
By Bob Clark
When Blackwater Worldwide changed their organization’s name to Xe Services, in 2009, and eventually Academi, in 2011, their intention was to remove themselves from the public spotlight for all of the negative attention they’d garnered in the past decade as the first name in private military companies. With mercenary soldiers serving as contractors in conflicts on the behalf of governments and corporations stretched around the world, they secured themselves a reputation for being an efficient and professional group of exacting army servicemen, with jobs ranging from bodyguarding and other protective duties to full assault missions in the burgeoning, horizonless scope of the modern War on Terror. With better pay than their state-run equivalents (one might say competitors), it wasn’t unheard of for army regulars from different nations leaving their units behind to join as professional soldiers in the private sector, especially since they’d likely be serving in exactly the same conflicts once they were deployed. But while Blackwater managed to project an attractive image of themselves as a valuable part of the evolving shape of warfare, they weren’t able to escape the newfound scrutiny that roughed-up glamorous image attracted, and once their record for causing and covering up suspicious deaths (including those of their own contractors) and all manner of criminal activity on the fields of war, they began assigning themselves as many nommes de guerre as it would take to regain some measure of anonymity.
Still, while the public at large may not know the difference between “Xe” and a long forgotten item from the periodic table poster hanging in their high school teacher’s classroom (to say nothing of what they’d think of “Academi”– some kind of charter school, perhaps), the name “Blackwater” has since managed to go down in the annals of cultural memory as one of the buzzwords for the confluence of private industry and the war on terror in modern days, a carry-all catch phrase that summarizes the corporatization of warfare and the running for profit of human lives lost and fought for on third-world stages across the globe. In films, television and video-games for the past decade and more we’ve seen the PMC become one of the prime sources for easy-to-hate villains, and though they may come with different names like Jericho‘s “Ravenwood” or Metal Gear Solid‘s “Outer Heaven”, they’re all closely modeled shadows of the original Blackwater pattern. That name still evokes the threatening, yet not necessarily hostile image that the corporate founders of the company no doubt chose it for, that poetic combination of positive and negative aspects that would make it sound attractive to governments and private firms seeking their security services, while backing it up with just the right amount of dread to imply that they could get the job done. One imagines they’re the same reasons that George R.R. Martin had when titling the body of water that serves as location and gives name to one of the major episodes of his Song of Ice and Fire books, and as adapted for the HBO program Game of Thrones becomes one of the stand-out moments of the show– the Battle of Blackwater Bay.
Is it going too far to imagine that Martin might’ve known about the implications in the name of “Blackwater” when he chose it, and the connections made between his story of an alternate-reality medievalist fantasy depicting seven kingdoms at war with one another for absolute power, and the modern-day tyranny and conquest made in the realm of mercenary warfare? There’s certainly no end of mercenaries fighting for thrones in Martin’s stories, and to a certain degree they’re portrayed as being somewhat more free than the common peasantry of smallfolk that various high-born nobles talk down upon throughout– in a world of feudal conquest and absolute plutocratic rule, sellswords and knights-for-hire are the ones at least entertaining enough measure of self-worth to fight for their own interests rather than those of a thieving king or queen who’d be just as happy to send them to their deaths. Many of the lordly houses and families of Westeros come across as little more than corporate inheritors, treating campaigns for kingdoms and seiges upon strongholds with the same dispassionate dispositions as CEO’s in board rooms. In some cases, we’re even able to see a clear eyed look at the economics of warfare and vice-versa in ways that those with a myopic view of history might not imagine existed any further back than the 1980′s– in the bloodthirsty, penny-pinching halls of the Lannisters, we see a picture of banking power turned to military conquest that feels right at home in the age of PMC’s and off-shore finance and wouldn’t appear out of place in the days of Machiavelli or the Medicis. Whether they’re corporate or feudal, overlords tend to behave the same.

As such, it’s tempting to look at the episode “Blackwater” and look on it through this kind of lens, and especially to consider Martin’s books and the HBO series developed by David Benioff and D.B. Weiss as an elaborate meditation on the similarities in the kinds of power struggles we see today in the white collar world with the medievalist sword-and-shield power struggles of the battlefield. That would be going too far, at least somewhat. But all of the modern resonances both built into the series by design and elaborated upon through execution help its core themes resonate in ways that lend an immediacy to all the long-ago backdrop in ways that we haven’t seen in fantasy cinema, appropriate for a work that manages to strike an essential response to the dominant cultural strains in that genre. Though it may not be delving very deep into modern territory, the Game of Thrones series succeeds in putting a genuinely human face onto the kinds of feudal struggles and conflicts present from the Lord of the Rings, Narnia and even at times the Harry Potter series in ways that none of those literary or cinematic franchises quite allow themselves to be self-aware of. While those books and films, especially Peter Jackson’s adaptations of Tolkien, take for granted the notions of feudalism and monarchism as principles of divine right, casting their kingly heroes against huge swaths of inhuman barbarism and Manichean conceptions of absolute evil in retellings of crusade mythology that would provide a good case for plagiarism by the holders of the Song of Roland copyright (if there were any), Martin’s books and the television series that spawned it have done as excellent a job as any of bursting open all those instruments of mythological chivalry and examining the human cost of it all.
In a sense, it’s one of the better juxtapositions of Arthurian myth and medieval reality since Monty Python and the Holy Grail, and rendered with nearly as much of an ear for humor and at least as much an eye for the kind of epic lyricism that Terry Gilliam could make there and on Jabberwocky with a strained budget. Money issues are of prime concern throughout much of Game of Thrones as a production, and it’s easy to see everywhere how Benioff & Weiss do their best to make the most of their television-sized budgets, especially as they spread them to portray several lands and countries at once while combining studio and location shooting. So far, they’ve done a marvelous job of rendering their fantasy world in ways that are grounded in just enough realism to read on-screen, but with plenty of visual aplomb and beauty throughout. From the incorporation of real locations around the world as diverse as Malta, Belfast and Norway to the design and dressing of sets and cinematography, the series stands as one of the best showcases of cinematic layering and world-building this side of a Ridley Scott feature. Where the production has shown its limitations, however, has been on the side of the kind of action it puts on screen. Though this is an epic medieval fantasy series with an emphasis on power struggles for the throne of an entire world’s worth of kingdoms, there hasn’t been a great deal of warfare put before cameras. To be fair, for the most part Weiss & Benioff have been wise so far to emphasize the behind-the-scenes struggle for power rather than go for the easy spectacle of largescale combat. Under their hand and a talented team of supporting writers, directors and certainly the able cast, they’ve managed to balance that high-wire act of first-rate drama that’s often hard to manage in the histrionic high-speech realm of fantasy storytelling, allowing the political gambits to be fleshed out for all they’re worth in ways that make the relative lack of big action scenes not such a problem.
And certainly, we’ve seen a fair deal of one-on-one fighting throughout, and even some rather inventive set-pieces, like Season One’s duel between a pair of representative fighters in the so-called civilized court of the Vale, with a whole audience of noble men and women watching knights fight in a trial by combat, with the very real possibility of death ever present in the form of the floor’s “Moondoor”, a stage worthy of video-game playability. But for a show that talks so much about the approach of war and kingdom-wide conquest, there’s been precious few scenes in which we even see enough extras onscreen to even count as an army, without them doing any fighting. For the most part the show has done a fair job of making up for the lack of largescale spectacle battles thanks to both the attention paid to the slow build in the rising action of these early parts of the story, and for playing up the graphic qualities of what action we see, putting a premium on the bloodletting of the violence. Whether it’s an unexpectedly and horrifically gory scene at a seemingly placid jousting tournament, or the sight of beheadings performed in the name of a lord or by that lord themselves as a canny metaphor-in-action of the way that some leaders accept responsibility while others keep passing the buck, the show often finds key ways of allowing the spectacle of violence to release the tension of all its endless rising action and avoid putting the expensive spectacle of warfare onscreen. It’s also done this, at times, with an equal eye for graphic sex throughout the series, to the point that it’s become something of a running joke for fans and critics alike. There’s something of the usual HBO studio house-style of it, as well– just like Deadwood, Rome and True Blood before it, Game of Thrones sometimes risks turning into an expertly made piece of trash with all its blood and nudity making it feel less like a mature program and more what an adolescent’s fever-pitched imagination wants to think is mature.

To be sure, there’s moments where it works, more or less– especially in scenes like the naked reveal of the “Mother of Dragons” or a fire-worshiping priestess’ act of skyclad black magic– and even this episode finds a spare moment to spend on a bit of “sexpository” cavorting before the shouting and the tumult begins. But once it does, we’re treated to a series of sequences that both make good on the better part of two season’s worth of rising action in the form of endless parades of dialogue and finger-pointing map reading, and puts as many characters’ politicking into steel-trap conflict at the climax of their game-playing. We are also, at long last, given a truly epic battle sequence staged at a significantly wider and higher scale and scope than anything we’ve seen on the show up to now, and frankly bigger than much of anything produced for live-action television. The seismic shift in the scope of the episode is made clear from the credits alone– written by author Martins himself and directed by feature-filmmaker Neil Marshall, the hour represents the show at both its tightest and most economic in terms of sharp scripting and its most dynamic in terms of on-screen action. Portraying the full-scale invasion by rival throne-seeker Stannis Baratheon and his fleet upon the Lannister-held citadel of King’s Landing, we’re witness first to a naval assault that quickly turns into something else entirely, thanks to the shrewd planning of Tyrion Lannister. As portrayed by Peter Dinklage (who won an Emmy for the role as a supporting actor last year, and may well be up for one as a headlining actor this year), Tyrion has become something of the definitive Game of Thrones character, one who manages to navigate the dense web of political gamesmanship and moral quagmires better than anyone else while still maintaining integrity and insight.
While we’ve had plenty of other characters to sympathize and identify with as figures of moral clarity, mostly on the side of the Stark family, Tyrion represents something of an ideal blend of both morality and practicality, forever keeping his cards close to the chest but revealing the depth of his character by the extents to which he’s willing to put himself on the line to protect not only his friends and family, but also the whole city’s worth of smallfolk and common people that most of his fellow nobles would just as soon leave to die. It helps put him head and shoulders above Sean Bean’s beloved Ned Stark, who last season proved himself a brave leader and good, kind man, but woefully naive and unlearned in the politics of King’s Landing. His death in the penultimate episode last year cemented him as something of an Arthur-as-martyr figure in the world of the show– the one good, honest man in a sea of liars and vipers. Tyrion certainly isn’t an honest man, but he’s slowly revealed himself to be a good one, especially in comparison to his fellow Lannisters, most of whom come about as close to the morally ambiguous show gets to portraying pure, unmitigated greed and evil. It’s primarily in the way that Tyrion’s combination of shrewd dishonesty and hidden goodness that he wins as much of a following as he does from fans and critics, and especially in this way that he proves himself as a tactician.
It helps the sequence build off of all of the table-setting he’s had throughout the rest of the season– warning his blithely sadistic and egotistical sister and nephew of coming wars from rival kings and the likelihood of an insurrection by their own downtrodden subjects; investigating the various betrayals and plots in King’s Landing and discovering a treasure’s trove of “wildfire”, a weaponized substance powerful enough to melt stone; even slowly but surely building a network of friends and allies amongst the unlikeliest figures imaginable, from the eunuch-spymaster Varys to the common troubadour sellsword Bronn, who may come the closest anyone gets to on this show to being a true friend. Throughout the past weeks Benioff & Weiss have delicately weaved their different strands together behind the various A-plots while biding their time for nearly all of them to come together in this hour, and the manner in which Martins & Marshall pay off all the slow wheelspinning prior helps make this not only one of the showiest and most viscerally entertaining hours of the show so far, but easily one of the smartest, igniting the action in a very literal sense with the debut of Wildfire against the Baratheon fleet.

It’s a grand visual spectacle from the first shot, a grand explosion of mint-green plumage spreading throughout all of Blackwater Bay, destroying most of the boats in its wake and sending their crew to die horrible, flaming deaths. Yet it’s also an illustration of great military acumen that capitalizes on the weeks’ worth of investigation on the weaknesses of King’s Landing and the great danger of Wildfire as a defense weapon– Tyrion had previously discovered his sister’s plans to simply have soldiers rain it down on the invaders from the wall, and very likely wind up destroying the city itself in the process. Instead, he mounts a trick that combines the mythological brilliance of Odysseus’ fabled invention of the Trojan Horse with the Dam Busters tactical elegance of the rebel assaults from the various Star Wars features and their ilk– sailing an unmanned ship full of Wildfire into the coming Baratheon fleet, and then setting it ablaze with a well-timed fire arrow. It stands in stark contrast to the sheer force with which conflicts are won in typical fantasy genre efforts, where even battles between small, outnumbered bands are won by sheer physical determination, rather than any kind of guile or trickery. It’s one of several aspects that helps turn Blackwater Bay into the anti-Helm’s Deep, to reference the climactic battle from Lord of the Rings which the episode most closely resembles. The first line of defense is not the military force itself, but the ways in which they are put to use by our heroes (or in this case, perhaps just the singular), making it a matter of brawn vs. brain from the outset. As the strategy comes from the dwarf Tyrion, the least physically capable character of the show in terms of traditional male heroic paradigms, it turns the tables on the usual examples that medievalist fantasy adheres to. It’s not a case of might makes right– or as most divine proclamations to rule would have people believe, “right makes might”.
Still, Martins & Marshall are wise enough to acknowledge that simple cleverness and tricks can’t solve everything, and as such the Wildfire marks the beginning of the fighting, not the end, as opposed to Star Wars and the various recyclings of its Death Star motif– the Baratheon fleet can be weakened by Tyrion’s trick, and victory made possible by its audacity, but thinking alone isn’t enough to turn the tide of war. Yet even when relying upon the old tropes of seige-combat and portraying all the classic knightly fighting on the shores before the city’s walls, the writer and director manage to portray the limits to which sheer force and the feudal systems it supports can endure in the face of unrelenting hostility. We see how seemingly invincible warriors like “The Hound” can be frightened away from battle by the sight of a man lit on fire, and how even previously unyielding monarchist loyalty isn’t enough to motivate him back into the thick of fighting. We see how the young Lannister king’s taste for cruelty and sadism amongst his most vulnerable subjects doesn’t spare him from cowardice, running inside to the safety of the keep at the first excuse. In both cases, we see a character who has previously held almost uncontested displays of physical or political force being frightened off, and thus deflating the positions of power they represented. By contrast it’s Tyrion, the least likely fighter and military leader of them all, who risks his own life by volunteering to lead a desperate last charge as battering rams shake the walls, and even uniting the disparate, dispassioned civilian defenders of the city to rally and fight off the invaders with an inspiringly clear-eyed class-conscious revision of the typical Crispin’s Day Speech motif–
“Don’t fight for your king, don’t fight for his kingdoms, don’t fight for honor, don’t fight for glory, don’t fight for riches because you won’t get any! This is your city Stannis means to sack, your gate he’s ramming. If he gets in, it will be your houses he burns, your gold he steals, your women he will rape. Those are brave men knocking at our door. Let’s go kill them!”
What’s really astonishing about this sequence, and how it illustrates the lengths to which the fantasy genre has come since the staunchly monarchist sentiments of Tolkien and the writers following in his wake, is how Tyrion appeals not to the usual sentiments of God, King and country, but to the safety and well-being of the subjects themselves. Many fans and commentators have praised this moment while calling it an appeal from Tyrion to the commoners’ self interest, but within the context of the story, what we have is something far deeper. It stands as one of the biggest subversions of the feudal power structure that the series portrays, a moment where the smallfolk are both braver and more deserving of being defended by any of the high-born cowards who go running to the keep. It helps especially that Tyrion has yet one last trick up his sleeve to upend the expectations of brawn winning out over brains, and that throughout the whole episode his efforts are intercut with the wicked Sersei Lannister sulking drunkenly with her ladies in waiting, laughing about how they’ll all be raped once the city’s sacked and contemplating the death of her youngest son, to spare him from the horrors she fatalistically expects at the battle’s end, while a teenage Stark girl seeks to placate the masses with appeals to religion.
As such, it seems almost unfair that in the end Tyrion’s heroic assault is beaten back by overwhelming numbers, not too mention treachery in his own ranks and family. It seems especially unfair that the old order comes riding in with the cavalry to administer the coup de grace on the Baratheon forces and no doubt take credit for the victory overall, especially given the fact that the Tryion’s hateful father Tywin marches in as the victor. But given all that we’ve seen and the delicacy with which it has been presented, it’s unlikely that anyone watching the show will take seriously the notion of anyone other than Tyrion and the commoners of King’s Landing as the true heroes of the day. Tywin and his bannermen may have swooped in once all the hard work and heavy fighting was done, but nobody can count them as rescuers in the same vein of Gandalf returning at the end of the Helm’s Deep battle. And yet, like everything in the sequence, the similarities help make it feel like an expert answer and dissection to everything Tolkien attempted to prop up, and all the various connections with further pop-mythological institutions broadens the cultural discourse the episode represents. Thanks to Martin’s layered script and Marshall’s expert shooting and staging of set-pieces both large and small throughout the attack– summing up a whole city under seige with a burning boat, a ladder on a wall and the fights over them– Game of Thrones has never been quite this epic or meaningful.
It may be hard to pick a favorite moment from the series, once it’s all done, but right up there as a contender will be that of Tyrion’s face as he watches the Wildfire explosion, his face bathed in its green light as he listens to the screams– relieved no doubt that his city is well defended, but horrified by the cries of his dying enemies, a moment of double-bladed humanity. It recalls nothing less than all those trickster heroes in ancient mythology and space-opera alike, and to all the real world minds who cast their minds towards war, with equal amounts determination to preserve their way of life and regret that it has to end so many others’. It also may provide an ideal summation for the series as a whole, from the words of Kenneth Bainbridge after witnessing the Trinity nuclear tests alongside J.R. Oppenheimer– “Now we are all sons of bitches”.







Some excellent points, Bob, but Jesus, STAR WARS. AGAIN! It’s about as relevant here as The Birth of a Nation or Potemkin.
And this “There’s something of the usual HBO studio house-style of it, as well– just like Deadwood, Rome and True Blood before it, Game of Thrones sometimes risks turning into an expertly made piece of trash with all its blood and nudity making it feel less like a mature program and more what an adolescent’s fever-pitched imagination wants to think is mature”
You proclaim having nudity and blood in a series is to please adolescents then talk about Star Wars. If Deadwood is trash and Game of Thrones is trash, what does that make George Lucas? A latrine? A cesspit? The un-cinematic antichrist of the late 20th century? All of the above? Probably.
It’s a bloody shame, because if you’d leave Lucas out of everything where it isn’t actually about Lucas and stopped shooting yourself in the foot by proclaiming things of an immaturity it’s plain you revel in yourself to greater degrees, you could be a bloody good writer. Instead, you’re like an alchemist and his reverse in one. Trying to make us believe shit is gold and trying to make us believe gold is shit.
Very sad! I join in a Henry II style exclamation: “can anyone rid me of this Lucas arse!”
Fish– disappointing that this is such a bugaboo for you, considering it makes up about a sentence or two of the piece. But at any rate, the way that Tyrion uses the Wildfire carries the same kind of “secret trick vs. sheer brute force” motif that plenty of the Odysseus stories maintain, and yeah, things like “Star Wars” continue. It’s less that the Wildfire gambit is like the Death Star assults, but rather that they’re both carrying a kind of Trojan Horse logic, and they do represent a genuinely different kind of thinking than the dominant strains in fantasy and sci-fi. They also include crackerjack shots that explode a huge-ass military force (a fleet on one hand, a space station on the other), but that’s beside the point.
And yeah, I think that all the blood and nudity after a while has the opposite effect of trying to maintain a “mature” image. It’s a bit like all the comics that followed in the wake of Alan Moore or Frank Miller, all of the ultra-violent and pimped up overkill graphic novels of the 90′s. After a while the better writers and artist start to remember that the shock value and titilation of graphic content alone doesn’t ensure really adult sensibilities, unless all you want is “adult” in the meaning of nigh-pornographic material. That’s something that “Game of Thrones” was at risk of becoming at certain points last season (that eye-rolling scene where Littlefinger tells his life story while instructing a pair of prostitutes to fist one another smacks of fanservice so gratuitous even Gainax wouldn’t go near it). Thankfully it’s more or less outgrown that crap and spent more of its time developing character in stories in ways that don’t necessarily require actresses getting their kit off for no reason other than to draw in viewers, and perhaps more importantly saving those moments for instances where it can make more of an impact (King Joffrey’s harrowing, largely off camera introduction to the finer arts of de Sade went a long way to show just how hopeless his moral trajectory is). When it’s done selectively, it can work fine to help genuinely mature the genre from the chastity of Tolkien and Lewis and their ilk. When it’s done as an obligation, it just tramps things up into the fantasy equivalent of a cheap B-grade exploitation flick (and if that’s what it’s all aiming at, then we should just let Ralph Bashki animate the rest of “Lord of the Rings” and be done with it). “Game of Thrones” is a great so, so far. I’m just glad it isn’t at risk of turning into the medieval equivalent of “Spartacus: Blood and Tits” anymore.
For the sake of a few sentences I admit it is, Bob, just leave it out. Having seemingly unconnected films come to mind when writing is one thing, I do it often enough, but when it’s always Star Wars, it’s alienating. People just dismiss, it’s becoming a bad joke. It’s why no-one comes and comments, you’re tarnished being Lucas’ cheerleader.
As for the sex, the novels are far more disturbing in that regard. Sansa isn’t just forced to bare her shoulder by sick Joff, she’s stripped completely and is around 12-13 not 16, there are numerous sex scenes in which characters talk of “being inside you/me” in detail. There’s none of that in the show. It’s a violent, lusty world and the sex is just part of that. The same with Deadwood, where whores were very much part of the life there and in Rome – though that isn’t on the same level as Thrones or Deadwood as a show. Part of the reason Weiss and Benioff introduced the character of Ros was to give a link or viewers rather than just have random prostitutes all the time, but even she remains scarcely seen. The sex scene seen as most gratuitous by the short-sighted viewers was the one with her involved in lesbian sex with another whore, but it was wholly unerotic and merely served to counterpoint Baelish’s speech during the scene. Sadly few picked up on that subtlety, just crying out “God, not more tits and ass!”
There’s no sex in Lord of the Rings because it isn’t in the books and rightly so, it’s a kids’ book; you cannot compare the two. A Song of Ice and Fire is for adults; vast, complex, sprawling, in parts unfilmable (especially in the subplots involving Bran to come).
Like it or not, Fish (and you’re clearly among the latter), but “Star Wars” remains one of the touchstone science-fiction and fantasy works of the past 35 years, especially where film and television are concerned, so raising it as a point of comparison (and to a “single shot destroys an enemy military from the inside” set-piece, at that) is above and beyond the call of fair game, particularly when you’re focusing primarily on sci-fi and fantasy works in film and animation, as I’ve opted to do. End of story, far as I’m concerned.
Anyway, Benioff & Weiss have certainly done a better job of marrying the sexual content of the series to their themes this season, as well as toning things down just enough in order to make those “sexpository” moements stick out strongly instead of feeling like obligatory smut-mongering to thrill the viewers. Yes, there’s some sort of wry commentary that they’re aiming at with the way that they portray the exploitation of women in this medieval context, but much of the time in season 1 they were just as often merely giving into the exploitation fanservice instincts of titilating their audience. It’s frustrating in the same way that much of Moore & Millers’ more recent comics work have been in the 90′s and 00′s, and I’d hold their near-pornographic approach to genre storytelling in the same “maturity = sex & violence overkill” category that Martins’ series sometimes falls into, at least on the screen. On the page, it may work a little more subtly, but on screen it’s just distracting to have Little Finger whine about his love life while instructing his whores on how to fist one another (or at least to have so much of it on camera).
LOTR is certainly a work for kids, but I’d hesitate to say that the Martins series is anywhere near approaching a work “for adults”. For teenagers and college-kids who want as much sexual fantasy in their genre storytelling, maybe, but not adults. Yeah, it’s a “violent and lusty” world, but there’s something immature about that to begin with, like some budding adolescent’s dream of what an R-rated adulthood is like. If you want to push the sexual content of your story that far, it helps to be able to go into stylistic directions that are just as adventurous– I don’t think anybody will be comparing Martins to Joyce anytime soon, in that regard. Thankfully, Benioff & Weiss have been making it work on the show since overindulging themselves last season, and if they keep pacing themselves well enough, they could outlast the shallow stuff that kept dragging “Rome ” and “Deadwood” down, where they had so much potential to explore deeper stuff but kept coming back to the whoring ad infinitum, and at such a tremendous cost in the budget– really, if that’s all you need (and that’s all most viewers ask for, sadly) you can just watch crap like “The Borgias” or “The Tudors”.
Having badinage with you is like trying to teach a tortoise to count. Clark, you are dismissed and ridiculed by everyone for your Star Wars obsession and for bringing it into every argument possible on pain of death.
If you don’t see Deadwood and Game of Thrones as adult (and I was actually referring to the books of Thrones, though I know you don’t read anything without pictures) and dismiss The Wire as a cop show, you are pretty much dismissing yourself of worthy of consideration. (Just me saying what others are too politically corect to say out loud or, to be more accurate, to your face). You’re as relevant as the Doomsday Book, though I suspect you could even find a way of writing about a survey in 1086 – oh, I am sorry, 858BL (Before Lucas) – and bring the cinematic genius that is the bearded blunder into it.
Imagine your pieces on other subjects. Today I’m going to talk about the layout of the Egyptian burials in KV 17-55, but first, doesn’t all this sand remind you of Tattooine.
Or, a consideration of W.A.Mozart’s Requiem, but first let me say how John Williams’ Imperial March puts Mozart back where he belongs, the immature little adolescent oink.
Yes Fish, I know you’re referring to the books as “adult”, which really only works if you’re comparing them to the kiddie fare in the rest of the fantasy genre, not quite if you’re holding them up to actual literature like Joyce or DeLillo (two guys who know how to balance art and smut with more nuance than Martin). And granted, I’d say much the same of a lot of other sci-fi and fantasy authors, including ones that I read on a regular basis– Herbert’s “Dune” books aren’t quite as smutty as Martin, though at times they come close, same as Gibson’s cyberpunk fare (they’d all make better films and series if the right crews were found). And my point with “Deadwood” (and “Rome” for that matter) is more to do with how they spent so much money and assembled so much talent before and behind the cameras, but mostly stuck to soap-opera antics that Showtime and Starz production crap like the “Tudors”, “Borgias” and “Spartacus” shows do on the cheap. Focus too much on the smut each week, and you lose the opportunity to explore what’s really important– granted, “Deadwood” and “Rome” did that in stretches, and by and large they might’ve been lost causes for how much money they were spending to begin with, but the more “Game of Thrones” relies on the things that viewers can’t get in a diluted form on a lesser program, the more likely it is to remain on the air long enough to tell its full story.
And again. If it’s sci-fi/fantasy circa post 1977, and was made by somebody who wasn’t marooned on a desert island, stuck in a cave or trapped in a nuclear fallout shelter for the past several decades, the game is fair. The same would be true of Mozart if he were to come back from the dead and compose a work that takes place on another planet (a “space opera”, if you will).
[...] Read more… [...]
In all fairness with the exception of last week’s essay which probably failed to attract comments more out of people not seeing the subject, Bob’s previous Saturday essays have done very well in terms of comments. As a fan of THE GAME OF THRONES I was fascinated by this piece, and can certainly see why Bob has deemed to frame it in this sense. Bob’s writing talent is beyond reproach, and it would be an incalcuable loss if he were to retire. I do agree with Allan that the lack of sex in LOTR has more to do with Tolkien’s abstinence.
Is that fence comfortable?