by Allan Fish
(USA 1924 81m) not on DVD
Bring on the clowns
p Louis B.Mayer d Victor Sjöstrom w Carey Wilson, Victor Sjöstrom, Gregory Zilboorg play Leonid Andreyev ph Milton Moore ed Hugh Wynn m uncredited art Cedric Gibbons cos Sophie Wachner
Lon Chaney (Paul Beaumont), Norma Shearer (Consuelo), John Gilbert (Bezano), Marc McDermott (Baron Regnard), Ruth King (Marie), Tully Marshall (Count Mancini), Ford Sterling (Tricaud),
“What is it about human nature that makes people quick to laugh when someone gets slapped – whether the slap be spiritual, mental or physical?“ In setting out to answer the question prompted by a caption during the movie, great Scandinavian in Hollywood Victor Sjöstrom gave Lon Chaney one of his finest roles. An actor of both demonstrative bravado and subtle skill, Chaney was the movies’ first chameleon, a master of disguise, make-up and eccentricity. And if The Pemalty, The Hunchback of Notre Dame, Tell it to the Marines and The Unholy Three were also superb personal triumphs for the actor, they just lack that special something that signifies true greatness today. He, however, to shorten the title in the way that his character is referred in the film, is Chaney’s unheralded greatest film and one of the greatest silent productions of the twenties. For too long it has been famous for being the then fledging merged studio of MGM’s first major production and for introducing the future king and queen of the MGM lot, Shearer and Gilbert, to stardom. Yet their romance is the one thing that dates in the whole shebang. Artistically, however, and in its lead performance, it’s hard to see how it could be bettered.
Paul Beaumont is a driven scientist under the patronage of the Baron Regnard who finally proclaims that he has proved his wonderful scientific theories. However, the Baron tricks him, passing the theories off as his own, stealing his wife from him, and slapping and humiliating him in front of the scientific worthies. Reduced to pitifully laughing at the sick irony of his fate, Paul turns his back on his old life and becomes a clown in the circus, billing himself as ‘he who gets slapped.’ He soon becomes a big success, and falls in love with the daughter of another baron, who has joined the circus as a bareback rider. However, when Regnard returns to try and buy the girl as his wife, Paul decides to take his overdue revenge.
Though never a horror film, there are undoubtedly horrific aspects to this most artistic of melodramas. Indeed, to many it may be very reminiscent of Paul Leni’s later silent classic The Man Who Laughs, though there the eternal smiling face was as a result of a physical deformity. Here Chaney hides behind his anger and resentment, rather like Jack Nicholson’s later Joker declaring “I’m only smiling on the outside.” To watch Chaney’s facial contortions and expressions is a marvel of expressionistic acting. Just observe the heartbreak when he declares his love for Shearer, only for her to playfully slap him and laugh, thinking him to be joking. The look of abject despair on his face is more than palatable, and even more heartrending when he suddenly hides behind laughter again to hide his pain. As many critics have noted, the symbolic wearing of his heart effectively on his sleeve points to his final demise, and what a demise. The final scenes of Chaney, fatally wounded by the reprehensible Marshall, staggering out for one last bow to his adoring and unaware public, before collapsing to the floor, is one of the great moments in Hollywood cinema of its decade.
Not to overlook the contribution of Sjöstrom, who fashioned this potentially laughable story into a truly exquisite work of art. His use of psychological distortion and superimposition is majestic, most memorably when Chaney sees the faces of the laughing scientists amongst his fellow clowns. Just to hear the immortal March of the Clowns, or to see the savagely caricatured framing character of the clown twirling his globe-like sphere (which looks forward to the Iron Man in The Wedding March) is to enter a magical place in which it is very clear that the lot of a clown is not a happy one.








I love Lon Chaney, but I don’t remember this one….I mostly think of him as the Hunchback and the Phantom…..nice review by Allan Fish
I like Mr. Fish’s contention that the director uses “psychological distortion and superimposition.” I agree this is a very great film, maybe the best of Chaney’s career. I personally didn’t really care for his Hunchback. Excellent review.
Ax excellent and rather obscure film, but an inspiring choice for the site to headline. I saw this a number of years ago, but it has always stayed with me. Chaney gives a phenomenal performance.
I once owned this laserdisc, it is without any question Chaney’s greatest film and second greatest performance after “The Phantom of the Opera.” I must compliment Allan Fish for an expert review.
Nice idea doing some silents.
Thanks fot the comments Karen and David. It’s one that deserves to be better known, and not just for Chaney but for Sjöstrom, too.
And thanks, too, to Frederick and Joe. I will get round to some more silents in time, don’t worry.
Just wish that Warners would fulfil their promise of it in Vol 2 of the Chaney Collection when it finally comes to DVD.
yeah, I liked this one a lot too. That image of the clown is one of Lon Chaney’s most famous. I hope the DVD comes out soon.
Very good review.
This is an excellent review, Allan, of a tremendous film. It is probably my favorite Lon Chaney picture. As you say, it’s not a horror film, but it does have its horrifying side, and it’s quite a beautifully mounted silent melodrama.
Spot on, Alexander! It’s just a shame it’s so overlooked.
Congratulations to Allan on a terrific review of a timeless silent classic that would rank high on any list of 1920′s masterworks. It is indeed very frustrating and disheartening that the film languishes in DVD limbo, the victim of apparent rights issues, or even indifference by Warners. (who have also balked at the promised releases of THE WIND, THE CROWD and GREED)
Luckily I have a decent copy of the film though.
Nice to see Alexander, Bobby, Joe Dave, Frederick and Karen chime in too.
No rights issue, Sam, old boy, just Warners being (expletive deleted). You can add SHOW PEOPLE, THE FOUR HORSEMEN OF THE APOCALYPSE, THE BIG PARADE, THE STUDENT PRINCE OF OLD HEIDELBERG, NOAH’S ARK and various others to that list.
Hey guy and gals, your intrepid sleuth has located this movie here:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5767253815622002246
Great work there Tony! Anyone who wants to see it, and dosen’t have any kind of a bootie, can now watch it!!! Excellent!!
Nice one.
Nicely written review. I am not a silent film person, but this one does look interesting.
After Allan’s review, which is excellent btw, I watched this, and found it every bit as great as Allan portrayed it.
A wonderfully expressionistic work which uses the circus ring cum spinning globe as a deeply pessimistic metaphor for life, love, and death. A deeply profound performance by Lon Chaney in the lead role as He, the clown whose act is built on his being slapped for laughs as he repeatedly falls and gets up for more. Before a tragic finale he wreaks a terrible revenge on his tormentors. The final scene sees his limp body at the front of a spinning earth ringed by clowns unceremoniously swung into the void…
Superlative analysis Tony. I have known of your deep love for this film for a while now, and i couldn’t agree with you more.
Wow, never heard of it but will look at that link later tonight.
Thanks and it sounds amazing!
ps: Sam, sent an email this am.
Aye, Michael I received it, thanks so much!
Hi! Allan, Sam Juliano and Wonders in the Dark readers…
Here goes some great news via Roger Ebert, (and a fellow film commenters’ on a message board.) about director Fritz Lang’s 1927 silent film Metropolis.
Missing Footage…
What an interesting article and here goes some additional links…
Kino
Spiegel De International
The Guardian
Fritz Lang’s Metropolis
DeeDee
Thanks again Dee Dee for broaching what many may have missed. I was informed by e mail -by Bob Clark- that the showing of the film was a complete bust, as they weren’t transmitting the film, but a filming of the film being shown, if that makes any sense. Anyway, I know METROPOLIS will be available on DVD in the restored form soon enough!
By the way, here goes another website that you might be able to view the missing footage on a French website called arte.tv I think later this evening… Here goes the link…How very apropos that Allan is
featuring Lang’s Metropolis in Tony’s graphics…
Arte.TV
DeeDee
Excellent work as usual Dee Dee. Great link here!
Sam Juliano,”Thanks again Dee Dee for broaching what many may have missed. I was informed by e mail -by Bob Clark- that the showing of the film was a complete bust, as they weren’t transmitting the film, but a filming of the film being shown, if that makes any sense. Anyway, I know METROPOLIS will be available on DVD in the restored form soon enough!”
Hi! Sam Juliano,
I plan to send you an email and some information pertaining to this film…shortly!
DeeDee
By the way, Sam Juliano, This could be the reason why they didn’t stream the missing footage. (I must admit that I was out there on the “internets” Oops! I meant to say…internet) in search of the 4 minutes snippet from the film Metropolis…arte TV did post a 4 minute snippet, but they must have removed the video.
Metropolis Coming On blu-ray and the Missing Footage…
By the way, The article is from 2008/2009…and the date for the release of the blu-ray disc have not been announced…yet.