by Allan Fish
(Japan 1960 128m) DVD1/2
Aka. Akibiyori
Two lights in a hallway
p Sanezumi Fujimoto, Maskatsu Kaneko, Tadahiro Tedamoto d Yasujiro Ozu w Kogo Noda, Yasujiro Ozu ph Yuuharu Atsuta ed Yoshiyasu Hamamura m Kojun Saito art Tatsuo Hamada
Setsuko Hara (Akiko Miwa), Yoko Tsukasa (Ayako Miwa), Mariko Okada (Yukiko Sasaki), Shinichiro Mikami (Koichi), Kuniko Miyake (Nobuko), Miyuki Kuwano (Michiko), Nabuo Nakamura (Shuzo Taguchi), Fumio Watanabe (Tsuneo Sugiyama), Chishu Ryu (Shukicki Miwa), Keiji Sada (Shotaru Goto), Shin Saburi (Soichi Mamiya),
Watching Ozu’s late masterwork prior to jotting thoughts down here, I was reminded by a throwaway piece of dialogue from Hitch’s Rebecca when, during the Monte Carlo prologue, Joan Fontaine’s demure heroine tells of how her father, an artist, wasn’t one for variety, preferring to draw or paint the same tree over and over again. He felt, and I quote from memory not verbatim, that once you have found one perfect thing, you should stick to it. Larry Olivier’s Maxim mutters that “I’m a great believer in that myself.” I get the feeling that Yasujiro Ozu might have nodded at such a maxim.
Late Autumn would be the first of two reworkings of his earlier masterpiece Late Spring. Unlike in that film and in his later farewell An Autumn Afternoon, it differs in one vital plot detail. Those two films detailed the attempts of a widower to marry off his young devoted daughter, whereas Late Autumn showcases a widow trying to do the same for her daughter. The widow, Akiko, and the daughter, Ayako, attract the attention of three middle-aged friends of their late husband/father, who become matchmakers in triplicate, with one of them holding out his heart to the widow as well. The young man they find for Ayako, Goto, is at first turned down by her, but then she warms to him. She nonetheless worries at her mother being left alone, and is delighted when she hears that she’s going to remarry.
There’s a strange symmetry to this, for in Late Spring it was Setsuko Hara who played the finally married daughter and, as if the whole thing has moved forward a generation, it’s now she who is left alone by her daughter. It’s simple, one could almost be excused for calling its plot perfunctory, and yet it’s a film which is, if it’s not a contradiction in terms, perfunctorily perfect. Hara’s mother goes through her own ritual, in this case preparing for bed and her first night of a life alone in her home. Throughout as she always does, Hara smiles through the pain, and it makes it all the more emotional to watch, not least in the scenes towards the end where mother and daughter make a final trip to a relative before the daughter’s marriage. If in a Western film a mother talked of how she was going to be lonely but the daughter shouldn’t mind that, and went on about how it was going to be their last trip together, one might find oneself muttering obscenities at the screen at the mother’s selfishness. That’s what makes Hara’s performance all the more remarkable, for you never once think that; there’s no emotional blackmail here, she’s utterly guileless, and when she talks of remembering their last trip, you’d swear you can see her memorising the slightest detail for the memory banks. The performances are typically superb, not just from muse Hara, but from Okada as the friend who dispels the gossip and rumour and visits Hara in the deeply affecting final scene, and from Tsukasa, magnificent as the young daughter. The ethos is plain, even obvious; time passes, friends part, daughters leave, parents are left behind, but it’s timeless. For Ozu, sadly, time was closing in, not just his own mortality but in the way his cinema was seeming old hat. Even the setting – the surrounding pre-fabs and railings on baking concrete roofs – looks ahead to the cinematic revolutionaries of the decade to come, of Oshima, Imamura and even the excesses of Wakamatsu. Mizoguchi, I always felt, could have adjusted to the times, but Ozu couldn’t, and nor could Hara. She never made another film after his death, retired at 43.








Well, Hara did admit she hated acting, Yet she turned in some of teh greatest performances in cinema history. Isn’t that the way it always is?
The tender and bittersweet LATE AUTUMN may well be the 11th Ozu masterpiece, and it’s as morally complex as any film he’s made. I am most excited at the screening of it I will be attending next week at the IFC (Sunday, October 24) as part of the winding-down Ozu Festival.
Yes, Jean Arthur was another who hated it.
Yep, I’ve long known that too.
“for in Late Spring it was Setsuko Hara who played the finally married daughter and, as if the whole thing has moved forward a generation, it’s now she who is left alone by her daughter.” Yes, I like this as well – the pathos are acute.
(But not overplayed of course – this is Ozu)
Tonight I will be re-watching two films that, among others, show that Ozu painted more than one tree: An Inn in Tokyo (1935) and The Flavor of Green Tea over Rice (1952). And anyone who has seen Setsuko Hara in the films of Kurosawa and Naruse will be of opinion that she could have gone on after 1963 and created other great roles.
Nevertheless, I am enjoying your series on Ozu. Why is it that “in a Western film” a person must be selfish unless blatantly unselfish or victimized, whereas in Ozu’s films at least one or two of the characters can face pain and turn the brightness outwards?
There are indeed exceptions, Leo – A Hen in the Wind is another – but let’s at least agree it’s the same forest.
Sadly, that’s the last of the mini Ozu series (though of course I have reveiws of his more famous films as part of the decade countdowns – see related posts), next week we move on to two masterworks from less heralded directors (at least in the west).
Yes, domestic drama can be a deep wood.
Leo: I will be posting a massive feature on Ozu’s cinema, and the 18 films I will have seen by mid-November, when my Ozu piece will appear here.
Look forward to reading it. Though I live in Albany, I saw Brothers and Sisters of the Toda Family at the IFC. Sound was IMHO too loud.
Thanks Leo!!
Yes, I found that the earliest Ozus (though the prints were acceptable considering the ages of the films, and the purported difficulties the Japanese had with preventing some deterioration) were maligned with some audio interference including a constant ‘hum.’ The later films (and the final string of color features) have looked terrific though.
Wow! You traveled down from Albany to the IFC? Now that’s dedication (and passion!). Our good friend Samuel Wilson lives in Albany too.
No – I was visiting my daughter, who’s a student in NYC. But I did bring her and her friend to the Saturday morning showing.
I got ya Leo. Still it was great you all went together, attending this terrific festival!
I have been attending the Sunday screenings since Week #3.
Given I admire all of Ozu’s work, look forward to your feature, Sam.
Because Ozu and Kurosawa present parables on how to live the right life – they are philosophers. Wisdom is their purpose and film-making their metier. Their well-spring is the Eastern view of where right-living comes from a duty to family, the microcosm of society. In the West the family is an economic unit, an instrument of ambition and control.
Ozu shows persons not personalities, character not characters.
I love the two screen grabs you’ve chosen and the first paragraph, really the whole thing is good. Nice work.