Copyright © 2010 by James Clark
On first viewing Fire Walk with Me (1992), we soon find a motif sending out characteristic Lynch wit and daring, and then our heart sinks. There are two FBI agents, the junior member of the exploratory team bearing a vertigo-inducing resemblance to long-ago child star, Bobby Driscoll, who lent such charm to Walt Disney’s 1950 adventure, Treasure Island. During their brief stint on the screen, their investigation into the murder of a runaway teenaged girl is interrupted by a denizen of the trailer park setting, one eye covered by a poultice of sorts, hunched over a makeshift crutch. He backs off when questioned as to the case, but he has already made his point, as “Black Dog,” delivering the “Black Spot” of pirate recriminatory (resentful) justice to “Billy Bones.” The senior partner is “Chet Desmond,” a spare, self-impressed and combative representative of “Federal” power on behalf of mainstream justice. He soon perishes on poking around a trailer nearby the girl’s last home, his windshield becoming lipstick- inscribed to read, “Let’s Rock.”
In this lift-off there are gambits familiar to the full flood of Lynch films, and touches not familiar but soon understandable as noteworthy. Desmond is brought into the challenge, at woodsy (Deep Meadow) Washington, out of the (less deep) Fargo, North Dakota, crime zone, where he is seen leading a SWAT team against a drug-dealing school bus driver and a few of his Goth (piratically) bedecked clients, on a farm road, with the insufficiently solvent youngsters onboard crying their eyes out. With regard to the crime-tainted Fat Trout Trailer Park, he experiences (like Sailor and Lula, at Fat Tuna) a rural sheriff and his staff inclined to be disrespectful, to titter and leer the same way the good old boys did. But Desmond (in accordance with the jazz-inflected theme music at the credits, his persona would be rife with drug-troubled Chet Baker and Paul Desmond) was a bit of a prima donna and something of a control freak, and he relished kicking ass around that little office, a federal employee privilege that would cost him his life, and would set in relief the career of a feisty high school girl about to test those same troubled waters. From Eraserhead Henry onwards, the films have taken special notice of figures bound to inferences seemingly, but not really, apt for life-enhancing advantages. Desmond and his little buddy, “Sam Stanley,” are veritable avatars of up-to-the-minute information gathering and refining—going so far as finding a tiny “T” on a tiny bit of paper under the nail of the murdered girl’s ring finger. And they do a lot of chewing over the logic device their Director sends them off with, namely, a startlingly uncoordinated “dancer”/relative of his, namely, “Lil,” dressed in hot pink gone amok and wearing a blue rose. Though Holmesian deductions, about her, fall trippingly from Desmond’s tongue, he falls mute about the blue rose, which troubles Stanley. We know, from other films by Lynch, there is a persistent reflection relating to surrealist filmmaker, Jacques Demy’s, precept about an exigency to coordinate the powers of crying (blues) and laughter (rosiness). We also know that the central figure of the film where that logical treasure is lodged is a mediocre dancer named, “Lola.” The biggest surprise, therefore, consists of the Field General, giving the boys a very odd sendoff, being none other than Lynch himself!
With data tracks coming at him through a headset, leading him to be continually shouting out relentlessly upbeat observations and orders—“Give Sam Stanley the glad hand! He cracked the Whitman case!”—Lynch casts himself as missing the boat here, as being as bad an investigator as the Pink Panther. Operating under the corporate imprimatur, “Absurdia,” Lynch would oversee not only remarkably designed and realized feature films addressing complexities of world historical headway, but a stream of adjacent and zany parodies ranging from world religions to cooking shows. (Perhaps going even further was composing hymns to suburban domesticity for Julee Cruise.) Particularly bemusing was his recourse to television (and, later, internet) shows, as if driven to deliver surreal surprises to every corner of the globe. The film at issue here gathers up intimations of a TV series, “Twin Peaks” (1990-1991), in a bid to carry the ball beyond the near free-fall of Wild at Heart. But it has been saddled with much of the marketing strategy of prime-time fixedness, particularly in obeisance to that Zeitgeist only having eyes for the perfect muscle tone and seismic hormones of adolescents. On the other hand, tracking straight through from the rockabilly rebelliousness of Wild at Heart, our current event has been put together with clear awareness that it was no mere coincidence the defiance toward rationalist power inherent in proto-rock and roll would find its most responsive chord in people still going to school. There, too, the business of recreational drugs would find its most devoted adherents, and so a scenario both crudely sensational and reflectively promising was born. Lynch knew he had his hands full with this baby, and perhaps that is why he played the bungler—a sort of unsmiling Jackie Oakie with a W.C. Fields driving-with-no-brakes roll to his ornate delivery—in front of the camera, as if to say something about the guy at the helm. Fire Walk with Me, would, while bound for the consummate rigors of Mulholland Drive’s “Go somewhere with me,” be far less an ecstatic highlight than an aside, “Bear with me, guys, I’m going through a patch of hell here.”
Now although it would be unfairly cruel to describe Sandra Dee as “a patch of hell,” after the cut away from the debacle of Lynch’s “Gordon Cole” and his highly questionable staff of investigators, there comes into view, on a tree-shaded suburban street, Sheryl Lee as “Laura Palmer,” the reigning Homecoming Queen of Twin Peaks High, strolling to school in her lovely blonde mane and boxy displacement, and right from this get-go we see it’s going to be a long shot. She catches up with her best friend, “Donna,’” coming out of her parents’ spacious property, who zaps a couple of classmates, “Bobby” and “Mike,” flirting from a parked car (“Yeah, Mike, You’re the real man!”/ (they) “Mike is the man!” and, after the girls part ways in the school hallway—using Bronx gang hand lingo—Laura goes to the washroom and in a stall snorts some cocaine. Somewhere on the premises, near the girls’ shower room, her friend, “James,” fondles her breasts and they kiss passionately; but she has to straighten him out: “Quit trying to hold me so tight. I’m already long gone…like a turkey in the corn.”/”A turkey is one of the dumbest birds.”(Her eyes welling up with tears.) “Gobble, gobble, gobble.” Cut to: Looking like a pirate (or Bobby Driscoll, doing double duty as a go-between), with his checkered shirt wrapped around his waist like pantaloons, and also resembling Jack Elam’s “Charlie,” a goon/adversary of Mike Hammer in Kiss Me Deadly, Bobby races up to her, as she leaves with Donna, asking, “Where were you? Who were you with?” She disses him with, “I was standing right behind you. You’re too dumb to turn around. (to Donna) “If he turns around, he gets dizzy!” Taking umbrage at this, he cryptically implies her cocaine supply is in jeopardy, she gives him some phony smiles, and that is all he needs to send him, smiling, truckin’ backwards into the school. “Love you, Baby!”
We get this kind of market-friendly/ maturity-remote static throughout, impelling a probe for a subtext to make sense of it, notwithstanding. Coming from a physical package (“Gidget,” in a perpetually bad mood) presupposing reflective nullity, but burnished by the Hollywood tradition of, in Donna, the homely but noble sidekick, there is a passage where the two girls are seen from above, lying on adjacent plush chairs, airing out their psyches and revealing some heart. After disabusing Donna of the idea that James is far more suitable than Bobby (“Sweet! He’s gorgeous!” And he ensures “true love. Bobby’s a loser. He’s a goon.”/ (Mocking) “James is very sweet… very gorgeous…”), she is prompted by her to say what she thinks about the dynamic allowance of her body falling through space. “It would go faster and faster…” and, after a time of not realizing one’s racing, “it would burst into fire and burn forever. And the angels wouldn’t help you, because they’ve all gone away.”
This is a mighty big mouthful for a little gal, and there is only one serious precedent in all of cinematic history, namely, Robert Bresson’s La Mouchette (Sparrow), from the 1967 film of that title. “Donna,” picking up the thread of Bresson’s Balthazar (a donkey), in the “Don”/”Donnie” axis of Blue Velvet, thereby draws attention to Laura’s (like Mouchette’s) being way too young, being in way over her head, for playing with any real efficacy the impossible hand she’s been dealt. Whereas Mouchette is an impoverished waif, living in a forested area of France near the Swiss border with an abusive father and brothers, and a sweet but dying mother, staging a spirited war against a pious and corrosive neighbourhood, in the course of which being raped by a poacher and committing suicide by rolling herself into a fast-moving stream, Laura is likewise not sanguine about a lumber town whose formative priorities fail to coincide with her perceptions (she being a Palmer in the land of pines; but her grand guignol parents could not be more at home), finds herself placed under incestuous violence from her father, and finds herself playing her one advantage (in addition to financial comfort) absent in Mouchette (her physical attractiveness) to make some headway with a group of local treasure-seekers—a piratical band of dealers in drugs and prostitution, whose home base, “the Bang Bang Bar,” is run by someone, admiringly referred to by Bobby as a “crazy, fuckin’ Canadian,” named “Jacques Renault” (Jacques/James the reine, queen [Demy being bisexual]) and, with its log cabin configurations (the bordello zone of which sends out the greeting, “Welcome to Canada”) reminds one of the stockade on Treasure Island in which Jim Hawkins would find himself dealing with various friends and foes. That forward momentum proves illusory, she succumbs to full dependence on cocaine and prostitution, thinking thereby to checkmate her most pressing pain, Dad/Bob, only to find him catching up with her at a tryst with Jacques, being smashed to a horrific piece of bloody meat by him—just as he dealt with the subject of the investigation misdirected by Gordon of the FBI—wrapped in plastic and floated down the river.
There is a recurrent image, a signature piece, in Fire Walk with Me, which traces straight to Mouchette. On, variously, anticipating with hallucinatory dread and actually being confronted by predations from her father, “Leland,” Laura displays a face frozen with terror, mouth agape as if her jaw had been ripped by an earthquake, eyes bulging, head twisted at a startling angle. That same rictus smashes down on Mouchette’s face, at moments ranging from reaching for compensatory warmth from her assailant’s body to reaching for notes her terrible singing voice cannot manage, in being humiliated in front of derisive classmates by her teacher. On finding her diary with pages cut away, Laura drives over to “Harold’s” book-lined cottage and, disclosing that they have had many heart-to-heart meetings (and that he has encouraged her to write her thoughts down in that diary), she emphasizes that her tormentor, “Bob,” has been “having” her since she was twelve and that he says “he wants to be me or he’ll kill me,” that he drills her with the unappealing command, “Fire walk with me.” As she conveys this latter invitation to acquiesce in rape, her face becomes extremely tense and contorted, and by the last word her skin is corpse-like. Leaving, she tells him she may never be back; unlike him, sipping wine and rereading Proust in such a hell hole as Twin Peaks, is not what she can settle for.
In light of her own desperate, quite hopeless, confinement, there is a narrative recourse (soon to become basic for Lynch’s later work) to recurrent, decadent failure as setting in relief the accomplishment level of thriving on such severity. Laura’s disaster echoes that of “Teresa Banks” whose plastic-wrapped corpse drifting by a river’s banks we saw at the film’s first moments. (Her name also entails the mercenary feature of her work, and the basic equipment bringing it about.) This cyclical format of world history lends itself to depiction as a tangible center of physical struggle, fear and venom, to be flashed out periodically in menacing those figures whose histories we care about. In its 1992 embodiment, it is a “Black Lodge,” presided over by an anxious, prissy, bodily discounted midget, managing a cadre of spooks whose function it is to draw Laura into the allure of an emerald ring, like the one gone missing from Teresa’s corpse, and the last thing Chet Desmond ever touched. One of the emissaries, a sedate witch with a boy in tow whose papier mâché mask features a phallic nose, hands to Laura a gift for her bedroom wall, a painting of a wall with a partially open door (bringing to mind the room causing so much apprehension in Jean Cocteau`s 1930 film, The Blood of a Poet), which would act as a nocturnal conduit for her turmoil. The actor playing the director of that lodge, here calling himself “the [go-getter] arm,” Michael Anderson, reappears in Mulholland Drive as the dominant force behind Hollywood. Lost Highway has its little, reproachful man (“We’ve met before”), and Inland Empire has its obese, sedentary Fence upon whom Nikki hammers with acerbic words, becoming somewhat energized, somewhat pulled down, as into a tar baby. The New Orleans-based Murder Inc., with its “suave” and canny Brit CEO, in Wild at Heart, is an even earlier entry in this mode, but lacking an engine to interrupt frequently the course of the protagonists. The first such mean and ridiculous siren in Lynch’s corpus is Henry’s dream girl in Eraserhead.
With the night at the Bang Bang Bar, the full proportionality of Laura’s enhancement, by depth and elegance of sensibilities gone by, comes to bear. The occasion commences at Laura’s house, where we find her ensheathed at last in adult, form fitting clothes, an all black short skirt and top, black stockings and black shoes with four inch heels. Donna comes by in bobby socks, and, for the first time, Laura is realized as the older Cécile, Lola, and Donna is the younger Cécile (in Lola, they never meet, but their presences and longings do set off sparks in tandem). The earlier, grotesque and giddy instance of Lola, introduced by Gordon, with its implicit tale of cry/laugh would now begin to assert itself as posing for Laura at the eleventh hour an impossible task of composure and historical efficacy. After initial pleasantries—“Where’re you goin’?”/ “Nowhere fast. And you’re not coming.”—she reiterates the refusal to take Donna along, this after her “best friend” had mooted a chemical sendoff which she covered with code words, “Fred and Ginger,” whose trajectory would brush upon the so light and so adult, “Laugh who will,” gracing Lola, however sporadically. (A subsequent night with Bobby—whereby he kills a cocaine delivery man [the formerly tittering Deputy Sheriff of Deer Meadow] and she, practically OD’d, can’t stop cackling with clearly the wrong kind of laughter—turns the screws of a slow torture. She can’t stop claiming, “You killed Mike!” laughing herself to the ground at the thought.) As she reaches the bar’s door, she is agonized over by an almost ludicrously earnest Earth Mother (recalling the “seer” crying out, “Something’s wrong!” [about Rita] in Mulholland Drive), whose language does have a point, but not the do-good point she intends. “When this kind of fire starts, it is very hard to put out…Then all goodness is in jeopardy.” Laura’s salty brush-offs fail her here, she almost sleepwalks into the bar where Julee Cruise is back (from Blue Velvet) addressing—not a house full of Lumberton “good kids” but cowboys and lumbermen out for some semblance of the unusual—one and all with another hymn on behalf of trouble-free and troublesome love. This easy out moves Laura/Lola to tears; she has seen things through to the point of obviating such sweet blues (Julee of course is bathed in a blue spotlight), and her struggle takes her to a place so bleak that even the tatters of integrity gracing the song’s crude posturing can sting. But a couple of clients come by her table, put down some greenbacks, and she rhetorically asks them, “So you want to fuck the Homecoming Queen?” One of the guys asks, “You ready to go all the way around the world?” and then Donna shows up with a perfect little Cécile turn of phrase, “Let’s boogie.” (She was, after all, very fond of the expression, “Hot damn!”)
The four of them go to the second of the bar’s rooms, the one having inspired its name. Infra-red light and a rockabilly band laconically pulsing out power chords at paralyzing volumes necessitating subtitles (perhaps also in deference to the putatively foreign territory they’ve entered). Thus the whirling of dance, strip and orgy is punctuated with barely audible screaming over the music, along lines like this: “I’m not Jacques. I’m the Great Went!” (Laura) “I’m the Muffin!” (Jacques—monstrously obese—simulates, with his fingers, shooting himself in the head.) Then he says, “I’m blank as a fart.” (Laura) “Chug-a-lug, Donna!” Laura and a long-lost friend, “Ronette,” from a stint in a place called (with respect to both Black Dog and Balthazar), “One-Eyed Jack’s,” sit side-by-side at a booth, and Laura—anticipating Mr. Eddy with Alice in Lost Highway—gives her client a hand sign and he slides down from the seat across for some oral sex. Laura notices Donna close to penetration and rushes over to her, putting clothes over her and pushing hard to get her out. The girls sit together at Donna’s house the next morning; the latter can’t remember how she got home (there being more than beer in her bottle). Laura says, “Life is full of mysteries, Donna.”
The girls declare their love for each other. Laura’s father comes by for her and imagines they are lesbians. On the drive, they are tailgated by a hysterically angry man with one arm, wearing and brandishing that green ring as though it were the Black Spot and screaming at Leland, “The thread will be torn, Mr. Palmer!” On the way to being torn, Laura sees James one last time, during which she runs by him the hapless request, “Let’s get lost together.” He asks, “What the hell’s wrong with you?” She replies, “That’s right. There’s no place left to go.” He thinks they have “everything” going for them…“Open your eyes, James. You don’t even know me. There are things about me even Donna doesn’t know…Your Laura disappeared. Just it’s me now.”
She and Ronette entertain Jacques and Leo (a couple of Beasts with nothing to offer), they are tied up for some sado-masochism and Leland becomes even worse news, a Beast who could only direct his Beauty to revulsion (as did Bob and Bobby). His slashing and her screaming would, at this point, seem to be devoid of any traces of cogent fire. But the film transpires in such a way that the “thread” enhancing Laura’s persistence in view of the integrity of Mouchette, Balthazar and Lola does not become broken. And so we have a final moment in the field of stifled fire, the Black Lodge, showing a poised Laura with one of Gordon’s well-meaning nonentities (the same actor, Kyle MacLachlan, who played Jeffrey in Blue Velvet)—the “Mike” here has also proved to be impotent—smiling, then crying, then laughing, very much like Cocteau’s Belle, headed for a “happiness” she is too grown up to believe. Laura had generated this much gusto—albeit sporadic and lifted by histories she never knew. Her only sustaining and creatively promising consort was the little Beast, Donna, whose waywardness, like Balthazar’s stint with the circus, could not seriously tarnish a resilient heart. This sprawling, decadent, near-travesty has proved to be a vehicle with hidden strengths and a catapult into more stable, more realized excitements.
The cool-jazz sax solo with blues motifs (awed, stricken and pushing on) at the outset and intermittently after that (making up a Badalamenti tune called, “Falling,” have been installed to help us see beyond the myopia of the lives on display. So too, the Jim Hawkins/Treasure Island motif (somewhat) cuts against the grain of irrevocable distemper. The Jim/Bobby Driscoll figure, with his technically magnified observations skills, pries away one of Teresa’s corpse’s fingernails to retrieve a tiny square of paper with the letter “T” inscribed. Though from Bobby’s jacket we see that that is an athletic letter awarded by Twin Parks High School, it is also, for the scenario in full gear, a reference to the “treasure” she and Laura lost their lives going after. It would seem that the girls come up as good as empty, and destructive, puritanical phonies (“What’s the world coming to?”) like Leland rule. The trailer park operator asserts to Desmond, “I’ve already gone places. I just want to stay where I am.” Where he is, is amply revealed to be a fractious and petty round of sterile self-assertion. His settling for that stagnation constitutes an easily discounted gauging of, over and above her specific torments, Laura’s refusal to settle for sweet and safe James, and, indeed, all of respectable historicity. Perhaps the most difficult and necessary to fathom aspect of Lynch’s art is its being no longer moored to the bathetic goods of normal history. Accordingly, his films reserve a special place for protagonists having broken away only to be assailed by stupendous conflict with hordes having settled for a self-evidence (“where I am”) bereft of cogent illumination. Leland and the forces of justice (including Sam Stanley, cracking the case of “Whitman,” a derisible notion if the Whitman’s first name is “Walt”) come across in their various weirdness (“weird on top”) as safely dismissed. But do we find our way from the strangeness of “Falling” to the far more sober establishment against which it is ranged, prompting Laura’s remark to easy-does-it James, “Just it’s me now”? (In reply to his, “We have everything,” she counters with, “Everything but everything.” The assault-barrage of rapists in Laura’s life, creepily unbelievable in its teen horror flick reflexes, has been placed along a sightline of vicious violation having nothing to do with that genre. [Incestuous skirmishes with Leland—on one occasion marked by her keenly wanting to believe there is at least a shred of love in his apology for a monstrously coercive incident—are one thing; fear-crazed imaginings of bedroom-window invasions by a gat-toothed loser are something else.]) At “Hap’s (for happiness), Irene, the graveyard-shift waitress, puts the FBI boys in their place with, “You want to know the specials? We don’t have any.” The bile behind those dead eyes of hers is far closer to the point of Laura’s discernment (violated diary, history) than the childish melodramas, the Treasure Island mayhem. On entering the VIP room of the Big Bang Bar, Laura hears, from a couple of porn starlets, “Welcome to Canada. Don’t expect a turkey dog here,” and, as such, her earlier “turkey in the corn” bid receives a setback.
Out of the pressure cooker of Lynch’s retooling comes this very slippery object, so easy to fumble. Perhaps its final scene, at the “Lodge,” that volatile foundry of defeatedness, is the most treacherous of all. There the bootless agent of justice, whose car had tailed Leland and Laura, and the midget impresario intone, “I want all my pain and sorrow,” confirming the place as devoted to the mawkish overdrive of the blues. (After that tailgate trauma, Leland had rushed his blue convertible to “Mo’s Motors,” a setting redolent of Nick’s place in Kiss Me Deadly, whose theme song, like that of this movie, “Falling,” sustains the idea of something more rigorously real than blues, prompting the expression, “Rather Have the Blues [than what I’ve got ].”) In accordance with that disclosure, a more mature presence of Laura, appearing there to confirm that “it is very hard to put out” (once and for all) the resolve to integrity, and accompanied, as was Belle, at the finale of the 1946 Beauty and the Beast, by a picturesque bore—here agent Cooper/Jeffrey—laughs (albeit, for the most part, kindly) at the angel apparatus coming with the requiem moment. Then, just as the picture is about to fade, the angel’s robe and hands describe a donkey’s head and ears (Laura, whose laughter has become hearty, perhaps almost joyous braying, replaces the angel, and maintains the breathtaking montage), Balthazar the donkey (from Bresson’s film) maintaining on this occasion of slaughter, that better days lie ahead.
Donna, with some top heavy expression, remarks to Laura, “If I had a nickel for every cigarette your mother smoked, I’d be dead.” Laura’s mother, as played by walking-corpse specialist, Grace Zabriskie, is precisely dead, in the same way the whole town is, the whole world is, and of course Laura knows it. That horror is the real point of her insistence (against all known plausibility), “Bob’s real! He’s getting to know me now. He wants to be [own] me, or he’ll kill me.” She relates to creampuff, Harold, the rapist’s mantra, “Fire walk with me,” and at the same time, corpse-tinged, she emptily puts to him an invitation that Mulholland Drive’s Rita found to make sense apropos of Betty, “Go with me somewhere.” Whereas the protagonists of the “road trilogy” can look to adult associates, however compromised (even Nikki/Laura has, however fleetingly, the other Laura [Harring]), Laura is stuck with school kid Donna (and James, like Jim Hawkins, the honorary “adult”) and a landscape cluttered by the likes of Fred, Pete, Adam, the Cowboy, Nikki’s Cowboy and Devon; and Jeffrey, the kind but clueless dick. So the first, optional, part of the title, namely, “Twin Peaks,” would look, with French and Surrealist war-of-the-worlds flourish, to the two, hardly equal, power presences. The requiem at the end, with her conflicted laughter, would thereby speak to the “detection”-implicated, cracked Liberty Bell (off-putting Philly being Gordon’s redoubt).










James,
An essay studded with little jewels (Pirates, Demy etc.). Lots of interesting observations and thoughts and an odd style that reads like an unfinished jigsaw.
Fire Walk With Me stands on the highest peak for me, next to DEKALOG. It is brutal and beautiful, abject horror and angelic compassion. It is like an open wound. Sheryl Lee is amazing and once her story begins the film gets better and better.
Lynch’s use of blank verse mundanity and rich poetry are everywhere. If I can just correct your quoting of the extraordinary line:
“Your Laura disappeared. It’s just me now”
Maybe not quite a Julianoesque ‘Staggering masterpiece’ but maybe as close as any other film I’ve seen.
Stephen,
Thanks for your commentary, and for noticing that the “odd style” bends to a strange problematic.
Thanks, too, for being a fan of this movie that has been generally kicked around from here to Fargo. Lynch’s self-endangering daring–which includes spilling out advised incoherencies like, “Just it’s me now”–is at full, masterful flood in this one.
Best,
Jim
Jim,
If you are interested I wrote a (very) short review of the film a while ago here:
http://checkingonmysausages.blogspot.com/2009/04/twin-peaks-fire-walk-with-me-1992-david.html
It’s good to see this film come out of the shadow of its parent TV Show. You could have retitled this essay: “Falling FOR David Lynch’s Fire Walk With Me”
Stephen,
Your review is a very sensitive response to Laura’s situation of beseigement.
As you remark, I have, after some initial misgivings, fallen for this film. Its title, though ensnared in the rape/incest torture, does include a level of kinetics becoming an obsession for much of contemporary dance.
Best,
Jim
This is an engrossing read Mr. Clark, and some of your ideas do have me thinking. Like many other Lynch films, FIRE WALK WITH ME depicts the dual nature of a waking and dreaming world. These two worlds do not separate in The Lynchean Universe.
Not all, but some of the actors from the TWIN PEAKS television series, and most of the critics, felt that Lynch had lost something with this film that was a part of the original television series: the dark underbelly of evil that was hidden just beneath the surface of a small idyllic town in Northern Washington. They felt that the film was too “in your face.” (See the documentary on this disc.) While it is hard to witness, it was important for Lynch to pull no punches in depicting the events of Laura Palmer’s tragic murder. Although it appears as such, the abuse and destruction of Laura Palmer is not a bogeyman lurking beneath her bed. It is the beast in man displayed in full form, breathing his foul stench into the face of the innocent. It is the curdled cream that floats to the top of a festering cup of evil coffee. A damn fine cup of evil coffee. It is not a story to be presented delicately or to be brushed under the rug to make it more palatable. It is a story of abuse that happens everyday. It depicts the harrowing, violation, and destruction of an innocent girl. Because of Sheryl Lee’s brave and amazing performance, it is an extremely effective film, psychologically and emotionally.
Bill,
You do an excellent job of contacting and conveying the outrageous violation at the center of this film. Lynch has embedded this dilemma in a cosmos of conflict and pain, in order to bring to view a seldom contemplated difficulty about being alive.
I am with you in saluting Sheryl Lee’s performance, which brings tenuous, startling grace to a formulaic adolescent crudity.
Best,
Jim
Depending on the day FWWM is my fave Lynch film, right up there with BLUE VELVET. I always found it interesting that the first image of the film is a TV with a static-y image only for it to be smashed by an axe. Hmm… I wonder if Lynch was still bitter over TWIN PEAKS getting canceled? I also think that it was Lynch stating that in no certain terms was the film going to be like the show – it would be darker, more violent and basically everything the show was not. This certainly upset many fans of the show but I think that the film is better for it. After all, the focus is predominantly on the final days of Laura Palmer and her descent into drugs, sex and the horrors of being abused by her father/BOB.
That being said, I do enjoy the first third which is full of Lynchian absurdist humor. The interplay between Agents Desmond and Stanley is a hoot – I particularly liked how Stanley was able to figure out the cost of the entire set-up of the Sheriff’s Waiting Room but once we get to Twin Peaks this humor, for the most part, is gone.
I also think that this is Angelo Badalamenti’s best soundtrack for any Lynch film. The ominous slow-burn jazz that plays over the opening credits sets just the right tone. And then you have the droning twangy mood music in the Canadian roadhouse that, coupled with the strobe light effect, is absolutely hypnotic. I remember seeing this on the big screen and the sound system was cranked way up and you really felt immersed in the scene, which, I’m sure was Lynch’s intention.
Also, the performances of both Sheryl Lee and Ray Wise are astounding. The dark places that both of them go during this film is something else. There are certain scenes where you see a shift in Wise’s facial expression as you can see Leland shift to BOB that is incredible – what a portrayal of madness and evil. And then the emotional range that Lee has to cover must’ve been exhausting to portray as her character is pushed and pulled in all kinds of directions.
Finally, the final act of the film, depicting Laura’s demise, has to be one of the most harrowing sequences in all of Lynch’s films. Incredible stuff.
J.D.,
I enjoyed your crisp survey of the film, particularly your appreciation of its darkness, and the theme music.
Lynch is a student of the impulse to deny that there could ever be “specials” on the menu. That impulse can quickly turn horrific, because it is rooted in fearful cowardice. The jazz motif absorbs the bleakness and affirms it can be overcome (which is a very different thing from being eradicated).
Best,
Jim
This is at times a terrifying film, and it contains one of the most unforggetable conclusions in all of Lynch. The bizarre humor that Lynchian fans found so memorable in films like “Wild at Heart,” “Blue Velvet” and “Lost Highway” is in even greater abundance here. This might be James Clark’s most fascinating essay yet in the series.
Frank,
I’m glad you liked the piece.
What a range we have here–Sam Stanley’s eighteenth-century optimism, and a small town population looking like a death cult.
Best,
Jim
“There is a recurrent image, a signature piece, in Fire Walk with Me, which traces straight to Mouchette. On, variously, anticipating with hallucinatory dread and actually being confronted by predations from her father, “Leland,” Laura displays a face frozen with terror, mouth agape as if her jaw had been ripped by an earthquake, eyes bulging, head twisted at a startling angle. That same rictus smashes down on Mouchette’s face, at moments ranging from reaching for compensatory warmth from her assailant’s body to reaching for notes her terrible singing voice cannot manage, in being humiliated in front of derisive classmates by her teacher.”
I do applaud this observation James, with special affinity. But again you’ve raised the bar with an extraordinary examination of one of Lynch’s most beloved works, that includes a thematic treatment, and a fascinating and exhaustive look at the film’s artistry and it’s mystery. The parallels to Cocteau are here again, but especially to all the films you’ve assessed in this series. As a result this particular review has a cumulative effect, which does I dare say bring everything full circle, even with A STRAIGHT STORY and THE ELEPHANT MAN still to be explored.
Actually, I am also forgetting to mention DUNE here as another yet-to-be-covered Lynch.
Sam,
Thanks for appreciating the Mouchette factor. It sends the payload here into regions far beyond verbal expression.
I’m going to cover those other three films, each of which has much to contribute to understanding Lynch’s art. But for a change of pace, I’m going to l look at Antonioni’s Il Grido (The Cry), because it allows us to home-in more single-mindedly on that very compelling matter for Lynch, namely, the tempest of taking hold of one’s emotions and bringing them to powers both necessary and seemingly unreachable.
Best,
Jim
Alrhough I was a fan if the show (at leasst in the first two seasons-the third and fourth were merely to find out what happens), I could never fully cotten to this film. Cryptic to the max and, in the revelation of Laura’s murderer, totally predictable. Had you not watched the show prior to seeing this film you were in for nothing more than the amazing visuals that dot this film. If you consider that this film is really leveled to only fans of the show, really not caring an iota about the rest of the film-going world, then its the worst kind of failure. I don’t mind an uncompromising director when it comes to vision. What I do mind is a director that has no care for his virgin audience at all. Lynch has always been tough to swallow if you’re not a fan. This film is EXIHIBIT A in that offense. I get, I got, you can keep it.
Dennis: I dunno. Is TP:FWWM any more challening to viewers unfamiliar with the television series than, say, Eraserhead, Lost Highway, Mulholland Drive, or INLAND EMPIRE to *any* viewer? Compared to those, FWWM seems relatively straightforward.
What little Lynch has said about FWWM seems to indicate that he regards it not as a patch intended to fill in the show’s gaps, but a semi-autonomous work about the same characters, and specifically about a character we actually saw very little of in the series (being that she was dead.)
On this point I must side here with Andrew, in that that entire lineup is just as challenging as TP:FWWM. Heck, I still say that Lynch’s most difficult film is MULHOLLAND DRIVE, and yet it’s his most highly regarded.
dennis,
I’m sorry Fire Walk has left you cold.
Though it is heavily packed with historical initiatives and phenomenological exotica, its protagonist can be seen as undergoing the same thrilling adventure as that graced by Rita in the more approachable Mulholland Drive, and Alice/ Renee in Lost Highway.
Lynch did, however,bear down upon regions of finitude–physiological unpreparedness in Laura and pronounced, almost zoological, capitulation in the “adults” of Twin Peaks–that stacked the deck against a wave of approval.
Best,
Jim
Bewildering and perceptive essay, as usual, James.
Corn appears in its creamed form as “garmonbozia,” which is “pain and suffering”. Laura, therefore, as the “turkey in the corn,” is out in the fields, darting to and fro through pain and suffering. And BOB has been making a feast of those emotional states, just as he intends to make a feast of her turkey (soul; the avian ka of Egyptian myth).
Andrew,
Thanks.
Fire Walk does make a special study of imprecise metaphors, one of which is Laura’s touchingly rural allusion to her being after what, in the lexicon of Kiss Me Deadly (and Bobby speaking to crazy Jacques), has been covered by the phrase, “something big.” That the jittery and “blue” little man slurps up some corn niblets not only identifies her early aspirations as a bit off the mark but, in view of where her rough musings take her, allowing of rising above such banality.
Best,
Jim
My problem, ANDREW, is that, with his stand alone films, you can. Look to them and judge for yourself. If something like ERASUREHEAD has you scratching your head then you didn’t “get” it. Now, soime are brave enough to give the film another try. Some, though, just think these films are so off the fuckin’ wall that they leavev well enough alone. With FIRE, I feel that most that walk away think they’re missing something that fans of the show only understand. Had a recap of some sorts been involved then the head-scratchers might have faired better. As it is, I WAS a fan of the show and, even then, there are moments in this film that just baffle me. I’m not saying its a failure. What I am saying is you either get Lynch or you don’t. I don’t get MULHOLLAND, ERASUREHEAD or FIRE. Maybe I just prefer BLUE VELVET. After three viewings of FIRE I’m happy to leave it and say: not my cup of tea.
Dennis:
Okay, I get what you’re saying now. A person who watches Eraserhead and doesn’t grasp it is likely to go, “Huh, I don’t get it. Oh, well.” But a person who watches FWWM and doesn’t grasp it is likely to go, “Hugh, I don’t get it. Maybe if I had seen the the TV show I *would* get it.”
I see how this is a dilemma for FWWM, but I’m not sure how to get around it. Lynch made the film as a film. Recaps are for ongoing, episodic television, and at any rate, I doubt that five minutes of clips from the show would illuminate anything for the non-fan. If anything, it would seem to just whet those same impulses I note above. (“Well, this movie is clearly saying that I need to watch the show to understand what’s going on…”) It’s thorny.
I have always found this film mesmerizing, even if it is a narrative disaster, where characters who are introduced are never heard from again. It’s a surrealistic The Big Sleep in a sense, but I suspect Lynch was more purposeful than many think. The main concern of course is that much of the symbolism that we know Lynch included in the television series, could not have been understood by watching the film alone. Without this context, and without knowledge of some plot turns from the series, it’s no wonder a viewer could be completely lost.
Peter,
Fire Walk is indeed mesmerizing and surrealistic, having fixed upon a turning point in world history, the adversarial differences of which include murderous rancor.
Best,
Jim
JIM, GUYS–Im not saying that FIRE is a bad film in the sense that it has no merit. But, one has to admit that this film is not a successful cinematic in the sense that it DOES (like it or lump it) alienate most of those who: A) have never seen or understood a Lynch film. B) have never seen the TV show TWIN PEAKS. Unlike, say, THE X FILES where you don’t have to be a rocket scientist to understand that Scully and Mulder investigate the bizarre and that SHE’s the skeptic and HE believes and the bones of the concept is relatively simple to understand. There is so much going on in the world of TWIN PEAKS that the film really takes a certain kInd of viewer to grasp it, fully enjoy it. For this reason, the film CANNOT be considered a resounding success. As to the rest of Lynch’s canon, you either get it or you don’t. I am not ashamed to say, and I consider myself intelligent, that I don’t get FIRE, MULLHOLLAND and ERASUREHEAD. For those that do, God Bless. I can only look at film 5 times before I throw in the towel
Dennis,
You are to be congratulated for persisting through five viewings of a film that makes little sense to you. That’s a real commitment to understanding!
Your ruminations do yield an intriguing point, namely, that Fire Walk seems to presuppose that most viewers won’t get it, or at least won’t be satisfied with all that they can cull from it. I wonder if Lynch, who seems to be hyper-attentive to the physical presence of his players–he wouldn’t begin a first interview with Naomi Watts because she was in jeans and not made up–stitches together amazing and propulsive historical-imaginative quilts that almost no one will notice, only to hope that the actors’ bodies will convey what we really need. In that sense he would be a kind of close-up dance choreographer.
Best,
Jim
I’m always intrigued by what others see/have seen in the Lynch films.
Like many, once Twin Peaks started, it was the most creative show on the tube as I remember. Quirky characters and dialog, always making you wonder.
Seems I’ve enjoyed his films more for face value, than trying to read into what he may or may not have been trying to say……….
Nicely done and an enjoyable read!
Cheers!
coffee messiah,
Glad you liked it!
Your point about enjoying the”face value” of the work takes us back to the reply to Dennis, directly above. I think Lynch is haunted by a subterranean history that sends out subtle riches to make bearable a mainstream spelling big trouble, and he can’t resist sharing those resources, alone and in tandem with others. But they are for the most part quite forgotten in our time, and complex beyond direct conveyance. They constitute a barely audible baseline for “face value” efforts more compatible with the movie industry and with the powers of cinema itself.
Cheers!
Jim
COFFEE MESSIAH-I try to take Lynch’s films at face value as well and often find more in them than meets the eye. As a intellectual person who loves a good movie, I find it inevitable that I’ll dig deeper than what’s merely splayed across the surface. Like Sam and Allan and Bob and a lot of the others here at WITD, its not always possible to just take it straight. Because of this Lynch poses, for me anyway, a massive problem. Pergaps I’m not as hip or artsy as he is, I don’t always get where he’s going. BUT, I foind it hard to believe that the average asshole walking into a moviehouse blind to Lynch and only taking a film at FACE VALUE will get where the directors going. Lynch is not for the novice. He’s cryptic, overly metaphorical and attending, sometimes, parties only he gets invited to. He’s a difficult director who hasn’t truly hit mainstream because he’s too difficult. An arthouse hero? No doubt. Outside of the arthouse? He’ll send the viewer off in a strait-jacket.
Dennis: That’s why I enjoy his films also, always outside the mainstream, and there’s no better place to be in this world, at least that’s how I feel. Yes, to think, and analyze is a good thing.
Until I started reading about films here, I never thought that that was what I was really doing myself, in my own way.
Cocteau had me going from a youngster and I enjoy imagery in that way.
Being on the sensitive side, I find it hard watching any kind of violence, no matter what it is.
Not sure who I got this from, but I did ; (
COFFEE-Outside the mainstream is fine. Making films for yourself and not giving a shit about your audience is another. Some get Lynch, they’re an elitist group, but most look at his work as too off-the-wall and completely incoherent. This is why BLUE VELVET is his most successful film. In that one he curbed his tendencies to go way out there and delivered a film that is accessable and mysterious at once. I admire an artist who lives in his own world. I just don’t think its fair when he puts out art for all to see but locks the door before we can see it.
JIM-I have only seen FIRE 3 times. As I stated above, 5 times is my limit before the proverbial towel gets tossed. When I get to the fourth and fifth viewing I’ll letcha know. I don’t like thinking a film has beaten me. I am one to retract an opinion as a film grows on me and it does, indeed, warrant retraction. Sam and I were initially damning of THE SHAWSHANK REDEMPTION upon its original release. But, several viewings later, as our skepticism let down, we warmed to it a little. I don’t give up easily but there has to be a finish line somewhere as I have, literally, hundreds of films I want to get to. That I’m willing to give FIRE another whirl is not so much about the film as I’ve had enough good experiences with Lynch that I feel it deserves another look. If he can’t make it in 5, the films done for me. MULLHOLLAND got 5, as did ERASUREHEAD. Of Lynch’s work, BLUE VELVET is his best. I adore LOST HIGHWAY. DUNE is some kinda work of art that interests me even if it doesn’t work completely-love it.
ALSO-JIM-As one of your most frequent commentators here, I’m gonna make a request. Because of my love for the film (and because I’d like to see what a big brain on the subject of Lynch has to say), I’m gonna request that you put THE STRAIGHT STORY and THE ELEPHANT MAN on hold and forge right into DUNE if your scheduling hasn’t placed it next. I feel because DUNE’s story is so universal, almost religious, that its the one Lynch film that becomes so cryptic in his philosophies that it almost defies interpretation. This said, I’m wondering if you got the stuff to make heads or tails of Lynch’s agenda in that film or if you’re like the many who just take it as a straight forward adaptation of Frank Herberts immortal novel. The game is afoot!
dennis,
I always enjoy your observations.
I’ll get going on Dune right after Il Grido.
Cheers,
Jim