by John Greco
It began with an idea from Jim Jacobs who thought it would be cool to do a show with 1950′s rock and roll music. He mentioned it to his friend, and fellow amateur theater associate, Warren Casey. Both men had nine to five jobs, but Casey would soon lose his job, and to pass the time he began to write what would turn out to be the pajama party scene in the finished musical. The two men got together and worked on the book and some music, and then just like in the movies, they managed to put on a show. The venue was in Chicago, a small theater called Kingston Mines. It was a low budget production with cheap painted backdrops; the cast included an unknown Marilu Henner as Marty. The show itself was still evolving, a few of the songs were there from the beginning (Beauty School Dropout, Grease Lightnin’), others would be added later. Two New York producers saw the show and thought with a few changes, but keeping its rough edges intact, the show would make for an interesting Off-Broadway production.
In New York, songs were added but the show’s unpolished primitiveness was purposely preserved. “Grease,” like “Hair,” its rock musical predecessor, was not going to be a slick showy production. It’s values and look would be closer to Off-Off Broadway and the experimental theater of the 1960′s than with the traditional Broadway musicals it would eventually play alongside of like, “No, No Nanette” and “Sugar.”
“Grease” opened at the Off-Broadway Eden Theater on 2nd Avenue and 12th Street to mixed reviews in February 1972 playing for four months before moving to Broadway where it would run for eight years (it was the longest running Broadway play up to that point in time). The original cast included Barry Bostwick as Danny Zuko and Adrienne Barbeau as Rizzo. Future cast members included Jeff Conaway, Treat Williams and Patrick Swayze all playing Danny Zuko, Marilu Henner as Marty and John Travolta as Doody. Contrary to what many believe, John Travolta did not play Danny Zuko on Broadway.
The original 1972 musical was raw and unpolished, you hear it in the original Broadway Cast album; it purposely lacks the polish of the customary Broadway musical which is exactly what the creators and producers wanted. Their desire was to capture the feel of those early rock and roll records, the doo-wop sounds of the urban streets. Jacobs and Casey grew up in that environment, listened to those records back in Chicago and captured it perfectly, the language, the violence, the themes of teenage love, pregnancy, friendship and rebellion.
Hollywood came knocking in the guise of Allan Carr (Can’t Stop the Music, Where the Boys Are ’84) and Robert Stigwood (Stayin’ Alive, Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band). Anyone familiar with the work of either of these men would realize trouble was on the horizon. It was decided the book, and some of the music, for “Grease” was too rough edged, the language too vulgar, too much about city kids in Chicago, pregnancy and gang violence, and not suburban, white bread enough for general audiences, so Carr, who had a hand in adapting the play for the screen, softened up the storyline and softened up the character of Danny Zuko in particular. (1)
Having seen the original Broadway production a few years earlier, the movie version of “Grease” has always felt like a guilty pleasure. (2) It was clear the folks who made the film did not understand or did not care what the show was about; turning it into a pandering twisted aberration of 1950′s wistfulness. The film was released in 1978, while the hit Broadway show was still running strong.
In some ways, “Grease,” the movie is not much different than those Frankie Avalon/Annette Funicello Muscle Beach Blanket Bingo Party films that filled the screens in the early sixties. All were pure Hollywood fantasy of what young teen life was like. The main difference between those A.I.P. films and this Paramount production is the budget dollars spent. Set in 1959, the film has little to do with 1950′s urban high school life or the early days of rock and roll, and more to do with a re-imagined, sanitized Hollywood account of what this period was like. Unlike the original production, there is nothing subversive or rebellious about the film, even if Jacobs and Casey did it all with a wink and a nod.
The setting is Rydell High School where the guys wear leather jackets, smoke excessively and walk cool. These are the Thunderbirds consisting of leader Danny Zuko (John Travolta), a blueprint for “Happy Days” loveable greaser, Arthur ‘Fonzie’ Fonzarelli, both who are about as threatening as Eric Von Zipper. There is also Kenicki (Jeff Conaway) and three dorks who must be the illegitimate children of the Bowery Boys. The girls are the Pink Ladies, led by gum chewing toughie Rizzo (Stockard Channing). Add on to all this the inappropriate disco sounding Barry Gibb penned title song sung by Frankie Valli, the awful, awful, awful, and bogus Sha Na Na, who perform during the school dance and the bland white bread king himself, Frankie Avalon as “Teen Angel.” It all adds up to the likes of someone sniffing a little too much Brylcream.
That said, I enjoy watching “Grease,” it is a fun film to watch; it has an infectious quality thanks to some nice energetic and engaging performances from John Travolta, a perfectly bland Olivia Newton-John (who better to play bland) and Stockard Channing. The young Travolta, fresh off a major success with “Saturday Night Fever,” makes for a lovable gang leader (how many of those have you come across?). He shakes struts and quivers through a series of catchy songs, many of which became top 40 hits. Travolta never looked better, a cross between young Elvis and James Dean, he burns up the screen. Olivia Newton-John, making her screen debut, is sweet and virginal, perfect for the role of the Sandra Dee blonde figurine who falls for the lovable greaser, Travolta, and manages to go, unconvincingly, leather jacket to leather jacket with him by the end of the film. (3) The real acting highlight though is Stockard Channing as Rizzo, the school’s tough, dirty talking broad, who underneath is as mellow as the cliché Hollywood hooker with a heart of gold. One of the strongest highlights of the film is her mocking version of “Look at Me, I’m Sandra Dee.” With it she comes close to stealing the movie from the two leads.
The film sucks in all the 1950′s nostalgia it could with the casting Eve Arden, the star of 50′s sitcom, “Our Miss Brooks,” as the school principal, Edd “Kookie” Byrnes of “77 Sunset Strip” fame as DJ Vince Fontaine and the great Sid Caesar (Your Show of Shows, Sid Caesar Hour) as the school’s Coach. The hair cream gets piled even higher with the aforementioned early 60′s teen idol, Frankie Avalon crooning “Beauty School Dropout.”
As I mentioned earlier in this essay, I find “Grease” an enjoyable, fun, guilty pleasure. It’s easy to understand why it was and remains so popular. Yet, the filmmakers got so much wrong. Most of the musical numbers are unimaginative and the direction is dull, just look at the “Grease Lightnin’” number which by the way was performed by Kenicki in the stage version. That made sense since it was his car and only was changed in the film to spotlight Travolta (must have pissed off Jeff Conaway). Then there are the new songs not in the original stage production like, “You’re the One That I Want,” which sounds more like 1970′s pop music than 1950′s, plus the previously mentioned inappropriate title song. The film is also a bit sloppy in it nostalgia, I mean, did anyone ever notice that during the opening animated credit sequence, the cartoon drawn Elvis character is wearing a 1970′s jumpsuit!
“Grease” the movie was a revisionist intent to change how we look at the early days of rock and roll turning 1950’s teenage rebellion, even it Jacobs and Casey did it with a wink and a nod, into glitzy empty headed, water downed pabulum for the entire family. The film doesn’t rock as much as it slips, slides and oozes its way into your heart. Like I said earlier, for me it’s a guilty pleasure, it’s a sit on the couch with some munchies and a cool drink and let yourself have fun kind of a movie. Only I keep thinking on how great it could have been if they actually had been more faithful to the original production.
Footnotes:
(1) The evolution of “Grease ” from a raunchy rock and roll musical, anti-establishment theater piece to the bowdlerized film version, to future glossy productions, and even still “cleaner” High School productions, is as drastic a transformation as the early rebellious Elvis transformation into the overweight Las Vegas “lounge” singer he became later in his career . Original songs from the first production (Freddie, My Love, Mooning, All Choked Up) were dropped while new songs like “Sandy,” “Hopelessly Devoted to You” and “You’re the One That I Want” were added in for the movie version. The bastardization of the stage musical continued with its two Broadway revivals in 1994 and 2007 when songs written specifically for the movie were incorporated into the revivals including the Barry Gibb disco like title song. High School productions sanitized the language even more and social issues were minimized turning it into a Disneyfication of its former self.
(2) I was rather surprised to see “Grease” positioned in 39th place while the only other rock and roll musical to place in the top 50 in the survey, Richard Lester’s innovative and influential, “A Hard Day’s Night,” came in at 44? That was a jaw dropper! The visual style of Lester’s film, the editing, the music are all at such a higher level compared to Randall Kleiser’s bland direction that I was stunned by this result more than any other ranking in the survey.
(3) Because Australian accented Olivia Newton-John was selected for the role of Sandy, the character’s name was changed from the ethnic Sandy Dumbroski to Olson in the film.
How Grease made the ‘Elite 70′:
Judy Geater’s No. 19 choice
Marilyn Ferdinand’s No. 35 choice
Dennis Polifroni’s No. 35 choice
Sam Juliano’s No. 59 choice
Allan Fish’s No. 67 choice







“Having seen the original Broadway production a few years earlier, the movie version of “Grease” has always felt like a guilty pleasure. (2) It was clear the folks who made the film did not understand or did not care what the show was about; turning it into a pandering twisted aberration of 1950′s wistfulness. The film was released in 1978, while the hit Broadway show was still running strong.”
John, I love the fact that you pulled no punches with this essay, and obviously that you can to the table armed with the experience of having seem the Broadway show, a claim that many won’t be able to duplicate. Sadly this means that so many will only know “Grease” through the permanence of the film. You have given the film the de-luxe Greco treatment with vital historical background information and a thorough discussion of the music, the performances and the actors themselves. I like your additions at the end as well. I can only say that the reason that “Grease” edged out “A Hard Day’s Night” by a few places, is that there is a question with some if the Beatles film is really a musical, while with “Grease” there is never a doubt. Interestingly enough if you look at internet musical polls, you will always find “Grease” near the top. I am not saying it should be this way -in fact of course I favor the Beatles film- but there is definitely a cult for “Grease.”
Sam,
Thanks Sam for your overly kind praise. If anyone who voted and did not consider AHDN a musical would like to respond as to their reasoning, I am curious to hear it. Not looking to argue, just curious what your criteria was.
John, I’ve never been much of a fan of this film, so I nearly gave your post a miss. Am I glad I didn’t, because it’s a real gem. Having seen the original New York stage production, you write about the film from a unique, knowledgeable, and personal perspective. When I saw you were writing on this film, I asked myself why, and now I know! You identified all the things about the movie that leave me cold, and it’s clear from your comparison of the NY and movie versions, that they are two truly different works. You make the stage production sound raw and appealing in a way the slick and in many ways bogus movie isn’t. (I liked the crack about it being not much more authentic than the teen beach movies of the sixties.) I especially liked the thorough way you compared the music in the two versions. What I did like about the movie were the old-timer guest stars and–here I’m in absolute agreement with you–Stockard Channing, who for me steals the movie from its putative stars. An interesting footnote you added about the relative merits of “Grease” and “A Hard Day’s Night.” Couldn’t agree with you more. But I understand Sam’s comment that some voters were uncertain whether the Beatles-Lester film was a musical in terms of the countdown, whereas there was no question that “Grease” was. If I had voted, I think that defining for myself which films qualified for consideration and which didn’t would have been the most difficult thing.
Thanks R.D. – having Eve Arden and Sid Caesar was nice touch I have to admit, and I always get caught up in it ,even if as I am sit there thinking, what the hell did they do! Changing Sandy to be Australian just so they could use Olivia -Newton -John. If Allan Carr and Robert Stigwood would do a remake of “A Streetcar Named Desire,” they change Stanley Kowalski to Australian calling him Stanley Olson so they could use Hugh Jackman.
Im half way loving this film and the other half hating it. I think that most of plot and the incidental dialogue moments really suck, and the character development is almost non-existent…
BUT…
The music numbers are infectious, the FRANKIE AVALON/ANNETTE FUNICELLO references (things like BEACH BLANKET BINGO spring immediately to mind) are a trip and both Olivia Newton-John and Stockard Channing are near flawless in their big moments on screen.
Also, the film brings fond memories to me as I remember seeing this as a kid when it first came out and being stunned by the swooning the younger girls in the audience committing every time John Travolta appeared on screen. For me, this film is my generations version of seeing an Elvis movie back when he was the most popular singer on the planet. GREASE is an ode to teen-idol matinee fare and it’s just alot of fun…
What can I say? There must be a guilty pleasure/toe-tapper on my list and, I guess, this was the one…
Dennis, you said the word “infectious” and I agree. As wrong headed as I think it is I do enjoy watching this film. thanks for your thoughts, sir!
This is a really wonderful piece John. I completely enjoyed reading your essay from start to finish with glee. I’m just wondering why you wrote it since Grease didn’t even make your list lol. I can see Sam scrambling like some newspaper editor trying to make a deadline turning to you and saying…. its all yours kid. You got two days to finish it, keep it under a thousand words, and don’t forget to mention the stage play.
I remember seeing Grease countless times with my mother as a kid. It was one of her favorites that she would watch periodically. As a pre teen, I remember having a crush on both Marty and Olivia Newton John after her transformation. I can’t say I really liked the film as much as the idea or sanitized subject matter it presented. Zuko and Kenicki seemed so cool that it would frustrate me when they would break into song all the time. Haven’t watched it in quite a while, but I suspect that my opinion would probably be similar to yours. I’m actually a little surprised that certain specific esteemed voters chose this picture to make their list. Overall one of the best written entries in the countdown.
Maurizio—
First off, let me say that John Greco is unquestionably one of the best writers in our circle. To boot, he’s personable, incredibly supportive and well-rounded in every cultural area. He’s one of the most cherished friends I’ve met online, and I hope one day to meet him.
Why this testimonial to John today you might ask?
Simple. You asked about John not voting for the film on his ballot. John was not part of the musical voting panel, because I didn’t want to bother him with an assignment I erroneously figured he’d not have an interest in. Truth is John is as diverse as they come, and at the expense of being melodramatic I made the worst mistake in my three years at WitD by not asking him to submit a ballot. Of course, he’s written some fabulous essays, which in the long run are far more significant than compiling a ballot, but I keep kicking myself for being so short sighted.
What was I thinking?
Sam, you praise is overly done my friend but I do appreciate it and will add it to my scrapbook (lol). Seriously, when it comes to musicals, I have plenty of open holes, as well as works that I do not care for at all or even have a desire to watch. As a young teen I was “forced” to see THE SOUND OF MUSIC at the old Rivoli Theater on Broadway where it was running as a road show engagement. Back then, it was a big deal to see a film on Broadway like that, you even had to get “dressed up,” at least I had too. That was the first and last time I watched the movie and ever since, whenever I see a clip of the film, usually Julie Andrews running across the hills that were so much alive, I get a chill that won’t go away for days. There are some childhood traumas you just never get over (lol).
John—
You illustrate here why I was hesitant to lobby for a commitment from you in this one genre. Based on comments at other sites I was convinced the the musical category wasn’t your most favored one, and I figured (initially) I was doing you a diservice. But your veteran status and obvious affinity for so many films within these parameters has left me shaking my head. I have a completely different take on THE SOUND OF MUSIC, but be rest assured I thoroughly enjoyed yours!
Thanks very much Maurizio. While I did not participate in the voting Sam did ask if I would be willing to contribute some pieces and I picked GREASE among a few others. In this case I thought selecting a film I do not consider a classic of the genre, and if fact a guilty pleasure, would generate some interesting thoughts since it ended up in a decent position in the overall countdown. Thanks again!
John,
You’ve written one of the best pieces on this countdown yet. Your background knowledge is amazing and so informative for me as I didn’t really know anything about the history of it.
I have a story to tell on this film.
My Dad and younger sister have always been HUGE fans of this film. I mean HUGE. Dad loves Travolta and everything about it. For me, I refused to watch Grease for years despite their pleading. I had never seen it and pretty much decided I was never going to because I thought it was going to be trash and didn’t want to waste my time. I swear everytime I would get together with my parents, something about Grease would come up, and my Dad would always say, “You still haven’t seen Grease!”. Seriously, it would come up in conversation every few months. After Sam presented us all with the upcoming prospect of the Musical countdown, I could feel the tugs of this film. I suddenly felt compelled and drawn to see this in fairness to the countdown and for my perspective on the musicals. So, a few months back, when we went over to my parents house, I told my Dad I was ready to see Grease. He about fell on the floor. We rented the thing and I know it sounds pathetic, but my Dad and I watched Grease. I mean come on, two guys watching a musical? I know it sounds pretty lame. But, the amazing this was, I found myself liking the film. Now, I totally get all your points about the film lacking a lot of elements and not being true to the source material. I still liked it and enjoyed the music and the escapist element. I mean it’s a sugary, escapist film, but that’s generally what musicals are in my opinion. They’re usually sugary, melodramatic, over the top etc. So this doesn’t bother me. I still think Stockard Channing steals the show. She plays up the juicy role and is the most memorable performance for me.
My point of all this is I’m glad I saw it and understand what Grease is all about. Great write-up again and it was a pleasure to read it.
Jon, thanks so much and that is a great story, thanks for sharing. One never knows where family memories are going to come from. Channing does steal the show, I really do like her rendition of “Look at Me, I’m Sandra Dee.”
Excellent writing from Mr. Greco. I like this a little more than a guilty pleasure, but I can’t blame anyone who is perplexed by it finishing ahead of A Hard Day’s Night. But it’s light years ahead of Saturday Night Fever. I enjoyed the personal elements in the review. And seeing the show enhances any treatment of the film.
Thank you Mr. Gallo (can we say Frank and John?) Seriously, thanks very much. You bring up SATURDAY NIGHT FEVER, another Carr/Stigwood film which strikes close to home for me. I grew up in Bensonhurst, right next to Bay Ridge where the film primarily takes place (though the opening scene was shot in Bensonhurst), lived there during that period though I hated the whole disco scene. The movie I always found to be a stereotypical look at Italian-Americans working class kids who lives consisted of not being too bright, ignorant, lacking ambition and racist. Needless to say, I am no fan.
How can you not like this sweetly dippy contraption? Of course, all the actors look WAY too old to play high-school adolescents (especially Channing), but who cares?
You’re right, it’s no ‘A Hard Day’s Night,’ but those are the vagaries of polling. I had to rub my eyes when I saw it made Fish’s list.
Does this mean John Waters’ ‘Hairspray’ made the countdown, too?
“How can you not like this sweetly dippy contraption?”
I like that Mark!
I was definitely surprised too by Allan’s placement.
I wonder if I’m the only one who still likes the version of Hair directed by Milos Forman. I prefer it to Grease in every way.
I see I liked this musical more than the other voters – maybe because I was exactly the right age for it. I was 17 when it came out at the cinema, and I remember queuing for it with friends and how excited we all were about it at the time, even if the actors all looked about 30. So for me it is more a case of 1970s nostalgia than 1950s – I remember the two songs with Olivia Newton-John and John Travolta being number one in the charts for about 10 weeks yet, and how we all learned all the lyrics off by heart.
I’ve also seen many stage productions over the years since, and my daughter performed in one at her high school, so I heard the songs many more times then. I hadn’t realised that the original Broadway show was more rough and ready, and maybe if I’d seen that, as so well described here, John, the movie would appeal to me less, but I’d have to say I think it is quite sharp at times even so and often undercuts its own cheesiness – for instance, the Frankie Avalon song ‘Beauty School Dropout’ might sound sweet but the lyrics get nastier all the way through.
When the film is screened on UK TV it usually seems to be shown in the afternoon or early evening and heavy cuts are made – last time I bothered to watch, the whole scene with the split condom was removed, along with Stockard Channing’s great song ‘Look At Me, I’m Sandra Dee’ (you can’t be “lousy with virginity” before the 9pm watershed!). The first time I watched it with my daughter I was outraged at these cuts and had to get hold of the DVD to show her what she was missing!
Judy, I understand you fondness for the film completely and to tell you the truth there is another musical that appeared nowhere on the list that I have a fondness for mostly because at the time, I was only about 14 ot 15, and my young teenage genetic makeup forced me to have a major crush on Ann-Margret. The film was BYE BYE BIRDIE, which is even a worst example of rock and roll and teenage high school life. I must have seen it four or five times during its initial run.
Thanks, John – I don’t think I’ve ever seen ‘Bye Bye Birdie’, but I enjoyed the storyline about it in ‘Mad Men’, where one of the advertising guys tried to imitate one of Ann Margret’s songs to push a product! I must see the film some time, but I won’t rush out and buy it.:)
PS On ‘A Hard Day’s Night’, I do like the film and did think about voting for it, but I tend to think of musicals as films with song and dance numbers stemming out of the action and to me this is more of a mock rock documentary, if a brilliant one. I felt that if I voted for it then I really ought to start checking out rock biopics like The Doors, Buddy, etc, and my time to decide on the ballot was running out – but anyway, I think I probably should have voted for it after all now, after reading your essay.:) As a Dylan fan, I like ‘Don’t Look Back’, a few years later, even more than AHDN, but as that is a documentary without the “mock” I had no excuse at all to vote for it. All the same, the endlessly-imitated opening sequence with him showing the cards to Subterranean Homesick Blues has to tie in with your discussion of early rock videos.
Understand and you point on the Suberranean Homesick Blues segment is well taken. I like that doc. quite a bit myself. Have you seen the Scorsese doc. on Dylan?
Thanks, John – yes, I saw the Scorsese documentary on Dylan and thought it was great. Also liked his one on the Stones, except for the bits where Scorsese himself comes in shouting “cut” etc, which are a bit much! And I’m looking forward to his George Harrison film too.
The fact that the countdown includes entries like this just makes the whole crazy process & site more endearing to me haha. I love Maurizio’s hypothetical description.
I grew up with Grease too, the movie/play was big in jr. high though they sanitized it probably even more than in high school versions – I remember that Rizzo was “having trouble at home” rather than pregnant! I remember having a crush on the girl who played Rizzo and later seeing the movie on video, in theaters, and also a stage production.
It’s interesting to see that the stage version got affected by the film, and it makes sense as I was thinking to myself “I don’t remember the local production I saw being that different from the film.” I guess there’s a reason for that.
Films like this still hold fascination for me today, even as I might wary of the onetime charms, for what they tell us about history – less the history of the time they ostensibly cover than the history of the time they were made, and how this period views that period (other films like this, some period pieces, some not, include Field of Dreams, Forrest Gump, Running on Empty for the 60s, this and American Graffiti for the late 50s/early 60s, and then later on stuff like Virgin Suicides or Boogie Nights – better movies both than some of these others – for the 70s. And eventually the 80s too, but I feel we’re still waiting for the 90s revival onscreen. Not necessarily with bated breath…)
And the timing on this essay is perfect as I just watched Rebel Without a Cause for the first time in years last night. It’s amazing how all of a sudden, more or less out of the blue, a teenage culture emerged several years after the war and has stayed with us, in different forms but with the same fundamental bedrock, ever since.
Joel,
I love hearing how they changed things to make them suitable for young audiences (Rizzo was having trouble at home – I am sure she was!)
Yeah, the teenage culture really came to life with REBEL. There were some films prior, but REBEL and probably THE BLACKBOARD JUNGLE were the big films to start it off. After those two, I think the studios realized there was money to be made in the merging youth market.
Oh and like everyone else…Allan had this at #69? Really?!!?
Much as I love his refined Lubitsch pieces, part of me wishes he was covering some of the more eccentric picks on his list – he keeps surprising me!
“It was clear the folks who made the film did not understand or did not care what the show was about; turning it into a pandering twisted aberration of 1950′s wistfulness.”
I’m glad you think so. I really hate this movie. To be clear, I don’t hate people who like this movie, but I really feel an almost physical revulsion anytime I watch John Travolta prancing around in his fake outfit, singing and expecting girls to fall all over him. In general I just dislike John Travolta, despite his two or three good roles in movies like Pulp Fiction or as bad guys that I can root against. But everything about this movie gets on my nerves. Except for a couple of songs–I get “Summer Lovin’” stuck in my head a lot for no reason, and “Grease Lightnin’” and “Beauty School Dropout” have their easy-listening charms. Even the moral of the story strikes me as stupid and offensive–the “good girl” finally puts on leather, decides to hang out with the bad crowd where she can smoke and drink, and will finally have sex with the “bad boy” who she shouldn’t have been treating so badly? Come on!
I’ve never heard/seen the original show; I suspect I’d like it better, especially without Travolta, but I confess to still having little interest in checking it out.
So yeah, count me among those surprised you guys all had this film so high.
Yeah, the weird thing about the film’s message is that it actually seems to believe it’s saying something moral in some sense, like that penultimate scene where she poignantly sings to herself that kind of echoes all those sequences in movies where characters gather up their courage to get their act together and do the right thing as hard as it may be. And her “doing the right thing” is to sacrifice her personality and make herself into the fantasy of some dumb kid. Kind of perverse and unintentionally comical, no? But the movie doesn’t seem to play it with a wink at all, a campy wink perhaps but not an ironic gee-isn’t-this-a-terrible message self-awareness.