
by Sam Juliano
Pianist Vladimir Feltsman bolted out onto the stage six times after Monday night’s all-Prokofiev venue at Avery Fisher Hall to acknowledge a cheering sold-out throng, who were wildly enthusiastic over his work on the”Piano Concerto No. 2.” The rhapsodic and galvanizing virtuoso turn dazzled concert goers with it’s breathtaking perpetual motion and march-like intensity in a work that is probably three times as difficult to negotiate as Sergei Rachmaninoff’s beloved “Second Piano Concerto,” a perennial concert favorite. Feltsman, who left Russia in 1987, and became an American citizen in 1987, beamed as he was handed a bouquet of flowers, while being flanked by London Philharmonic Symphony Orchestra conductor Valery Gergiev, the world’s foremost Prokofiev interpreter. It is purportedly a rule that any pianist who successfully negotiates this (one of most difficult of all piano concertos) is entitled to win delirious applause.
The “Piano Concerto No 2″ is laden with dissonances and aggressive tempos, yet there’s no denying it’s breathtaking music that builds in intensity. With Feltsman running his hands back and forth across the piano keyboard like a magician, Gergiev led the Londoners in an inspired reading which immediately shifts into gear in the lengthy first movement cadenza, but climaxes in the rather relentless final movement, the “Scherzo,” which is a relentless tour de force of perpetual motion. The music is fierce and almost barbarous, and the fact that Prokofiev was able to transcribe this to a piano concerto, rather than a symphony is musically remarkable. The moody, almost sinister sound of the music echoes his celebrated contemporary, Dimitri Shostakovich, whose music is dominated by long somber and ominous discordances.
The First Symphony, also known as “The Classical” is often referred to by musicologists as a parody of the classical style, but you’d never known this by the sincerity and effervescent final movement with its subtle harmonic twists and clever musical phrasings. It’s true that this symphony employs melodies, forms and rhythms that are associated with the classical tradition, but Prokofiev took these in another direction with his own “moderations.” Yet, it seems that below the surface, the essence of the classical symphony is intact. The first part of the piece recalls the melodic perfection of Haydn, but this quickly dissipates into a purposeful (seemingly) off-key section that may come off as ethereal or even with a touch of humor.
The lyrical melody typically appears in the slow movement, and while it isn’t as beautiful as similar movements from Tchaikovsky or Rachmaninoff in their symphonic works, it is nonetheless striking in its serenity and harmonic fervor. It’s definitely Prokofiev’s most renowned symphonic work, even if some of the later works may have shown him more at the height of his composing prowess.
Such a work was his Sixth Symphony (Prokofiev wrote seven) which seems to open on a landscape of somber pastoral music, the militant sound of trumpets, and a funeral cavalcade, all of which are eventually informed by the lovely melody launched by the English horn and what appeared to be violins or violas. Of course such an irresistible combination of these instruments were the inspiration for Tchaikovsky’s sublime Romeo and Juliet Overture. The Second Movement brings forth “crying” sounds of angst which eventually yield to a more measured horn solo, and then back to the sounds of anguish, with a preponderance of woodwinds. There is a restless, foreboding mood in this movement, which at least is countered by the optimism in the third and final movement of the 23 minute work. There is unadulterated joy in the opening, even if this carefree mood has an underpinning of tension and uncertainty. This sense of foreboding is confirmed by the expeditious finale, which is inordinately harsh and dissonant. Some of the abrupt musically clashing is violent, as the work was composed at the end of World War II and Prokofiev wanted to allude to the victory won despite the massive death and destruction. The dark and melancholy Russian sensibility, however, was woven into the fabric of much of his music however, much like Tchaikovsky’s ‘Pathetique’ Symphony No. 6, and just about all of Rachmaninoff, much of Schostakovich and Mussorgsky.
Maestro Gergiev, who over the last few years conducted the Metropolitan Opera Orchestra in staging of Prokofiev’s War and Peace and The Gambler (both attended by this reviewer) approaches this composer as a countryman who understands the style and the emotions involved in both the composer’s tortured wartime mind and in the Russian musical tradition, which Gergiev studied intensely in his conservatory education. Hence, his startling insights into these works results in resplendent readings, undoubtedly enhanced by a proper navigation of some Soviet musical “color” which may influence tempo and emphasis. His guidance of the renowned London orchestra has made them more adept at interpreting this quintessentially Russian composer. Gergiev has long conducted Prokofiev’s operas and ballets at the Marinsky Theater in St. Petersburg to universal acclaim.
The three encores was testimony to Mr. Gergiev’s mastery of this adventurous musical genius at home and on the international stage, and Monday’s results were no less than electrifying for this tireless champion, his distinguished pianist and the exalted company he has helped to mold.
Note: I attended Monday evening’s (Match 23) all-Prokofiev venue at Avery Fisher Hall all by my lonesome in Lincoln Center. It was the first of an eight-day treatment of the composer’s symphonies and concertos. I will also be attending this coming Monday’s (March 30) concert of two more of his symphonies and a violin concerto. I found parking immediately, and spent time checking out brochures and enjoying (or wolfing down?) a turkey panini in a nearby sandwich shop.







My own exposure to Prokofiev is mainly the score to Alexander Nevsky. His music there is thundering, but it’s also magnificent. I bet some of these qualities were on display in your concert. I must say, excellent review.
This is quite a review. It appears that music is your real expertise. I have heard the classical symphony and the first violin concerto, but not the piano piece. It’s always a thrill to witness a world-class pianist in action, and I’m sure Feltsman really brought the place down. Prokofiev is one composer who deserves attention, as too many (like Bobby above) are familiar with him mainly from his film work. Clearly, he’s one of the greatest Russian composers.
You went alone, eh? What does Lucille say to this?
I really would have loved to have been there. And you lucky dog you. Another one lined up for Monday! Gergiev is the top Russian conductor, without a doubt. I have a few of his CDs on Tchaikovsky. I’d be interested in knowing if he has tackled Stravinsky.
I don’t know the Piano Concerto you review here, but sounds like Mr. Feltsman was worth the price of the ticket alone.
This review is something.
Glad you guys had a good time. You deserve a break. This isn’t something that I would enjoy myself though.
One definitely does not go to a Prokofiev concert expecting to hear lush melody. For that you go for Tchaikovsky. This kind of music requires patience and an ear for discordant sounds. Prokofiev speaks like an impressionistic painter draws, and there can never be a general single interpretation. I am very imprssed with yours Sam. Your writing on anything that has to do with music stands tall.
Thanks everyone for the exceedingly positive assessment of this most special evening I had on Monday.
Maria: Thanks for visiting the site, but Lucille wasn’t with me; I was alone.
David: That was one of your typically excellent comments, which I can’t at all dispute. I like writing about film and music about equally, but music does get a slight edge. Your input at WitD is deeply appreciated.
Peter: Indeed, Feltsman WAS worth the price of admission alone! I wish you could come with me for this coming Monday, especially as I am alone. But I do bhave Lucille coming with me tonite to hear all all-Handel venue.
Frank: Lucille says this: “Better you than me!” Dpo you think if I had any other wife besides Lucille, that I would get aways with all the shit I pull? She is one of a kind in this world. And I suffer from what is known as “OCD.” Thanks for the praise and stellar assessment.
Bobby: Indeed. Most people know Prokofiev primarily from the film scores. Thanks, cuz.
PROKOFIEV?
WHO’S HE?
HOW ABOUT SOME JOHN PHILLIP SOUSA?
Russell…note to self…
USA not = WHOLE WORLD
I know it’s hard to get past the elementary programming, but you’ll get there.
And Sam, better clarify that most people ON THIS BOARD may know Prokofiev mostly for the film scores, but most people in general wouldn’t even know he wrote film scores, and would remember him for symphonies, ballets and other pieces.
Prokofiev is not one of my own favorite composers, but hearing and seeing this concert always shows the music in the best possible light. I might be convined. Fantastic review Sam. And great picture of Avery Fisher Hall at twilight.
Just listen to the Piano Concerto No.2, Op.16, and you’ll see why Prokofiev is the greatest of 20th century composers. No one was able to fuse melody and modernism with such elan.
The trouble is that the cold war has decimated his reputation among American critics who want us to view him as a boot-licker or a neo-romantic.
Chout, Fiery Angel, Quintet, Sarcasms, War Sonatas, neo-romantic? I don’t think so.
Thanks so very much Nicholas for that most enlightening sentiment, which I must completely agree with you on lock, stock and barrel.
I managed to see two more symphonies and the magnificent violin concerto the following week, and my review of that is forthcoming.
Thanks again.
What were the encores that were played during the March 23rd concert?
Hey Will. Thanks very much for asking. The encores were short hodge-podge pieces, not recognizable numbers. but they were still a lot of fun.