by Sam Juliano
Gus Van Sant’s new film Milk, is less a film biography of a life cut short by violence than it is a story of a “movement”, that continues to grow today despite some bizarre recent setbacks. The passage of Proposition 8 in California, which bans gay marriages, has that ‘temporary’ ring, but it’s a wake-up call to those who feel that the mission will be free of obstacles.
Van Sant’s career has been mainly experimental and art-house, but he went mainstream a few times with films like Good Will Hunting and Finding Forrester, the former of which was a reasonably decent film that attracted solid reviews and award attention. His best films have been the ones where his artistry has broached metaphysical and metaphorical contexts in films like Elephant, Drugstore Cowboy, My Own Private Idaho and earlier this year with Paranoid Park. He is most interesting as a ‘visual’ filmmaker, and together with deft cinematographer Harris Savides, who is again on board for Milk, Van Sant has crafted some of the most visceral and provocative images in modern American cinema, often at the expense of linear narratives. Milk is neither mainstream nor art house, but a most successful mix of the two. The story of the gay man who becomes the first of his kind to win public office must be told with some rudimentary adherence to the facts and chronological order, but Van Sant uses flashbacks, flash-forwards and an effective ‘linking device’ to imbue his singular and invigorating directorial style on the proceedings. The result is ‘compromised’ Van Sant for cinematic purists, but a fluid and insightful look at a turbulent time and one of it’s altogether fascinating central proponents.
The release of the film coincides with the 30th anniversary of the assassination of the key figure in the acceptance of the gay lifestyle in California at a time when Anita Bryant was condemning such activity as perverted and an affront to God. And Van Sant incorporated newsreel footage to excellent effect of Bryant’s speeches and the news reportage of them. Milk may not be known to everyone outside the gay community and San Francisco, but he has been essayed over the years quite adequately, including in a very fine 1984 documentary, The Life and Times of Harvey Milk, from which Van Sant has generously borrowed some segments from.
One of the first segments of the film is a newsreel clip from November 27, 1978, when Dianne Feinstein, then president of the city’s council, (and current U. S. Senator) made public the chilling news that Milk and San Francisco Mayor George Moscone had been brutally murdered in their City Hall offices by disgraced former supervisor Dan White. The film then commences to return to the very beginning of Milk’s accendency to civic prominence.
Harvey Milk (Sean Penn) and his lover, Scott Smith (James Franco) head to San Francisco in 1972 and take up residence on the famed Castro Street and open a camera shop (where much of the film is subsequently ‘headquartered’) Even with the neighborhood turning gay, several of the shop owners, like the police, are extremely hostile. The outgoing and flamboyant Milk immediately rallies support, and several gay friends assume leadership positions in his inner circle, including Cleve Jones (Emile Hirsch), his closest confidante. The film chronicles the early defeats Milk incurs, before his ultimate victory as City Supervisor, the first elected triumph for an ‘openly’ gay candidate in the nation. Soon after his election, Milk becomes the leader in the fight against “Proposition 6,” a statewide initiative barring gays and lesbians from employment in California’s public schools. The bill was sponsored by State Senator John Briggs, and it exploited parents’ fears that their children might be molested by gay teachers despite the preponderance of statistics that overwhelmingly showed that roughly 95% of child molesters are straight men. The measure seemed certain to pass, but Milk’s leadership against it thrust him into the national spotlight, and his passionate but informed debates against the hateful, ignorant Briggs helped sway voters against it. Van Sant splendidly related this campaign, and used a number of dazzling techniques, including a multi-split screen featuring phone callers. Milk’s victory was especially an amazing achievement, as at that time numerous ant-gay measures were sweeping the country, led by the moralist Bryant.
Running concurrent with the political episodes were Milk’s sexual trysts, which were handled with unfettered candor by Van Sant, who himself is gay. In every sense of the word, the charismatic Penn, with his chameleon-like physical agility and studdied mannerisms gives an extraordinary, multi-leveled performance, that is probably a career-best. Shown at the start as a wide-eyed hippie, Penn is later presented as having more savvy, as a consumate organizer and mediator. And Penn has his amusing moments too, like the one where, knowing the value of good PR, the “showman” presses for ordinances to control the doggie poo problem, and during an interview he accidentally steps in a mound of dog feces for the benefit of the camera. As a straight man, Penn’s scenes of affection seemed genuine and unforced. As the protagonist of the tape recorder framing device, Penn’s ominous monotone pontifications seem to suggest an impending doom, which of course is well-known from the outset.
Josh Brolin as Dan White perfectly embodies a man whose anger is slowing reaching the boiling point–a man who is hampered by demons and who explodes in violence. Brolin’s quietly modulated performance, as opposed to the more comedic work he exhibited in W is further proof of his remarkable diversity. Emile Hirsh, who worked with Penn in Into the Wild gives an engaging performances as Milk’s most impassioned supporter. James Franco is adequate as Milk’s lover in a role that holds no surprises.
If Milk at times seems nominally directed and edited, it’s because the material is presented historically with little textural embellishment. Savides’s cinematography is often muted, grainy and dim, which in essence perfectly complements the many passages that employ newsreel clips. The pathos-laden score by Tim Burton regular Danny Elfman is properly unobstrusive and is quietly effective.
Van Sant presents his ultimately tragic tale as a celebration of life and the beginning of a movement that will inevitability result in the complete obliteration of social constrictions that were long governed by lingering hate and bigotry. As such, it’s an often exhilarating film that gives this remarkable figure the stature he truly deserves. Milk is one of the best pictures of the year.
Rating: ****½ (out of *****)
Note: I saw “Milk” on Thanksgiving evening at the Chelsea Cinemas in Manhattan with Lucille, Broadway Bob and Robert McCartney, all of whom issued effusive praised for Van Sant’s film. Where did we eat? Well, I won’t even go there, as Lucille and I (and all the kids) gouged ourselves at Lucille’s sister’s home in Butler, New Jersey earlier in the day. NYC was almost deserted, but the show we attended did sell out as expected.
Gus Vant Sant. My favourite director of all directors. This film looks amazing. No, actually, more than amazing. Words cannot describe how brilliant I expect it to be. How touching it will probably be. How topical it is. And how well crafted it probably is. Can’t wait to see this, really, I can’t. And your fine review (that I skimmed) details why.
Sam, I would be interested in seeing this, but I doubt it will get a release here – maybe on the art house circuit.
You seem dismissive of Good Will Hunting and Finding Forrester, but to me they are both excellent films. They are those rare gems: intelligent mainstream movies with wide appeal and the deepest integrity.
The NSA interview scene in Hunting has to be one of the mosts subversively iconic scenes in a Hollywood movie (Screenplay by Matt Damon and Ben Afflick):
Will:
“Say I’m working at N.S.A. Somebody puts a code on my desk, something nobody else can break. So I take a shot at it and maybe I break it. And I’m real happy with myself, ’cause I did my job well. But maybe that code was the location of some rebel army in North Africa or the Middle East. Once they have that location, they bomb the village where the rebels were hiding and fifteen hundred people I never had a problem with get killed. [rapid fire] Now the politicians are sayin’ “send in the Marines to secure the area” ’cause they don’t give a shit. It won’t be their kid over there, gettin’ shot. Just like it wasn’t them when their number got called, ’cause they were pullin’ a tour in the National Guard. It’ll be some guy from Southie takin’ shrapnel in the ass. And he comes home to find that the plant he used to work at got exported to the country he just got back from. And the guy who put the shrapnel in his ass got his old job, ’cause he’ll work for fifteen cents a day and no bathroom breaks. Meanwhile my buddy from Southie realizes the only reason he was over there was so we could install a government that would sell us oil at a good price. And of course the oil companies used the skirmish to scare up oil prices so they could turn a quick buck. A cute, little ancillary benefit for them but it ain’t helping my buddy at two-fifty a gallon. And naturally they’re takin’ their sweet time bringin’ the oil back and maybe even took the liberty of hiring an alcoholic skipper who likes to drink seven and sevens and play slalom with the icebergs and it ain’t too long ’til he hits one, spills the oil, and kills all the sea-life in the North Atlantic. So my buddy’s out of work and he can’t afford to drive so he’s got to walk to the job interviews which sucks ’cause the shrapnel in his ass is givin’ him chronic hemorrhoids. And meanwhile he’s starvin’ ’cause every time he tries to get a bite to eat the only blue-plate special they’re servin’ is North Atlantic scrod with Quaker State.
So what’d I think? I’m holdin’ out for somethin’ better. I figure I’ll eliminate the middle man. Why not just shoot my buddy, take his job and give it to his sworn enemy, hike up gas prices, bomb a village, club a baby seal, hit the hash pipe and join the National Guard? Christ, I could be elected President.”
PS: ‘bazarov ‘ the poster of the previous comment is me – one of my many aliases. He sometimes pops-up and demands attention…
Exceptional review Sam. I must see this film ASAP. Milk’s life has always fascinated me, and I think highly of that documentary you mention in the review.
Tremendous clip there Tony, and a wonderful supplement to Van Sant’s cinema.
Somehow Tony, I didn’t translate well. I actually LOVE “Good Will Hunting” and the film made my Top Ten Films of it’s release year! I completely agree with your position on it. Thanks for your sustain and stellar support of all the posts at this site, where your writing is particularly revered.
As far as FINDING FORESTER, I found that one more problematic, as it was a formulaic film (not in the best sense) but it was still entertaining and engaging regardless.
Nick, I must admit I cannot wait to hear what you say here, especially with your great love for Van Sant. Thanks again for your kind word.
Ditto Frank. I just know you will love this film.
I plan to see this soon, or when it comes to N.J. Great review, although I skimmed, not wanting to know everything before entering the theatre.
Sam: excellent piece as always..
Bazarov: Love your ID!
I told my husband we have to see this. Sean Penn is really coming into his own as of late, and even though you seem to be indifferent on Franco, I like him too.
……..you know, I never realized that the San Francisco Mayor, George Moscone was killed with Harvey Milk. And it’s interesting to note that the reason Milk was killed really had nothing to do with his homosexuality, but rather with domestic dispute within City Hall. Yeah, it indirectly had to do with Milk’s activism, but more to do with disgruntlement. Great to see that Penn is really coming into his own, and a role like this, where he is a straight man playing a gay man should make his stock rise with all persuasions…….
Great report here Sam. I think we can safely say that Penn will get some awards and perhaps even a nomination for this performance. Of course, it’s an actor’s showpiece, and anyone who landed the role was sure to excel in one way or another. But Penn is daring, and with Van Sant on board, it was a winning combination.
Sam, I like the part where you claim that the film is neither mainstream nor arthouse, but a combination of both. I think this is to Van Sant’s credit, in the sense that an unfettered, straightforward presentation would have been too pedestrian. His special style is probably what ultimately transformed it. I plan to see it soon.
I have been following this release for a number of weeks and have seen the trailer more than once. The reviews for the most part have been exactly where you stand on it, so it’s kind of a must-see. I am surprised what you say about Franco’s performance, but I’ll have to judge that myself. Excellent review again.
I saw this on Friday, and while I admired much of it, I have to say I loved “Paranoid Park” more. “Milk” didn’t do anything unexpected, while the other film remains on re-viewing most intellectually challenging. Of course your review is outstanding.
I appreciate all the kind words and various insights in the film. Everyone is at the top of their game today!
As one who attended the film, I can say that you have pretty much corraled my own feelings for it. I’d be surprised if this didn’t get multiple Oscar nominations.
Excellent review, Sam. I loved this film as well. I’m still sort of collecting my thoughts, but I’m telling everyone I know in the area that they HAVE to catch this one while it’s still playing here.
Thank You very much for that, k. I actually read your excellent review a little while agao at INSIDE THE GOLD and your enthusiasm is really infectious.
Bobby, you are probably right.
K, the review I read of yours was SLUMDOG. But that only bolsters my certainty of a great follow-up with MILK.
This is a very exciting time of the year!
Well you nail my thoughts right in your first sentence, Sam. Milk does indeed shed more light on the movement than it does the man, which disappointed me a little bit but didn’t take away from the fact that it remains an excellent overall film.
Thank You very much for that Dan, and in retrospect, I can see why you’d feel that way. As outstanding as the film is in a number of ways, I think the price to pay was a less than desirable scrutiny of the central character, who is many ways was kind of a symbol.
Indeed – and probably to be expected for any biopic about the figurehead of a movement.
I’m finally seeing this today! Gosh, I have waited so damn long…
Nick, I saw it last night for a second time with Allan Fish, and it held up beautifully. I can’t wait to hear what you think of it.
Yeah, I loved it. Still love Paranoid Park more, but Milk gets 4.5 stars from me. I have written my review of it, but I am not sure when I will publish it. Don’t want to post too many reviews in a short period of time.
I look forward to your review Nick.
Thank You.
Better late that never… I finally saw MILK last night. I was certainly impressed with Penn’s performance and the effective historical sweep of the narrative. Sam, your review reflects my feelings, though I was more impressed with James Franco in a difficult role.