
by Allan Fish
(West Germany 1977 429m) DVD1/2 (Germany only)
Aka. Hitler, ein Film aus Deutschland
You are the executioner of the western world
p Hans-Jurgen Syberberg d/w Hans-Jurgen Syberberg ph Dietrich Lohmann ed Jutta Brandstaedter m Gustav Mahler, W.A.Mozart, L.Van Beethoven, Richard Wagner, Joseph Haydn art Hans Gailling
Heinz Schübert, Andre Heller, Helmut Lange, Amelie Syberberg, Harry Baer, Peter Kern,
When debating the masters of modern German cinema, most critics would concentrate on the canonical trio, Wenders, Fassbinder and Herzog (with a passing nod to Reitz and Schlöndorff). And yet arguably the most individual, ingenious and undoubtedly the most demanding, was Hans-Jürgen Syberberg. His films are hard to see, largely unavailable on DVD anywhere in the English speaking world, but in a film that parallels Arthurian legend, the Grail analogy is a worthy one. To see your first Syberberg is a life-changing experience, and if his entire oeuvre cannot mean as much as it would to one of his nation, his films remain idiosyncratic treatises of incredible complexity, individual “J’accuse” testimonies to provoke outrage, anger and, occasionally, a nod of acknowledgement.
Syberberg’s masterpiece consists of four parts, and was shown as such on West German television in the seventies; “The Grail”, “A German Dream”, “The End of a Winter’s Tale” and “We Children of Hell.” Each part probes, examines, and generally performs a post-mortem on the reasons behind the rise and fall of Hitler, his doctrine and iconography, the psyche of the German people and even turns the accusation on the individual viewer. As the narrator observes, it wasn’t Hitler’s ideals that were beaten but his army. The ideals stood fast to the very end.
There are allusions to so many aspects of German culture as to almost verge on sensory overload, but you are hypnotised, in much the same way as the German nation were by Hitler. As the film proposes, Hitler presented to the German people the realisation of a fairy tale nightmare, a totalitarian state destined to rule the world. We are continually shown a puppet or dummy of Hitler whose very passivity still strikes fear into the hardiest of hearts. Even the simple recitation of quotes from the Nazi bigwigs is done in such a matter-of-fact way as to chill. The actors, too, are merely puppets to the puppet-master, with various actors reminding one of Laird Cregar and Peter Sutcliffe, individuals who became infamous as serial killers (on screen and in reality). Then throw in the remembrances of old cinema, from the snowstorm recalling Citizen Kane to the tales of Hitler’s obsessive film-viewing at the Berghof to the direct re-enactments from old German films, most famously, and appropriately, the final underworld trial of Peter Lorre’s Dusseldorf murderer in M. The accusers are accused and, though Hitler is indeed shown to be a monster, how could we allow him into power in the first place and turn a blind eye to his antics prior to September 1939?
Above all aspects of the film, it’s the imagery that transcends and spellbinds the viewer on each viewing. We find our anger summoned, but also our responses to savage beauty and, though several composers’ work are heard, from Beethoven to Mozart over the final cosmic credits, it’s Hitler’s – and Syberberg’s – beloved Wagner who dominates. (Quite appropriately it’s Parsifal that provides most of the sweeping majestic music, the same opera filmed by Syberberg five years later.) The whole visual style is pure Syberberg, and seems to have also been influential on the last part of that other great masterpiece of German television history, Fassbinder’s Berlin Alexanderplatz. However, the filmic virtues of Fassbinder and Syberberg could not be further apart. Syberberg is not interested in individuals, but ideals, emotions and national culture. “Did we insult anybody, offend anyone?” one of the actors asks the audience. We can only respond with a gesture, akin to that of the little girl at the fadeout, covering her eyes with her hands. This is the theatre of the cinema and vice versa, and its greatest surviving example.







This is fascinating. Sam has been tirelessly promoting this film to me and others as one of the great films from this country. Like you, his speaking of it almost borders on the passionate. And, low and behold, the other big brain of WONDERS IN THE DARK unveils it at No. 3!!!! I admit my schedule these days doesn’t allow for much time to do anything, let alone look at moves of this enormous length. However, after Sam’s unstoppable pushing, and your sensational essay, I’m gonna find the time soon to let this one wash over me. Thank you so much for solidifying my suspicions on this one. This is why I love these countdowns! I’m pretty sure Schmulee has this film on DVD. Ill have to throttle the big-boy and wrestle it from him next time I visit. Thanks Allan! Dennis
Yes, I made him watch it in the first place.
That doesn’t surprise me at all. He has so many movies to see it’s a wonder he knows which ones to start with. But, I don’t envy him. Its gotta be hard seeing all these films, getting into the city to keep up with all the new stuf and tend to a web site (not to mention keep up with his kids and home life). Its a wonder that poor Schmulee hasn’t passed out yet.
This is a fantastic piece. But I’ve somehow never been sold on Syberberg. The marriage of opera and cinema is something I’ve always had questions about. In many ways I find the two modes to be antithetical. Hitler is certainly a very ambitious grandly operatic effort. I’ve just never connected with Syberberg though.
WOW! I must see this…is it available on DVD in the States?
I shall reply to my own question by saying it is now in my NETFLIX queue! I can’t wait…this piece was absolutely transfixing…and I had no idea this movie even existed! Thank you, Alan!
Add me as another who went to Netflix immediately after reading this review and added it to the queue.
Happy to remove the blinkers, David.
Great review, I’m going to set a weekend aside in the future to watch this again.
What’s so interesting about this review is what can top this… twice! The intrigue…
Yes, Sam has been trying to find that out for the last two months, without success, he’s like a kid waiting for his Christmas present rattling it inside.
Mr. Fish, Sam has promoted this film with me for three years now, and even tried to get me to come to his house to watch it. As I recall he has it in his top 5 of the decade, and he’s a huge Wagner fan too.
Sam is a fan of anything with singing in it, let alone opera, let alone Wagner. Glad he’s promoting it, though, it took me a while to convince him to watch it.
Thanks Peter. Actually I have the film at #7. (see top 15 below)
1 The Last Picture Show (Bogdonovich; USA)
2 Mon Oncle Antoine (Jutra; Canada)
3 Cries and Whispers (Bergman; Sweden)
4 Celine et Julie von en Bateau (Rivette; France)
5 Don Giovanni (Losey; UK/Italy)
6 The Ascent (Shepitko; Russia)
7 Hitler: A Film From Germany (Syberberg; Germany)
8 I Never Sang For My Father (Cates; USA)
9 A Clockwork Orange (Kubrick; UK)
10 Cabaret (Fosse; USA)
11 Le Circle Rouge (Melville; France)
12 I, Claudius (UK; Herbert Wise)
13 The New Land (Troell; Sweden)
14 Love (Maak; Hungary)
15 Picnic at Hanging Rock (Weir; Australia)
When I finally watched this the other night, I had been eagerly anticipating it for a while. The first half – that is, about 3 1/2 hours of the movie – did not impress me. I found the attempts to tie Hitler in with the present day embarrassing, the overall approach severely didactic (something I often like, but in this case I thought the didacticism was too severe), and the approach to Hitler bordering on mystification. At any rate, it was another day or two before I sat down to watch disc 2, or parts 3 and 4. This time I was fascinated with what I saw. Partly it was the mood/mindset I was in – for whatever reason I was meeting disc 1 on unfriendly ground (it was a work night, I was tired, distracted by other matters) whereas I was ready to sit down and give myself over to disc 2. But I also thought the concept of Part 3 was stronger than Parts 1 & 2 – more emotionally evocative of the Nazi terror, and more intellectually provocative (in part because the emotions were more engaged too). I even thought that Syberberg did a decent job explaining the dissonance of his savage attacks on contemporary civilization and more respectfully fearful and even awed take on Nazism. (It seemed somewhat unfair to take the hatchet to capitalists and know-nothings while giving Hitler the more nuanced approach – but eventually Syberburg explains how he relates his scornful disgust with modern society to the obvious fascination – though certainly not admiration – he has with Hitler; that Hitler’s indulgence of man’s Id destroyed Western culture and left it wide open to the banality of the present. I don’t necessarily agree, but at least he attempts to synthesize his various arguments and approaches.)
Interesting that this & Stalker, both back-to-back on this list and in my viewing – close with a silent little girl in a shawl and “Ode to Joy”
All in all, by the time this 7-hour opus was finished I had reconsidered my harsh opinion of the film garned from its beginning. Now I want to see it again. Thanks, guys, for turning me on to this (I’d heard of it before, but it was not something I was planning to seek out especially soon; also for some reason I thought it was a conventional biopic of the Fuhrer).