posted this review. I think you really did a fine job there describing what actually happened in that first house, where you get to know their personalities.
I think it’s interesting to note however, that in th einstance of this film ‘character’ does not control fate in view of the constant danger that can blow them up at any moment. Kael suggests “theviolence in the film is to force a vision of human experience” rather than to just serve as plot excitement. And she also suggests the film is a “parable of the modern world.”
Guy I never took special note of the names Mario and Luigi, though you may well be right with that video game show. I’ll have to ask Allan if he remembers this. Ah yes, good old Bert and Ernie……
Thanks for always lighting up the site with your brilliant insights Guy.
Is this film horrible?