
by Phillip Johnston
This past Sunday, Lost ended. If that means something to you, you may be happy to be reading about the show on a website dedicated to the very best of film and (sometimes) television; if it doesn’t mean something to you, you may be tempted to skip over this post.
I would ask you not to, for in evaluating this massive piece of storytelling that has unfolded on American TV screens in the last six years, there is a job to be done – a job I can only but begin in a short, accessible post and will try to do with a minimal amount of spoilers. It is the magnanimous task of separating myth from character, a job accomplished to near perfection by the creative team behind Lost, but perhaps not so well by a few viewers and devotees.
When Oceanic Flight 815 crashed on a mysterious island back in 2004, viewers and castaways alike were confronted with an inexplicable place that held more than a few impenetrable mysteries. There were polar bears on the island, a strange underground hatch, an ancient Egyptian statue with only four toes, and, most terrifying of all, a monster made of black smoke.
But there was always something more important going on. From the very beginning, each episode focused intensely on a different character, showing a flashback of what life was like for this person before they were brought to the island.

There was the fugitive constantly on the run from the law after putting a fiery end to her abusive stepfather. We met a member of the Iraqi Republican Guard who had tortured many men and lost the love of his life. There was the man of science who balked at the notion of destiny and the man of faith who knew differently after a life-changing healing experience on the island.
As the show progressed, the flashbacks switched unexpectedly to flash forwards then finally to a parallel “what-if” timeline that afforded characters an opportunity for a new life with new choices to make. A renewed existence was offered with a tabula rasa on which their redemption as characters could become palpable in an off-island world.
The alcohol-addled spinal surgeon finally got to restore a life, giving back to a patient the ability to walk. A self-absorbed megalomaniac became a father figure, learning to help others instead of endlessly looking out for himself. A likable castaway, plagued with bad luck, got to turn the streak around and become a successful businessman. The list of beautifully realized reversals goes on. (And most of these characters, I must add, have been impeccably and consistently acted.)
But all those island mysteries were still there. Some audience members have said that by not explaining the deepest mysteries of their show, the writers of Lost took the path of least resistance and performed one long con on millions of viewers. Others realize that since they wrote mysteries so deep, the writers rendered explanations irrelevant – asking “What is the island?!” became equivalent to asking “What is The Force?” in relation to Star Wars (i.e. something you just don’t do).
Explaining the truth behind a mystery will always leave some people unsatisfied. Mystery engenders wonder; rational explanations often decimate it. This was no doubt a matter of much discussion for the Lost storytelling team as they approached the end of their epic.
In one of the final episodes of the series, two characters approach each other after a long separation and are given a chance to catch up. “It’s about time,” one says. Yes, it is – the guiding theme of Lost has always been time and what people do with it.
In pondering all six seasons, I couldn’t help but think of something William Faulkner—no stranger to the concept of time and man’s relation to it—wrote in his novel Light in August: “Memory believes before knowing remembers. Believes longer than recollects, longer than knowing even wonders.” Complicated? Yes. Thoroughly engrained into the world of Lost? You bet.
It would have been inconsequential for the castaways to leave the island the same people they were when they arrived, saying “Wow, wasn’t that a crazy trip?!” The many layers of Lost ensure that these characters will remember why they were once brought to the island and that their desolate pasts will no longer impede them from moving on toward a fuller life. Memory will believe even after knowledge is forgotten.
There will be holes of disappointment for we Lost lovers who, deep down, wanted our pet mysteries explained, but I would like to think that, like all of the primary characters, we’re no longer floundering in a place we must approach with unease and trepidation. We have been told a complete story in the classic sense—a story about lost and lonely people who needed some sort of redemption and found it in a most unlikely way. If anything, helping us believe in the hope of that redemption for six seasons is a most notable accomplishment on the part of Lost’s cast and crew.






“In pondering all six seasons, I couldn’t help but think of something William Faulkner—no stranger to the concept of time and man’s relation to it—wrote in his novel Light in August: “Memory believes before knowing remembers. Believes longer than recollects, longer than knowing even wonders.”
Nice Phillip!
Well, I watched a good number of episodes thanks to Marc Bauer, a WitD staff writer who urged me a few years ago to check the show out. My daughter Melanie has become a big fan. So basically, aside from all the mysteries, it’s really about ‘time’ and ‘what people do with it.’ What a great concept!!!
I also liked that passage, then I blushed thinking that Faulkner (and his quote) was just used in the same sentence as Lost.
I don’t want to disrespect Phillip and this great essay though, glad that fans of the show got a nice send-off that appears to be spoiler-free, which seems to be both a big deal for a show like this and a huge accomplishment in this internet news age.
Yeah, that was a bit of a pretentious touch on my part, but I thought it fit. Apologies in advance if there are any Faulkner scholars here (which, I assume, there probably are…).
Oops – I watched the show very regularly for every season since the 2nd; yet due to distractions and an unexpectedly flagging interest (as well as the turning-in of my DVR, no doubt) I sat this one out. Now I see I’ve missed the finale! The episodes are online, right? I’ll have to revisit before someone spoils it for me. In many ways a silly show, but a fun one…
My friends just advised me not to watch the finale without watching the rest of the season – that it will make absolutely no sense. But I’m plowing ahead with “The Final Journey” recap followed by the end – I don’t think I have time to catch up with the whole season, besides which even if I did by the time I got to the finale it would probably be spoiled for me. I will return after viewing…
MOVIEMAN-NO, DON’T!!!!!!! The pleasure of this show has always been the slow revelations each episode makes, week-to-week, episode-to episode. I must urge you find the time to sit and watch them all in a single sitting (like I used to do) or clap my ears closed to spoilers and forge ahead with an episode a day till you get to the end. Matthew Fox said in an interview that the writers produced an ending that would not disappoint as long as you stayed loyal to the bitter end and, by God, I agree. I’m saddened that a show of such ingenuity and intelligence is no longer with us. It boggles my mind that things like HOUSE, CSI: EVERYWHERE and TWO AND A HALF ANNOYING SLOBS survive and a great show like LOST slowly fizzles away. Well, no bother, THE SIMPSONS heads into its 21st year and shows no sign of slowing and TRUE BLOOD moves into another (hopefully) glorious season…. Who knows, maybe they’ll spin KICK ASS, a terrific film I saw with Sam’s kids just the other night into a show? Real potential there for HBO.
I’m actually in the process of writing something about the show myself, but now that I see we’ve already got it represented on the site, I might let it sit on the back burner for a bit and allow myself more time to process and digest it again season-by-season. But for the moment, I’ll keep it simple: “Lost” is probably the most important pop-cultural artifact to hit viewers since “Star Wars”, and definitely the most accomplished. Plenty of other sci-fi and fantasy works have come and gone with varying degrees of success– the “Back to the Future”, “Matrix” and the “Lord of the Rings” trilogies all started out with strong first acts, but failed to follow through. Cult-favorites like “Blade Runner” and “Videodrome” have been accepted and embraced over time as true classics, but still remain rather remote to mainstream audiences. Even my own beloved Prequel Trilogy doesn’t match what “Lost” accomplished– I love what Lucas was aiming for, but even I’ll admit that his execution was a little shaky at times.
The same should be said of the work Abrams, Lindelof and Cuse did over the course of their show, but overall their hands were about the steady. Over six years they explored more territory than most series even dare attempt in twice that amount of time. And while I’ll admit that I was less than happy about how the ending turned out (all that interesting sci-fi mythologizing, only for a half-hearted secular sermon for organized religion), for the most part it was great. Definitely the best genre-effort on TV in the decade, possibly the best genre-effort over all, and arguably one of the top ten works for television in the past twenty years. The small screen didn’t feel so big since David Lynch took us to “Twin Peaks”.
Like I said, Bob — I only barely scratch the surface here in trying to write for LOSTies and non-LOSTies alike. It’d be great to engage with a more expansive piece especially from the angle you seem to be viewing things just from your comment.
Dennis – Lost didn’t “fizzle away.” It ended only because the creators wanted it to end – because, in fact, they demanded, several years ago, that the network allow them to set an end date. They didn’t want to string it out forever like some shows, they wanted to tell their story and bring it to a satisfying close.
Anyway, I generally think Lost was a great show, but I have mixed feelings on how it ended. The finale was a great sendoff for the characters, a real emotional catharsis. At times, it felt like I was seeing the actors merging with their characters, saying goodbye to one another, and the whole thing was undeniably moving. On the other hand, while I’m not one of those people who wanted them to explain “what is the island?” I do wish there had been some more satisfying resolution to the mythology. But so many things from earlier seasons now seem irrelevant or nonsensical in relation to the finale. I won’t go into spoilers, but certainly most of season 5 (one of my favorite seasons, incidentally, and one of the best treatments of time travel paradoxes and the free will/destiny debate that I’ve seen) has turned out to be a narrative dead end with no impact on the larger story, and the same thing arguably goes for how they wrapped up, or failed to wrap up, the whole Widmore plotline. Maybe I’ll feel differently when/if I revisit the show from the beginning, but as of now I just have this feeling like they let so many of the show’s most fascinating currents slip away in favor of vague spiritual uplift.
I wish I had a more substantial comment here, but I didn’t watch the last seasons of the show. Still, Ed’s submission here is quite a perceptive one, particularly the suggestion that the show finally provided a “vague spiritual uplift”.
Ed, the “vague spiritual uplift” disappointed me too, primarily because I saw how easily it would work within the show’s own sci-fi considerations of time/space and parallel continuities. Faraday probably could’ve explained things in a far more credible and satisfying manner than Christian Shepherd (considering that he was really the smoke monster for most of the show, why would Jack trust his word?). They lost track of the science fiction, and fell into mere fantasy.
BOB-I agree, almost, wholeheartedly about this landmark show. I diverge, slightly, with your opinion of THE LORD OF THE RINGS (but, we’ll get to that in later responses as I’m sure Allan will be featuring the rest in his count-down-Ive got my boxing gloves ready-LOL!). In all, though, I think you hit the nail on the head. For the most part, the realm of Sci-Fi television has never reached the heights that this show and STAR TREK: THE NEXT GENERATION achieved. Both are fine examples of programming that exudes a fantastical wonder while simultaneously expounding, in metaphor, ideas about society, humanity and politics. The tube was a better place to visit with LOST on the air. Please, by no means deprive us of your thoughts by holding back an essay. I think the bloggers here would be interested to read what you think.
Dennis– no doubt, LOTR is where we part ways. But TNG is a great show, too, and all things considered probably the best “Trek” property ever made (I don’t care for the hokey-charms of the OT, the Kirk-era movies ranged from great to mild, and the new Abrams film just rubs me the wrong way). “The X Files” could’ve been another great sci-fi television classic, but they didn’t have the good sense to cut their losses and time the show to end with Duchovny’s departure. The recent “Battlestar Galactica” remake probably comes closest to being a great third place show, in live-action anyway. There’s several examples of great animated sci-fi television, but that’s opening up another can of worms entirely.
I’ve been working on a LOST obituary since the show ended on Sunday night. I’m having a harder time writing a postmortem for LOST than I did writing any of the essays for my college applications. For six years I had a relationship with this show, and at the end of each season, I suffered from separation anxiety. How could I wait 9 months until I see it again? When I came within a month of the next season, I would take the time to rewatch all that had come before, gearing up for the return. After each episode aired, I would join the online community on the many websites dedicated to the show, and share my thoughts, read other people’s theories, and eagerly await the next week’s episode. Lostpedia, Darkufo and The ODI were amongst the best. Lostpedia is encyclopedic in scope, but Darkufo offered theories, fan art, fan fiction, spoilers (for those so inclined) and podcasts. This season saw the advent of neverseenlost.wordpress.com which was a delight. Someone that hadn’t seen the first 5 seasons started watching with the season 6 premiere and recapped each episode with great humor. If you’re a fan, and completely caught up on the show, it is worth the look.
An interesting clip of JJ Abrams, sharing his storytelling philosophy, can be found here: http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/j_j_abrams_mystery_box.html
Even now, talking about the show is cathartic. Like discussing a good friend in the wake of his/her demise. By keeping the memory fresh, you keep them alive. LOST will remain a part of me for years to come. I am a Survivor of Flight 815.
Boy can I vouch for this! Marc Bauer’s love and dedication to this show was incomparable. In nearly every e mail conversation with him dating back over three years, he always asked me about any progress I may have made in viewing the latest episodes. When he says he lived this show in every sense he is not exaggerating. The passion there was a beautiful thing!
The end of LOST wasn’t satisfying, as the writers choose to leave much of the island history they developed over five seasons in favor of the more ‘spiritual journey’ (suggested by some of the respondants) that loses most of the tension set up in the initial episodes. In order to veer away from the sentimentality that prevailed for a long stretch, they did present a startling final episode.
Why does everything need to be answered? Battlestar Galactica (re-make) tried to tie up all the loose ends for the finale, and as a result, the finale felt forced. Sometimes in life, we don’t get all the answers. By leaving some questions unanswered, the ardent fans are able to continue the conversation about the show for years to come.
All the BIG questions were answered, and those that weren’t answered directly, enough details were given for you to connect the dots on your own.
And, if you truly want answers, the complete series collectors edition of the DVDs and Blu-Rays will contain additional footage to fill in some of the gaps.
Lord of the Flies meets Gilligan’s Island?
The LORD OF THE FLIES connection is a good one Fred, as the issues of authority do parallel, but as far as GILLIGAN’S ISLAND, I think that’s a bit of a stretch. That admittedly popular show was nothing more than a throwaway, methinks.
Some more literary/cinematic parallels:
Mysterious Island (Verne; Harryhausen)
Swiss Family Robinson (Wyss)
Robinson Crusoe (Defoe)
The Cay (Taylor)
The Island of the Blue Dolphins (Newbery winner; O’Dell)
And Then There Were None (Christie; Clair)
Shutter Island (Lahane; Scorsese)
Isle of the Dead (Robson-Lewton)
Swept Away (Wertmuller)
Cast Away (Zemekis)
The Black Stallion (Ballard)
Survivor (CBS)
What others did I miss?
I used THE ISLAND OF THE BLUE DOLPHINS last year, and it’s truly one of the best of its kind, dealing as it does with about a girl marooned on an island for 18 years.
Didn’t Rod Serling have a show for a little while that was very “Lost”-like called “The New People”? You could also arguably add “Battle Royale” to the list, though that’s more of a “Lord of the Flies” meme than desert-island, really. There’s also M. Prado’s magnificent graphic-novel “Streak of Chalk”, which is very worth checking out if you can find it.
If you really want to get into it, someone has put a LOT of love into crafting a blog comparing LOST to Dr. Who Key of Time. Again, if you aren’t completely caught up on LOST, this is laden with spoilers: http://lostanddoctorwhokeytotimesimilarities.blogspot.com/
BOB-I couldn’t agree with you more on everything you said above. TNG was hallowed ground for me every Sunday night at 9pm. THE X-FILES ran out of steam the moment the dynamic of the original duo was broken, yet, I dare say, that show was really best in its stand-alone story episodes. The whole “black-oil” conspiracy thread became all talk, no action and, in my mind, a tedious bore after a while. I feel LOSTv proudly carried on the lineage as represented in great sdhows like them and THE OUTER and THE TWILIGHT ZONE. I’m just sad because there really is nothing, aside from THE SIMPSONS and 60 MINUTES, of real worth on TV now.
Dennis, there are other options on TV. Mind you, none are of the ilk of LOST… AMC’s current shows, Mad Men and Breaking Bad are fantastic. There are a few recent hours of Breaking Bad that are amongst the best hours of TV in recent memory. FX has Justified, HBO’s new show Treme is fantastic and the upcoming Boardwalk Empire also look fantastic. And, in a scant few weeks, Matt Groening’s Futurama will return to Comedy Central with all new episodes, and the next season of True Blood will take the air.
I despair the loss of LOST, but I embrace the other opportunities for great television.
“Mad Men” is okay, but I find the period-piece atmosphere forced and not enough to compensate for the soap-opera dramatics. “Justified” is cool, perhaps the best Elmore Leonard adaptation since “Jackie Brown” or “Out of Sight”. “Treme” so far is all atmosphere and character but no plot– yeah, it’s nice that they’re filming in New Orleans and creating jobs and all, but I really don’t care for the show itself. “Battlestar Galactica” was a damn good show while it was on, and “Caprica” is now showing a good deal of promise with an outlook less cosmic and more cosmopolitan. “Fringe” is probably my favorite thing on television right now, and this season I’ve often liked it even better than “Lost”.
I have to agree with MARC BAUER here… Not everything has to be explained and, considering all the territory covered on the show, damn impossible to do it all in a two hour finale. We should be thankful for what we were given and in lieu of the entire series, also thankful that a show like this had the guts to present itself in the first place. The ingenius flashback use, the fine chaqracter development, superlative acting (Terry O’Quinn, a big stand-out) and the ingenius writing will keep this one in a sacred place in my mind whenever I look back at shows I adore. In all honesty, I have not one bitch about any turn this series took. One of the true greats in tube history.
I tried MAD MEN and it does nothing for me. I agree that there are moments of brilliance on BREAKING BAD. However, neither show has captured my attention or imagination. On the other hand, Alan Ball’s TRUE BLOOD has me sinking my teeth into it (every pun intended) week after week and proves again that Ball’s success with SIX FEET UNDER was no fluke. BATTLESTAR is one that I have yet to sit down in front of, but I assure you that I will make time for it now that my favorite show is no longer. HERO’S annoys me. FUTURAMA, that’s interesting to me if they can capture the first season magic of the original FOX run. Other than that, TV is a barren waste land to me (aside from my guilty pleasure with Lucille and Sam’s daughters: GLEE-lets not get into it, I just really like the show. Nuff said…).
“Heroes” had a near perfect first season, but in the second they were fatally hamstrung by the writer’s strike. By the third season, the writers were second-guessing themselves out of their best stories and falling over themselves to make the fans happy, which is next to impossible in today’s internet-saturated audience base. Season four almost made for a second wind, but by that time it was too little, too late. All in all, they’re lucky they lasted this long, which is sad– ideally, they had a premise which could’ve sustained years and years.
And Dennis– BSG is very interesting and a lot of fun, to boot. Visually impressive, cleverly written and the acting ain’t bad, either. Very nice to see Edward James Olmos in center stage.
And Sam may have forgotten the BEST of them all: Ernest Shoedsack and Merian Coopers precursor to KING KONG: THE MOST DANGEROUS GAME!
The ending was perfect. I’m working on my own end note of this excellent series, it’s hard trying to remember my reactions to all those episodes, but also I feel that everything’s there waiting for me.
As someone else said: “Live Alone, Die Together”.
Well, that was anticlimactic.
Oh, no, not the final episode – which I haven’t watched and now probably never will. Rather, the 60-second “last time on ‘Lost’” recap which is the first thing that plays when you go on ABC.com. And which, in this case recaps the final episode for…wait, why exactly? To whet our appetite for…nothing? Who spent the time cutting this and putting it together? Who paid someone to do this? Who would voluntarily watch this (I thought I was watching a recap of the second-to-last episode)?
So much for the build-up!
If that’s too elliptical, let me explain in clear terms what happened. I went to the site to watch the final episode. I clicked “play” on what I thought was a recap of the second-to-last episode, to prepare me for the finale. Instead, I was treated to a recap of the finale and now I know everything that happened. Game over.
(Yeah, I know there’s still the drama to consider but honestly, Lost was always just as much about the twists and surprises and “where is it going next…” as any human element, particularly as the seasons wore on. Anyway my “now probably never will” was hyperbolic, but at this point I guess I’ll just wait for the season to come out on DVD and go through it slowly, as per Dennis’ prior suggestion. Still a bummer though.)
Just had a chance to watch the finale last night finally. I found it to be very good from the standpoint of giving a satisfying sendoff to all the characters. Did they answer all the questions? No. Did I really ever think they would? Not really (Lindeloff and Cuse have been saying for years how they would answer this and that and it never happened — but that’s just par for the course with mystery based shows, you have to string people along with the mysteries, but whenever you answer even one, you have to start throwing out 20 more, most of which you can’t answer).
I also have to echo Ed above, as he states that the problem with the show is that so much of what happened in earlier seasons had absolutely no bearing on how the show eventually ends. Stuff like Walt, The Tailies, the entire time travel thing, Widmore vs. Ben, even the temple stuff at the beginning of this season, is all basically inconsequential, which I’d be fine with if they hadn’t made such a huge deal out of all of it as we went along.
And that all gets to the legacy of the show. I’d surely rewatch the entirety of THE WIRE, DEADWOOD, THE SHIELD, BATTLESTAR GALACTICA, plus MAD MEN and BREAKING BAD (assuming they continue on as good as they have started). But I’m just not sure how I would watch the entirety of LOST again knowing that much of what I’m watching isn’t relevant to what’s to come (though there are some stellar single episodes that I would surely rewatch if they were on).
But more than anything, I’m pissed that Miles, Frank, and Richard weren’t invited to the big afterlife party