by Allan Fish
as a precursor to the imminent 1940s poll – during the course of which I will be doing a reverse countdown of my top 25 films of that decade (this time not announcing them beforehand) – one of those that missed the cut, but which remains still imperishable.
(USA 1941 100m) DVD1/2
The stuff that dreams are made of
p Henry Blanke d/w John Huston novel Dashiell Hammett ph Arthur Edeson ed Thomas Richards m Adolph Deutsch art Robert Haas cos Orry-Kelly
Humphrey Bogart (Sam Spade), Mary Astor (Ruth Wonderly/Brigid O’Shaughnessy), Gladys George (Iva Archer), Peter Lorre (Joel Cairo), Sydney Greenstreet (Kaspar Gutman), Barton McLane (Det.Lt.Lundy), Elisha Cook Jnr (Wilmer Cook), Ward Bond (Det.Tom Polhaus), Lee Patrick (Effie Perine), Jerome Cowan (Miles Archer), James Burke (Luke), Murray Alper (Frank Richman), Walter Huston (Capt.Jacoby),
In his Film Guide Leslie Halliwell describes John Huston’s film as showing the difference between excellence and brilliance. Huston’s debut was indeed brilliant, but his statement was referring rather to his review of the excellent 1931 original version of Hammett’s tale which, if truth be told, is actually closer to the spirit of Hammett’s original. But if Halliwell was right, what is true of films is also true of their directors, and Roy Del Ruth, who directed the said original, was an excellent journeyman who made fast paced, entertaining early talkies and whose credits include such fun pre-code stuff as Blessed Event, Lady Killer and Blonde Crazy. Huston, meanwhile, was made of worthier stuff, and though not perhaps one of the all-time greats, is guaranteed a place in cinema’s hall of fame for directing The Treasure of the Sierra Madre, The Asphalt Jungle, The African Queen and The Dead. However his debut film remains his best and the likes of David Thomson have been quick to knock him, so do I also have doubts?
The fact is that Huston never really fulfilled his promise. The aforementioned films are memorable, but perhaps more memorable than they are truly great and much of his later years was spent as an actor for hire (brilliant in The Cardinal and Chinatown, for example). The Maltese Falcon was tossed to him because no-one else would touch it, in much the same way as it was tossed to Bogart because George Raft didn’t want it. The original, with Ricardo Cortez, was well regarded, and certainly had a Brigid in Bebe Daniels who reeked of sex and Dwight Frye, fresh from his horrific immortality at Universal, was a memorable Wilmer. Yet swiftness and sexiness aside, it lacked a touch of inspiration and that is what Huston gave it as both writer and director. The Maltese Falcon is a film buff’s dream, a film of unbridled, relishable joy, full of diverse characters, homophobic subtexts that are barely contained beneath the surface and a very real inherent sadism. It is also filled with one of the great ghouls galleries in Hollywood history; Peter Lorre’s effeminate Joel Cairo, the overnight star Sydney Greenstreet as the literally larger than life Gutman, Cook as the slimy Wilmer and Astor, radiating more mystery than sex as Brigid, a woman so duplicitous as to even deceive herself. They throw themselves into proceedings with relish and the script Huston gives them if anything improves on Hammett’s original. The Production Code may have necessitated the sexual edge being removed, but he filled the hole with something equally intoxicating, that indefinable something that equates to greatness. Very much what Spade referred to the Black Bird as, “the stuff that dreams are made of.”
It is true that Huston’s film is rather stagy at times, and certainly not as visually memorable as the later noirs that immortalised the style, through no fault of Arthur Edeson. Occasionally the direction does falter, but his delight with his new directorial toys more than makes up for it and, if like Orson Welles at RKO he owed his dual role to the success of first time writer-director Preston Sturges’ The Great McGinty the previous year, it still comes up smelling as sweet as Cairo’s stationery. In addition to the rogues gallery, Ward Bond and Lee Patrick are perfect and Bogart is simply magnificent as Spade. He’s not the womaniser of Cortez’s original who would screw anything with a pulse, but he’s the real McCoy. By the end, his and the film’s immortality are assured so that, when he lets the cops take away his beloved Brigid in the elevator, you applaud him. Altogether now, “that’s right, Angel, I’m going to send you over!“
A fair-minded review, Allan, but we have to give greater credit to Huston for his screenplay, which was the first serious attempt to bring the hard-boiled nature of Hammett’s fiction to the screen.
The 1931 version may have more closely followed the story of the novel, but it did not carry the hard-boiled spirit of Spade to the screen, and the 1936 version, Satan Met a Lay, with Bette Davis played the story as broad comedy.
David Spicer wrote in his book Film Noir (2002) that Huston’s film “was much closer than previous versions to the cynical tone of Hammett’s hard-boiled novel, retaining as much of Hammett’s dialogue as possible”.
William Luhr, in his book on the 1941 version says that: “Spade does not happily juggle a plethora of women but is bitterly involved with only two… For him, sexuality is not carefree but dangerous and guilt-ridden. The mystery and the evil world it reveals dominate the mood of the movie, and this sinister atmosphere does not entirely disappear at the end. Such an atmosphere presages film noir.”
The Spade of Hammett’s novel is deeply cynical, and at the end of the novel, but not in Huston’s film, he is ready to resume his affair with Archer’s wife. Mayer and McDonnell in The Encyclopedia of Film Noir (2007), say this about a scene in Huston’s screenplay: “Huston replaces Hammett’s cynicism with a more romantic gesture from Spade as he tells Brigid, ‘Maybe I do [love you]’. While Ricardo Cortez’s Spade in 1931 is more or less resigned to handing Wonderly over to the police, Huston extends this sequence by accentuating the psychological disturbance within the detective. His torment is palpable, especially when he shouts into her face that ‘I won’t [fall for you] because all of me wants to, regardless of the consequences’. While this is not an existential moment, as some claim, it does represent a significant moment in the development of film noir. Unlike the novel, where survival is all that matters to the detective, Spade’s torment in the 1941 film nearly destroys him.”
“The stuff that dreams are made of”
Hey! Allan,
Thank-you! Thank-you! Thank-you! for your most excellant review of one of my favorite film(s) of all time… director John Huston’s 1941 classic film “The Maltese Falcon”
Simply put… I Love this film!…and “The Bogart.” A couple of apropos…
…First of all,
“The Master of Film Noir, ” Tony D’Ambra, critique summed up the film(s) perfectly!..and he was the first to comment on “The Falcon.”
Secondly, It’s Bogie’s Birthday this month…Yay! (and thanks, to “The Master of Film Noir”…I know that TCM will feature 4 of his best on December 25, 2008…Another Yay!)
Finally, The question is…Do the “other ““Sam” have to send to me this film?… and the answer is…Nope!
because I own the most excellant, 3 disc boxset…You betcha!
darkcitydame 😉
p.s. And to think I didn’t even have to change my avatar in his (“The Bogart”) honor for the month of December. haha!
I can’t argue with much of that, Tony. I had a feeling you and dcd would link that one, but it was Sam’s suggestion as a precursor of the poll. Shows you how good the 1940s were when Falcon didn’t get a look in.
Message To Dark City Dame and Tony D’Ambra:
Both of you are beautiful people—Nothing that I say here about this timeless film, nor about Allan’s fine review of it could come within hailing distance of addressing the incredible enthusiasm evident in your comments here, whether it be Tony’s extraordinary addition, rightly citing Huston’s screenplay as an integral element, the essential references to David Spicer and William Luhr, (the the lighter 1936 film version) and the overiding cynicism of Spade’s character in Hammett’s novel; Dark City Dame’s exclamatory and lovely post are music to the ears of any serious film lover, and this site is blessed to have her gracious smileys and infectious spirit. One almost gets teary-eyed to see this kind of excitement, even in her reference to her personal avitar.
And yes, I knew these responses would boost Allan’s piece immeasurable.
But of course this is Tony’s area of specialty and I know he gave this film definitive treatment at his own site, not to mention continual supplemental posts at Films Noir showcasing this film classic’s many excellent literary treatments; Dark City Dame is also a Film Noir expert and fanatic and her love for both this film and Boagart is beautiful to behold.
Yes, DCD, I also have that 3 disc edition of the film, so both of us are good there.
Incidentally, while Allan (who did love this film and gave it the highest rating) admits it will narrowly miss the cut, I feel otherwise. It will be high on my own Top 25. It is one of the greatest of all American films in any genre, methinks.
Wait, Sam, until you realise what you have to leave out to put it in. You had 40 certainties in the 1930s and you’ll have at least 50 in the 1940s…
Sam said,
“Dark City Dame’s exclamatory and lovely post are music to the ears of any serious film lover, and this site is blessed to have her gracious smileys and infectious spirit. One almost gets teary-eyed haha! to see this kind of excitement, even in her reference to her personal avatar.”
(Laughter) haha! Thanks, Sam Juliano, 🙂
Calling Tony D’ Ambra and all WitD posters…. Can you guess who Birthday it’s today?
Hint (It is one of Tony D’Ambra’s favorite author(s)…I think this man is one of his favorite(s) authors?!?)
dcd 😉
Is it the birthday of Dashiel Hammett?
Anyway, I have to side with Sam, Tony and Dark CD in that this is not only one of the greatest film noir entries, but also in its own right a milestone in cinema.
I do agree with Allan Fish when he says that this film contains one of the ‘greatest ghouls galleries’ in Hollywood history. My favorite of them all is Sidney Greenstreet.
Allan, with all due respect, THE MALTESE FALCON for me will be in the Top 10. Yes, it’s true that some tremendous films will miss out, but I assure you NOT this film. As I said in a previous post, this is one of the greatest of all American films.
Bill, I suspect that your answer of Hammett for Dark City Dame’s query will be wrong. At this point I am pondering her question, but I don’t yet have an answer.
DCD, I know I can sometimes get carried away with myself, but I meant every word in regards to your postings, which any site should be grateful for having.
………….I originally thought of Raymond Chandler, but I will now say it is Cornell Woolrich’s birthday. I am not sure if this is one of Mr. d’Ambra’s favorite authors, but that’s my answer………..
Frank, you could be correct there. I just checked, and Woolrich’s birthday is December 4th. As far as Tony liking this particular author, he has written a number of reviews in the past months that have featured films based on Woolrich works. Of course I always think of Val lewton’s THE LEOPARD MAN.
Still, we’ll have to wait for Dark City Dame’s word on this.
But I do appreciate your time on this Frank. You have been a trooper here for us.
Fine piece, Allan, about a great film, although I’m not sure that he didn’t reach his potential. He has such a diverse body of work — gangster films, noirs, character pieces … it’s hard to pin down where his greatness lies.
Sam’s right: all the comments by this bunch here — Tony, dcd, Frank — really enhance the piece and I learn something every time I come.
What I find most interesting is that this is Huston’s first film. He didn’t match it in my view, but I’ll admit it’s a close call with “The Treasure of the Sierra Madre.”
The Mary Astor character is the most fascinating in the film–“The Femme Fatale,” but Bogie and Lorre are divine, a fact that no real movie lover would attempt to refute. Excellent review.
oh and I loved Elisha Cook Jr., who later was a lead in the campy House on Haunted Hill with Vincent Price.
Elisha Cook Jnr is the crown prince of noir losers.
Thanks for the kind comments Rick.
Indeed Rick, your comments are most appreciated here.
And the same goes for Joe and Frank Gallo, who have blessed this site with their regular, stellar submissions. We would be nowhere here without the support of people like Rick, Joe and Frank, not to mention Dark City Dame who lights up our lives.
One of the best movies ever.
There really isn’t too much I can add to this discussion, that Mr. Fish, Mr. D’Ambra, Sam, Rick Olson, Bill, Dark City Dame and others haven’t already said. One of the true greats.
Hi! Allan, Sam, Tony, Bill H, Frank H, Frank Gallo, Rick, Joe, Bobby and David Noack.
Yes!…The answer is Cornell Woolrich
Hi! Rick,
It’s good to see you out of your “house”….haha!
Sam said, “DCD, I know I can sometimes get carried away with myself, but I meant every word in regards to your postings, which any site should be grateful for having.”
Whatever you do Sam Juliano, don’t ever change!….Just my “silly”
sense of humour…kidding around with you of course!
darkcitydame 😉