by Sam Juliano
Note: This is the sixth entry in an ongoing series that honors creative bloggers who have really made a difference, raising the bar for quality and productivity on the cultural front.
Renowned film critic Roger Ebert, in assessing “Ferdy on Films” declared “You put a lot of love into your blog,” while appreciative fellow blogger Daniel Getahun opined: “I feel like commenting here in the presence of greatness.” Indeed, both observations inform the attraction and worth of the long-running site, based in Chicago and founded by a mid-50′s freelance writer and editor named Marilyn Ferdinand (who happens to double as an impassioned cineaste and film preservation champion.) Ms. Ferdinand, who holds a B.A. from Lyola University of Chicago is a well-traveled culture maven, with a taste for vegan food preparation, classical music and gardening, but beyond these innocuous interests, she’s a tireless crusader for artistic purity and social justice. Whether she is discussing the rescue of a long-lost silent film, the sadness surrounding a death caused by prejudice, or the outrageous incarceration of an outspoken film director of a third-world country, Ms. Ferdinand is gloriously opinionated and guided by a strong underpinning of morality, human rights and the preservation of our national heritage. Hence, her film reviews invariably go much further than just evaluating a work’s elemental value, but actually project her uncompromising views on politics, philosophy and femisnism, while maintaining an equilibrium in expressing certain principles that underline her world-view and an abiding adherence to what she feels will ultimately reform failings in the system.
The Windy City native, who is married to Shane Truax, is at the height of her erudition and persuasiveness when discussing gender issues, but her extraordinary work as a film critic is arguably as imperative, and adorned with a marked talent for descriptive writing. Her spectacular review of Ken Russell’s The Devils, which was informed by a life-long infatuation with the director’s work, is matched by her soulful piece on Leo McCarey’s wrenching American masterpiece, Make Way For Tomorrow, where she emotionally admits in the essay’s comment section that “she was never moved as much by any film in her life” and by her incomparable coverage of festivals, where she regularly attends just about every feature offered, and subsequently of penning a high-quality review at her site within a few days or even hours afterwards. In 2010, her coverage of the Chicago International Film Festival (CIFF) was the envy of bloggers everywhere, as she got the jump on the latest features by masters such as Kiarostami and Weerasethakul, and some critically-praised documentaries like Lucy Walker’s Wasteland. Indeed, the documentary feature is as specialized a form for Ferdinand, as is her admirably chronic attention to the silent era. The documentary, in fact, often encompasses and constitutes for the erstwhile revisionist, a platform to segue in the ‘call for action” that is often the underlining motive for a number of filmmakers.
Sporting a name that harkens back to Bronte’s England, Heath, who is currently persuing a B.A. at the Australian University of New England, currently resides in the town of Lithgow in New South Wales, (which in the words of the writer “is on the opposite side of the Blue Mountains from the city of Sydney, but still connected to it by rail,”) is an astonishingly prolific writer, who at full-throttle provides a stream of essays for “Ferdy-on-Films,” while simultaneously stocking his two solo sites, “This Island Rod” and “English One-o-Worst” with commeasurable prowess. The latter archive reflects the author’s long afffinity for English literature, and like his film work, demonstrates a remarkable command of the subjects under scrutiny. While Heath’s online movie admirers are often seduced by his incomparable and equalitarian examination of the works from psychological, philosophical, sociological, political and purely aesthetic angles, others are open-mouthed at his uncanny ability to peel away the gauze with exeeding erudition and colloquial ornamentation that stands among the best writing anywhere, including that in the professional ranks. Either way, fifteen minutes spent with Roderick Heath provides a single-session university course with the film under analysis with a fair-minded and ever-enlightening discussion of it’s artistic worth and in occasional instances compelling evidence and opinion to warrant it’s dismissal. At the end of the day there are few, if any writers out there, who can visualize as film as vividly as Heath, nor can summarize it with such style nor illuminate it with such an arsenal of references and sustained perspicacity. Heath has authored eight novels, most of which he regards as “apprentice work,” but felt anything but during composition, and he categorizes Claudia, written when he was 25, as one fully deserving of a re-write. he is presently working on a series of supernatural-adventure novels with the over-arching title The Blue Magus.
With pride, Marilyn Ferdinand talks of her involvement with film preservation, and “For the Love of Film” which she asserts unequivocably is the “standout event” during the five-year tenure of “Ferdy-on-Films.” She rightly takes note of the fact that she helped save two films and received screen credit for it. Her association with Greg Ferrara and the Self-Styled Siren, Farren Smith, has morphed into lasting friendships. Ferdinand credits the latter with setting the seed for raising money, while of Ferrara she states affectionately: “Greg is a very creative person who makes short films, writes music, and creates blog banners that are always a lot of fun. He even created a moving, dancing banner for my dance blogothon, Invitation to the Dance Movie Blogothon.” But in the end it’s the around-the-world chemistry that unites Sydney with Chicago, combines trenchant realism with poetic lyricism and a generational diversity that has allowed for such an amazing compatibility and such impressive production. When asked what the secret was to the enduring association, Ferdinand points to a relationship nurtured by far more than internet cameraderie: “I’ve been to Australia to see him and his parents, and we spent some significant face time together one summer when he came to the U.S., so we’re not just internet-only buddies.” At a time when blogsites and some internet relationships are as fleeting as the theatrical duration of the latest multiplex hit, Marilyn Ferdinand and Roderick Heath have proven with remarkable staying power how both can achive full fruition through serious talent and affectionate regard.
The following on-line interview was conducted two weeks ago with Ms Ferdinand and Mr. Heath by e mail. Questions and responses are printed, with Ms. Ferdinand’s appearing first:
When did you launch Ferdy on Films?
I launched it in December 2005. We’ve been going for five years, which makes us one of the older film sites out there.
What motivated you to become involved with a website?
I had been part of film discussion board that had a thread for movie reviews. I wrote several reviews – in fact, the first reviews on FonF are copied and pasted from that board – but they generated very little comment, I couldn’t post them myself (the moderator had to), and I couldn’t include graphics. So, I thought I’d try my hand at a blog.
When did Roderick Heath come on board, and what motivated you to take him as a site partner apart from his fantastic writing skills?
Rod started posting on FonF a mere month after I launched the blog at my invitation. He was also a member of that film discussion board. He and I had developed a rapport on the board and were much more deeply engaged in looking at films closely than most of the other participants. Our tastes and approach are similar but also complementary, so we cover a lot more ground together than I could ever do alone.
What is your history in regards to film preservation, and as to your close friendship with Greg Ferrara?
I don’t have a specific “history” with regard to film preservation. I’ve loved silent films since I was a girl and became aware much later of our endangered heritage after seeing restored films at theatres and on DVD. I decided to ask people to donate to the National Film Preservation Foundation when my birthday was announced on Facebook instead of sending me little messages, and Farran Smith Nehme, The Self-Styled Siren, commented that she had always dreamed of raising money for film preservation. I’m the kind of person who hears a good idea and decides to do something about it. She and I cooked up “For the Love of Film: The Film Preservation Blogathon” to raise money for NFPF, and we held it last February. We raised $30,000 in donations and matching funds and paid for the restoration and preservation of two short films from 1912, The Sergeant and The Better Man.
Greg is well known in the blogosphere from his Cinema Styles blog, which I started reading a while back, when he was still using his Jonathan Lapper pseudonym. We and a few of other bloggers became friendly via our exchanges on each other’s blogs and formed a loose “posse.” Greg is a very creative person who makes short films, writes music, and creates blog banners that are always a lot of fun. He even created a moving, dancing banner for my dance blogathon, “Invitation to the Dance Movie Blogathon.” I tapped him to create banners for “For the Love of Film,” and he’s done a great job. He created cool new banners for the second edition of the blogathon, to benefit the Film Noir Foundation. We finally met when I went to Washington DC at the beginning of December.
What specifically are your experiences with Roger Ebert, a fellow Chicago native?
Not as much as I’d like. I invited him to my birthday party this summer, but he had his 50th class reunion to go to. I see him at screenings and have attended his Ebertfest since its inception. I talk with him a bit by e-mail and when I see him at Ebertfest, but we aren’t really friends. The most important interaction I have with Roger is that I’ve been a fan from his earliest days in TV and in the Chicago Sun-Times. He’s been a model for what I do on my blog, and I’ve been grateful for his support of me, the blog, and the film preservation blogathon.
What more than anything else has inspired you to stay the course with Ferdy on Films?
It’s a wonderful creative outlet for me. I have met a lot of great people in the course of doing the blog, and the film preservation blogathon would not have been possible had I packed up and gone. I enjoy working with Rod, and of course, I love seeing films. I get a little tired sometimes—I have a full life and full-time job—but this is a special labor of love for me.
What have been your film festival experiences over the years?
I’ve attended the Chicago International Film Festival for many years, and have had press credentials to cover it since 2006. I’ve been to some smaller festivals in Chicago and while on vacation (Big Island Film Festival in Hawaii, the Italian Film Festival in Canberra, Australia). My trip to the Taos Talking Picture Festival resulted in bringing Mexican director Francisco Athié’s psychedelic death film Vera (2003) to Facets Multimedia in Chicago, where it got its only commercial run; Facets also released the film on DVD, so I’ve done my part for new cinema, too.
Educational background from grammar school, to high school to college to graduate school?
Viola H. Nelson Elementary (Morton Grove, IL), East Maine Junior High (Niles, IL), Maine East High (Park Ridge, IL), Loyola University of Chicago (BA). Claims to fame: Hillary Rodham Clinton, Harrison Ford, and Carrie Snodgrass attended my high school, and Bob Newhart attended my university.
Describe your work experience.
Ad sales, Chicago Tribune; writer and editor for the infamous World Book Encyclopedia; editor Journal of Healthcare Materiel Management; editor Healthcare Financial Management; editor at large for the Association of Rehabilitation Nurses and the Association of Pediatric Oncology Nurses; editor Our Children (National PTA); lots of freelance for feature magazines and newspapers, medical device manufacturers, and healthcare consultants.
What kinds of films (and/or directors) have impressed you the most?
My favorite directors are Stanley Kubrick, for his incredible visual sensibility and engagement with the macro questions of life, and Luis Buñuel, for his sense of humor and his engagement with the micro questions, particularly his relationship with dreams and the unconscious.
I champion films from underexplored regions of human experience—including the female experience as told by women—because I don’t think I or my culture “know it all” about life, and we certainly have plenty to learn. I’m a particular fan of Balkan cinema for a number of reasons, both visual and narrative, but mostly because this region of the world has undergone tremendous hardship over the centuries and has found a way through its cinema to comment on and come to terms with its tragic past, criticize its flawed moves toward progress, and find some optimism in the face of adversity that isn’t founded in denial.
What is your opinion of the Oscars, critics’ awards, and of making “lists” in general?
I don’t make lists. My lists would have films that virtually no one has seen and virtually no movies everyone has seen. The Oscars are boring to watch and good for advertising Hollywood and its stars; they rarely reward true excellence, though now and again they blunder into a good choice. Many critics’ awards suffer from the same Hollywood- centric myopia as the Oscars. I am part of an awarding critics organization (the Online Film Critics Society), and almost all the screeners I’m being sent are for mainstream Hollywood products or big-little indies. I don’t have any foreign-language films coming my way.
What are your proudest moments at Ferdy on Films?
Obviously, the standout event was “For the Love of Film.” How many bloggers can say they helped to save two films and got screen credit for it! But I also have found it gratifying to give some exposure to films that deserve it and could change things for some people. For example, I reviewed a little documentary called Windfall, which details the unadvertised dangers of wind power, and made it possible for a community in Wisconsin faced with a choice about installing wind turbines to get some of the facts by helping them get a copy of the film. I also like it when directors and other film industry people show up to comment. It’s happened fairly frequently, and I like that they know their films, or their parent’s films, have been noticed and commented upon.
What is the secret of the amazing chemistry you’ve maintained with Roderick Heath?
Distance? Joke, Rod, joke. I don’t know exactly. We’re longtime friends, and we share a burning interest in film and for not suffering fools gladly. I’ve been to Australia to see him and his parents, and we spent some significant face time together one summer when he came to the U.S., so we’re not just Internet-only buddies.
Travel? Favorite type of music? Opera or Classical exposure and affinity?
I used to travel a lot. I’ve been to the British Isles, various parts of Europe, South Africa, Australia, the British Virgin Islands, and all over the U.S. and Canada. My favorite spot to vacation is Hawaii, and I may retire there. I love swimming, the ocean, the flowers, etc. And I love Hawaiian music. I like all kinds of music, though you’ll catch me listening to our classical radio station more than anything else, and I particularly like Lauridsen, Mozart, Monteverdi, Bach, and Piazzola. I love most kinds of Latin music, and a local radio show called “Mambo Express” is a favorite. World roots music is my favorite nonclassical type of music, anything from Irish jigs to South African township jazz.
Other hobbies like gardening, and special skills?
I’m a birdwatcher, and I love to cook. My husband has a green thumb, so this year, we rented a plot in a community garden and grew our own tomatoes, leeks, kale, peppers, celery, and squash. We’re planning to expand our plantings next spring. I used to dance (so-so) and be pretty good at American Sign Language, and Greg Ferrara will attest that I can read near-illegible handwriting pretty well.
Family life if you wish to discuss it?
Shane Truax is my late-in-life love and the caretaker of our two tanks of fish. We both take turns spoiling our cat Fluffy, an old Silver Persian we adopted from his daughter. Shane also shares his three grandchildren with me.
Long-term goals for Ferdy on Films?
Just keep on going until it feels like time to quit.
What do you feel are the best essays you have ever written at the site? What are Rod’s best writings, and what are his strengths?
I think my essay on gender attitudes in I Spit on Your Grave and A Question of Silence was good, but the comments it engendered were even better. I like my essay on The Quiet Man because I was able to really get into the deep Irishness of the film and rebut those who hate the sentimentality of the film. I also think my review of Tuesday, After Christmas was good because it helped me pull together my knowledge of Romanian cinema in a pretty satisfying way. My essay on Studs Terkel at his passing and the impeachment of former Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich were my favorites dealing with my home town.
Rod’s essays always blow me away because of the breadth of knowledge he brings to each of them. His grasp of cinema and the references, one film to another, are unbelievably assured, and he really brings a scholarly heft to his writing. His essay on the British Free Cinema is the one that has stuck with me the longest and been the most helpful. On the review front, his overview of Martin Scorsese’s oeuvre is a tour de force, and his recent review of Sofia Coppola’s Somewhere did what all his best essays do—crystallize what a particular director or performer is about.
Why would you say you and Rod are arguably the finest one-two punch on the internet today among film writers?
Thanks for the compliment. I think others do a pretty good job at the one-two, even three-four-and-five with Wonders in the Dark. What Rod and I bring to the table is that I’m a middle-aged American woman, and he’s an in-his-prime Australian male. We have distinct perspectives and areas of interest, but we both love a good movie and want to tell others why.
Questions/Responses to and from Roderick Heath:
1. When did you begin your association with Ferdy-on-Films?
My association with Ferdy on Films began before there was a Ferdy on Films. Marilyn and I had long been friends, and our friendship was based initially in movies. We had conversed regularly on the New York Times’ old film forums. When she came for a holiday in Australia in 2002, my family put her up for a few days. The following year I visited the US and stayed at her place in Chicago for several months. During my visit, inevitably, movie-going was one of our regular pastimes. Marilyn was lucky enough to procure tickets for a charity preview screening of Sofia Coppola’s Lost In Translation, which we enjoyed tremendously, and more importantly, in what was a first for both of us, we had a scoop on our hands – the chance to write about a terrific film virtually no-one else had seen. We each penned a joint review which, with arrangement with the forum moderator, was then posted together on the Readers’ Opinions page of the New York Times – the first review of that film to appear in the newspaper. That was quite a coup for us and a fine capstone to some of the best months of my life.
After I returned to Australia, the NYT drove away most of its forum contributors with a newly restrictive regime of what we could and couldn’t talk about. Some members had already started their own film websites. Now a large number grouped together to start a new forum. But Marilyn and I were rarely happy in that closed-circuit environment. I had been writing essayistic pieces for some time for various forums, and had an expansive piece on The Leopard Man and Le Corbeau was published in the Bright Lights Film Journal in June 2005. Marilyn had been doing some film journalism too, and resolved to start a website where she could showcase the pieces she wrote on independent, classic, and international filmmaking, of which she’s long been a connoisseur, and asked me if I wanted to contribute. Marilyn’s initial posts for Ferdy on Films were of course her usual excellent stuff, but snappy and very much to the point. Imagine her reaction when I lumped her with my 3,436 word piece on Ridley Scott’s The Duellists, roughly as long as the six initial pieces she’d written for the site put together, and she insisted I hack it down. Once that was done, it appeared on the site which only a month old.
2. What to you attribute to the on-line chemistry with Marilyn Ferdinand?
Well, as I said once back when we wrote up our 500 Posts piece, I think it’s because although we often disagree about specific things, we share a similar worldview and a passion for art that’s demanding as well as infectious. We’re both very left of centre politically, if sometimes in a differing fashion, and share the sensibility that no matter how serious things are, there’s always time for a laugh, and conversely that everything frivolous contains something worthy of serious attention.
3. Educational background?
Peculiar. I was a plain old high school student until 1996, and then I set on a long self-education in screenwriting which culminated in my squeezing a small but prestigious grant out of the Australian Film Commission in 1999. I was accepted as a writing student into the Australian Film Television and Radio School in 2000, but finished up not attending, largely because by then I already knew how to write. I started studying for the Bachelor of Arts that I am currently pursuing in 2008 through the Australian University of New England.
4. How have you effected and sustprolific writing ained your trademark habit?
Not having better things to do is a very large part of it. I forced myself to learn the art of regular writing years ago, so the act of sitting down and writing is rarely too difficult for me. Learning to take a break, in fact, has been harder.
5. Traditionally what is your favorite genre in film to write about?
For better or worse, I’ve put a lot of time and effort over the years into writing seriously about the cinefantastique, especially horror. But I don’t really think of these as favourite subjects, especially compared to the sprawl of horror film bloggers out there, whose omnivorous affection for the genre is far beyond mine. I do love watching many films in the horror, fantasy, and sci-fi genres, and that inevitably translates into a wealth of potential commentary, especially considering that such generic stuff doesn’t get written about with sufficient depth and engagement, even by those myriad blogs. And I think that’s perhaps what I like writing about with a particular zest: under-examined and under-appreciated movies.
6. Has your command and interest in English literature been lifelong?
Pretty much, yeah. Not just English literature either (although, yes, in English), for I’ve read quite a bit of American, Russian, French, Japanese, Australian, and German literature too over the years. I recall devoting a long chunk of my teenage years to reading War and Peace and was certainly the only student in my high school you could catch reading Nausea in the schoolyard. I often think of my life actually in terms of the different books I’ve read at different ages – 16? Crime and Punishment. 20? The Sun Also Rises. 22? The Magic Mountain. 25? The Charterhouse of Parma. 30? Wuthering Heights.
7. Who are your favorite film directors and/or film?
That’s one of those question I might have answered far more easily when I was eighteen than now. I don’t tend to have specific favourites, because many films offer such entirely different pleasures. Over the years I’ve watched the likes of The Duellists, Le Corbeau, Jaws, The Big Sleep, Operazione Paura, Levres de Sang, Kill Bill, and The Red Shoes so many times I can almost recite them in my sleep. I can, I guess, honestly state that my love for the likes of David Lean, Stanley Kubrick, Alfred Hitchcock, Akira Kurosawa, Martin Scorsese, Quentin Tarantino, John Ford, Sergio Leone, Terence Fisher, Mario Bava, Steven Spielberg, Orson Welles, Luchino Visconti, Powell and Pressburger and big bunch more have remained pretty well constant.
8. Who are your favorite authors?
Favourite authors might be a bit misleading in the sense that I’ve not always read a lot of books by writers whose work I nonetheless admire beyond measure and whose work I thumb through when trying to get the right key. Thomas Mann changed my outlook with The Magic Mountain and made me decide to pursue authorship as an ambition rather than filmmaking, but I’ve still never gotten around to reading another of his books; Joyce, likewise, after Ulysses, which had a very, very good effect on my brain and a very, very bad one on my writing. Doris Lessing’s The Golden Notebook was a brilliantly riling read. James Baldwin’s Giovanni’s Room and Another Country. Yasunari Kawabata. Stendhal. Hemingway, natch, Dostoievsky, Henry Miller, and Norman Mailer’s been one of favourites for a long time, much more so than Saul Bellow, whose spongy books I always have trouble finishing. Lest that roster seem a bit too testosterone-y, Shirley Hazzard, Pat Barker, the Brontes, George Eliot, Anais Nin. Graeme Greene for good non-fuss prose. Alistair Maclean, funnily enough, for strong descriptive writing. Dashiell Hammett and Raymond Chandler and Eric Ambler are perennial loves, M. R. James and Sheridan LeFanu, Frank Herbert and H.G. Wells and Conan Doyle. I could go on; I won’t.
9. Please explain the advent of ‘This Island Rod’ and ‘English One-o-Worst.’
I started This Island Rod when I decided to put all of the short and thumbnail reviews I had written for various forums and websites over the years in one place, and also, as Ferdy On Films was becoming more popular, I wanted it to be a kind of annex full of quick notes on films I didn’t have time to write up in the lengthier fashion. It’s slowly evolved into a more ambitious site, but that’s still the basic brief. English One-O-Worst was started for a similar reason, so that some academic writing I had done might not be lost, although that site is much more an authentic labour of love.
10. Have you ever (or are you currently in fact) written or writing a novel?
I have written eight novels, most of which I would regard as apprentice work, although I will admit they didn’t feel like that at the time. The first one that I’d feel comfortable calling a real novel at this point is “Claudia”, which I wrote when I was 25, and probably ought to have rewritten. I am currently working on a series of supernatural-adventure novels with the over-arching title “The Blue Magus”; I’ve written the first three books in the series, and after underwhelming efforts to interest agents I’m completely retooling the first part.
11. Where specifically do you reside in Australia?
I live in the town of Lithgow, New South Wales, which is on the opposite side of the Blue Mountains from the city of Sydney but still connected to it by rail, which makes it, I suppose, a far-flung satellite. It’s a town of about 16,000 people and used to be a mining town, but that industry waned in the ‘80s and barely ever came back, so now it’s more an odd mixture of semi-rural gentility with many aspects of a working class slum.
12. What is your long-term aim?
Do I have to answer this? My neck’s sticking out far enough already.
13. Present or past employment and special skills aside from writing?
I’ve never had a standard job, really, although I’ve done a few odd things over the years. Fence painting, cleaning, handyman renovations, audio tape transcriptions…







Marilyn is one of the finest writers on film I have come across on the internet (I am less acquainted with Roderick, I’m afraid), not only in her reviews at ‘Ferdy on Films’ but in the comments she leaves in discussions at other sites (her comments on Black Swan at the HOUSE NEXT DOOR stand out from the crowd).
Marilyn is always perspicacious and eloquent, qualities film criticism needs more of.
Stephen – Thanks so much! I’m blushing.
You have sized Marilyn up definitively here Stephen, and these are indeed the qualities that cause Ferdy-on-Films addiction for cinephiles who want some cream in their coffee.
great site
happy new year
Thanks for stopping in Roy! You chose the perfect thread to make your first appearance here! A very healthy and prosperous New Year’s to you and yours!
I have been watching FERDY ON FILM for quite some time now. I don’t comment much as I feel that what I’m reading there is pretty well concluded and wrapped up.
I did, however, hash out a few words a few weeks back when I read a review that was posted on CLOVERFIELD and was surprised by the good graces and wonderfully spirited words of Marilyn that accompanied her response to me. I
I immediately sought out CLOVERFIELD, and was so happy and surprized that my perspective of that film matched Marilyns take almost verbatum.
Since that day, I hover over FERDY ON FILM an look forward to both her and Roderick’s take on all things pertain ing to film and literature and music. I was even more delighted to see that the site covered more than that and gave me other perspectives in subjects that went as far along as politics.
I don’t really comment as much as I’d like to on other sites (then again, I’m really always so busy hashing things out here with Sam and the gang that I don’t get much time), but I’d be lying if I said that I didn’t read through FERDY ON FILM regularly and often caught an ear-to-ear smile by what I was prerusing.
SAM has written a wonderful overview of the fine work and interests of these two wonderful people and I feel honored that I am able to say I know of them and love their stuff!!!!!
Dennis, feel free to chime in! We’re friendly.
Always coming in with the towering comment Dennis, and thanks exceedingly for everything you say. I do well remember that CLOVERFIELD discussion, and of your intricate and fecund views. Similarly you are quite right to bring up politics, which is a subject that Ms. Ferdinand discusses with glowing verve and conviction! The interview responses by both open up a world of fascinating admissions, befitting the distinguished status of these unique subjects.
And the other reason I love Marilyn so much?
She’s a huge supporter of my favorite director:
STANLEY KUBRICK!!!!!
We need to stick together!!!!
Dennis
Kubrickkrazy1@yahoo.com
Kubrick rules!!!!
Yes, he does!!!!
I just wish more people ould rally behind him as one of the ten greatest American directors a little more. Since his passing I have felt the movies to be void of truly astounding experiences and lacking in the kind of visual audacity that was a hallmark of his work.
I am, and I’m proud to say this, one of the few that think Stanley was responsible for a perfect track record…
He made 12 fims feature films in his career and, in my mind, 12 masterpieces…
Kubrick needs more fans? He’s generally considered most average film fans (and many serious film fans) favorites… He’s many things, but neglected he is not.
Yes, but he made 13, Dennis. And it certainly wasn’t a perfect record. Fear and Desire wass a typically bad debut film, Killer’s Kiss an occasionally interesting but generally mediocre noir and Lolita a mixed bag at best. Then there’s Full Metal Jacket, superb for the first 40 minutes of marine boot camp, rather forgettable after.
Oh yes, you are correct Allan… specifically on LOLITA, I mean A. Lyne’s version is quite a bit better, and more faithful to the book (thematically and conceptually).
Jamie and Allan, with LOLITA I am not on the same page, as I found it far more effective in a humorous vein largely because of Sellers. That opening murder scene was one of the single greatest sequences in all of Kubrick. By I respect the divergence of opinion.
yes, Sam I agree Sellers is largely successful in the film, but when he’s only in about 15 minutes of screen time you’d understand why ‘mixed bag’ would be an apt description.
Sam, just curious do you like the Lyne version?
Jamie, it is indeed the height of coincidence that you mention that, as I screened LOLITA on New Year’s Eve before the Honeymooner marathon that commenced at midnight, at the request of site commenters Andrei Scala and Bobby McCartney. We had a very interesting conversation that eventually moved into a comparison of the two versions. It appears I am the only one of the three who values the Lynn rather highly, though it’s a difficult matter to decide which film is better. I grew up with the Kubrick, so I guess I’m prejudice, but I’ve always given the Lynn some serious attention. That’s another that’s overdue for another viewing I must say.
I am convinced that if you striped someone of all knowledge then had them read the book and watch the Kubrick version (therefore at this point they’d had no preconceived knowledge of who Kubrick was/is) the vast majority wouldn’t rank the Kubrick at all. I’m convinced it’s all institutional thinking about Kubrick, a complete inability for some to question the genius. But it’s ok to admit that his sensibilities to not mesh with Nabokov’s intent in that subject.
Saying his LOLITA is poor is hardly a knock, as he still has 10 or so masterpieces or near masterpieces in 13 films. That’s a HELL of a batting average to have.
Nabokov actually wrote the screenplay for Lolita so a lot of the shifts in tone and approach from the book were actually his idea, not Kubrick’s, which always surprises people (it surprised me when I found out)! I quite like the film as a kind of tangential spin-off of the novel; by not trying to mimic the book’s quality but rather achieve a success all its own, I think it works (and it’s nice that the novelist himself knew what was needed, and did not slavishly commit himself to reproducing the source material; on second that, perhaps only the novelist could do this!) It’s also fun to see a “looser” Kubrick at work and play – usually with him even a comedy like Dr. Strangelove is intense and tight as a drum.
Fair enough Jamie. I won’t poison this particular thread with a Kubrick “list” as I respect Marilyn and Rod too much to start clouding this thread with such nonsense, but I will say that LOLITA isn’t one of my absolute favorite Kubricks.
Do we know what Nabakov thought of Kubrick’s film?
While it is accurate to say that Nabokov wrote the screenplay, when one actually reads that Nabokov screenplay you realize how different it still is from the Kubrick’s film. Nabokov approached writing the script with the already altered plot at Kubrick’s request, and still managed to pen a brilliant 400 page script, that was published for all to read and compare. Per wiki: “The screenplay is credited to Nabokov, although very little of what he provided (later published in a shortened version) was used. Nabokov remained polite about the film in public, but in a 1962 interview, before seeing the film, commented that it may turn out to be “the swerves of a scenic drive as perceived by the horizontal passenger of an ambulance”"
I agree that it is a ‘looser’ Kubrick, but I feel that the book has quite an undercurrent underneath that, when played loose, isn’t adapted properly. It’s an interesting film to consider in terms of Kubrick’s canon, but not an interesting (or even good) one when considering the brilliance that is Vladimir Nabokov.
For a very interesting piece on the LOLITA story, and the mythos of the two films in question, jump here: http://blogcritics.org/books/article/book-review-chasing-lolita-how-popular/
This fascinating portrait of these two sits among the best work you’ve ever done at the site Sam. The writing is incredible, and the interview rich and smartly put together. I always find it amazing how the internet can lead to close personal friendships. Seems these two are a perfect pairing. I liked the comment “Arbogast” made at Ferdy’s site!
Thanks Frank, but the writing is only a replication of the richness associated with these two amazing people. THEY are the subject here, and from the breath of the comments their work and personalities have resonated with many.
Yes, Arboghast is a blast! Ha!
Great piece, great interview. Love the two of them to death.
(Cough, choke.) You may remove your hands from my throat now, Ryan. I’m not really a huggie kind of person.
I said I loved you… TO DEATH!!!!!
I just got home on my lunch break and I just want to say thanks very much Ryan for that! I’ve known for quite some time of the deep mutual affection shared by you, Marilyn and Rod, and it’s really one of the marvels of internet bonding. I have never had much time for twitter, but I know your relationship has matured there as well as with the blogsite conviviality. I can well see why this amazing relationship has developed, and have seen the analytical fruits that have blossomed. And I must say Marilyn and Rod have exceedingly good taste in regards to you!
i wish to thank you for your insight into these two complex yet warmly touchable people. Few persons have walked away from a read on their site without taking something with them. This is the pleasure I gather from all the comments here. You have approached this interview with the same familiarity many of us feel toward them and thereby making us feel as though we have just sat down with a cup of tea/coffee with them. I couldn’t ask for more…thank you for your kindness. Shane
“Few persons have walked away from a read on their site without taking something with them.”
Ain’t that the truth Shane! Of course you know this better than anyone, and I know you’d enjoyed your share of tea and coffee with them. The interview comments by Marilyn and Roderick certainly speak for themselves.
Many thanks to you my friend!
I read almost all my reviews aloud to Shane to see if what I’m saying makes sense (and I find typos that way!). He’s really a wonderful advisor to me, and very patient.
Very impressive Sam, you continue to outdo yourself every time out. Your subjects are seriously accomplished people who appear to have brought online criticism to the highest level. I’m sorry to say I haven’t been over to their blogsite yet, but will soon.
That’s quite a tribute paid by Ebert!
Yes Frederick, the Ebert testimonial is something else, but it’s fully deserved. Check out Ferdy-on-Films. There is eternal enlightenment on display there!
I had the pleasure of taking Marilyn to lunch recently, here in D.C. and it was a delight to talk with her. She is as impassioned and eloquent in person as she is online. She and Rod are two extremely gifted writers who have enriched the cinematic blogosphere beyond measure.
Thanks, Greg. Your check is in the mail.
Thanks so much for adding that Greg. I can only hope to know these gifted people as well as you have, and in forging such a wonderful relationship online and in person!
I too enjoy frequenting ‘Ferdy-On-Films’, as it’s a true film lovers environment where everything from classic Hollywood, modern multi-plex, European art-film, to obscure cult share space side by side. I can’t say how often I’ve gone there and been pointed towards an old film I was unaware of, or something new that I should reconsider (Rod’s 2010 wrap up and given a few!). Nothing celebratory I’ll say here will accurately measure the sites greatness. Keep up the great work.
And I’ve also, in the last month or so, had the opportunity to meet Marilyn and Shane. Lovely people who reaffirm that obsessing over culture does matter, and makes one the better for it.
Though Marilyn, I did (finally) see CLOVERFIELD at your prodding… I don’t understand the affection for that one!
Jamie – It has been a pleasure to spend time with you, too, and thank you for your generous compliment.
Everything I think about Cloverfield is in the review, so I guess we’ll just have to disagree.
Oh I know, and that’s the thing I don’t disagree with many of your points in the review. It does seem to be a modern zeitgeist film… but I suppose as a young person whom that film is about I don’t connect to it. Or rather, I hope that’s not what my generation is up to.
It is interesting to think of modern films on these grounds, I’d need to pause to come up with others. You have any?
I recall naming THE GIRLFRIEND EXPERIENCE as one from last year, did you ever get to that one?
No Jamie, I haven’t seen it. I’m going to try to get my hands on it, though, at your suggestion.
I have found myself mulling over I’m Still Here as a zeitgeist film; it’s quite unpleasant, but it has all the touchstones for our times – godlike celebrity and the tabloid desire to tear down, Hollywood success as the death of the artist (both at home and abroad), the blurring of reality and fiction, reality TV and documenting of the mundane and sensational alike, the belief that success should come almost instantly, without paying one’s dues.
I saw a zeitgeist film of the 60s this weekend: Seconds. The rush to join the “hippie” California youth culture, jump into artistic expression, yet finding adjustment from a rule-bound society impossible to negotiate.
I had (somewhat) avoided I’M STILL HERE, hearing it not worth the time. You’ve prompted me to seek it out, I’ll watch it asap.
SECONDS is indeed an American zeitgeist film of the 60′s. I’ve always described it as a Sirk film, if Sirk made a Horror picture. (If you don’t consider his world Horrific I mean) So much of what we hear about the 60′s is all the flower hippie stuff, but with that is also Middle America’s reluctance to embrace those new values (as the rise of the religious Right attests too), to Middle America wanting to embrace these values but being unable to due to excessive cultural baggage the other way (the ‘you can’t teach an old dog new tricks’ idea you talk about in SECONDS). Along these lines Kazan’s film from 1969 THE ARRANGEMENT would make a great double bill with SECONDS (I omit the obvious FACE OF ANOTHER from Teshigahara), as would THE SWIMMER from 1968, THE GRADUATE, etc (man the 60′s really pumped out films like that).
Then I think Cassavettes took these ideas in HUSBANDS and blew them up forever, and it remains my favorite film of his career.
The mother of all interviews!
This is really the way to approach the valuable contributions of the blogging community. I don’t branch out enough to take advantage of such vital writing that you indicate goes much further than just summarizing a film. I like the wedding of talents and the international scope; it gives more meaningful perspective.
As a silent film lover myself, I’d be interested in knowing what films from that period or directors that Ms. Ferdinand holds in the utmost esteem.
Hi Peter! I have two favorite silent film stars – Colleen Moore and Rudolph Valentino. I think Charlie Chaplin was a giant as a director, composer, and actor. I’m in awe of a great many silent films, including The Wind, The Last Laugh, Broken Blossoms, A Fool There Was, The Adventures of Prince Achmed, The General and on and on. King Vidor, Marshall Neilan, Maurice Tourneur, Hitchcock, Fritz Lang are among my favorite directors of silents. This is really the tip of the iceberg for me.
Thanks for responding Ms. Ferdinand.
I have never seen “A Fool There Was” but all the others, yes. The Buster Keaton film is my favorite silent comedy, but then I always gave (sorry Sam) a slight edge to Keaton over Chaplin. Those are all great names; I even remember Hitchcock’s work on “Blackmail” which I saw years ago. I love the Fritz Langs too. Glad you didn’t mention “Cabinet of Dr. Caligari.” I could never make it all the way through with that one.
I also love a number of the De Mille silents.
Peter – I used to favor Keaton over Chaplin, but my taste has reversed with age. Maybe we just start to get a little more sentimental when the gray starts to come.
I’ll tell you this much Marilyn. I laughed at your reference to the “infamous” World Book Encyclopedia, for which you served as an editor. I grew up with that reference tool, and have many fond memories of using it after school in my local library. It was the preferred choice over the Brittanica and Compton’s because it was pleasing to look at, (attractive pictures and typography) and the design and writing was economical and uncluttered.
I know they started to have a lot of problems though in later years, despite years of faithful annual revisions.
I, too, love Marilyn and Roderick to death.
Aye Adam! You are another one with impeccable taste!
This is all a rouse, of course…”Marilyn Ferdinand” is one of Jonathan Rosenbaum’s many female aliases, and the pic at the top is clearly a photoshop forgery. But it’s fine fiction, all the same — quite vivid, too, particularly the details about the persian cat.
Anyway, great stuff, guys! It’s fantastic to hear the story behind one of the most consistently erudite and dead-on filmcrit sites around. I’ve had the privilege recently of getting acquainted with Marilyn…ur…Jonathan…face to face and no one is more worthy of the opportunity to tell her backstory.
hahahahahahahahaha Jon! You are the best!!!!!!!!!!!!
How nice to read this about you two!
Having seen your name pop up here for over a year now, I always forget (sorry) to look in more. I will finally link to your blog so I don’t forget to read your posts.
Seeming to have less time nowadays.
Nicely written Sam and Cheers to ya’ll!
Many thanks Michael! I know well you have been faithfully following all the writing, and I’m sure Marilyn and Rod will be most flattered. Happy New Year to you my friend!
A lovely and well-deserved tribute to two fine writers.
I had the pleasure of meeting Marilyn this past summer and participating in her birthday celebration at now sadly defunct Bank of America cinema. It was a thrill to be there, especially Marilyn was one of the earliest readers and commenters at my blog and was highly encouraging of my early efforts. I have the highest regard for her passion, her intelligence, and her continuing efforts to bring little known films to the fore.
As for Rod, I find his reviews brilliant and his breadth of knowlege of both film and literature are beyond impressive. His reviews have always given me a unique perspective, a different way to look at a film I thought I had made my mind up about.
That’s a wonderful story Pat, and I’ve followed a good deal of the great conversations between you and Marilyn at both FERDY-ON-FILMS and DOODAD KIND OF TOWN. I once even remember Marilyn and I had a mild parting of the ways on THE READER, which I liked more. But it was a fruitful dialogue as always. Terrific too that you and Marilyn met, and that the party was so memorable.
Happy New Year’s Pat!
Not I, Sam. It was Rod who reviewed “The Reader.”
Pat, thanks so much. I hope you’ll return to your blog with more regularity. You’re such a great writer and have wonderful insights about film to share.
Aglow with embarrassment, Roderick dashes for the back exit, after giving Sam Juliano a quick, grateful shake of the hand…
Come back please! The audience is still applauding!
Well, I’ve enjoyed this very much…
I remember first encountering the vividness of Marilyn’s descriptive but concise prose style in her many comments here and it reminded me Pauline Keal, but the without vindictiveness agenda and with real understanding and pleasure and love for the film she was talking about.
In the last couple of weeks, I popped over there from a link here, for a read of Houston’s excellent ‘Moby Dick’ and found myself going through the decades in enriched enjoyment.
And Rod’s superb article on ‘Ben Hur’ had be captivated. He even wrote about Nigel Kneale’s ‘The Stone Tape’, something most SF cinéastes should know about and usually don’t. He even has the same view of Classic ‘Dr Who’ versus the lousy new version as I do. Bravo!
I’ll be popping over there more often. Though I find myself so often in agreement with Marilyn and Rod – I hope I’ll be able to pipe in!
Bobby:
That’s quite an assessment, and who could argue? You’ve hit the nail on the head on every point, and it was a real pleasure and enrichment inreracting with these two talents. They are no doubt appreciative for all your praise.
On another note I will be getting to your long submission to the other thread tonight! Now that was really something! I have already been over to the Outer Limits site thanks to your heads-up, and will try to be regular there. I will also be getting to many of the others comments on the MMD this evening.
Many thanks.
Pauline Kael? Wow, I don’t know if I can live up to that assessment, but thanks for thinking it.
W00t. Do we have the post of the year already?! What a great article, one of the very best I’ve read at this site. And such terrific questions and answers, with humour to boot.
I love Ferdy on Films, but I must confess I’ve only been an accidental reader, reading reviews because I chanced upon them a Imdb (the review of PROBLEMA for instance) or through the MMD entries (Sam’s making me a lazy bum). The CIFF coverage has been phenomenal as mentioned and so were the other reviews that I’ve read at the place. And the film preservation blogathon has been the stuff of internet legend. Really commendable work. Just reminds me that I’ve to update my blogroll, again.
Way to go, Marilyn and Rodrick.
And Sam’s just pulled a David Frost here. *BOWS*
Cheers!
That’s one of the greatest of all compliments my friend, and it’s deeply appreciated. These were rich “subjects” and it was just a matter of putting the pieces together. I’m sure both Marilyn and Rod are immensely grateful for your exceeding kindness and appreciation.
You have always been in a class by yourself JAFB.
Thanks so much JAFB for the kind words. Accidental or not, I’m glad you read us and find some value in what we do.
Okay, I’ll join in the lovefest too…
For me, one needs to look no further than their “best of 2010″ posts to realize why Marilyn and Rod are vital reading. They include a ton of films that don’t get much play in the film blogs I read daily, and I appreciate that.
Just looking at the great reading I’ve found there recently, I’d note Marilyn’s posts on NAKED and BLACK SWAN and anything Rod ever writes about British horror/sci-fi (I think he did a Hammer Karnstein film not so long ago) and his older post on PICNIC AT HANGING ROCK, which I think is the best I’ve read on the film. Also, Marilyn’s set of comments at Jason/Ed’s discussion of BLACK SWAN had me thinking about the quality of the dancing scenes in the film, where before I pretty much glossed over them.
Anyways, hooray for the two of you
Troy, that PICNIC AT HANGING ROCK review that Rod penned is one of the greatest I’ve read online by anybody. If I were less informed, I might be tempted to suggest he had a leg up on a number of others because he’s Australian! Ha! But I know better. I just spent a few minutes attempting to link it here, but Ferdy-on-Films (like Wonders in the Dark) has a difficult search engine to navigate. But while I was over there I said “wooo-hooo!” when I saw that Marilyn has named my favorite film of 2010, (LOURDES) among her favorites, and I also discovered thanks to a past review of Rod’s that my still unpublished list (this coming Monday is planned) is again invalid until I come to terms with SAMSON AND DELILAH, which I have somehow inexplicably forgotten is a 2010 film (opened in USA theatres during that time, hence this is the year.)
Marilyn’s BLACK SWAN review and all her follow-up comments were superlative, I completely concur!
…………..your writing Sam, is simply amazing. It’s powerful, vivid and composed with a scholarly heft. It’s one of your greatest posts. The people you are examining are fascinating in their talent and in their chemistry. Their answers are honest and engaging. I am not surprised at all the fuss………..
Frank, it’s always a treat when you can stop in, and I much appreciate the flattering words, though of course it’s the two critics here who are to be commended the most by quite some distance! All the points you make here are quite right!
Sam,
I am late in getting around to reading this but you have done a superb job with the interview. I have admittedly been only an occasional visitor to Ferdy on Films but Marilyn’s comments here I am well familiar with and are always knowledgeable and interesting.
Thanks so much for that John!
Yes, Ferdy on Films is a place that’s given movie fans scholarly writing and refreshing ecclecticism, not to mention five years of dedication.
Hi! Sam Juliano, Allan, Marilyn, Roderick and WitD readers…
How very apropos…That you decided to take a look at Marilyn Ferdinand and Roderick Heath from over there at Ferdy-On-Films…
…especially, with the upcoming month of fund-raising that Marilyn plans to do when it comes to assisting author Eddie Muller, and The Film Noir Foundation.
What a very interesting, very informative interview too!…between you, Marilyn and Roderick. I think that Marilyn and Roderick, have a wonderful blog that is very ecliptic. Even though she changed her template last year…the substance is still the same.
Sam, I’am quite sure that you are going to have to add interviewer by your name to the WitD staff sidebar…Thanks for sharing!
DeeDee
Dee Dee: There is no interviewer to match you in every sense my friend, and as a long-time veteran of this aspect of blogging I very much appreciate your most valued of all opinions! This post went as well as it did because of the exceeding quality of not only ‘one’ person, by ‘two,’ and two equally stupendous writers at that. One living in Chicago, another in New South Wales, well the stage is set there for something special just based on setting alone.
And yes, you are astute to note the timeliness of the interview, what with the the Eddie Muller Noir Fundraiser around the corner. It does lend it a kind of urgency.
And as far as that fundraiser goes, you have been an inspiration right from the start my dear friend.
You know what I think?
I believe this vies with that piece you did last year about the greatest opera films as your magnum opus. Then there was that review of ‘From the House of the Dead to be considered, and maybe a dozen or so film and music reviews. But this is up there. I agree that it helped that you had willing and distinguished people to study. It seems that Ms. Ferdinand and Mr. Heath make from some interesting contrasts- one with an austere tone, the other comedic. It would be interesting to see both of them review the same film to see the differences more pronounced. I guess that’s what the comment sections are all about.
But after reading this, you get the feeling you have known these people right along.
David, I will be sending on your agreed-upon stipend for these remarks. So divine of you to recall Prokofiev and the opera flicks!
Marilyn Ferdinand and Roderick Heath are not cause to think of Ingmar Bergman and the Marx Brothers in the same vein. Marilyn could be witty and quite funny, and Rod can be quite solemn. I agree that their interview was uncompromising, and as a result you did get a vivid portrait of them.
Many thanks my friend!
Was I the austere one? Oh drat!
I am actually looking again at David’s comment and he wasn’t clear as to which of you was the most serious one! Ha! David, be more specific! Ha!
It´s been some days now and the applause is still not fading.I like to join as a late guest…in many ways.
I first noticed Ferdyonfilms in August by coincidence(another word for being bored and playing with google) without knowing anything about film blogs and nearly anything about blogs .This wasn´t any kind of forum ,fan site,far too funny for any kind of academic studies und very different from any reviews i´ve ever read, more some kind of essays or even film-related short stories…
Becoming extremly curious (that never changed) i started to look up the older posts as well.Slowly some part of me woke up from hibernation.I used to be film-obsessed but that was years ago and half-forgotten and it all came back now completely unexpected.
Next i started to pay attention to the comments and was surprised by their high level and the intelligence,knowledge and respect i found there.Many have added comments over the years while others were just passing by and i started to recognize their different voices. Because many were bloggers themselves i have not only discovered one new world but a lot of them ,like the one i am visiting now,connected with mouseclicks and friendship and with not much distinction between authors and readers.
For a while i was thinking of a way to express my respect and gratitude for Marilyn and Rod without sounding too much like the kind of admirer i supspect i already am. Sam ,you have done this better than i could do it.
The other way is perhaps a more practical one: Watching the films mentioned there and adding some useful comments to them.
Maren, that is quite a lovely tribute to Marilyn and Rod that you offer up here yourself, and many thanks for it!
You have sized up the situation quite well with both, and if you have indeed been ‘lurking’ you are aware of their unique chemistry and approach. At the end of the day the real appeal there is the quality of the writing and the scrutinying assessments, but politics and social concerns often find their rightful place in the presentations.
I’m sure both will find your comments here quite flattering!
Many thank to you for stopping in, and adding this formidable comment!
Thanks l lot Sam for understanding what i tried to communicate.
Shane Truax”Few persons have walked away from a read from their site without taking anything with them ” was a good point to start…wherever this will end.
“Lurking around” in the shadows…..definitely, but only with the best intentions!
Hello Marilyn
I’m new to ‘Ferdy on Film’ looking forward to seeing more. Good to know you’re still ‘in the frame’,