
by Brandie Ashe
I think it’s safe to say that the combination of Rock Hudson and Doris Day in three candy-colored onscreen frolics— Pillow Talk (1959), Lover Come Back (1961), and Send Me No Flowers (1964)—resulted in one of the most indisputably adorable cinematic pairings of all time. But don’t hold that cuteness against them—these three films are genuinely funny romantic comedies, trading on Day’s subtle sexiness and Hudson’s macho appeal in a series of hilarious battle-of-the-sexes romps. Add in a trio of amusing supporting turns from Tony Randall, and you have the recipe for pure entertainment … and the basis for pretty much every romantic comedy to follow (I’ll leave you to decide if that is ultimately a good thing or a bad thing, given the current state of romantic comedy).
While each film has its respective charms, to me, the best of the lot is the first (which, incidentally, won an Academy Award for Best Original Screenplay). In Pillow Talk, Day plays Jan Morrow, an interior decorator sharing a telephone party line with songwriter Brad Allen (Hudson). Brad’s constant appropriation of the phone–wherein most of his conversations involve him singing a variation of the same tune to one of his numerous female lovers–irritates Jan to no end, and sight unseen, the pair share a mutual loathing of one another. When Brad’s best friend, the wealthy Jonathan Forbes (Randall), tells Brad about his infatuation with his new designer (Jan), Brad is intrigued and determined to try to snag Jan for himself. The two of them happen to meet at a restaurant one evening, and knowing that Jan hates him, Brad pretends to be a rich rancher from Texas named Rex Stetson, in the process sweeping the unknowing Jan off her feet.
The film is a grown-up mix of sex and charm, and does much to dispel the virginal persona that had plagued Day up until this point in her career. Jan is a modern girl, ready to embrace a sexual relationship with Brad/Rex that doesn’t include the exchange of wedding vows … that is, until his deceptions come to light. And the movie has fun playing with the sexually-charged nature of the action, inserting characters and set-pieces that reflect the lustier appetites of the film. There’s a fertility goddess, a couch that turns into a bed with the flip of a switch, a handsy Harvard man, and the infamous split-screen telephone scenes, including one in which Jan and Brad/Rex talk to one another while in their respective bathtubs. That bathtub scene in particular demonstrates the teasing sexuality that underlies the entire film: as Brad and Jan’s talk turns amorous, each one stretches a leg up onto the wall of the bathroom, their feet “meeting” in the middle. His foot slides down the wall a moment and hers retreats, as if tickled or startled, then slowly returns and plants itself firmly “against” his as Day purrs, “You’ll find that most people are willing to meet you halfway … if you let them” (and you thought a train pounding through a tunnel wasn’t subtle).
While Hudson, who had built his career on stalwart, manly leading roles, was reportedly nervous about trying his hand at humor with this film, there’s no hesitation in the end product. The comedy is brisk and witty, with Day and Hudson snapping off one-liners at one another like seasoned pros, aided ably by the always-reliable Thelma Ritter (whose drunken maid, Alma, almost steals the entire movie) and the eternally-befuddled Randall. And there’s a whole lineup of minor characters who have shining moments of comedic brilliance in the film—my particular favorite is the nightclub singer (Perry Blackwell) who realizes Brad’s game and sings the song “You Lied” in tribute to him … to which he responds with a roguish wink.
The character of Brad is an interesting one to consider because, in essence, he’s a real jerk. He dangles multiple women on the line–literally and figuratively. When one woman coos over the telephone, “I love you,” Brad’s response is a condescending, “I know” (you thought Han Solo originated that particularly heartfelt response, didn’t you?). And his mission to bed Jan becomes increasingly mean-spirited as the film continues. While playing the part of Rex, Brad also inserts himself into the “relationship” between Rex and Jan, calling her to warn her of the dangers of Rex’s “cowboy act.” He tells her Rex is going to try to lure her to his hotel room … and then “Rex” brings her up to a hastily-rented room to fetch a coat. He tells her Rex is probably a “mama’s boy” … and “Rex” daintily lifts a pinkie when sipping his drink at the cocktail bar that evening. It’s almost cruel, the way he continually screws with her mind.
Yet we forgive Brad, as Jan eventually does, because … well, wouldn’t you forgive him, too? Hudson’s charm and ability to force the audience to empathize with Brad, particularly as he wages his campaign to win Jan back after the “great reveal,” goes a long way toward making his character seem less an unmitigated ass and more a misdirected, soon-to-be-reformed heel.
There are light elements of screwball sprinkled throughout the film, particularly the final scenes in which Brad, angered by Jan’s method of revenge (which involves turning his apartment into a scene worthy of a kinky Cirque du Soleil) kicks open the door to Jan’s apartment, yanks her pajama-clad butt out of bed, and carries her through the streets of New York to his apartment. These moments generally don’t overwhelm the film–the action, and the humor, stay heartily down-to-earth.
The only motif in the film that rings a note of ridiculousness is Brad’s series of fleeting interactions with an obstetrician and his nurse, whose office is located down the hall from Jonathan’s. Trying to hide from Jan one day, Brad ducks into the doctor’s office and begins complaining to the nurse about the “strange pains” he’s been having. The disbelieving nurse fetches the doctor while Brad slips out of the room, and the doctor, thinking that Brad might just be a miracle of modern science, berates the nurse for her “limited” thinking. While these two characters do end up providing a so-cute-it-almost-hurts coda to the film, the three scenes in the medical office are little more than pockets of painfully strained farce in a generally light and frothy picture.
Despite that minor quibble, Pillow Talk is a delight, pure and simple, from start to finish, and a must-see movie for fans of romantic comedy. If you want to see how the genre should ideally be done (attention, makers of any number of crappy “comedies” starring Jennifer Lopez, Katherine Heigl, and their ilk), there’s truly no better example than this.
How Pillow Talk made the Top 100:
Frank Gallo No. 14
Peter M. No. 28
Bill Riley No. 29
Frank Aida No. 30
Pierre de Plume No. 36
Brandie Ashe No. 52







The only motif in the film that rings a note of ridiculousness is Brad’s series of fleeting interactions with an obstetrician and his nurse, whose office is located down the hall from Jonathan’s.
Oh God Brandie, yes. That was one lame sketch that did nothing by slow down the film and detract from the excellent screenplay and delicious humor. Even the cheesy split screnes work in this film, in large measure because of the great leads nd screwball humor. I just saw this film at the Film Forum last month as part of their ‘Universal 100th Anniversary Festival’ and enjoyed it all over again. Agreed this is the best of the three films that starred Hudson and Day and as always enjoyed the work of Thelma Ritter and TonyRandall. While it’s hard to fathom someone allowing a friend that much flack after having his girl yanked from under his nose, it all adds to the film comedic charm. You’ve written a terrific piece here as usual, bringing all the vital components to the table, and writing with anice breezing style.
In case you are interested, dear Schmulee, that same 100 Anniversary print you saw at the forum is now available on Blu-Ray…
http://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Pillow-Talk-Blu-ray/25069/
Much obliged, Sam. This is one of those movies I would love to see on the big screen someday. Doris Day was one of the stars who initially drew me into the world of classic film as a teenager, and her movies with Hudson have always been particular favorites. I have the Day-Hudson collection on DVD and it’s one I turn to time and again to perk me up when I need it. Thanks again for allowing me to toss my two cents into the countdown!
Brandie, I’ve always preferred “Lover Come Back” to this film (although not by a lot ), but you explain why you like this one so much quite well. I certainly agree that Rock Hudson was a great comedy actor. With his laid-back charm, he sometimes seemed comfortable in his dramatic roles and sometimes didn’t, but he always seemed at home in comedy. I like the way you described the clever–and risque–visual ideas in the film, not only in the suggestive use of split-screen, but also in the film’s decor. I especially like the way the film suggests that the two initially believe they’re incompatible but end up together because each needs the other to get his outlook more centered. He thaws her out, she cools him down, and in the end they both become more human. That’s another thing this picture has in common with many of the classic screwball comedies.
Thanks, R.D. I think one of the reasons I prefer this one to Lover Come Back is because LCB has always struck me as a bit of a retread of Pillow Talk, what with the conceit of the man tricking the woman with the other identity, and the Tony Randall roles being similar in both films. That’s not to say I don’t like LCB–I truly do–and I particularly enjoy the sort of role reversal that is employed in that movie (wherein Hudson manipulates the situation so that Day becomes the sexual aggressor and he is the “innocent” object of pursuit). You make an excellent point regarding the balance that Day’s and Hudson’s characters reach upon their pairing in this film–I didn’t fully consider that, but you’re exactly right in noting that it’s an essential element of screwball romance!
Brandie, you’ve managed to bring together the many elements of this film — some good, others not so good — in a way that justifies its presence on this list. I’ve always loved this film, despite its flaws. I tend to feel that such things as Brad’s jerkiness have to do with the now out-of-date gender politics of the era; and society’s current views on alcoholism have changed enough to cause a wee bit of squirming over Ritter’s character. So, yes, the film suffers a bit from these factors. Despite that, however, the film shines because of its well-crafted script and the truly wonderful performances of the 4 principal performers. I’d be hard pressed to choose between Hudson and Day because they both play their roles to perfection. Day’s crying sequence with Randall in the car is a cinema gem. The big reveal, with Day at the piano, is one of the best done comedy moments I can recall.
Because we now know the truth about Hudson’s sexuality, the scenes involving hints of homosexuality resonate on more than one level — not all positive, by the way — but I acknowledge that the kitsch factor is another reason to appreciate this film. You’ve done a great job of addressing these sometimes conflicting elements while underscoring the overriding quality of the work.
Thanks, Pierre! I agree that viewing Pillow Talk from a modern perspective sheds a different light on these characters and their interactions. I remember watching this film again upon realizing that Hudson was gay (I was a teenager when I first saw it and didn’t know anything about the background of the film or the performers), and wondering if the scenes in which he had to “play fey” were uncomfortable for him in any way, because Brad seems to take a bit of malicious joy from making Jan believe that “Rex” could be a “mama’s boy.” If Hudson was uncomfortable with delving into the stereotype, though, there’s certainly no hint of it onscreen. I, too, love the crying scene in the car, and the subsequent scene in the roadside diner–Randall’s exasperation cracks me up every time!
I’ve read some literature — both credible and questionable — on the subject of gay Hollywood and also have known people who worked in that industry back in the 1940s-1960s, including those who were part of the publicity and press machines of that era. My recollection is that Hudson (and selected others) enjoyed a certain level of protection from public disclosure as to his private life. In fact, I seem to remember that another star was “sacrificed” to the fan mags in exchange for Hudson’s continued safety. The fact that we see no hint of any possible inner conflict onscreen belies the fact that, after the fact, leading a double life takes its toll in other ways.
The bottom line, of course, is that — fluff or no fluff — this is a very enjoyable film in more ways than one. Thanks for your comments!
Some call this film fluff…
Ok. So, it’s fluff.
But, it’s some of the funniest and most ingeniously presented comic fluff of them all. PILLOW TALK may not have made my ballot, but it was a close consideration for the top 100 and was barely squeezed out. It’s writing, use of split-screens, the performances (Day has never been more appealing or funny) and tight direction elevate the fluff factor to serious comedy.
Inspiring essay, Brandie!!!!!
Thanks, Dennis! I agree that this film is, comparatively speaking, a bit “fluffy,” but it also has a great deal of substance–the writing, as you point out, is superb, with some truly clever dialogue that never fails to make me laugh (and quote it repeatedly).
Dennis, this film is one that kept shifting to and from my final list. That the film made my list, but not yours, is pretty much a function of timing. In the end, the best moments in this film trumped the negatives.
I could pretty much watch anything Tony Randall did. For my money, while others have played the character well, Randall WAS Felix Unger… Terrific supporting actor and comedian all around!!!!!
Brandie…well written essay here on a film you know very well. I enjoyed reading it. I’ve actually never seen this film, I must admit. I do find Day enjoyable in the other films I’ve seen her in. I also like Hudson, who of course as a Homosexual adds some things buried beneath the surface in most of his films that adds another layer. I really like Romantic Comedies…however as you note, they are often not done well. They certainly are derided often enough. I think it’s really hard to do them well in fact. I think Annie Hall would qualify as a romantic comedy and is also probably the best one IMHO. I do have a soft spot for the genre, but usually when it’s smart and intelligent and doesn’t stoop too low. Well written piece!
Thanks, Jon. Annie Hall seems to be the standard-bearer for “smart” romantic comedy–a reputation that is, I think, well-deserved. I love the genre, too, but it’s become so watered-down in recent years that when something merely halfway decent comes along (Bridesmaids), it’s lauded as the second coming of the comedy gods in comparison to the rest of the schlock.
Brandie -
Very nice summation of PILLOW TALK, and of the Day/Hudson films in general. Like R. D., I actually prefer LOVER COME BACK to this one,but I enjoy them all. They may be generally considered “fluff” but there’s a great deal of sophistication beneath the candy-colored surfaces.
Thanks, Pat! I’ve noticed that when people consider the Day-Hudson films, they state their preference for either Pillow Talk or Lover Come Back–poor Send Me No Flowers gets very little love! Not really surprising, though–it’s a bit dry, all things considered …
Recently I watched Lover Come Back, also with Doris and Rock, and also very funny. Great review, Brandie!
What I want to know is how this countdown works and how I can participate. There are lots of comedies I’d like to write about.
Greetings!
Thanks, Le! I appreciate the comment.
Everything about this film would cry out ‘disaster’ but as you have so well established, somehow it all works.
Thank you!
Excellent stuff Brandie. You make a great case for this film. I am not a big fan of Day or of Hudson and to tell the truth it has been years since I have seen this or the other two Day/Hudson comedies but your enthusiasm does make me want to take another look..
Thanks, John. I hope you do take another look at them (at least this one, anyway) soon–I’d love to read your thoughts about them over at Twenty Four Frames someday!
It’s a long time since I saw this, but I do remember enjoying the Day/Hudson comedies as well as ‘Move Over Darling’ with Day and James Garner. Your review makes me want to revisit this one, Brandie.
Thanks, Judy! You remind me that I haven’t seen Move Over, Darling in a long time–something I need to revisit, too!
This is such a fun movie. I love Thelma Ritter in absolutely everything and I agree she practically steals the whole show! The one delicious bit of irony I love is Rock Hudson playing a straight man who pretends to be gay at one point. Wonderful review!