(Roman Polanski, 1965)
(essay by Robert)
Polanski used a minimalist approach to give us this shocking depiction the deteriorating mind. In doing so he delivered one of the finest examples of psychological horror of all time. Still today an intriguing and gripping film, Repulsion unapologetically explores the thin and fragile balance of sanity without accusing or presuming. The first of his “apartment trilogy”, Repulsion unfolds with the director’s distinctive subtlety and humanism.
Catherine Deneuve portrays the sexually fearful Carole. She is perfectly cast as the voluptuous but apprehensive manicurist. All around her in swinging London are the trappings of a sexually parochial society that is threatening and revolting to her. From the daily cat calls she endures and the lingering presence of her sister’s (married) boyfriend to the aggressive advances of her landlord and seeming shallowness of her own profession, she is cornered relentlessly. When she is pursued by Colin (John Fraser) she groups him with all of her pent up feelings and stereotypes. He essentially has no chance. Deneuve’s casual portrayal of such an agonized character is absolutely mesmerizing. Her violent and murderous charges overtake her calmly as her natural defense mechanism. These spurts seem to be her truest moments. What at first seems a quite and impenetrable shield turns out to actually be a front for completely terrifying anguish and instability.
Of course you cannot explore Repulsion without deep musing of the sexuality of Carole (and all the film’s characters). Polanski depicts Carole’s torment aggressively by showing us her dreams/hallucinations of sexual assault and allowing (forcing) us to hear her sister’s real life sexual encounters. He also takes full advantage of her physicality by not-so-subtly parading her in her divulging nightgown. These powerfully build Carole’s tension and defenselessness. The film though is about much more than sexual resistance and repression. Polanski uses this very sensual theme to explore his deeper subject of the inhibiting and anguishing command of human fear.
It cannot go unmentioned that, in addition to this compelling concept and fantastic delivery by Deneuve, the young director shows an inspiring level of depth by utilizing strikingly simple (but powerful) visual and audio. He maximizes the effectiveness of his black and white film buy shedding countless shadows and shooting close-up angles. He also somehow manages to transform everyday noises like dripping water, train tracks, ticking clocks and house flies into horror devices. Also, notice the awesome rapid-fire drumbeat that accompanies her slashing of her landlord.- this is an exceptional representation of her pounding mental torture.
The absence of plot though is Polanski’s most effective tool. It is also his most telling clue that he does not intend to place guilt or provide us with rational explanation to Carole’s plight. He casts us straight into the scenario without history and back-story. Although he refuses to let us off the hook by telling us too much, he does tease us with glimpses of a family photograph showing detached Carole as young child. This perhaps suggests some lifelong Freudian explanation to Carole’s ultimate undoing. He does not elaborate further. Instead he wonderfully challenges us with questions (not answers) about his characters and ourselves and leaves us to devise our own solutions. This photo often times (unfortunately) becomes the focal point for discussion of the film. It is often commented that the photo tells us all we need to know about Carole. I maintain the director was making a much deeper point about the fragility of the human mind- one that cannot be explained away so simply.
Repulsion, most simply put, is an exploration of madness. In his truest form, the director includes us in his study. Polanski most certainly wants us to taste the madness; to sympathize with Carole’s torment, but he is more interested in us recognizing our own. What makes the film so engaging and human is the undeniable sense that madness is not only a completely reasonable response but one that we all teeter-totter with.
(this film appeared on Roberts list at #4, Jamie’s at #19, and Troy’s at #22)









Polanski brilliantly uses wide-angle lens, harsh lighting and sound to create Carol’s nightmarish decent into a catatonic world. A wonderful essay and a great choice. Has always been one of my favorite films.
Terrific comment here John!
A study of psychosis amidst contemporary culture, with a phenomenally subtle, moving performance by Catherine Deneuve and camerawork so coldly precise that the horror seems to bloom naturally from the mundane landscape of the film. Deneuve plays Carole Ledoux, a Belgian beautician who lives in London with her frivolous sister. When the sister and her married boyfriend leave to vacation together in Italy, Carole begins to isolate herself in her apartment in a sexual and violent frenzy. The movie becomes more and more subjective as Polanski plunges into Carole’s mind and her psychoses, but what’s stunning about Polanski’s dissection of Carole’s consciousness is the way that the director moves so brusquely from an objective perspective into his protagonist’s fears without bluntly heralding the transition. We’ve already become part of Carole’s awareness before we realize it. In this sense, “Repulsion” mirrors both Luis Bunuel’s “Belle de Jour” and “Un Chien Andalou” in its precise, logical progression that expresses what is in fact illogical. The movie never feels like it’s caught up in dream logic whatsoever–it’s all starkly real and flat, until the scene reveals itself to be a subjective or illusory perception. An admirable review by Robert and a horror classic.
Bill, this is an amazing comment!!!
Hard call as to which one I ultimately like better, REPULSION and ROSEMARY’S BABY… Ultimately, I feel ROSEMARY stands tallest as its themes and paranoia speak to a wider audience. That said, REPULSION is by no means a sloutch of any kind. Its this kind of film and intricate film-making that defines Polanski as one of the best in the psychological field. As such, films like his MACBETH, CHINATOWN and TESS are all the better for his experimentations here. Like his earlier and very effective KNIFE IN THE WATER, its simple set ups of the camera and playing up of natural sounds that drive the tension levels through the roof. Deneuve is a masterstroke of casting as well playing against her chic fashion/style to present a tormented soul under that she’ll of smoking hot sexuality…
Yeah Polanski places 3 films in the top 50 here, and has the very great KNIFE IN THE WATER. Which would be top 150 to me if it’s considered Horror (I think it is)… then his vastly underrated NINTH GATE is probably top 200 or at least 250.
He can honestly lay claim to being the greatest Horror Director cinema has ever seen.
As alone as I may be, I also love The Fearless Vampire Killers……
“He can honestly lay claim to being the greatest Horror Director cinema has ever seen.”
Very interesting choice there Jamie, and one to be taken seriously. Here’s my own list in order of preference for this designation:
1. Mario Bava
2. Terrence Fisher
3. David Cronenberg
4. Jacques Tourneur
5. James Whale
6. Roger Corman
7. John Carpenter
8. Roman Polanski
9. George Romero
10. Todd Browning/ William Castle
I hope to see Kobayashi’s KWAIDAN on this list, and I would also mention Miike Takashi, Dario Argento, Freddie Francis, Wes Craven, Sam Raimi, Geores Franju.
I could have included Hitchcock for just PYSCHO alone, though obvously THE BIRDS and a few others could easily qualify. But I decided to categorize him as a “thriller” director as most would.
Jess Franco is a hack, and Lucio Fulci is rather uneven, though I like one of his giallos and THE BEYOND.
Wow a few on here that I didn’t know you really liked that much Sam (mainly Cronenberg). I know you adore Bava so that makes sense.
I actually plan to get around to a personal Top 500 of Horror list, and keep it on my desktop and edit it whenever I see a Horror film that merits inclusion. Doing this countdown has thrust me into the world I was at at 18; watching Horror like it’s my job. I figured when this countdown died down I’d return to a steady diet of ‘normal films’ instead it’s dropped me into going as far as I can with the genre. So I must say thanks to this blog. I plan on posting this list (once compiled) every 6 months or so as it changes and I see more. it’s ambitious but I could do it right now (in a few hours), it’s just getting around to watching more so things like ‘Cheerleader Camp’ eventually drop out of the 500.
At that point could I begin to make a list of top Horror directors. I would say that of your list I wouldn’t rank Bava that high, or Corman. Raimi or Craven also don’t merit high placement to me.
Terrance Fisher and Roger Corman over Polanski, Carpenter, and Whale is very interesting. I personally don’t consider any Hammer or Corman films to be great. From your list my top 5 would be……
1. Roman Polanski (Repulsion, Rosemary’s Baby, The Tenant, The Fearless Vampire Killers)
2. John Carpenter (The Thing, Halloween,The Fog)
3. Jacques Tourneur (Night Of The Demon, Cat People, I Walked With A Zombie)
4. James Whale (The Old Dark House, Frankenstein, The Bride Of Frankenstein)
5. David Cronenberg (Dead Ringers, The Fly)
I agree about Franco, he blows. Fulci I plan to reassess after this countdown as Kevin’s arguments make me believe i’ve missed something.
I asked Allan yesterday (speaking of Franco) is he’d ever seen a Pere Portabella film. His two best known/highest reviewed horror films VAMPIR (1970) and its sequel/companion UMBRACLE (also 1970) I want to see them ASAP. They seem right up my alley, and Rosenbaum adores them, who I trust.
Of course Tourneur, Cronenberg and Polanski also have at least one masterpiece film each in other genres. I’m shocked at how underrated Polanski is considered by critics. His highly questionable personal life should not be judged against his work in movies. I would go so far as to rate him top ten English language directors ever (that would still leave out Knife In The Water which is great)…….
Someone like Shozin Fukui would be rather high on my list, over many, many perceived ‘greats’. Miike too, and Sergio Matino as well. Umberto Lenzi.
Making a list is very hard for genre, because while, say, Corman worked in Horror a ton, a person that made just one Horror film that’s great would trump all his. For example Claire Denis has made one Horror film, TROUBLE EVERY DAY and I’d take it over Corman’s entire Horror output.
“Claire Denis has made one Horror film, TROUBLE EVERY DAY and I’d take it over Corman’s entire Horror output.”
Jamie I love Denis, but that’s a bit tough. For what Corman did he was peerless.
Five in his Poe series are top rank:
The Masque of the Red Death
The Tomb of Ligeia
The Fall of the House of Usher
The Pit of the Pendulum
The Premature Burial
And then we have:
The Haunted Palace
A Bucket of Blood
The Little Shop of Horrors
all of which are memorable. Some cult films are also distinguished.
While I’m not a large fan of Terence Fisher (though for the top 500 I’ll dig deeper) I do think he lays claim to one of the greatest titles in cinema history:
THE EARTH DIES SCREAMING.
man is that cool or what?
yeah Sam, that’s fair. The discussion becomes is someone who has 5 films sprinkled in a top 500 say, but none higher then 150 better then someone with just one in the top 500 but it’s top 45.
(And we don’t necessarily have to be talking Corman and Denis) It makes an interesting topic worth debating I think.
Ha Jamie!!!
THE EARTH DIES SCREAMING reminds me of VILLAGE OF THE DAMNED, at least in the opening reels. Good one!!! Ha!
As far as Fisher goes, I would defend his inclusion among the greatest of all horror directors on his prolific output which includes five first rate horrors and some others on the next level. The five are:
The Horror of Dracula
The Devil Rides Out
The Brides of Dracula
The Curse of Frankenstein
The Hound of the Baskervilles
ah, see thanks. I doubted him but I’ve seen jut 2/5. I have much viewing for undertaking of ‘the 500′!
May I list my top 5 Horror Directors?
(Haven’t seen the Polanski film yet)
1. George A. Romero (Night of the Living Dead, Dawn of the Dead)
2. James Whale (Frankenstein, Bride of Frankenstein, Invisible Man)
3. Tod Browning (Freaks)
4. John Carpenter (Halloween, The Thing)
5. Sam Raimi (The Evil Dead, Drag Me to Hell)
Kinda weird list, don’t really know.
There’s nothing wrong with that list Jaimie!
Nice work!
Just jumping in at the end here…I may have to take up the same quest as Jamie and aim to see every horror movie I’ve missed. I currently have around 275 horror movies rated in my database (that’s over a 1/4 of all movies I’ve ever seen…take that for what you will), but I still have so many gaps that I’d love to catch up on.
As for top horror directors, here are the ones I have with 3 or more **** to ***** horror films to their credit:
Dario Argento
David Cronenberg
George Romero
Jacques Tourneur
Mario Bava
Roman Polanski
As you mention, though, it’s hard to rate within a genre as I’d like to give credit to guys like Stuart Gordon, Lucio Fulci, Bob Clark and others.
yeah, I think it will be a fun exercise to compile a list that large. though I do need to buy that ‘Overlook Encyclopedia’ you’re always talking about. I looked it up, it sounds AWESOME. I’ve seen 500 horror films I imagine, it’s just recalling and ranking them, then seeing more to flush the list out.
Sadly the Horror edition is out of print and ridiculously overpriced. Mine was only $40 or so back when I got it (I have all four in the series — the western and sci-fi ones are just as awesome).
Amazon lists copies that are in good shape, used, and hardcover for around 35 to 40 bucks that seems extremely reasonable.
Good review Bob, nice work.
I think this film is all about our fears of human interaction, that everyone has but precious few realize, vocalize, or feel. Sex is the most intimate encounter and the best way for film to show this idea so that is why the film deals with that topic so much and so well. But really early in the film when Carol is still on her way home you see how uneasy she is walking with man, interacting with strangers on the street. Conversations with others have the possibility to be as intimate as sex so she (rightfully) fears this too.
The fact that Polanski cast someone as beautiful as Catherine Deneuve is a brilliant stroke; you easily believe that people would want to be around her and know her.
Thanks James,
I agree completely- Fear is the most personal and yet the most common emotion. To your point about “being around Deneuve”, my favorite scene is when Colin busts down the door just to see her than immediately realizes how absurd he was for doing so then tries to bumble through why he wants to be around her so much…then of course she bops him over the head.
Great work, Robert!
I think you are spot on, in remarking that here Polanski examines with bravura “the fragility of the human mind.” The casting, for dealing with a sense of repulsiveness about carnality, was inspired, in view of Catherine Deneuve’s having recently portrayed, to great acclaim, a wife of calculated low-wattage, in Jacques Demy’s Umbrellas of Cherbourg; and the actress portraying her sister, Yvonne Furneaux’s having, in La Dolce Vita, driven Marcello to fury with her babies ‘r us sexual appetite.
The subject of a “teeter-totter” we all ride in dealing with our bodies slipping out of whack is germane to horror, and to our times.
Thanks Jim,
I must say that before we started researching for this countdown, I had actually never seen this film- quite a gaff(e) I know! Certainly I was familiar with both Rosemary and the Tenant but somehow I had missed this. I was so very taken with it that I have seen it 3 times since. Polanski takes such a natural approach and Denueve delivers so honestly that we can’t help reflecting on and digging deep into our own psychological blemishes and imperfections. The film truly is a wonderful study.
Well the last two films on this countdown are absolutely amazing. I just watched Don’t Look Now last night for the second time and I hope it makes this list as well. I don’t think it showed up yet……. The top ten awaits.
JAMIE-YES. Along with the meticulous camera placements (something he’s known for and uses, I feel, to even greater effect in ROSEMARY), the casting of Deneuve is vital. The idea that psychosis of this sort can strike even someone as ravishingly beatiful and sexually desirable as her belies torments abilty to not discriminate and crush even those that have an extra advantage in life. I still feel, as I did on first view of this film many moons ago, that Polanski has a thing for putting beautiful women on the executioners table. Here, as in KNIFE IN THE WATER and, ultimately, the waifishy sexual Mia Farrow in ROSEMARY, he ups the anty by physically convincing the audience that innocence of the highest example is at the chopping block. If he had, say, put Bette Davis or Kate Hepburn in the role, the tension would have been cut in half. Polanski is, as we should mention, is also one of the great CASTING geniuses working. John Huston in CHINATOWN, Nastassia Kinski in TESS and Adrien Brody in THE PIANIST prove this.
Ummmmmmm, SAM, KWAIDAN was already on the list….
Hey guys, how about Jean Rollin?
LOL!!!!!!
Allan just reminded me about another film many of us love, VALERIE AND HER WEEK OF WONDERS (1970; Czechoslovakia; Jaromil Jires) He’s dead-on!
Sam,
I’m new to your blog but I’m loving the top 100 horror movie breakdown. While I don’t agree with every choice, or even with the why behind some choices, I’m so pleased to see a well-reasoned and well-written treatment of the horror movie; an approach far too many horror fans (in either literature or film) great with an anti-intellectual disdain.
Frankly, I’m inspired by your work here.
Cheers,
Paul Tremblay
Thank Paul, but 100% of the credit goes to Jamie Uhler, Troy and Kevin Olson and Robert Taylor, who have nearly completed this spectacular venture.
I am a fervant cheerleader, no more.
Wow just missed the top ten! I’m not sure if I have seen 5 horror films better than this and I’m not sure if Polanski has made a better film. A wonderful film that shows that Catherine Deneuve was not only one of the great beauties in the history of cinema but also one of the great actresses. A perfect film and a great essay!
I’ve known your love for this film for a long time Anu! Great to hear from you my friend!
Just reading this now — I think it’s your best review thus far Robert. Great stuff, especially in that paragraph describing Deneuve’s portrayal of Carol. Also, glad you mention the use of sound in the film, as that dripping water faucet is enough to drive anyone mad (or is it just me…)
I think this is the most shocking and psychologically trenchant of Polasnski’s Apartment films. There’s a kitchen-sink realism to the world that Polanski films that is offset by the offputting actions of Carol.
Great screencap of the raw, rotting rabbit…that’s simply an iconic horror image.
My favorite Polanski. As disorienting a work as is in the cinema.