by Jamie (this post is of dual purpose; it’s the continued examination of the BritPop movement within the larger ‘Getting Over the Beatles’ Series and it’s the 5th selection in the Ed Howard originated ‘Record Club’, where members discuss one record every month as selected by member in turn)
In many ways BritPop could be looked at as a direct response to American’s grunge movement of the day, specifically the meteoric rise of Kurt Cobain’s Nirvana. It wasn’t like Britain didn’t like grunge, a quick watching of the Nirvana dvd Live at Reading more then shows this, as does the interpretation of Cobain’s career by several of the leading glitterati of the BritPop movement. Noel Gallagher for example, wrote Oasis’ breakout single ‘Live Forever’ as a direct counter to Nirvana’s ‘I Hate Myself and Want to Die’, expressing essentially that pop stars have some sort of obligation of message to millions of impressionable, adorning fans. It would almost be weird stance for him to take, as in a few short months Oasis would themselves be heavily under the influence of hardcore street drugs (his direct quote on ‘I Hate Myself and Want to Die’ was, “‘Well, I’m not fucking having that.’ As much as I fucking like him [Nirvana frontman Kurt Cobain] and all that shit, I’m not having that. I can’t have people like that coming over here, on smack, fucking saying that they hate themselves and they wanna die. That’s fucking rubbish. Kids don’t need to be hearing that nonsense.”). But, as is almost always the case British pop, it distinctions or breaking off point (with grunge) had class distinctions at heart. As Noel continued, “Seems to me that here was a guy (Kurt Cobain) who had everything, and was miserable about it. And we had fuck-all (the Gallagher’s grew up in a broken home that was incredibly poor), and I still thought that getting up in the morning was the greatest fuckin’ thing ever, ’cause you didn’t know where you’d end up at night. And we didn’t have a pot to piss in, but it was fucking great, man.”
What all this says is a critical distinction of the era’s music geographically (it could probably be extended beyond just this era to the entire post-Elvis pop landscape in the specific countries, American pop music deals in rebellion in a expressionistic, nihilistic way that is incredibly individual, while British pop celebrates the class ascension afforded it’s pop stars. In short, that’s the essential dream of becoming a pop star [but both are rooted in the under class]. It’s why the clothes are so important to the British pop star (they are the easiest symbol of new found affluence), and why fashion has been relatively consistent throughout its family tree; Pete Townshend wore Fred Perry in 1965, as did Steve Marriott in 1967. Then so did Desmond Dekker in 1971, then so do Paul Weller and Terry Hall in 1979, as did Graham Coxon and Damon Albarn in 1993, and why Alex Turner did in 2006. It’ll be why the next great artist will in 2015, or 2020). The point of all this is to point out that while BritPop on the surface looked like throwaway cheery pop compared to the doom and gloom of grunge, this wasn’t actually the case. BritPop was as depressive as grunge (and in some ways more so) and most of the leading records of the movement clearly exhibit this. In fact several are specifically about this depression, often articulated as either individual existential angst (Suede’s Dog Star Man and Pulp’s This Is Hardcore, or more acutely Oasis’ ‘Morning Glory’ and Blur’s ‘Badhead’ and/or ‘Tracy Jacks’) or the collective crumbling of English imperial class culture (Blur’s Modern Life Is Rubbish or The Auteurs New Wave, or more acutely Pulp’s brilliant ‘Common People’). Nirvana, and the music that came in their wake, was just music colored in slightly different tones but essentially philosophical cousins to much of BritPop.
This key distinction, that’s just a distinction of articulation of similar themes, is but one thing that makes the Manic Street Preachers The Holy Bible from 1994 such an interesting record. Kurt Cobain was found dead of a self-inflicted shotgun blast on April 8, 1994 and Oasis’ ‘Live Forever’ appeared on August 8, 1994 just 4 short months later. It’s a weird oscillation of pop psychosis then that The Holy Bible would appear just weeks later (August 29, 1994 to be exact) capturing both the individual expressionistic angst of American grunge with the historical political scope of the best of BritPop. The Holy Bible is the record that collects and articulates everything from the era (from all vantage points) in the most articulate, coherent statement (I’ve often said that the album needs to be read just as much as listened to, and it’s why I found it so vital to link this, almost a Cliff Notes summation with the album when it was presented as my pick for the Record Club), and it happens to feature an iconic cover painting from British painter Jenny Saville to boot.

It’s a wonder then that the album was so difficult to find in the US during its initial run as it was meagerly imported by a record company deeming it a bit to obscure and English for the American audience thus leaving the Manics to be seen as fringe cult artists (if seen at all). When in fact, for a brief time after The Holy Bible‘s release (and its triumphant follow up, 1996′s Everything Must Go) the Manic Street Preachers were the best, and most important band in the UK. A fact lost on virtually anyone inside and certainly outside that geographic region.
The Manic Street Preachers started as a guttural, almost anarchist group much in the vein of a mix between the Sex Pistols, Hanoi Rocks, and Appetite-era Guns N’ Roses (early statements from the band exhibit a desire to create the UK Appetite For Destruction, i.e. a debut that sells 10 million plus copies, then just quickly burn up and go away) with a pinch of the revolutionary left leanings of the Clash thrown in for good measure. Generation Terrorists, their 1992 debut, was well received and highly ambitious, but its follow up Gold Against the Soul (1993) with its increased sheen was generally seen as a setback. Just as their heros the Clash had refocused after Give ‘Em Enough Rope by writing London Calling together in a rehearsal space over a few months producing a tighter more complete record, the Manics decided to turn back into their heritage as well. This meant rehearsing and recording in Cardiff, Wales where they’d started and first attracted attention, and stop listening to American music and extinguishing the desire of American fame. It was back to listening to their English influences from the early days, including Magazine, Wire, the Skids, PiL, Gang of Four, and Joy Division (oddly enough, all bands we’ve covered in this Series already). The band worked with an “academic discipline,” according to lead vocalist and guitarist James Dean Bradfield while working on the songs “so each song is like an essay”. An essay on what is where the album begins to reveal its intricate brilliance.
While the rest of the band was secluded in Cardiff reconnecting with their musical roots and finding a visual identity to which they could present themselves, Richey Edwards the bands chief lyricist (he wrote almost 80% of The Holy Bible‘s lyrics according to band) was mired in a dark struggle with depression, drug and alcohol abuse, and body image issues (he long battled self-harm and cutting and had recently become embattled with anorexia nervosa actually falling to 84 lbs. during recording). He had gotten so bad, and so open about his struggles that the band became increasingly ‘frightened’ about the state of their bandmate and friend. Edwards was admitted to the hospital after one severe cutting episode coupled with his mental state further worsening when he learned of another friends suicide in the middle of the year. By the time the album was released in August he was in a mental hospital (that he’d later compare to Nazi Concentration Camps in his journals), before getting released to rejoin the band in the fall of that year to promote and tour the record. His eating and self-harm issues continued during this time and into the new year, though the band was optimistic as his alcoholism seemed under control. However on February 1, 1995 Edwards disappeared and was never seen again. His car was found at a popular local suicide spot, but members and friends never believed this could be his ultimate fate, and to this day the band continues to keep his royalties separate in the event that he should return (Edward was however pronounced legally dead 13 years later).
This is quite a lengthy build up, especially compared to what is the norm for this Series, but it is important to put this records conception into proper perspective, it’s a complex dark record coming from an intelligent, introspective band with intense ideas and presentation, within a movement that is surprisingly grim in an era where pop music was as serious as it had ever been.
‘Yes‘ opens the album with an account of personal anguish and prostitution. It’s the buying and selling, or reframed as using and abusing that is so on the protagonists mind. Bradfield somehow turns the density into a workable melody (his vocal talents in finding melody where there is seemingly none is his greatest asset—outside his guitar chops— and he’s one of the supremely underrated vocalists of his or any generation). ‘Ifwhiteamericatoldthetruthforonedayit’sworldwouldfallapart’, the albums second track is an account of the hypocrisy of democratic countries (acting as totalitarian regimes) that spread freedom and other liberties with military ‘intervention’ (see: bullying). The conflicts (see: atrocities) of Grenada, Nicaragua, and Vietnam are explicitly referenced coupled with the rise of moral majorities (“yet your morals only run as deep as the surface”), slightly bringing into focus one of Edwards chief concerns: find a personal moral compass in an increasingly immoral and highly hypocritical world (and the prospective of the songs voice changes sarcastically about midway through to find a “friend” in Tipper Gore). ‘Of Walking Abortion‘ continues this moral descent, perhaps to the eventual bottom, finding the whole of humanity in a zombie state of carcasses rooming a barren world where “everyone’s guilty”. The track opens after another sound clip to a circular echoed catchy riff before moving between frenzied traditional rock to slowed melodic pulse.
‘She is Suffering‘ takes its conceptual cue from Dostoyevski’s The Brothers Karamazov specifically the controlling and therefore destructive nature beauty (or seeking to attain it) can have on one’s self. Mishima chose the idea to also open his seminal Confessions of a Mask (actually quoting the Karamazov passage) an allusion Edwards must have understood and intended. It’s almost a ballad performed as a midtempo rocker, and when done live the hook given extra nuance and beauty. ‘Archives of Pain‘ shows the brutality of their moralistic leanings. Easily (and misunderstandably) interpreted as a right wing call for capital punishment for mass murders, rather it’s just a savage ‘eye for an eye’ essay about a specific kind of criminal, and a specific kind of crime. Besides, the sound clip that opens the track is an undeniable clue to the songs meaning; even if the removal of mass murders is the moral thing to do, we must understand that we lose a bit of ourselves when this solution is sought. Musically it’s a deflating number featuring a bubbling, almost flat tire sounding bassline as its driving force. ‘Revol‘ continues much of this idea, specifically the political bent. Musically it’s delivery as a driving rocker and as such it was released as one of the successful singles from the album (amazing consider what’s actually being said). Lyrically it’s one of the most obtuse concepts the Manics ever attempted, and I’m not even sure I understand the connections being made (‘revol’ is ‘lover’ spelled in reverse so many fans believe its meaning is connecting the regularity at which both political leaders and love relationships dissolve or fail).
‘4st 7lb‘ is a harrowing contemplation of the ills of anorexia. It’s delivered in a condemning tone, specifically the vogue heroin-chic look of the day (the razor thin Kate Moss had just burst onto the fashion scene) and the celebration of it by the media. Know what Edwards was going through, that he would write this just brings his self-loathing into sharper focus, plus his ability to always take his personal ills and relate them (or see them manifested) into the larger society or history of the day is but one reason for his (and therefor the Manics) brilliance. It’s perhaps the most elegant rocker on the album (a great introduction to the band for those unaware), shifting between interesting riff with a military drum cadence to slowed contemplative beauty. ‘Mausoleum‘ is the poetic manic sound of approaching armageddon, where no meaning is available and the sky is “swollen black” complete with a contemplative J.G. Ballard sound clip during the songs climax. Bradfield urgently delivers most of the lyrics set to a chugging tempo. ‘Faster‘ was the lead single that garnered controversy due to the band performing it on Top of the Pops (I link to the performance) with Bradfield sporting a black balaclava (he wore it to honor the British Special Air Service though most saw it as an allegiance to Irish Paramilitary Terrorist Groups like the IRA). The song, with lyrics about the ambiguity of self-harm (the doer sees the act exactly opposite as those around him/her) is again given larger political context (some of those opening lyrical couplets are among their best). It’s raucously performed as a catchy rock song which helped it become quite a successful single (it predated the album by almost 3 months).
‘This Is Yesterday‘, (shown here in a beautiful live take which features a sublime rendering of the guitar solo) track 10, is in many ways the most important song on the album. It offers a slight emotional respite in the otherwise dark whirlpool that has threatened to pull the album into the abyss. Its respite isn’t the normal on of course, it’s more of a confession, or a plea rather, to be forgiven that this is the only articulation (as shown in the albums others songs) that the narrator feels accurate. If placed at the end of the album, as the last track, it could perhaps lead us to a better place, instead it’s just a island unto itself climax which will lead us to additional dark resolution. When the next track, ‘Die In the Summertime‘ opens with “scratch my leg with a rusty nail, sadly it heals” we are brought to this realization rather suddenly and quite obviously. Thematically it is a continuation on the thought left earlier by ‘This Is Yesterday’ of the inability to maintain a “fixed ideal”, and features a dizzying mix of instrumentation to open it and continue its forward thrust. ‘The Intense Humming of Evil‘ begins with a sound clip taken from the Nuremberg Trials which, even if one doesn’t know that, places things in a dark, somber tone (and for this record that says a lot) connecting the enslavement of the masses by various leaders throughout history. It’s the atrocious atrocities that seem to get all the press and the remembrances (and rightfully so) but the small ones, that happen everyday, are also worth fighting and collectively standing up to. ‘PCP‘, that albums frantic closing track (rarely played live now due to the vocal difficulty had matching the abundance of words with the quick pace), is a take down of PC mentality that is meant as a liberal celebration but often is just the opposite leading to “police victory” (and the clever connection, “when I was young PC meant police constable”). It’s as appropriate a closer as any (really how do you end an album like this?) and forever a fan favorite since its appearance.
The Nirvana comparison in the opening is also important to note in how the records are approached from a sonic template. Ritchie was a Nirvana, specifically In Utero fan, so that is his chief lyrical touchstone (he could be looked at as the English Kurt Cobain, he’s that good in his brutal honesty) but since his input on the Manic’s sound was incredibly minimal (he’s easiest to be compared to a more talented Sid Vicious. Often live the Manics would unplug his guitar without his knowledge, as he wasn’t a master on the instrument—even if the odd video here or there showed he could play a bit— and generally live he had taken to intoxication to the point of hindered finger dexterity necessary to play even passibly. But he was really a writer first and foremost), the album doesn’t really sound like In Utero (and this is also because the Manics didn’t have access to the great production ear of Steve Albinias Nirvana did). Where In Utero is raw and abrasive at at times minimalistic, The Holy Bible is textured, dense, and rather complex. It’s as aggressive as In Utero is for the most part, it just has most of its loose edges smoothed out (the Manics wouldn’t make a genuine In Utero sounding record until they’d tackle the rest of Edwards’ left over writings on 2009′s Journal for Plague Lovers, [a record that is The Holy Bibles equal] and actually get Albini to produce) a record that is often called The Holy Bible part II).

It could all add up to be quite an unbearable listen, and sometimes, it probably is. It would be all the time if it was cloaked in naked post-modern cynicism that so much of the 90′s (and 00′s) so lovingly wallowed in. No, here life, even in its seething destructive state, is reaffirmed. Reaffirmed because it’s taken as seriously and as intensely as it comes. It’s a literal matter of life and death, and nothing is cloaked in irony or typical cheekiness but instead the grand melodrama that every moment is (here’s how it reaches the Gallagher reference from the top, this is their fulfillment of an obligation to their fans and the world at large). From the loneliness of the Political act to the togetherness of a romantic embrace it’s all in the context of past and present, history as soon as it hit the record shelves. Religious books speak of and on ‘truth’ and here an album named liked one, does just exactly that.
Happy listening, see you next week.





In order to find out additional information just follow this link to:
In order to donate just follow this link to:
One of the records I always bring with me. Anytime I leave home, it is in my mp3 reader. If I’m moving from an apartment to another, be sure this is one of the first things I move. It’s such a part of me, but this could be said for the Manics as well. I totally agree with the deep analysis here. It’s a dark record, full of poetry. It has a unique voice, and its ideas of the world around us can be really scary. It deserves a quite impressive amount of listenings and attetion to reveal itself in its true beauty. It doesn’t fit well in the britpop era, but it’s not its fault, it’s its privilege (and I love Suede and Blur, I’m not saying britpop isn’t for the Manics).
I smiled happily and proud when reading the comparison with Nirvana (another of my personal fav) and Journal for Plague Lovers being called the Manics follow up to the Holy Bible. Those were the first things I had in mind the first time I listened to JFPL, and that’s why I love it so much.
It is strange to consider the Manics BritPop as when you typically think about the movement it’s a tightly controlled sound (most shown in the similarity between Blur, Oasis, Cast, and Lightning Seeds) but then the greatest of the great BritPop bands (Suede, Pulp, and the Manics) all sound pretty damn unique and different. Meaning, it’s a movement (like all good ones) that is defined by and almost undefinable, not consistent sound. Much like say, punk before it that had bands as unique as the Clash, Sex Pistols, the Jam, Wire, Buzzcocks, and the Damned defining the sound.
Glad you feel so strongly about the disc, I obviously agree with your assessment.
Great stuff, Jamie. This is the first album we’ve covered for the Record Club series that I think I’ll actually keep on my computer after it’s been covered. It’s dense, dark, and frightening, yet it also engaging and spiky to the point that it doesn’t seem to just trudge around in the sty. I could definitely hear a lot of Wire in their sound, but by fleshing out the material, they turned the angular, fractal nature of Wire into something that approached pop, albeit in a twisted manner. The background on Edwards clarifies the dark nature of the lyrics, and I’m especially disturbed to learn of the personal impetus for a song like “4st7lb.”
I had only vaguely heard of Manic Street Preachers in passing before this but I’ll certainly be looking into their other albums.
Wow, thanks Jake. Glade you liked the album. I’ll sort of use your comment here as the one for everyone that may have liked this album and is looking to dive more into their catalog.
If you like the anger and reflective honesty of this record then the next album you should go with is JOURNAL FOR PLAGUE LOVERS (as I said above it’s like THE HOLY BIBLE part II, and the band approached it that way, right down to another Jenny Saville painting on the cover). If you like the righteous political fury then EVERYTHING MUST GO and specifically THIS IS MY TRUTH TELL ME YOURS would be where you should venture (the track ‘If You Tolerate This Then Your Children Will Be Next’ is perhaps their greatest single ever, and one of the singular great political salvos the medium has ever seen. Plus, it has the Edwards track ‘Born a Girl’ which is just heartfelt and frightening at the same time). A few of the other records are great too, or at least have several great tracks on them, SEND AWAY THE TIGERS has ‘The Second Great Depression’, ‘I Am Just a Patsy’ (that re-imagines Lee Harvey Oswald in a love song and even uses the sound clip at a key moment), and ‘Your Love Alone is Not Enough’, KNOW YOUR ENEMY has the brilliant ‘Ocean Spray’ and ‘His Last Painting’. I’m also positive that many would probably like their debut a lot too; GENERATION TERRORISTS has something like the fantastic ‘Motorcycle Emptiness’, which contextualizes the biker in RUMBLE FISH into a great philosophical pop/rock song.
They have a massive cult following so their fans have uploaded all these tracks on youtube where you can sample them. Happy hunting.
Great piece and great choice, Jamie. This album initially just glided past me but it has really grown on me as I’ve listened more. I love how much anger and bile is lurking just below the surface of its approachable Britpop surface – there’s a real sense of righteous indignation that definitely links this band to predecessors like Wire and the Clash, though of course they do add their own spin to those influences. The second track, “IfWhiteAmerica…”, is probably my favorite on here, and also the track that most reminds me of the Clash, especially in terms of attitude. This is accessible but also has a real edge to it.
Glad you liked it Ed. I’m with you and Jake that both ’4st7lb.’ and ‘IfWhiteAmerica…’ are the two tracks that will draw most in initially (and are brilliant enough to keep them there), with the latter being the first track on the record that really did it for me.
I think they really show how to mix politics with rock music. You have to be somewhat obtuse at times (and doggedly persistent to the point of annoying many) to have a message that properly conveys the importance of politics and the complexity of it to peoples lives. You just hope your audience cares enough to read the lyrics and hunt down the reference(s).
Your work here is really seminal, and this latest installment in what is fast becoming the most prodigious achievemnt on line deseerves the highest commendation. This is clearly your singular area of expertise, and while the others on this thread can comfortably discuss the implications of the music and it’s varying influences, I (as one who has little exposure to this material) can sit back and marvel that one of our own has come into prominence as a musical scholar. I received my copy of ‘Manic Street Preachers’ in the mail yesterday, courtesy of the magnanimous author of this massive study, and will listen to it over the weekend, enabling me as it is to go far deeper than cheerleading.
Thanks Sam. I had payed a little extra and they assured me the package would be there on Saturday so you could have a few days to listen before this post arrived. Oh well, I hope when it does make its way to your stereo it will find you loving it.
More comments to come later, but I just wanted to say a great piece, Jamie! I’m glad you chose this album because it’s been years and years before I’ve listened to a punk record. I agree with Ed: the second track is by far my favorite and the one I return to the most. Yes, it definitely reminds one of The Clash, but you can also hear how this album — and specifically this song — influenced bands like Green Day…especially Green Day’s single “Jesus of Suburbia.” Anyway, I’ll have more thoughts later when I have some more time to comment. My general feelings for now: I’m lukewarm on the album. I can listen to it easily enough, but aside from one or two tracks, nothing sticks with me long enough to get me to want to continue with their discography.
I await your further thoughts, but sad to hear your ‘lukewarm’ initial reaction. I had a few records I was mulling over when I had to select this and this was the most ‘rock/hard rock’ one so I went with it specifically because what I think your and Troy’s taste to be.
I wonder if you listen to a few later records if you wouldn’t find them more to your liking (youtube the track I’ve mentioned already ‘If You Tolerate This…’.
Jamie, I’m really impressed by your dense essay here, which puts this record into context so persuasively. For me, this context is what I felt the album was sorely lacking in my experience of it. It felt foreign and confusing to me, but I think this essay will go a long way towards giving it shape.
Unfortunately, I can’t say I’m as thrilled about the record as you, Jake, GekkoP and, to a lesser extent, Ed are. It just didn’t connect with me musically or emotionally, eventually sounding like one long gritty punk explosion without much restraint or nuance (not that this is necessarily objectionable in itself; after all, I love Nirvana). But the biggest problem here (and let me know if this is just my issue or what) is that I simply cannot understand anything Edwards is singing! When sung, British inflections of English often sound slightly awkward to the American ear, but since Edwards has such a raucous vocal style, it was just unintelligible to me. The only political slogans these songs had to cling to were their opening mantras seemingly culled from radio and TV, and what followed made me feel like I was being berated in the name of vague finger-pointing towards America, government, capitalism, etc. I’m sure that these lyrics are more subtle than I think, but I just can’t extract any meaning when Edwards is so bent on dirtying up the human voice.
Music like this is, to a large extent, an incredibly subjective taste thing (hardcore, punk, much hard rock, and metal) you have to like it or not. This also can speak on the lyric understanding issues as these genres sometimes, over time, ‘train’ an ear in helping to understand or train a person in liking the music despite the ability to understand everything sharply and accurately. I mean, when I listen to a record by Carcass my first thought isn’t to say, “I can’t understand a word this guy is saying!” and yet I love those first 4 or 5 records a lot.
That being said, when I first heard this record (it was my introduction to the band) I couldn’t understand a bit of it, and needed the lyric sheets (it’s why I was so intent to forward those along to the group with the album). Over time, I read them enough in connection to the songs that I know what is being said. I think it is somewhat intentional (them obscuring lyrics I mean) for several reasons:
1) Considering other songs in their catalog, like ‘If You Tolerate This Then Your Children Will Be Next’ they rendered everything quite clearly and easily understandable. Welsh accent or not.
2) Some, even many, of the lyrics on this record are legible. Certainly much of ‘Faster’ is, and a lot of ’4st7lb’ is as well. I’ve always had a hypothesis, not really born out of any factual hard analysis, that much of the political content of the record (and their slant on it) is difficult to understand so that you DO read up on it and research further. Then much of the more emotional personal stuff is rendered quite clear, ‘This Is Yesterday’ is certainly easily understood in my opinion.
3) It is intended as a more raucous album, and the vocals take a hit (as I sort of mention in the opening paragraph).
4) I think some of the fury is so get things past censors and into markets. When you read the lyrics (think ‘Revol’) and think this stuff was decently selling singles, I have to belief this was somewhat planned.
This then leads to the interpretations of the record. There isn’t much finger pointing at all (at least in the ‘holier then thou’ implication I belief you’re intending, I mean they don’t think they’re better then anyone… in fact how ‘low’ they feel—in terms of self-worth— is one of the startling points of the record. Edwards is a genuine self-loather, thinking he’s no better then anyone and a lyric like “I am all the things that you regret” speaks on this in abundance), but there is some in that they are calling things out that they think are wrong, incorrect or morally reprehensible (calling a spade a spade if you will). It all cases, when the subtly and nuance of their points and lyrics are read their condemnation is more then applicable, reasoned, necessary, and (in many cases) needed. So we need to be careful not to interpret something that isn’t there, and certainly not judge them on this incorrect interpretation. It’s OK if your political persuasion is different, but it isn’t if your reading of black and white English language is.
Plus, they are Marxists so there will be much anti-capitalistic rhetoric. Again, I don’t look at this as a bad thing though.
It’s such an emotional record, that it’s strange to hear someone say they didn’t ‘connect emotionally’. I understand your phrasing and mine don’t mean the same thing… it’s just interesting wordplay that non-face to face conversations lead to. You’re saying its movement and sound didn’t effect your sensibilities (on an emotional level) and I’m saying the emotional weight of the musics content is so human and ‘true’ that anyone seemingly would (or should) be touched on some human level.
First off, another great write-up in the series, Jamie. Your knowledge of the British music scene is quite impressive and I’ve greatly enjoyed the history lesson and the connecting of the dots while following along these past 43(!) weeks.
The academic discipline you mention is obvious in the lyrics — they pack a ton of content into each song, forcing the listening to know their history and the source of various soundbites if they want to get the full picture. Still, the edgy sound of much of the music often gets across the proper emotion, whereby even if you can’t understand a word they’re saying (and honestly, I’m not sure how you could piece together much of what they were saying without a lyrics sheet — perhaps it’s just my American ears?).
Overall, I liked the album enough on the first few times I listened to it, and that increased a bit when I read the lyrics alongside listening to the songs. It definitely give them a lot more impact and depth . I’ll add to the list of those who consider the best songs “IfWhiteAmerica” and “4st 7lb”. The former simply has the best hook on the album (and was also the easiest to suss out the meaning of without resorting to lyrics) while the latter is downright frightening in the story it tells and the emotions it purs out. It’s dark and scary, without being angsty, making for a truly effective song.
I find the album tails off a bit after “4st 7lb”, though, and I’d find myself just relistening to the first seven songs (which is over 30 mintues of music) and often skipping the latter half, though often stopping for “Faster” and “This Is Yesterday” (I like the change of pace it provides musically to the entire album – though your point about where it lies in the track sequence is fantastic — I can totally see that being the case in why they didn’t end with this song, leaving it instead as an isolated moment of relatively peaceful introspection amidst the angrier bits).
The academic discipline you mention is obvious in the lyrics — they pack a ton of content into each song, forcing the listening to know their history and the source of various soundbites if they want to get the full picture. Still, the edgy sound of much of the music often gets across the proper emotion, whereby even if you can’t understand a word they’re saying (and honestly, I’m not sure how you could piece together much of what they were saying without a lyrics sheet — perhaps it’s just my American ears?).
I speak on this above in response to Carson, but I really wanted to point out your comment (“Still, the edgy sound of much of the music often gets across the proper emotion, whereby even if you can’t understand a word they’re saying”) is dead on and I think accurate to all music of this sort.
I’d also like to mention, in almost a sidebar, is that while this is an angry record (I think all the members of the Record Club have used this adjective) I think its overall emotion that is at the forefront is sadness. When ‘This is Yesterday’ opens with, “Don’t listen to a word I say, just listen to what I can’t keep silent” my heart just absolutely breaks. And it breaks virtually every time and I’ve heard the track at least 100 times probably over the years. The rest of the album moves like this more or less, just usually not this explicit. Thoughts anyone?
An amazing album, 10/10. Queen meet’s Clash meet’s Joy Division meet’s Bowie, genius.
I went ahead and bought the album tonight and listened to it all the way through, as well as relistening to a few tracks. Oddly enough, I didn’t feel like the vocals were very hard to understand but at the same time, I always zone out of lyrics especially when I’m first listening to music so if I didn’t have the customary problem understanding what he was saying, I did have my own.
I loved the sound of the record – I definitely hear 154-era Wire like everyone else – and look forward to a few revisits soon. I had kind of hoped to write a detailed comment here in response to the album but I think that will have to wait as a) it’s 2am and I’ve been doing a tone of other stuff and haven’t really had the time to sort my thoughts out and b) it always takes me several listens before I can really process an album; it’s always more a visceral than cerebral thing listening to music but usually when I know more of the context and am more familiar with the songs I can “say” something about it – but right away, after a listen or two it’s still just raw sound for me, an experience but not something I can really articulate or work my way around.
At first glance, it seems like a great selection and I look forward to returning here with more to say in the near future, like this weekend. Apparently I’ll be in good company as Sam has said he’ll do so too, and now I can hold his feet to the fire on that so as I’m not the only one (haha).
Based on initial impression, mostly sonic, Revol and 4st7lb were the tracks that most struck me though I was intrigued by the lyrics to She is Suffering and dug the intro to The Intense Humming of Evil (to the point where I was a little disappointed when it turned out to be a somewhat straightforward song rather than a sonic explosion, I was kind of hoping it would be this album’s European Son!). I glanced a little bit at your piece before listening, and saw a detail or two on iTunes when I downloaded, but mostly I went into the album blind (deaf?) to the point of not even knowing which song title I was listening to as I went.
It will be fun to piece this all together in a few days. See you then.
I look forward to the sustained discussion. Generally the record club takes a few days to properly get going too (or at least that’s been the case with the other 4 selections) so you should be coming back at a great time.
Glad your initial listen(s) found you liking it.
This is a good review although I don’t agree with all points. I got into Manics around 1992 – Generation Terrorists era, and they were no Britpop band. They were seen as a British Glam Metal Hard Rock band, their albums were full of blistering solos and agressive riffs etc… But seeing that their most successful singles were the softer ones (i.e. Motorcycle Emptiness), the band slowly changed its direction. Still, Gold Against The Soul was an American Hard Rock album in Manics style. In fact they toured with Accept and Bon Jovi during that era. So I don’t think Manics had the same background as Oasis or Blur really. Manics didn’t really fit any musical genre or movement until they released Everything Must Go. They were included in both pop music magazines, NME and Metal Hammer. No other band was like this at all.
The Holy Bible is one of my three favourite records from 90s and it is a true masterpiece. It was written and recorded at the right time with the right mood for all the band members – only this can explain why Manics could never touch its glory ever again, no matter how hard they tried. Probably Manics themselves have no idea how they created such a masterpiece, so the album is more than sum of its parts.
There’s not much to add about the lyrical content of the album. The musical side is a mixture of influences. There’s a lot of post punk influence in there yet there still are a lot of Steve Jones-esque guitar heroics as well. At times the album reaches metal music agression (Archives Of Pain, Mausoleum). You mentioned PIL and Joy Division, yet I think there’s quite a bit of early Killing Joke influence in this album as well, especially on a song like Intense Humming Of Evil. I think this album is free of any style definitions or any musical era. It could have been recorded in the 80s or 2000s and still it wouldn’t sound out of place. It doesn’t belong to any style. Which brings me back to the Killing Joke reference. Just like how people used to put Killing Joke into brand categories (post punk, gothic rock, new wave, industrial metal, and at the very end of it they gave up, after seeing that their latest album mixes all of these styles at once) but failed, trying to put The Holy Bible into a style context is a futile attempt. It doesn’t fit into any definition at all. It is the sole creature of its own kind. And Manics could never record anything like this record again. I wonder what they would have recorded after this album. The only song we have is Judge Yourself, which, just like The Holy Bible, doesn’t fit into any style definitions. One thing is for sure though: Judge Yourself is anything but britpop.
I think perhaps you’re taking me and the genre of BritPop a bit to literally. As I said above it is, like pretty much all large music subgenres, it isn’t one defined by a specific sound. Rather, it’s a few bands in a collective area, in a specific era making music to sway a zeitgeist (that then often times get grouped together after the fact). The Manics were certainly the hardest and most ‘punkish’ of the group, but the fact that they also like, say Glam, isn’t a point to declassify them (I mean Suede were clearly Bowie disciples, as was the movements on stage of Jarvis Cocker).
Besides, your initial comment on 1992, of course the Manics weren’t considered BritPop then as the term didn’t even exist then. Oasis was still two years away at that point!
I do think the Manics touched, or at least came damn close to matching THE HOLY BIBLE, but that I agree with you it’s thier defining statement. This is hardly a knock though, as I think it’s the best rock record post-1990. And with APPETITE FOR DESTRUCTION the best one post 1986 or so (certainly the best one when their part of the world is concerned). Though, I’d maybe argue that they are the best rock band 1990, certainly for the UK (only Radiohead is in the discussion IMHO).
What we do agree on is THE HOLY BIBLE is a landmark, seldom matched or even approached.