by Allan Fish
(USA 1927 97m) DVD1/2
A Song of Two Humans
p William Fox d Friedrich W.Murnau w Carl Mayer novel “A Trip to Tilsit” by Hermann Sudermann ph Charles Rosher, Karl Struss ed H.H.Caldwell, Katherine Hilliker, Harold Schuster m Hugo Riesenfeld art Rochus Gliese
George O’Brien (the man), Janet Gaynor (the wife), Margaret Livingston (other woman), J.Farrell MacDonald (the photographer), Bodil Rosing (the maid), Ralph Sipperly, Jane Winton, Arthur Housman, Eddie Boland,
So goes the subtitle to Murnau’s masterpiece, and no film before or since has come close to matching its tune. If one silent had to be preserved above all others, with the greatest respect to La Passion de Jeanne d’Arc, Napoleon, The Wedding March, Nosferatu and all the other great classics of this lost art form, without Sunrise one would feel that the cinema itself had died. In Interview With the Vampire Brad Pitt’s Louis mourns the loss of sunrises, but witnesses Murnau’s and even he, a soulless killer, can feel the emotion on the screen.
The story follows a young farmer entangled with a vampish woman from the city, who tries to tempt him from his wife by selling his farm – which he has already let loan sharks strip bare to finance his affair – and getting him to kill his once beloved spouse to run off to the city with her. However, when push (excuse the pun) comes to shove, and he takes his wife out on the boat, he cannot kill her, though she realises his intentions and runs away. He then realises his folly and spends the day trying to win her love back.
Silent films are often romanticised for their use of light, and this is a perfect case in point; there are uses of light here you never knew existed and the sun’s symbolism is as potent here as it was in Nosferatu five years earlier. Sure, the candlelight and lanterns may not seem as alive as those in Kubrick’s Barry Lyndon, but they still burn and light up the screen. This may be an American film made by an American studio who had given its director carte blanche, but it’s made by an German director, based on a German script (by great scenarist Carl Mayer) of a German author’s work (William Dieterle’s All That Money Can Buy certainly owed a debt to it), and Murnau manages to combine this German sensibility with a shiny romantic gloss that is pure Hollywood. That in itself is Murnau’s greatest masterstroke, not the expressionism itself, which is merely brilliantly eyecatching, but counterpoint of the symbolism. The film may be entitled Sunrise, but it’s at night when the moon is bright that many of the film’s symbolism is sharpest and Murnau’s use of double exposure to suggest dreams and suggestion is quite magnificent and, in its day, must have been revolutionary. Further irony is in the fact that, though the city is what lures the husband to consider killing his wife, it is there that he comes to love her again and win her back so that, in its slightly strange way, it’s just saying what The Wizard of Oz said a dozen years later, that happiness is in your own backyard.
It’s in the city that the real romance shines through, like a sun in itself. In today’s world many might see the wife’s forgiveness as too submissive, and they might be right, in this day and age. But then romance really did mean something, or at least romance on the cinema really did mean something. This wasn’t just love so much as devotion, a devotion not only existent in wives but in animals, as witness the dog’s hurrying to the boat and diving in when he senses his mistress’ life is in danger. And, though this is Murnau’s baby in every way, one cannot praise the actors enough, with Janet Gaynor, sporting a hair-do so tightly braided as to resemble a golden skullcap, quite unforgettable as the long suffering, loyal wife, radiating an inner beauty enough to shame the brightest stars (both actresses and astronomical).
The opening caption reads: “this song of a man and his wife is of no place and every place; you might hear it anywhere at any time.” Never was a truer word spoken, for this is as universal as the fact that the sun will always rise. Too often films are referred to as transcendental experiences, well Sunrise really is one. It’s the greatest paean to love ever filmed and one of the greatest films of all time. Finis.









So here we are… After over three months, one of cinema’s greatest works.
Allan, I can’t thank you enough for this series because t truly gives a clear picture of what lies beyond. The reviews themselves were extraordinary, not the usual reviews that one reads, but ones with anecdotes, legends and behind the scenes stories. This is remarkable stuff. And Kudos for that. What a treasure…
Well, again thanks JAFB, the idea was to educate and it seems to have done what it set out to do.
Hi! Allan Fish,
Great Choice! for your number 1 pick…Sunrise…
…By the way, I’am sooo… familiar with this film, but I’am yet to watch this film (all together and on the count of three…One, two, three…) with yet being the “operative” word right…
…Once again Allan, great choices, great reviews, but most importantly, another great countdown.
Thanks, for sharing!
DeeDee
My first awareness of Sunrise came when Hollywood:The Pioneers showed that incredible tracking shot of O’Brien wending his way through the swamp to his rendezvous with The Woman From the City. The scene never fails to thrill me. It just wouldn’t be the same in a talking picture. Murnau’s camera movement and Hugo Riesenfeld’s ominous score make it more than a movie and something other than choreography. Arguably, it’s the essence of silent film.
I’m not making Sunrise my top silent — some of the antics in the City drag a little — but it’s a choice I can’t help but respect. Congratulations, Alan, on completing this mighty project.
Thanks Samuel.
Firstly, congratulations on concluding this ambitious undertaking. You really showed your love of the silent cinema, and introduced a lot of us to new films and new directors. I’m still in the process of catching up!
Though of course we’ve seen this coming for a little while now (I thought your top pick would be either Greed or this, leaning toward Greed but with a contrary voice whispering in my ear that this would be it – and I’m glad it was right!), it’s nonetheless satisfying to see this Murnau masterpiece at #1.
Aside from all its inherent virtues, it really sums up the entire silent era in one film – merging all the European avant-garde traditions with a Hollywood sense of entertainment and imagination, right on the cusp of the transition to talkies. It’s symbolic, melodramatic, comedic, tragic, naive, sophisticated – but it also transcends all these categories. Oddly enough, I liked it right away but did not really fall head over heels for it, the way I did with other silents from The Gold Rush to Battleship Potemkin to The Passion of Joan of Arc (or, speaking of Murnau, Faust). I’ve theories on why, but they don’t really matter now – suffice it to say, the more I’ve seen it – and the more I’ve reflected upon it – the more intoxicating it becomes.
By the way, I love those admittedly silly antics in the city, though I understand where Samuel’s coming from – I also love the frolicking countryside passages in Faust, which are also divergent in tone from the rest of the film, and seemingly irrelevant to the story (though of course they help flesh out certain characters and storylines). In both cases, it’s the unexpectedness of the development as well as the feeling of being-in-the-moment (one of the greatest of cinematic sensations, but one I find hard to come by, especially in silent films).
I’m feeling a bit tongue-tied in expressing my affection for the film right now (it’s been a long week) but I’ll resort to an observation I’ve offered many times before. Who could have guessed, going into this film and on the basis of its brooding start, that an hour in we’d be watching a drunken piglet cavort in a Jazz Age nightclub? I love the film for that.
Geez, this comment here by MM is brilliance incarnate.
See comment about hyperbolean overstatement. It’s good stuff, though, Joel.
By the way, when you’re done with the 00s countdown, I hope you’ll consider – purely for the fun of it – listing an all-time top 100. I’d love to see how these countdowns stack up against one another.
Possibly, MM, but some time down the line.
I’ve enjoyed and learned a lot about silent films these past few months, and although I could not add anything to the dialog, wanted to let you know I read and have a list of films I need to watch at some point.
Having only seen 2 of Murnau’s films, I see I need to rectify that and see the others.
This too sounds like an excellent film and story line.
Thanks for all you’ve done. Cheers!
Again, thanks, CM.
HA-HA! RIGHT ON CUE! EXACTLY HOW I PREDICTED IT WOULD END! But of course, and I AGREE wholeheartedly with this choice. However, where this is what Allan thinks is the BEST of the era (and Raoul Walsh’s THIEF OF BAGDAD is his FAVORITE), this film is BOTH my PERSONAL FAVORITE and my choice for BEST of the period. The sumptuos production design, the true emotions of the performers, lilting and unforgettable visual composition; it all adds up. Not only do I think this is the nasterpiece of the era and Murnau’s personal best film, but its this film that really caps a career that turns Murnau into the greatest and most important director of the period and give him passage into the elitist team of the 10 greatest directors in history. They gave him an Oscar for excelence in production, but basically it was an award signifying a tie for BEST PICTURE. Rightfully so. SUNRISE is to great a film to overlook. One of the true masterpieces the new art can claim. Right on, ALLAN!!!!!
Allan,
I absolutely love lists and this has been the most thorough and interesting one I have come across. You did educate but, most of all, you spoke of how these films effected you personally as well as drawing together themes and metaphorical and political undercurrents. Excellent.
I would like to echo MovieMan’s call for a top 100 free from decade and genre boundaries.
A couple of thoughts on Sunrise, which is my favourite silent film too:
A great paean to love, absolutely, but also perhaps to its blindness – I know it’s a stylised and idealised love but it doesn’t take her long to get over the fact her husband thought about killing her!
The fact that I put that thought aside pretty quickly shows the rapturous (all rights reserved by Mr S.Juliano) and overwhelming nature of the romance.
My favourite scene could well be the tram journey. I’m not quite sure why. Ever since, I’ve kept my eye on similar journeys that pop up in other films: City of Sylvia and Pont du Nord spring to mind.
The ‘antics’ in the city did get a little bit tired but I can easily forgive the film such an indulgence. When the sun rises as if from her heart at the end it felt like it did the same in mine.
A great film and a great conclusion to this undertaking.
Stephen, much appreciated, and also nice to hear of a masterpiece you did love, I was losing hope.
BTW, overwhelming is also copyrighted by Sam, and any other word in Roget’s of hyperbolean overstatement.
Haha!
“BTW, overwhelming is also copyrighted by Sam, and any other word in Roget’s of hyperbolean overstatement.”
Damn, I could barely afford that sentence as it was.
Stephen, on this point I’ll admit I am guilty as charged! Ha!
Though I was lurking throughout the rest of your countdown, keeping quiet due to my relative unfamiliarity with anything but the most popular silents, I want to congratulate you for your hard work in keeping this countdown rolling. I can attest how hard it is to take on something so major without having your energy flag from time to time — I couldn’t do it!
SUNRISE is the perfect apotheosis of all that is special from this era, and I’m very happy to see it at the very top of your list.
I always knew you were “lurking” Tony! Ha!
Well, it had to be Sunrise, didn’t it? Is there any purer depiction of romance on the screen than this film? (Which is pretty odd, considering it involves not one but three attempted stranglings). Everything about the film is masterful, particularly Murnau’s layering of images, superimposing shots of the waves of the lake or visions of the city over the characters to convey their inner thoughts and turmoil. The camera movements are so graceful, a tragic counterpoint to the stilted, static aesthetic that filmmakers would have to adopt for the early talkies just to capitalize on the new craze. I could go on and on about the infinite pleasures of the film, but I already wrote about it at length on my own blog and frankly I just woke up and I’m groggy.
Congratulations on finishing this undertaking, Allan. You’ve written some terrific reminders of why I love many of these films and you’ve given me a staggering amount of films to seek out. Fantastic work.
Great to have you here Jake, and thanks so much for the kind words for Allan, who doesn’t always address compliments, but genuinely appreciates them!
Influences abound from this, one of the greatest movies ever made. I’d even go as far as say its one of the ten greatest films from a VISUAL standpoint ever made. The shadow reveal of Harry Lime in THE THIRD MAN. The rise of the sun over the desert plains in LAWRENCE OF ARABIA. The ENTIRE Silly Symphony, THE OLD MILL. The Big Guys rampage through a glimmering New York City in KING KONG, not to mention the tons of refrences Disney makes in his animated films (the sunsetting jump into the ocean in PINOCCHIO, the SCORCERER’S APPRENTICE sequence in FANTASIA even up to the “Kiss The Girl” number in the glade in 1988′s THE LITTLE MERMAID). I could go on forever. SUNRISE is that rare instance in film history where art meets technical prowess and is mixed with emotional sensitivity to reveal an artist working at fullest capacity. Murnau has become as much of a legend as this film is legendary. This is, without question, as perfect as they come.
I too, MUST congradulate ALLAn on this defining moment in ALL of the counts that form the base core of WITD. If there is a hook to repeatedly coming back to this site its nucleus that are these lists of films. Both Sam and Allan, using there combined slyness, decided to give the blogosphere a run for the money by brazenly voicing an opinion on what is GREAT, what INFLUENCES and what MUST BE SEEN. Sure, there are many other films out there that need, demand a spot-light, but the core, the base of film education is right here. How many sites, books even, run through and era like this with a fine-toothed comb. Allan has repeatedly stated this count was to EDUCATE. Man, he wasn’t lying. Even people who are considered big brains on the subject of cinema concede to finding something new and unthinkable here. My hats off to ALLAN (and Sam) for bringing this great feature (as well as the other counts) to intelligentsia!!!!!! Thanks soooooo much guys!
It’s really a wonderful thing to behold, seeing all these heatfelt, appreciative comments here under this thread for this film masterpiece, (one of the greatest films ever made of course) but more importantly for the countdown in general. It’s the most extraordinary achivement in the blogosphere, as it tackled what is surely the most unexplored cinematic genre, and informed it with a singular expertise. Hence, yes, it was educational, as the project was imbued with an authority rarely seen in any venture here or anywhere else. There is no a single film book or collection as comprehensive as this countdown in consideration of silent cinema anywhere on the planet.
To the many who contributed here without individual acknowledgement (Allan and I have a different philosophy on handling individual submissions) be rest assured the comments brightened the cinematic landscape.
No poll held at this site before or after can ever claim to have this level of enriching significance, and it is Allan’s sole triumph.
Not at all, it’s merely a vindication for the enterprise and the fact that, if it has made anyone watch anything they haven’t seen or, better still, even heard of, then mission accomplished. Bob – PLEASE WATCH GREED.
Okay…okay…here I go…I mean someone has to say it in the wake of all this gushing…
Yes, the visuals are astounding in SUNRISE and the technical prowess on display by Murnau is second to none…
…but man, oh man, the story in this is not up to snuff. I found it trite and tedious (albeit in a semi-good old fashioned typical silent movie kind of way) — I just did not find the emotional connection all of you seem to have found in this film. I did not care for any of the characters. There was nothing about them I found appealing or that I could relate to. They were all overly-stylized caricatures.
For me this film was all about style…and in that regard it succeeds beautifully.
A masterpiece? Undoubtedly. But this SUNRISE left me cold.
Of course, much kudos to the WitD team for putting together this list, surely the most ambitious of its kind in the blogosphere. There was a multitude of eye-opening entries here (my favorite finds thus far being FACES OF CHILDREN and THE ADVENTURES OF PRINCE ACHMED), many of which I still hope to catch up with sooner rather than later. Just watched Hitchcock’s THE LODGER, too, which was fantastic (even better than I thought it would be).
So thanks, as always, for the enlightenment. For me, though, nothing (perhaps from any period) can top Dreyer’s PASSION OF JOAN OF ARC.
David, terrific submission here (unsurprisingly!) and while I can’t agree with that main issue you have with SUNRISE (my own #2 of the silent era, and sometimes depending when you ask me, #1) you know I am with you lock, stock and barrel on JOAN OF ARC, which we both have at #1.)
STEPHEN-Among other words copywritten by Schmulee you will also take not on: FABULOUS, UNABASHED, MESMERIZING, HAUNTING, SPECTACULAR, TRANSPLENDANT, TITANIC, INARGUABLE and, of course, the ones he tosses around like a ball at a Quatamalan Soccer Game: STAGGERING MASTERPIECE! Actually, Webster has decided to put a section in the next edition of there best-selling dictionary that includes all of Sam’s most overused words and phrases. The section will be titled SCHMULEEISMS or HOW TO OVER EMPHASIS IN WORDS TO THE POINT OF INSANITY! Seems like a great feature to me.
Has anyone noticed how bad my spelling and grammar are coming off today? Geez! How humiliating.
Allan – I haven’t commented much throughout the countdown, mainly because there was little that I could add since I had seen very few of the films. But your reviews have been uniformly outstanding and I’ve read and enjoyed each one. When my own noir countdown comes to a close, I intend to immerse myself in silent film and this series has been a serious education for me. It’s been fun and most enlightening.
A while back, I realized I needed to know more about silent films. I checked out a book on silent films that included synopses of the greatest accompanied by a series of stills that depicted the story. I was immediately drawn to Sunrise because I hadn’t heard of it – and I was captivated by its simple story and its simple settings of country and city – divided by water – that seem abstractly symbolic rather than existing in the real world. There is an otherworldliness to this movie that I find most fascinating. When I finally found it on DVD, I was impressed by the lighting and cinematography, but it’s the film’s archetypal paradigm that captivates me the most. Some of the silly bits in the city scenes lose my attention somewhat, but the finale re-establishes the film’s power. My favorite silent film is Metropolis – but Sunrise is still an amazing masterpiece.
I guess I’m the only one who likes the drunken pig! Anyway, it’s good to have a bit of fun alongside the brooding darkness and romantic tenderness, isn’t it?
Man! That was the best part! I forgot about that.
Congrats for finishing! I’m ashamed to say I haven’t seen Sunrise yet, but it’s top priority. 2000s now?
Wonderful piece here Allan..
While I tend to avoid such cliches Sunrise is really ‘pure cinema’ if any film is.