by Allan Fish
(UK/Netherlands 2007 135m) DVD1/2
A frozen moment of theatre
p Kees Kasander d/w Peter Greenaway ph Reinier van Brummelen ed Karen Porter m Wlodzimierz Pawlik art Maarten Piersma
Martin Freeman (Rembrandt van Rijn), Emily Holmes (Hendrijcke), Eva Birthistle (Saskia), Jodhi May (Geertje), Nathalie Press (Marieke), Adrian Lukis (Frans Banning Cocq), Gerald Plunkett (Engelen), Michael Teigen (Carel Fabritius), Michael Culkin (Herman Wormskerck), Toby Jones (Gerard Dou), Kryzsztof Pieczynski (Jacob de Roy), Agata Buzek (Titia Uylenburgh),
Peter Greenaway hadn’t made a decent film in years. The heady days of the Film Four financed eighties as distant a memory as the Thatcherite years they erupted from. He was always there, though, like a demon that couldn’t be killed, banished into a bottle like a genie. All it ever took was someone to uncork the bottle. That someone had been formulating in his mind for some time, a film not just about the greatest of all Dutch masters but about his most chilling secret.
The time was right, too. Dutch masters were all flavour of the month again after the success of the book and film of The Girl With a Pearl Earring, and while that was more about the artistic process than the artist’s lot, it brought the era back into focus with a never before seen clarity. Simon Schama chipped in with an episode on van Rijn in his masterful The Power of Art, but his focus was largely on another conspiracy, the fate of his ‘Claudius Civilis’ in that most fateful of years, 1666. The ignominy of having to butcher one’s own masterpiece – at least Von Stroheim and Welles didn’t have to perform their hatchet jobs personally, June Mathis and Robert Wise played the role of Judas for them – and the parallel is not lost when one looks at the dimly-lit fragment surviving fragment of that particular masterpiece.
It had been nearly two decades earlier when Rembrandt made his simultaneously biggest splash and slit his own social throat. He accepted a commission to paint the militia of Amsterdam going out on manoeuvres, but he refused to just paint them in rows of lifeless poses looking like the posing ponces they were, but rather as men of action. What Greenaway and his film suggest, however, is a darker intent behind the scenes, with Rembrandt’s self-portrait hidden in the darkness performing an artistic J’Accuse against the subjects, accusing them of the murder of their leader. They can do nothing but let it hang there, but slowly discredit his influence and put him on the long path to poverty.
All of which is balanced against Rembrandt’s boisterous love life, from his wife Saskia to various servant lovers, discussing each to camera as if they weren’t there, and showing the artist as earthy, lusty, guttural. The purists may have been shocked, but Greenaway’s typically minimalist style is perfectly suited to its subject, and while one mourns for the loss of Michael Nyman as accompanist, Pawlik is an able substitute, his rhythms matching the pulse of the film most ably. The photography, likewise, is a treat to look on, not merely pretty but truly Rembrandtian in its composition, taking his mutterings of “miles of painted darkness lit by spasms of light” quite literally.
It should have been a triumphant return, but it was as if Banning Cocq and his conspirators still had hold over the painting’s reception. It took two years for it to finally surface in the UK and US, but those with the necessary impatience had already sought it out on a Russian DVD, lurking in the darkness like an assassin in the night. If the casting seemed typically idiosyncratic, it was inspired. Among the supports Pieczynski’s cynical critic captures the drama as the audience’s devil’s advocate, May is superb as the slutty professional widow, while Birthistle, Press and Holmes all make their mark as the other women in Rembrandt’s life. And holding centre stage, around that ornate bed on wheels, a truly astonishing performance from Martin Freeman as the rebel against the prostitution of his art which may well be the best ever given in a Greenaway film.









I absolutely agree, a wonderful movie especially for its main performance, which is very stunning and reveals a great actor. I sincerely hope that this movie will at one time receive the recognition it deserves. I’ve already been spreading the word by buying DVDs and shipping them off to friends ;D.
Terrific review on a film I like quite a bit and on one of my favorite directors of them all. I previously reviewed the documentary based on the film for the site, and am thrilled that the original subject gets it’s due here. One of art’s most celebrated and deliciously enigmatic works by one of it’s greatest geniuses was a stroke-of-genius stroke for Greenaway. I do own a Region 2 DVD of this.
I have to say, if you can get the Swedish Blu Ray of it, it blows the standard DVDs away. Absolutely stunning, one of the very best Blus.
I am definitely interested in the Swedish blu. I love the film that much!
It’s on amazon. It’s above your US prices, but worth every penny.
Amazon.com: Nightwatching: Jodhi May, Martin Freeman, Emily Holmes, Eva Birthistle, Toby Jones, Jonathan Holmes, Michael Teigen, Kevin McNulty, Agata Buzek, Natalie Press, Peter Greenaway, CategoryArthouse, CategoryCentralEurope, CategoryEasternEurope, CategoryFrance, CategoryUK, CategoryUSA, Festival Venice Film Festival, film movie Canada Canadian, film movie Foreign, film movie France French, Nightwatching (2007) ( Rembrandt's J'Accuse ) ( La Ronde de nuit (Night watching) ), Nightwatching (2007), Rembrandt's J'Accuse, La Ronde de nuit (Night watching): Movies & TV
Well, you cost me about $27.00 today my friend! Sold!
Good man.
I have not seen this Greenaway film. But I admire much of his other work: Drowning by Numbers, The Pillow Book, The Cook the Thief His Wife and Her Lover, Prospero’s Books, The Belly of an Architect. I agree this is a remarkable subject for a film. But Greenaway always had good taste! Definitely a brilliant review by Allan Fish.
Peter my friend, you remind me of PROSPERO’S BOOKS, a Greenaway film I absolutely adore.
I must again check to see if it has come out as one DVD (as opposed to a set) or as a blu-ray.
My local library has had this one for a while and I’m glad to hear that it’ll be worth a rental. The Cook and Prospero set the Greenaway standard for me so if this lives up to that standard it should be great stuff.
Great to hear you are a big Greenaway fan Samuel!
I have to say I find the feature film itself rather stiff and uninvolving– I found myself checking my watch rather frequently for a movie that clocks in at a mere 2 hours and 20 minutes– but I suspect this is largely the point of the style. With all those overly theatrical tableaux long-shots and lateral camera motions, anything that pushes us closer or breaks the straight-angle format stands out, and punctuates the moment, and gives you a feel for the classical painterly mannerisms that Rembrandt works in throughout. The main narrative of the whodunit conspiracy is rather unconvincing and flat in the main body of the film, but Greenaway spends more time investigating the dozens of other moral failings and hypocrisies of the painting’s subjects for that to get very much in the way– a mere assassination doesn’t really hold a candle in terms of Hellworthy offenses as child prostitution, institutionalized rape and infanticide-by-way-of-negligence, anyway. Most affecting is the portrait of Rembrandt’s marriage as one that is pragmatic, unsentimental, yet absolutely romantic in its own way.
Greenaway makes a better case for the mystery of the painting in his complimentary doc “J’Accuse”, even though he overestimates the importance of his subject just a wee little bit. The visual and conceptual dynamism of that film blows this one away, as well as appropriates the best moments of the feature. All in all, good dry fun, but the Simon Schama program is a good deal more, and not so stuffy.
The Schama programme is more approachable, Bob, but just very different. Certainly essential viewing.
His “History of Britain” is something I’m definitely going to have to check out at some point. Not because I’m terribly interested in Britain, but his perspective is bound to be interesting. I envy anyone who can sit in on his lectures at Columbia.