(by Joel)
Cleo From 5 to 7, France, 1962, dir. Agnes Varda
Starring Corinne Marchand
Story: After a bad visit to a psychic, pop star Cleo Victoire (real name Florence) fears that her recent medical tests will offer a sentence of death. As she wanders the streets of Paris, flitting from rehearsals to sickbeds to restaurants to strolls through the park, the artifice of her persona and appearance is slowly stripped away, until only Florence is left to find out what fate has in store.
The visual touchstone of French New Wave cinema is a character wandering down the real-life streets of Paris, trailed by a handheld camera or preceded by a makeshift dolly: think Jean Seberg shouting “New York Herald-Tribune!”, Jean-Pierre Leaud playing truant, Bernadette Lafont pretending to ignore flirtatious overtures from a passing car, or Betty Schneider ducking into a cafe to discuss a mysterious disappearance with Jean-Luc Godard. This visual tradition traveled through time when Jules and Jim brought the New Wave spirit to prewar bohemia, parading down the period avenues and alleys, Truffaut’s big hit seemed to capture the restless motion of a whole generation at the dawn of a new, exciting era in art and life alike (although in its ending it contained foreshadowings of the frustrations, disappointments, and uncertainties to come).
Then “the walk” crossed the Channel in 1963 with Julie Christie’s daffy, free-spirited stroll through a Yorkshire town in Billy Liar, and it crossed the Atlantic when Liar‘s director John Schlesinger set Jon Voight and Dustin Hoffman loose in a downbeat, grimy New York – by then, the sixties had taken a darker turn. (In 1974, Louis Malle would turn the French “city-walking film” on its head: rather than follow one character with a moving camera, he fixed the camera in place, allowing it to glimpse into the lives of all the passerby who crossed its path.) But no film more perfectly captures or fully explores the potential of this method than Cleo From 5 to 7, Agnes Varda’s second feature and her first fictional film since 1955′s Le Pointe-Courte, a documentary-narrative hybrid, which preceded the New Wave.
Varda’s roots (and future) in documentary are well on display here. All the New Wave directors are fond of asides, but few go so far as Varda in not just observing their hero’s surroundings, but capturing a sense of reality unfolding in multiple directions on- and just off-screen. Nearly forty years before The Gleaners & I, Varda is already gathering up everything she can: a pedestrian’s mumbled anecdote here, the aftermath of an accident observed there, the hustle and bustle of city life – hectic noise and blurred visuals – everywhere. There’s even time for a comical short film in a cinema, starring Jean-Luc Godard, Jean-Claude Brialy, and Anna Karina (and Varda herself in a cameo as a street vendor) – though its pleasant artifice and static camera only serve to highlight the naturalism and sinuous grace of the film proper.
There’s another element which stands out from the naturalistic flow of images: Cleo herself, a pop singer faced with her own mortality and wrestling with the question of her own identity, perhaps for the first time in years. When we first meet her, she is immaculately dressed and made-up, her porcelain skin almost frustrating in its doll-like perfection, her hair elegantly coiffed so that even the tears running down her cheeks (at the sight of a Death-headed Tarot card) seem artificial. We wonder if there’s really a “there” there, and exposed to the inner monologues of her compatriots on the soundtrack (a bemused older female assistant/guardian calls her a ”child”), we realize these doubts are not ours alone.
Indeed, Cleo quickly flits from melodramatic self-pity to smug self-congratulation, as fans cower before her own celebrity. She theatrically asks her cab driver to shut off the radio when one of her songs comes over the airwaves; complaining about the quality of the recording, in reality she only wants to highlight the fact that she’s a star. Back at her gymnasium-sized home, she receives a phony visit from an older Romeo, and works on some material with a couple wisecracking songwriters, who seem both to revere her beauty and condescend towards her perceived stupidity. As she hangs from a monkey bar suspended from her ceiling, cloaked in a fur coat, we’re inclined to see her as silly and spoiled, but while singing one of the duo’s new tunes, Varda’s lens closing in on Cleo’s visage cloaked by a black background, the real emotions start to emerge.
It’s a kind of breakthrough, after which Cleo shocks us by tearing off her hair – a wig. Beneath her locks are still blonde but the cut is shorter, more casual, all mussed up at the moment. It’s the first revelation that we’ve been seeing only one part of Cleo – her public face – but instead of feeling more distanced from her (wondering what she’s been withholding), we realize that for her too, this is a (self-)discovery. As she wanders Paris alone, meeting up with friends, passing out of their company, discovering a potential soulmate in a soldier shipping out to Algeria later that night, she is wandering “in disguise.” But ironically that disguise is in fact her true self, the confused, sensitive, romantic Florence concealed beneath the layers of the rich, famous, phony Cleopatra Victoire.
The ending is ambivalent: Cleo discovers that she does in fact have cancer, but is casually informed that “two months of chemotherapy should take care of it” by her doctor (who, driving past his office in a car, seems to think she’s already been informed of the diagnosis). The revelation is a bit of a shock, a further reminder of Cleo’s fragility (and it adds an ominous undertow to her dispensing of the wig earlier in the film). True, it is also a relief: she isn’t necessarily going to die, unless the physician is just putting a smiley face on a grim prognosis. Yet somehow, this news is more disturbing than a simple “you will be dead in a week.”
Cleo’s morbid fantasies of martyrdom at least have a tinge of romance and unreality to them: suggesting someone melodramatically but beautifully wasting away in a lavish bed like Bette Davis in Dark Victory. Two months of chemo, on the other hand, is grimly real and carries the prospect of pain. The day’s pinpricks of reality will give way to all-out torrent of suffering, bodily and mentally exposed (Cleo is not even comfortable with the prospect of nudity, and we gather that this discomfort is metaphysical as well as physical). The process we have seen over the course of this evening (on the longest day of the year) is both a prologue and a microcosm of what she will go through as the treatment begins: the soul giving way (and hopefully emerging stronger) along with the body.
This time the “walk” is neither a lark nor an escape but a journey and a discovery – the external manifestation of an internal shift in consciousness. She may be Cleo at 5, but by 7 she’s Florence, and ready, with however much trepidation and ambivalence, to face the future.








“Varda’s roots (and future) in documentary are well on display here. All the New Wave directors are fond of asides, but few go so far as Varda in not just observing their hero’s surroundings, but capturing a sense of reality unfolding in multiple directions on- and just off-screen. Nearly forty years before The Gleaners & I, Varda is already gathering up everything she can: a pedestrian’s mumbled anecdote here, the aftermath of an accident observed there, the hustle and bustle of city life – hectic noise and blurred visuals – everywhere.”
Aye Joel! I am not one of the world’s biggest Agnes Varda fans, Joel, but for the most part I do think reasonably well of this film and VAGABOND. Consitent with this series you have again given your subject definitive treatment, and for those who know Varda or this film, they’d be foolish not to get over here and be further enlightened. Interesting that you broach Varda today, as I have a tentative screening tonight at 8:00 P.M. of a 2010 documentary by Lucy Walker titled WASTELAND, which is playing at the Inde Screen in Brooklyn. The current snow blizzard might cause a cancellation, but I am prepared to go under any circumstances. Ha! I bring this highly-praised film up on this thread because it purportedly bears some striking similarities to Varda’s (aforementioned) “The Gleeners and I,” a film that left me cold. Still, I’ve been assured they stand apart in a number of wats, and reactions may well be drastically different.
I completely concur with what you say here about CLEO’S conclusion. This was one film that I needed repeat viewings of before at least partially coming around to.
The blizzard’s gonna be brutal (it hasn’t really hit where I am in full-force yet but I’m supposed to work tomorrow so that should be…interesting). Bravo to you for braving the storm for the sake of cinema!!
Thanks Joel! But I never got to see the film, as I got stuck in the snow on some unplowed Brooklyn street near the Williamsburg Bridge, and didn’t get out until well after the film had started, courtesy of a shovel-carrying woman who claims you saw me from her window a block away. This was a scary, seedy street, with nothing but condemned factories and some seemingly abandoned cars. Needless to say I was on on the road for over five hours, and was lucky to get home in one piece. Driving conditions out there are treacherous with visibility about 20%. I am ashamed that I made some a foolhardy attempt. Utter insanity, and the worst kind of OCD.
But it makes for a good story! I’d say that that street might be the very one I walked many nights when I lived in Brooklyn, but that one’s near the Bushwick border and not so close to the Williamsburg Bridge. It did have a lot of abandoned factories and chop shops, as well as a drawbridge…
Luckily, I don’t have to work tomorrow after all. Hopefully I’ll find the time to relax, watch some movies, read some books, etc… I’ve already prepared a warm bath, so excuse me a moment -
This is my favorite Varda film, and you’ve really done justice to it, Joel.
For someone who, through a long career, loved to paint herself as a “Surrealist,” she has tended to be remarkably prosaic, apparently taking a stand in quirky solicitude in lieu of breathtaking frisson. But I think in Cleo she really delivered—putting in motion a death spiral whereby the exposed sensibility presses a new-found desperate nausea into a gale of noisy posturing from acquaintances, to an upshot of premature burial in historical superficiality she so recently embraced. Only with the encounter of the Algeria-bound (death-touched) soldier does she discern traces of warmth and stability putting her in the situation of self-discovery as against self-revulsion. As such she is cued for being tested at a more rewarding timbre than panic.
Thanks, Jim. I still haven’t seen much Varda, though I very much like the little I’ve seen.
Joel, I’m a sucker for The Walk because I dig the documentary time-machine quality of those location-shot films. Cleo is one of those movies (A Woman is A Woman is another) that make me wish I could step through the screen into New-Wave Paris. From Varda I’ve only seen this and Vagabond, and while the latter is the stronger, Cleo is certainly more fun to watch.
Interesting, I’ll have to see Vagabond. Good point about The Walk, in a way it taps into one of the oldest draws and impulses of the cinema, the one connected with the Lumieres: to capture life in a moment, celebrating it in the present for its relevance and later on for its time-capsule quality (in this sense the more “dated” something is the more timeless it becomes). I’ve always felt that the two greatest appeals “the movies”/filmmaking have always had for me are imagination (creating a world and people and stories, or partaking in someone else’s creation of such) and observation (the home movie), basically the Melies effect and the Lumiere effect. I love how the New Wave, which its intricate plays between artifice and documentary, playfulness and realism draws on both traditions.
Cleo is my lover, and none of you can take her from me.
Glad to hear she made it through the chemo ok…
Terrific essay Joel and a reminder to me that I really need to see this one again after only ever seeing it once before. Every point you bring up about this film, I remember, were almost exactly the same as the moments I found so interesting about this film when I saw back then.
Oh well, I’m off to NETFLIX….
I got to see this on the big screen about 4 years ago, during that great Janus Films festival in NYC. I wonder if Sam was there too…
I hope this Matinee series continues after the New Year. In terms of quality of writing it’s among the best this site has ever offered up. I see this essay is no different.
Thanks, Frank, but the last entry will be next week. The best way to continue it is to keep exploring the movements it discusses – I know I will be…
I’ve never seen any of Varda’s work, but this well-done review has sparked my interest. Thanks, Joel, for the richly descriptive and rhythmic journey through this film. It’s as if you took me by the hand through Cleo’s streets of Paris.
Thanks, Pierre. If I can be the intro guide and then pass you into the seasoned hands of Varda for the rest of your tour, then I’ve done my job!