by Allan Fish
(France 1936 94m) not on DVD
Welcome to Our Home
p Arys Nissotti d Julien Duvivier w Charles Spaak, Julien Duvivier ph Jules Kruger, Marc Fessard ed Marthe Poncin m Maurice Yvain art Jacques Krauss
Jean Gabin (Jean), Charles Vanel (Charles), Raymond Aimos (Raymond, aka. ‘Tintin), Viviane Romance (Gina), Rafael Medina (Mario), Micheline Cheirel (Huguette), Charles Granval, Fernard Charpin (gendarme), Robert Lynen (René), Jacques Baumer (Monsieur Jubette), Raymond Cordy (l’ivrogne), Marcelle Géniat (grandmother),
One of the flagship films of the Popular Front of the mid thirties, like Renoir’s Le Crime de Monsieur Lange it captured the utopian mood of that movement in a nutshell. It’s not now as well regarded as the Renoir, and certainly not seen remotely as often. Like many Duvivier films of the period, it’s become unfashionable, marginalised in histories of the French cinema. Of course it’s political stuff, and it has been accused, not without some cause, of drifting a little too cosily into melodrama in its last half, and yet it’s a film that thoroughly satisfies in the watching and its faults are to be dwelt on retrospectively.
We begin at the Hotel King of England, little more than a glorified tenement building for the unemployed, where five men are drawn together through friendship and fate, as they held a tenth stake in a lottery ticket which pays up its million franc dividend. The five men thus have a 20,000FF prize each coming their way and they make individual plans. Jacques wants to go to Canada and travel, Raymond wants to go to the country, Charles to get a small wood workshop, Mario to marry his beloved Huguette. Then there’s Jean, who suggests a communal trust between the five where they pool resources to buy a plot of land on the Seine and build/renovate a dance hall. Things begin quite promisingly, but Jacques is soon gone, saying he still wants to travel, but really he loves Huguette and can’t bear to watch her with Mario. As if that’s not enough, Raymond falls fatally from the roof in an accident and, as piece de resistance, another wrecking ball appears on the horizon in the shape of Charles’ poisonous ex- Gina, a nude model with no desire for anything but herself and her needs.
In some ways the film could be seen as misogynistic, as the comradeship of the quintet is torn asunder by two women, and yet in many ways the method isn’t the thing, it’s the fact that people do drift apart. At one point early in the film, Charles, Jean and Mario refer to themselves as the Three Musketeers, and like Dumas’ inseparables, separation is inevitable as individual pride and destiny overrides the collective. Mario gets his Huguette, but it leaves Gina to drive a stake through the heart between Jean and the weak-minded Charles. In the end, an ideal is only as good as the men it holds together, and no bond is unbreakable because human beings are frail creatures. What’s more, brotherhood in poverty is easy, but when there’s money involved, all bets are off. That human frailty, it might be said, one of the reasons that the Popular Front itself was doomed to failure. Little wonder that Duvivier was so disturbed when a happy ending was filmed against his wishes (the sad version, only surviving from a German print with burnt in German subtitles, thankfully survives on some prints, including my own). Yet there’s no doubting that the first half, with essences of René Clair personified by the presence of Raymond Cordy, is the most joyful as it deals with dreams not realities. These “bums who look for work yet pray they don’t find any” are, in every sense of the word, comrades. And much of the credit for that must go to the playing of the cast. Gabin and Vanel are beyond perfect as the pair driven apart, Romance was never better as the sexy temptress with the soul of a leach and Aimos captures the spirit of the enterprise as Tintin, whose death appropriately foreshadows the imploding of the dream. What makes the film most memorable, though, and allows one to forgive the melodrama, is that it makes tangible the feeling of comradeship in a single smell, of wood shavings, of a fresh coat of paint, in the country air and the drifting waft of beef and onion stew on an open fire. Substitute for your own aroma of choice, we all have them.









“In some ways the film could be seen as misogynistic, as the comradeship of the quintet is torn asunder by two women, and yet in many ways the method isn’t the thing, it’s the fact that people do drift apart.”
Excellent point. As I suggested in a previous comment under another Duvivier film reviewed here last week, he’s an essential director in any serious exploration of world cinema. As you note here, it’s often underestimated or even devalued because of the political context.
Bonjour! Allan Fish…
I think that Monsieur Duvivier is quite frankly, in need Of a …how do we say…a box-set. The synopsis or your reviews are very well-written, very interesting and quite intriguing, but I have to ask myself…What is the point? Since the viewing public may never gain access to these films.
Merci, for sharing!
DeeDee
The viewing public needs to seek out, rather than wait for the mountain to come to Mohammed.
Allan Fish!
I’am not going to no…MOUNTAIN!
nor am I going to…MOHAMMED!
LOL!
DeeDee
Dee Dee –
There’s a copy of “La Belle Equipe” on i-offer. Possibly used. So….make an offer!
@ Hi! Mark S…
Thank-you, I will probably go over there to i-offer and bid on available copies Of the film “La Belle Equipe.”
@ Allan Fish…
I was just kidding around with you, with the posting Of my second comment…However, I truly do think that it’s kind Of a “shame” that film viewers have to seek or search for these (unknown) films.
When they should be readily available even though I know that isn’t being “realistic” expecting all films to be available on DVD…However, I will purchase a pick and a shovel and let the “digging” begin.
DeeDee
Allan, I’ve just seen this great film and was so glad to find your review in the archive. I think you are absolutely right to say that it is a film which thoroughly satisfies in the watching, especially with the original tragic ending which it has been working towards all through – with the building taking shape as the relationships fall apart. I can’t get enough of all those haunting long shots showing the trees and the river, the glimpses of a happiness which you just know isn’t going to last. (Gabin whispering at the end: “It was a wonderful idea, we had a wonderful idea…”
This should definitely be out on DVD or Blu-ray – surely a full restoration could get rid of those burnt-in German subtitles? (The subtitles quite intrigued me because, when Gabin says in French that he doesn’t love Gina any more, the German subtitle says ‘Lass mich zufrieden’ – ‘leave me in peace’ – so the subtitle is really referring to the expression on his face rather than his exact words.)
I was struck by the element of misogyny, but I actually think this is borne out more by the tagged-on happy ending where the friends merrily get rid of the interfering woman than it is by the original one, where all of them are flawed and their different personalities work together towards the messy conclusion – with Jean’s underlying violence and Charles’ weakness contributing just as much as Gina’s goading.