(Robert Wise, 1963)
(essay by Troy)
Expectations can effect your view of a horror film as much as anything. My first foray into The Haunting I wasn’t expecting much more than an intelligent, well-regarded ghost story, because how scary can a G-rated black and white film from 1963 truly be? Yet this is one of those horror films that if you watch it with the lights down and the sound turned it manages to creep all around you, causing an overwhelming feeling of dread to rise up. There’s a feeling of someone or something unseen, eyes peering down on you, yet you can’t look back. Or of your hand hanging by your side and having it suddenly grabbed by an unknown force. It’s our innate fear of the uncanny that The Haunting exposes so well.
The film concerns the notorious Hill House, which has “stood for 90 years and might stand for 90 more.” In a short five-minute span we see a history of death surrounding the house, how both of Hugh Crain’s wives died there and how this led to his daughter Abigail spending her entire child and adult life living in her nursery. An elderly Abigail dies one night when her caretaker was too busy with a paramour and didn’t hear her calling for help. In the present day, we are introduced to Dr. John Markway (Richard Johnson) who is intrigued by the supernatural history of Hill House. He enlists two women with supposed paranormal abilities, spinster Eleanor Lance (Julie Harris), and bohemian Theo (Claire Bloom), as well as the heir to the property Luke Sanderson (Russ Tamblyn), in an attempt to have the four of them inhabit the house to determine if there are any otherworldly forces in the house.
The Haunting was not Robert Wise’s first foray into horror, having cut his teeth with Val Lewton on The Body Snatcher and Curse of the Cat People. It was in between making two musicals (West Side Story and The Sound of Music) that he read Shirley Jackson’s The Haunting of Hill House and immediately saw the connection between her style and Lewton’s and pushed to make this film. The melding of the two must have seemed perfect, as Lewton and Jackson were both known for their subtlety, ambiguity, and use of suggestion to delve into the psychology of how the unknown horrifies us.
Wise impressively makes Hill House feel like a living, breathing (sometimes literally) individual. As Eleanor walks up to the house she intones that it feels as if the house is “looking at me.” Wise follows with a series of high-angle, POV shots from the house’s perspective and shows windows that feel like they are manifested as glaring eyes, along with a myriad of spires, gargoyles, and statues, all seemingly looking down at Eleanor. He then follows with a series of shot reverse shots, implicitly making the house a character that is interacted with. As Eleanor knocks on the front door, a cherubic door knocker bores a hole into her with its eyes. Once in the house, she scans the room and we are implored to find something sinister in the sea of overly ornate decor. We end the scene with Eleanor’s face reflected in the floor, along with an overhead light fixture, which looks like two sets of eyes watching her.
Throughout the film, similar techniques are used. Wise’s camera never seems on the level, always canted. In most shots there is a mirror or statue, the ghosts of the house seeming to inhabit each of them and look at and move with us as we pass. The house is already disorienting by the nature of it’s composition, as all the doors are hung slightly off-center, all the angles slightly off, leading it to becoming “one big distortion.” Wise furthers this by using an anamorphic Panavision lens in many shots to create distortion and a sense of movement around the edges of the screen. There’s also the short, almost subliminal superimposition of the cherub door knocker in a later scene, the effect of a door’s panels being “pushed in,” the extended close-up on a door knob ever so slightly turning, and the long zoom-in on a portion of the wall that surely contains a face (or does it?). Wise adds to this an aural assault that completes the disturbing nature — from strange muffled voices to distressingly loud and disorienting banging sounds, these further the unsettling nature of what happens.
At the core of the film lies an examination of Eleanor and her relationship with the house. From the beginning we see that Eleanor is a repressed and oppressed woman. She is struggling to break free and experience life on her own. She’s not had the chance to make her own choices as she has felt forced to care for her ailing mother for much of her adult life. Thus, the sudden opportunity to leave this stifling life is all she has left. As she drives up to the house she tells herself that “”I hope, I hope, I hope this is what I’ve been waiting for all my life.” This desperation is what eventually leads to the schizophrenic relationship that manifests via her experiences at Hill House. Eleanor comes to believe that the the house is something that finally wants her, even if it is somehow pushing her toward death, that after a life searching for affection and attention, she now has it. Of course, while being pulled in by that, she also pushes away as she feels an incredible amount of guilt by being in the house due to the death of her mother, the final moments of which mirrors the death of Abigail Crain.
This inability of Eleanor to make up her mind about her feelings toward the house is also duplicated in her muddled relationships with both Theo and Dr. Markway. There is a sexual tension between Eleanor and Theo (who is obviously a coded lesbian) that leads to Eleanor appearing to be interested in Theo’s flirtations, yet at the same time much too fearful to ever attempt such a relationship. When she works towards gaining the less “unnatural” (her words, not mine) attention of Dr. Markway, she is soon thwarted when his wife visits the house. While Eleanor expresses her disdain for Mrs. Markway in terms of her relation to Hill House, purporting that Mrs. Markway can’t “satisfy” the house and that it “wants” Eleanor and not Mrs. Markway, she is clearly referring to Dr. Markway here, as much as she is the house.
The love/hate nature of all of these feelings makes for a frustrating experience (well portrayed by Harris’ stagey acting style and socially awkward body language), as we truly want Eleanor to find peace, but soon realize she is incapable of it. It’s a complex web of emotions that lead to Eleanor’s determination that if she can’t have Dr. Markway and won’t have Theo, then the house is as all that’s left for her and that she is slowly becoming a part of the house and drifting away from reality. It all leads to the finale, when she is forced to leave and we can’t be sure if it is her hopelessness or the supernatural forces of Hugh Crain that control her steering wheel as she fatally crashes into a tree.
As perfect a ghost story as you can get.
(See more screencaps at Troy’s blog, here)
(this film appeared on Troy’s list at #8, Kevin’s at #48, and Robert’s at #50)








Terrific pick, Troy! The first time I watched this film I was about 13 years old, my parents went out for the evening and I was home alone. I believe it was on the old NBC Saturday Night at the Movies. It scared the hell out of me. The pounding sounds, Wise’s use of distorted camera angles and just a general feeling of eeriness frightened me more that any Frankenstein, Jason or Freddy Krueger could because this seemed so real. I was never so happy to see my parents come home (lol). Julie Harris gives an exacting performance; she makes her character believable despite her eccentricities which only adds to the strangeness of the story. Her characters sensitivity and vulnerability to the demon demands of the house make her collapse just more convincing. A great performance.
That’s a great story, John. I like that everyone has some kind of gateway film into horror where they watched it as you did and got the crap scared out of them.
Harris’ performance grew on me in my second viewing — it’s a little bit overdone, but as you say, it “adds to the strangeness of the story.”
“Wise impressively makes Hill House feel like a living, breathing (sometimes literally) individual. As Eleanor walks up to the house she intones that it feels as if the house is “looking at me.” Wise follows with a series of high-angle, POV shots from the house’s perspective and shows windows that feel like they are manifested as glaring eyes, along with a myriad of spires, gargoyles, and statues, all seemingly looking down at Eleanor.”
This is the vital passage of another Troy Olson reviewing gem. One of the most atmospheric and stylishly filmed of all horror films, and definitely one of Wise’s best films (with THE SET UP, THE BODY SNATCHER and his late life musical duo). Your positioning of the this film in your own personal Top 10 is fully warranted. I am still pondering my own list, but this will surely be in my own Top 10 as well. This is one of the greatest of psychological horror films, and the opening montage of Hill House’s past is one of the genre’s most compelling sequences. Nelson Gidding’s script is superlative, and Wise again presents some fascinating female characters. The lesbian angle is here too of course.
Sam — I need to check out Wise’s other films (I’ve only seen his musicals). I am making it a must that I watch the Lewton’s I haven’t seen for Halloween season this year (which includes THE BODY SNATCHER).
I’m racking my brain to think of a prologue that is as effective in using the “short history in 5 minutes” conceit (not that it’s been done hundreds of times or anything).
Glad you mention Gidding, as I often give credit to the director when the screenwriter deserves just as much, and Gidding has crafted a literate and (apparently) faithful adaptation of Jackson’s book.
Bravo, a superb piece which I’d rank as one of the sites finest. You really got underneath the skin of this, a Val Lewton homage done with the skill of Welles.
Bobby, Troy Olson is a great writer. This latest salvo in the series is no surprise at all. I completely agree with your assessment too.
Yeah Troy can write Sam. He also has pretty good taste. I like that he has been spotlighting the old school horror classics on this countdown. I’m hoping to see some Silents make an appearance as well. Nothing beats that 9 minute Jack The Ripper sequence in Waxworks. I hope Caligari and Nosferatu get some love. The Unknown with Lon Chaney is pretty great as well.
Wow, Bobby. Thanks for the kind words.
I’m sure your reference to Welles is no accident there, as Wise had a relationship to him as well (having done the editing on CITIZEN KANE and THE MAGNIFICENT AMBERSONS, though the latter without Welles’ blessing).
Thanks to Sam and Maurizio as well — glad everyone is enjoying my writing. Getting a chance to dig in to horror films has really re-energized my blogging enjoyment and made me want to write more.
Maurizio — there are still some silents to come, but I’ve not seen a couple of the ones you mention, so I can’t really comment on those. I do love the older horror films though — 9 of my top 20 are pre-1963.
WHEN STRANGERS MARRY is now with us under a new title of BETRAYED:
http://www.wbshop.com/Betrayed-1944/1000180179,default,pd.html?cgid=
Awesome news!!!
William Castle Lives!!!
My favorite Wise film. I prefer this to all his noirs which fall just short of masterpiece status for me. Tierney in Born To Kill is pretty bad ass though.
Great essay here Troy (no surprise), this is a film I saw surprisingly for the first time for the sake of this countdown– I had always thought it was to similar to another classic THE INNOCENTS that I’ve never really liked. This film is quite a bit better then that one to me, and you’ve covered exactly why.
This is a very surprisingly scary film. It didn’t make my list but I do like it quite a bit.
Wow Jamie I love The Innocents. The Clayton film would easily make my top 10 of horror.
I too like THE INNOCENTS, though it won’t make our countdown here, it fell into my top 50.
Yeah, THE INNOCENTS is a classy, polished, polite classic. These are all things I don’t think Horror should be. It’s like seeing punk rock performed at the Met by guys in tuxes. It’s an OK film, just not a great innovative Horror film (even for ghost stories it’s probably not as artistic as it needs to be, compared to something like KWAIDAN, or ONIBABA).
Jamie I’ll counter the punk reference with The Innocents is the “Television” of horror films. Not grimy and primal but well rehearsed and technically adept……
Both styles have merit. No need for exclusion.
Oh yeah certainly, I prefer the primal, raw and artsy. But the polished, well-made and spooky have a place too, hence why I put KWAIDAN out there. You’ll see on my top 100 how many films like this I actually like, I just don’t think THE INNOCENTS is all the great for this type, as I’ve already named 3 now from that decade alone that are better (KWAIDAN, ONIBABA, THE HAUNTING), and I’d probably add THE COLLECTOR to that as well. (And then there’s ROSEMARY, REPULSION, HOUR OF THE WOLF, TOBY DAMMIT, etc, the 60′s just offered quite a bit of spooky good films).
And, as polished and prim (and fantastic) as Television was/is they were still playing at the Bowery in their heyday.
Jamie — It’s a good comparison to THE INNOCENTS, as they are similar in look/style, literary connections, and the theme of exploring the repression of the lead female. I agree that THE HAUNTING pulls off the scares a lot more effectively, though.
Not sure if anyone is going to my site to view the screencaps I post on each of these, but if you are, I just put them up for THE HAUNTING (had some Blogger issues that kept things from getting posted).
http://troyolson.blogspot.com/2010/09/haunting.html#more
I’d like to say that I am especially elated to see my brother’s writing being showcased here. I knew you all would enjoy it. His blog has always been insightful, hilarious, irreverent, and full of passion…and I’m glad that over the last year more and more people are finding their way over there. Good job with these posts, fella!
What the hell was that Kevin. Where is the sibling rivalry?!?! You should be coming on this site saying how his writing sucks and you are the true blogging genius. Oh well I don’t have a brother but that is what I imagine my response would be to all the Troy love everybody is giving him here. Throw some F bombs, belittle everyone, and sway us towards your greatness instead…….
Actually, our gimmick has always been to set-up comedy bits for each other instead of going for the whole sibling rivalry thing. It probably stems from the fact neither of really knows how to be properly belittling, even in jest (though we do a quite good job of being derisive and poking fun at things — but all in good spirit!)
In case you haven’t read our wackiness before, I’ll point you to our blog where we co-write with each other — http://troyandkevin.blogspot.com. We’ve only written on two things there so far, but it’s always fun and something we need to aim for again when life calms down for both of us at the same time.
Fella…haha (there’s a little brotherly inside humor in that term). Thanks for the niceties Kevin. Someday maybe I can get a tenth of the readership you have (still impressed when I see your Google Analytics numbers) — though I surely will have to find a way to keep people reading after the horror movie stuff is over!
Oh, and don’t forget — shake them ropes!
One of the reasons this film works so well is that it toys with one of mankind’s oldest fears, fear of the unknown. It’s SO much more terrifying because so much of the horror is in our own imaginations! DEFINITELY recommended for fans of psychological horror, this one is TOPS!!