by Sam Juliano
Note: The above picture is of Allan Fish and the five Juliano kids on the Empire State Building during Allan’s three-week Christmas visit of December 2008, which we’ll never forget.
As we approach the one-year anniversary of Wonders in the Dark, we ask ourselves how we made it. What started out as a whim has blossomed into a glorious community of film and music bloggers, who have given the site some of the most spectacular threads recorded on-line. The site has attracted the comments of some worldwide artists and scholars, and it’s become a home for a number of bloggers desiring regular interaction. From the beginning I was determined to start anew with my own blogsite after a short stint at a fine site named Movie Zeal. Within a week of September 4th, with the help of Living in Cinema’s Craig Kennedy and my favorite Australian and long-time colleague Tony d’Ambra, the bare essentials were in place to proceed. As I am technologically useless, I immediately enlisted the help of my dear friend from the U.K., Allan Fish, and within a few more days the collaboration that has defined the site for twelve months was in place. With Allan’s extraordinary backlog of film reviews, posted piece meal from his unpublished book, we had the backbone of fresh daily material ready to post along with my own reviews of recently-seen films. The combination in those early weeks was read by only a few bloggers, mostly my personal friends and school colleagues, who posted as they still do from the work PCs. A few loyal supporters from Mr. Kennedy’s site were the only ‘outsiders’ placing occasional comments, so the site moved forward at a snail’s pace.
Then came an ‘event’ that was to forever alter the dynamics of the site, one that fueled the drive to reach a wider audience and to turn the site into a gathering place for ongoing dialogue, much in the tradition of Living in Cinema. An eternally effervescent blogger with a trademark syntax visited the site for the first time in late October, and singlehandedly transformed the psychology of the writers as well as providing an impetus for others to dive in and engage in discussion. The blogger’s name is “Dee Dee” and she manages three blogsites, including the one most familiar to most, Darkness to Light, formerly known as Noirish City. A graphic designer, who is a private person (I know her name of course, but won’t reveal it) she resides in the midwest, and is a tireless blogger with a disarming personality and a sense of goodness that stands apart from anyone and everything she comes in contact with. Her astonishing generosity, concern for her fellow bloggers, and good-humored approach to blogging have enriched not only the blogging community but those who were fortunate to get daily visits from her. ‘Dee Dee’ is an ever-astute film noir fan, who has spent the last few years gathering together and watching noir titles, interviewing writers in the field, and following DVD releases and festivals nationwide. She immediately infused the site with a sense of enthusiasm and excitement, which was frankly infectious. Her extreme kindness is legendary, and just recently she read where someone was looking for a film on one of our threads, and promptly bought the film for the person whom she didn’t even know. She acquired other titles for site regulars, who e mailed me to say what an unbelievable person she is. Dee Dee’s presence at Wonders in the Dark has been more than invaluable, it’s frankly been the heart and soul of the site. She doesn’t write reviews, but she is actually part of the staff here, as she has done more than just support Allan and I with perky comments, but she is a personal friend, and meeting her can’t be matched by any other favorable development over the past year. Even Allan, who keeps his emotions in check, has admitted to me that she is a ‘very lovely’ person, by telephone. Her trademark ‘smileys’ and quirky demeanor have become part of WitD’s fabric. But going deeper, she is a bright, articulate and crafty blogger who knows what is neded to enrich the subjects, whether it be providing links, overview, biographical embelishment, or even colorful asides like the broaching of birthdays, passings or relevant tie-ins.
After Dee Dee’s prolific presence at the site had taken hold, others began to surface. My good friend, the stupendously-talented Kaleem Hasan of Scarsdale, N.Y., became a scholarly force at the site, and in addition to his thesis-length comments, he authored several superlative essays. At that time, our close affiliate, Tony d’Ambra began to help the site in all sorts of ways, while still maintaining his stewardship of his own two blogs, both of which are still minimally retained in the blogosphere. D’Ambra rehauled the site, and for a long time managed the sidebar graphics, special features and upcoming events, while simultaneously logging comments an dwriting some impressive reviews and posts, including some striking poems that were critically-praised by the entire blogging community. Tony is still a fiercely-loyal friend, who will always be a close affiliate on both a professional and personal level.
Then the ‘heavy-hitters’ started to arrive. Ultra-talented site writers like our resident Joel Bocko, Professional “Jon Lanthier”, “Extraordinary”Ed Howard, tenacious John Greco, Divine Dave Hicks, eloquent R. D. Finch, New Jersey author David Schleicher, Bombastically Brilliant Bob Clark, “Mr. Personality” Kevin J. Olson, Kevin’s formidable blogging bother Troy, brilliant Bobby J. of the UK, scholar Qalandar, Guy Buzniak, fecund T.S., “Sage” Samuel Wilson, sweet Judy, and the original crew from LIC: effervescent Alexander Coleman, lovely Dorothy Porker, popular and talented Daniel Getahun, my close friend, brilliant Pierre la Plume, New Zealand’s brightest star, “sartre” and wonderful Jenny Bee Boulden. Jenny wrote several pieces for the site as well. This nucleus, along with the steadfast school friends (Joe, Frank G., Frank A., Maria Frederic, David N., Karen, Bill Riley, John R., Bill H. etc) has transformed the site into a comment factory, with so many threads going over 100, and most reaching between 40 and 80. This has maximized the potential of the original posts. in the early days it should be mentioned that young loyalist Nick Plowman of South Africa was amazingly supportive. Bloggers Phillip Johnston, a great friend who I met, Joseph Demme, another gem whom I also saw in person, lovely Pat, gifted Marilyn Ferdinand, Anukabist, gifted Film Dr., tireless Ibetolis, Margaret, Jeopardy Girl, Evan Derrick, Ari, Joel, Tony D., Alison, K, Chuck, Matthew Lucas, James of Out 1, and close friends relentless Dennis Polifroni, Voting Tabulator Angelo D’Arminio, Broadway Bob, Opera Maven Peter Danish, cousin Bobby McCartney and good friend Jason Giampietro have all made significant contributions.
The site was named to the IMDB ‘hit list’ in early summer, and the result was a surge that never really abated. One of our current writers and most fecund contributors, Jamie Uhler, was perhaps the biggest gain from that unexpected windfall in hits, comments and recognition. The thread that was cited was The Best Films of the 1950’s poll results, and the decade countdowns with Allan’s prepared reviews in tow have brought many people over to the site to follow the daily drama. With a little under a month to go for the 80’s poll, plans are in place to cover the silent era up to 1929, 90’s, and oo’s, as well as a film score poll, and one on the greatest albums and songs of the rock era. The IMDB mentioning brought the site attention from all over, and there was a sharp increase in hits from that point onwards.
World famous film composer Donald Sosin, J.W.W. Turner expert Shelby Whittington, the costume designer of Irena’s Vow, Topeka Opera Society President Robert Webb, and a number of other important figures in the theatre and music world left favorable comments at the site before and after the IMDB acknowledgement. Film lovers around the world have cast many ballots for our decade pollings.
It’s been quite a ride for all of us, but my friendship with Allan Fish, with whom I’ve maintained a contentious relationship on-line, has oddly resulted in a chemistry that has amused site visitors exceedingly. My ‘happy’ approach is countered by Allan’s probing cynicism, replete with his famous caustic wit, that has been the lynchpin for many heated discussions and arguments, where dirty laundry is often aired. No blogsite out there is as ‘open’ and adverse to ‘proper comportment’ as WitD, and this may well be its prime ‘selling point.’ The man with the steel-plated hide, the tireless and fecund contrarian Bob Clark has been in the middle of rows with Allan, but has always handled himself magnificently. After sustaining two three week visits from the UK from Allan, over the past two years, I can readily admit he is one of my very best friends. There isn’t a day over the last five years that I haven’t spoken to him on the phone or by e mail. Many days it’s dozens of exchanged e mails in fact. I understand Allan. I know his faults, much as he knows mine, and the chemistry has largely been a success story. Who would have thought that a testy Limey from England would be one of the closest persons in my life! And then there’s incomparable and beloved Lucille and my five adored kids, who’ve had to deal with this latest obsession.
From the bottom of my heart I want to thank all who have made this venture such a surprising delight. As Tony D’Ambra astutely noted to me in an email: “Once you get there, you must work twice as hard to stay there, always acknowledging the blogging community that enabled the success.” We will do our utmost to honor the trust we’ve been given.
The 80’s countdown will be postponed for one day (continuing on Saturday morning) so this vital post can top-line an extra day. The above picture is of Sam, Kaleem Hasan and Allan during Allan’s first visit to the states.
Well, Sam, you are quite a guy, and this is quite a post. (Not to mention quite a tribute to Dee Dee, who should be all smiley-faces when she read this.)
This blog has really been by online home away from home for the past six months; sometimes it feels like an addiction, but it has also been extremely rewarding, stimulating, and enjoyable. I honestly hope you maintain your enthusiasm and energy, and that Wonders keeps rising and rising. Honestly, I can feel myself drifting somewhat from the blogosphere as outside demands and personal changes shift my focus, and as the initial novelty and thrill of blog-writing and blog-reading inevitably fades. This drift has not really made itself felt in my presence on Wonders, where like Al Pacino, just when I think I’m out… (you know the rest) , and where I will probably keep regularly visiting and contributing at least through the conclusion of the countdowns, but I’m quite conscious of the fact that I have cut down drastically on my own blogging (which I actually think is a good thing, as I’m in a mindset right now where I want to develop and cultivate what I write, rather than compulsively post just to fill a quota) and certainly my own perusing of my peers, which is unfortunate.
Anyway, the best thing I can say about Wonders in the Dark is that there really isn’t anything else out there like it. There are other sites with profuse and lively commentary, strong personalities (though not this exact, and particularly effective, combo), and tireless promotion (in the best sense, of generosity and invention) but few with the combination of all these traits and others.
You’ve got a good thing here, Sam, and best of luck with it in the future.
Your response here Movie Man is simply incredible. I know you have made WitD your home, and I know you have burned the midnight oil regularly awaiting the countdownnight-after-night. I love your entire perspective on this entire enterprise, and your acknowledgement that there are unique aspects to this place.
But I think you appreciate the fact that Allan’s reviews are perhaps the most vital daily component to the site, and that his years of hard work where movies were the center of his life like no other human being on the earth, has finally come to be appreciated by so many.
Movie Man, it would be impossible to ascertain just how much YOU have done here, and your weekly posts are classy.
Thanks very much for everything, not least of which is this flattering testament.
And as far as Dee Dee, well, one can only consider themselves blessed to know this wonderful human being. The term ‘superstar’ befits her humanism on every level.
I’m honored to be mentioned as a “heavy hitter” alongside such great writers there! Thanks, Sam. You and Allan and others have a great thing going here, and although my commenting has subsided lately this blog is still one of the first of daily stops around the blogosphere. I almost always come away from a discussion a better movie-goer.
Oh, and I like being called “Mr. Personality”…it sounds like I should be a wrestler! Haha.
Congrats again on all the great work you do here. You deserve every accolade you’re bound to receive in this comment thread in the next couple of days.
Kevin: Your commenting has certainly not subsised here! Ha! Your massive post on Tuesday about books and films, and now here, not to mention many others last week and before. It is I who needs to be more consistant at Hugo Stiglitz Makes Movies! But I assure you I will be.
Although I referred to you as “Mr. Personality” it was basically a result of you having it both ways, the terrific writing talent and the personality to match. You and Dan Getahun are gifted in that sense, but that’s not to say others here are prigs! Ha!
Sam, they say in web marketing that content is king, and that is certainly true, but true success in blogging is building a community. The vibrant community you have built at Wonders in the Dark is fairly and squarely your achievement alone. Well done and God bless.
Well I thank you Tony. To say your help has been central here for many months, well, that would be the understatement of the year.
Tony’s right, Sam. Don’t you dare say “too kind”, however your politeness dictates. He’s just stating a fact, pure and simple. There will be no more comments from me on this thread, this is time for you to take some plaudits.
You are too modest here Allan. You reviews for the countdown are the hook.
A BIG CONGRATULATIONS!!!! A full year! Seems longer as the relationships between us all feel as if they’ve always been. There have been arguments, for sure, but the mutual respect we share for each others opinions and points of view thread through us and bond us tighter. I consider this site my haven, the place I go to get away from the harshest realities of my day. In this tumultuous time I feel rescued by a place like this where prejudices are put aside and brain power and passion rule the day. This site, an enormous think tank for art of every kind WILL, in my estimation, slowly but surely reveal itself over time as THE site for such debate, theory and passion. CONGRATS one and all!!!! Nice tribute to Dee-Dee as well! Love you all, Dennis
You are the rising star here my friend. I need not say anything more. Your late-night discourse with Bob Clark has kept th esite going round the clock! LOL!! Thank You.
Sam – Congrats!!!
Visiting WitD everyday has become a morning ritual. I look forward to the undiscovered films, the wit, the enthusiasm, the knowledge, and the drama. You have done a great job here.
John: You have been a steadfast supporter here for a long time now. You are one of the most sincere, genuine an dunpretentious people around, and your knowledge and talent (and passion) are remarkable. Thank You my very good friend.
Congrats Sam and Allan for bringing WiTD so far. Sam this is a truly wonderful essay even if I disagree completely with your generous characterizations of myself! I have been in and out of town over the past month and tied up with some other things but will return to some of the posts I’ve missed soon enough.
Oh no Kaleem. I can’t praise you enough for all that you hav edone. So what if you’ve disappeared for a short while. What about all the massive posts over months? Being a close friend of yours makes it even nicer.
Sam – I too am honored to be cited as a “heavy hitter.” This is without question my favorite movie site on the ‘net and I have learned a lot from your, Allan, and everybody else that posts. The discussions are fantastic, sometimes heated, but with a few exceptions it’s like a big family where everything is eventually forgiven and forgotten as we move onto the next post! It’s a great atmosphere, and as John said, it’s a ritual for me to stop by multiple times each day.
I’ll also reinforce the point that as you rightly praise others that have contributed here, Sam, don’t overlook yourself. You’re one of the nicest guys I’ve met online and you’ve helped me a ton in getting my blog to be active and in making movies available to me that I otherwise would likely never see.
And the relationship between Sam and Allan is always entertaining to me. As said in the article, the friendship is obvious, but they pick at each other like siblings! 🙂
Dave–
You are a prince, plain and simple. The things you say here would lift the spirits of a condemned killer, but as it is, no blogger could hope to get more sincere and effusive praise. I can’t address every point in fear of seeming I’m a gloater, but you pinpoint all the aspects of teh blogging experience that in th ecase of WitD have come together. Thanks also for the flattering words for me personally! I expected this thread to be back-slapping, but you always come to the table with the best-tasting food. I can’t thank you enough for all you have done here for months now! And God what a gentleman!
……..I’m honored to have my name mentioned. Best Wishes for continued success. You guys have really climbed the mountain……..
Thank Frank! I am hoping we don’t fall off.
A hearty congratulations on a year under the belt Sam! I knew you could do it and I look forward to the next 365!
Your help from the start was a critical component Craig. I speak to you by e mail as much as I do anyone else here, so that should tell you what i think of you, and how your site was in large measure an inspiration. It’s still one of my favorite regular stops, and no thread on any site have I visited as often as the famed “The Watercooler.” Thanks so very much.
Sam
Just wanted to add to the congrats being offered by others. I consider your site essential to my education as a movie fan — the best of decades lists have inspired me to watch many great movies I had never taken the time to see, and I’m glad I have done that. Thanks for all the hard work you put in, since I know this whole blogging thing can be quite a time consuming process.
Troy: I just added you to the post, as it appears your well-loved brother Kevin is getting all the attention!!! LOL!!! You have been at this site many times and have supported us with your regular insights, beautifully expressed. I will also add your site to our blogroll now. Thank You very much!
Congratulations are in order, but also acknowledgment for the extraordinary (albeit unsurprising) generosity of this post. Whenever I visit this site, I feel I receive an education; and, just as important, encounter an abiding passion on the part of those who visit this site regularly.
Those are beautiful words there Qalandar! And every visit from you in truth and been a special treat!
Sam, you stir the emotions better than anyone. I agree that it was team work here that brought so much success to this blogsite. It’s amazing how many bloggers have made repeated appearances here. It’s a testament to the high-quality presentation every single day. You all deserve the highest praise.
That “Dee Dee” is surely the Mother Theresa of bloggers, and she’s fluent in French too. I was moved reading about her.
I like that “Mother Theresa” of bloggers. Dee Dee has shown those qualities in spades. Thanks Joe for your continuing support.
It’s been a learning experience visiting this place almost every day of the work week. The features, endless reviews and always-astute comments have done more than occupy time for me. Thanks for the mention and for the memories. Good Luck as you embark on your second great year!
Thanks for all you have done here Frank!
Outstanding work on a regular basis. of course you must know that you have a family too, right? Planning to get them involved soon? Hey, just kidding. You have accomplished miracles in just 12 months. You should be proud.
You have a good point there! LOL.
Sam, in behalf of Sue and myself, I issue congratulations to you, Allan and the staff here, I recall many of those special moments you describe in this anniversary post. I know the IMDB nod was crucial, but I think you guys had built this up without that designation. The countdowns are always addictive, but so have all the classical and rock reviews and the Broadway shows been excellent. I also enjoyed the forsaken cinema series, and hope you will move on now with reviews of 80’s films you appreciated. Your revew of ‘Henry V’ may have been your greatest film piece, but there are many others. Your music pieces are tops though.
Dee Dee deserves all the emotions you described her with. I have visited Noirish City myself a few times, and there isn’t a kinder soul on the planet. What’s often lost in the shuffle, as you note near the end, is that she’s a brilliant contributor.
Peter, your observations are dead-on all the way through. Thanks to you and Sue for all you both have done here. I agree that while the IMDB nod was big, the site had already come into it sown by then. Thanks for the compliments on HENRY V. And yes, Dee Dee combines intelligence with humanism, a rare combo.
Happy birthday to you, WITD – I thought you were much older than one year old, I must admit!
I’ve enjoyed visiting the site over recent months and am honoured to be mentioned here. Many congratulations to Sam and Allan, Dee Dee and the rest of those who have built the site.
Thanks Judy! Your presence here on this and a number of other threads has really been appreciated. You are another one who brightens up people’s days, not to mention your vast knowledge and appreciation of film and the arts.
If ever a person deserved all the accolades here it is ‘Dee Dee’. She is not only tireless, but she colors a dar day with her outlook. All of you are lucky to have someone like her. The fact that she is generous isn’t a bit surprising. Best wishes for a continued and fruitful association.
Allan Fish deserves a great deal of the credit here too. I know you realize that Sam, and understand the teamwork is what made this site take off into the stratosphere. I will keep on reading as long as you make some more copies for me. hehehe. You know I jest my great friend. I appreciate all you have done.
David: Both Dee Dee and Allan DO deserve a tremendous amount of credit for varying reasons. Suffice to say they are part of the team here in a big way. Thank You!
What is really “lost” here is that apart from your statesmanship, you are as great a writer as any of them. This incredible post is further proof for all to see. Continued success for this great site!
Thanks very much Maria for that over-the-top compliment, and for all your loyalty here since the beginning.
Sam, you personally deserve more than a tribute like this for the support and friendship YOU have offered to so many of us since before you even started WitD a year ago. Thank you for your tireless enthusiasm, unbridled opining and steadfast loyalty as we all try to learn how to make sense of the ever-evolving blogosphere. The successful discussions you have had here are testament to the open-mindedness and fairness represented by you, Allan, Dee-Dee and the rest of the crew, and I wish you the best of success and many more acknowledgments in the second year!
One of the greatest of all the responses here Daniel. I am speechless. Thanks very much for always being here spread insight and encouragement. I’ll never forget your support during those dark days of the past. You were steadfast from the start.
Loved that Female Trouble review. I remembered the Lord of the Rings discussion too. Congrats to everyone. Long live and prosper. At least you know you have me on the Star Trek movie. Great stuff.
Ah, Ricky! You remembered that FEMALE TROUBLE review? What a guy! We ST fans must stick together.
An essay to join the best the site has ever offered. It’s the ‘feelings’ you eloquently evoke that count the most. I appreciate you mentioning my name. Your music reviews are the best, and Allan’s continuing decade survey never fails to afford daily suspense. I find myself looking at the computer every morning to see what is up next. Kudos to all involved, and a special nod to Dee Dee, for all she has done.
Thanks Frederick for spending time at WitD, and for telling us it was worth it!
My congratulations to Sam, Allan, Dee Dee, Joel, Tony, Kaleem and Jamie for providing readers with a premium service for twelve informed months. The writing can’t be matched.
And thanks for reading right along John!
Sam, congratulations on a terrific landmark.
You know, being a discerning film/tv connoisseurs can be an isolating experiance in some parts of of the globe, when the prevailing ethos is of propagating shallowness (was it ever any other way?), and when most of ones family, friends and neighbours probably haven’t seen anything silent, B/W or made before they grew into teenagers.
Your site brings together a diversity of knowledgable, provocative and thoughtful opinions. Every day logging on, it’s like visiting the neighbours in a utopia. You, a terrifically generous host, Allan – an inspiration, as for Dee Dee, what a marvellous spirit. Not to mention all the numerous contributers cited in your essay.
This site is enough to revive the dormant passions and fires that sometimes get blown to a low by harsh winds.
You are one classy guy Bobby! So thoughtful, so perceptive, so appreciative. It’s been great having you around, and your contributions at the Monday Morning Diary are just incomparable. Three Cheers for another year of shared discourse!
”Everyone will be famous for 15 minutes.”
Pop Icon Andy Warhol
I started to type this at 7:00pm
DeeDee
Cont…
Though atypical, as it does not contain any emoticons, this may very well be my favorite Dee Dee post…
Hi! Sam Juliano, Allan Fish, Tony D’Ambra, Craig Kennedy, Alexander Coleman and to all the Wonders in the Dark readers…Congratulation!
Sam Juliano, Thank you, kindly for acknowledging me, but just like Allan and Tony mentioned…all the accolades should go to you…for all your hard work and unyielding determination.
Tony, is right you are one of the nicest bloggers in the blogosphere.
Here hoping to your continue success and may you alway remain the same friendly, sincere and most honest Person…that I have come to know and respect.
DeeDee
Thank-you!
Cont…
I’ll add a few thoughts on what I’ve said before – one thing I like about this blog is the amount of factors it brings into play, which you rarely see combined in one place. It manages to be both democratic and erudite, knowledgeable yet unpretentious, lively but focused. It’s the combination of personalites, Sam’s stewardship of the community aspect, and Allan’s vast and untouchable erudition (not that everyone else are slouches, but that only highlights his own store).
I think the crucial point to return to is “un-pretentious” – Allan once described himself as amateur, and Sam contested the point but Wonders in the Dark is “amateurish” in the best sense of the word, which rarely gets used any more: none of the pretenses or loftiness of the (average, mind you) “professional”, twice the passion, ten times the democratic input. That this is not a site run by academics nor critics with years in the trenches is a point in its favor. Don’t get me wrong, I love many of those folks too – David Bordwell and Glenn Kenny, for example, run fantastic blogs – but there’s just something so refreshing and welcoming about the perspective of a hilariously and endearingly effusive jr. high teacher from Jersey and a grumpy Brit who hates his job (whatever it may be) – and who, by the way, don’t present themselves in that way self-consciously (as I wrote those descriptions they appears cloyingly on my monitor like some plot summary for a grotesque odd couple sitcom.) Rather they just are who they are and the personalities manifest themselves accordingly. Authenticity I guess (uh, oh, be warned – the hipsters will now be pouring in, in droves…). Yes, true, Allan will be headed into the academic thickets soon enough, but frankly, he’s earned the reprieve from the bittersweet rewards of amateurism and I’m quite sure he’ll retain his unique outlook and approach.
And not to be overlooked is that in distancing oneself from a certain loftiness or over-conscious stylization, one cannot distance oneself from actual knowledge and engagement with the field … often forgotten when amateurism is either derided or celebrated: to be an amateur is not to be ignorant.
Sorry if I made Sam cringe with that “a” word, but perhaps it needs to be redeemed from the tarnish it’s garnered, and not just here.
Movie Man:
You always manage to dissect a situation with a unique perspective. I loved, loved, loved the ‘effusive Jr. High School English teacher’ bit/Grampy Brit bit, (and grotesque ‘Odd Couple’ sitcom!! LOL!!!) and am not at all cringing at the ‘amateur’ label, which is appropriate here for certain. Allan’s brilliance is informed in large measure by the fact that he has focused his entire being on film and film criticism, but hey more power to him, he’s earned what’s he’s achieved. Few if any are prepared to released reviews for nearly 100 films of every decade from the silent era to the present, and truth be said it’s a STUNNING accomplishment. Allan has th eunique abilities to create similes on th espot, and many are classic. This is a gift. I think you sized it all up here perfectly Joel for the most part, and I can’t thank you enough for giving this whole scene here such deep thoughts and glowing appraisal.
I want to send out a special…Thank-you, to the following wonderful people
Sam Juliano, and Mrs. Lucille Juliano and their five lovely children,
(Pictured with Allan Fish) I have Listed the names…Alphabetically
Allan Fish, Alexander, Angelo D. Armino Jr. (Tabulator Extraordinaire)
Bobby McCartney, Bobby J., Broadway Bob, Craig Kennedy, Daniel Getchum, David Noack, Dave, Dennis, Film Dr, Frank Gallo, Frank A. Frederick Jamie, Jennybee, Joel Bocko, Joe, John R., Joseph Demme, Joseph “Jon” Lanthier, Kaleem Hasan, Newly weds Kevin J. Olson and Mrs. Olson, (and his brother Troy) , Qalandar,
Jason Giampetro, Joel Bocko, Maria, Marilyn, R.D. Finch, Rick, Ricky, Pat, Pierre La Plume, Peter Danish, Peter and his wife Sue, Shawn,(Deadpan) Phillip Johnston, Russell, (Oh! no, Russell…I didn’t “shout” your name…I was going to, but I had a change of heart.) Tony, T.S.,…
New acquaintances: author David H.Schleicher, Judy, (writers) and even though they don’t leave comments…Sam Juliano,
have acknowledged them personally.
R.L Bourges, Andrew (katsis) Eric (I must admit that Eric has posted here once at WitD) and his brother Scott Armstong.
For anyone that I have overlooked I’am so very sorry!…and to know that is was most definitely, unintentional…and most importantly, last, but not least I like to…Thank,…all the readers here at Wonders in the Dark for your support.
Thank-you!
See what I mean folks?
This is the typical infectious post that really has you smiling from ear to ear! Not only did Dee Dee mention people who were originally thanks in the first post, but a few others who were accidentally omitted (Like Rick Olson for example) and characteristics of certain people like my friend Russell Martin and Peter’s wife Sue. Dee Dee’s knowledge of the site personel rivals her command of her subject. She insists that I get the credit, but you know what, SHE is the one who triggered the surge, and has kept the spirit going. I am thrilled that everyone has responded with her on this thread with great enthusiasm!
Hi! Joel Bocko,
Joel Bocko said, “Though atypical, as it does not contain any emoticons, this may very well be my favorite Dee Dee post…”
Ha!Ha!
Joel, the emoticons, maybe missing…intentionally,
but a “typos” is presence……unintentionally,
I’am so sorry! for misspelling your last name Daniel Getahun.
DeeDee
Ah, Daniel Getahun…………..Movie Man, what do you think of Dan Getahun? Now is that a great guy or what?
To quote you when you agree with something but aren’t sure what else to say on the matter….indeed, Sam, indeed. (Dan and I had some great exchanges on Jackson a while back, which I believe you participated in as well…)
“Indeed Sam, indeed.”
hahahahahahahaha!!!!! Yes, that is one of my catch phrases, but I mainly use it when I am so much in agreement with the person that my agreement somehow makes elaboration almost insulting. But there’s no doubt I am also at a loss for words sometimes, so I don’t take risks! Ha.
That would be Michael Jackson, by the way, not Peter or Jesse.
Har, har. I just tried to post this and got this message:
“You are posting comments too quickly. Slow down.”
Do I get a prize, Sam?
Any prizes that are being given out here have been won by you a long time ago. You actually own stock in this site. As of late only Bob Clark and dennis are challenging you for the title of site overseer.
Whenever I think of Michael I get depressed. Would you believe that Billie Jean and Rock With You are being played in this house with regularity still, by my kids?!
To DEE-DEE. “And remember, the full weight of a true heart is not measured by how much you love, but by how much YOU ARE LOVED BY OTHERS..” (Frank Morgan as The Wizard in THE WIZARD OF OZ)
Apropos of nothing, I’ve been watching selections from Scarface quite a bit over the past few days (in preparation for my entry in Tony Dayoub’s De Palma week). The more I see of it, the more I’m convinced that it may be a trash masterpiece, but with the emphasis on the latter rather than the former – trash (in the form of 80s electro-pop, decadent clothes and sets, shameless greed, unsubtle bombast, and vulgar but clueless grabbing after “the world and everything in it”) happens to be its milieu, but Scarface conveys its rather venal but attractive (important point there) culture vividly and brilliantly. Seen in widescreen, with the colors restored (so many of us first experienced it in lurid pan-and-scanned VHS tapes) the film is lush and eye-popping, a decadent treat for the eyes. The film manages to both enjoy and subvert its hero’s vulgarity. I was just watching the scene where Elvira comes down in the elevator and for the first time I listened to the dialogue in the background. It’s hilarious, with Steven Bauer’s character chatting up Robert Loggia about the gunfight they were just engaged in, casually discussing it with macho bravado like a high school jock describing a touchdown or a geek relishing an especially cool video game he just played with his friends (or a film buff running off to a favorite blog to relay some great dialogue from a movie, um…):
“It’s nothin’, man, it went right threw me. (bragging) Hit the wall! I ran out of bullets, like an asshole and while I’m standing there changing the clip, the (emphasis) little motherfucker who I had killed already – but was NOT dead – shot me. (Loggia says something) No, the guy was behind me. I killed him. (Loggia asks how many “bullets he catch”) One bullet. Nine millimeters. Nothing. But what’s lucky is that Cicci came in at that time with Manoel, who’s bigger than him. Blew the fucker away. (bragging again, as Loggia chuckles) And I had already killed the lady who was sitting on the bed, who did not look like a lady. Too fucking ugly.”
Granted, a transcription only goes so far, failing to convey the almost innocent braggadicio in Bauer’s voice, the ironic juxtaposition of this lurid conversation with the sleek nouvea riche contours of Loggia’s digs and the clinking of the ice in the classy glasses, and the charmingly throwaway quality of the whole exchange (the focus of this passage is Pacino staring up at the glamorously bored Pfeiffer as she descends in an art deco lift; we don’t see the faces of the two speakers most of the time; and Giorgio Moroder’s hammy but catchy score masks the sound even more). Not to mention the superficial gloss which Bauer gives the alarmingly gory bloodbath we just witnessed a few minutes ago, as if he’s too shallow to even register its horror.
Also, a simile to pay homage to Allan – it reminded me of the brilliant scene at the end of Pineapple Express with the stoners unconsciously deconstructing their own climactic shootout.
Joel-i agree with you wholeheartedly on the brash visual style of DePalma’s film. But, aside from his recreation of a period that, at the time, was not far behind him, I feel that even the praise for that becomes long-winded. SCARFACE, in my opinion, has no redeaming qualities and is often praised as a look at times that are now history AS history. The lawlessness of the Southern/Latino drug trade was ongoing news at the time DePalma was making this film (NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN takes place at exactly the same time as this film-but THAT film is a recreation). Fact is, that the so-called visionary visuals of SCARFACE were merely pedestrian for a film about this topic made in that year. Its still MAJOR TRASH.
And I’ll take NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN any day over garbage like SCARFACE. DePalma is a hack director that couldn’t fit the Coen’s jock.
Jesus, did they direct No Country with their cameras or their dicks? 😉
Dennis, the dismissal of DePalma as a “hack director” frankly does not bear out any assessment of his work. You can dislike him if you choose, but a hack has mediocre talents, and De Palma does not. Perhaps you feel he could put them to better use, but it’s silly to write him off as untalented.
Also, I disagree completely with your assessment of Scarface’s value. Its appeal to me goes way beyond its historical relevance, but if we’re going to talk about that, how about the fact that the film does just what you say it does – capture the scene AS IT’S HAPPENING (and as myth, rather than documentary, which is even harder) rather than with 20 years hindsight to mull over the history. Usually it is not until well into mid- or even late-decade that we get zeitgeist-defining works; think The Graduate in ’67 or Saturday Night Fever in ’77. Scarface nailed the 80s in ’83, three mere years after the boatlift. Oliver Stone (whom you neglect to mention in your comment, though he played a huge role in creating Scarface’s vibe and edge) may have many faults, but failure to be relevant isn’t one of them – he’s always boldly going where few other writer/directors will tread. For better or worse, timidity is not one of his faults. You say “The lawlessness of the Southern/Latino drug trade was ongoing news at the time DePalma was making this film” as if that’s a bad thing – as if it’s somehow more brilliant to go back, safely, two decades on, with the benefit of lots of historical research to recreate a less lively version of the past. I liked No Country a lot, but it’s aim was entirely different from Scarface’s – rather than take us inside the thrill of the drug trade, it regards it from outside with the horror and mournfulness of old-time Westerners. That’s totally legit, but it renders any comparisons between the two films rather pointless.
Also, shooting a film in 1983 Miami does not automatically give it sweeping camera movements, lushly and carefully designed sets, nor brooding yet propulsive editing – all those elements belong to De Palma, thank you very much. But OK, let’s separate out what the filmmakers are and aren’t responsible for (though considering all the subjects available to tackle in 1983, that seems a little silly – as if Stone and De Palma just happened to stumble across the Miami scene as anyone would have in their position). Yes, many of the elements Scarface so brilliantly captured were, well, there to be captured, for whatever that’s worth. This may make De Palma’s achievement less praiseworthy than the Coens’, in theory at least, but since when does observing rather than creating damage the greatness of a film? I love verite for doing just that. Gimme Shelter is no less great a movie because the Maysles didn’t stage Altamont (though Pauline Kael virtually accused them of doing just that…)
It’s clear you don’t want to embrace Scarface as a masterpiece, which is your prerogative, but you haven’t made a very strong case against it.
Anyway, I should’ve known I was opening a can of worms there, particularly with Dennis and Bob, two anti-Scarface cadres, the only other nighttime lurkers at this hour! I’ll give you a chance to respond, and then try to wind things up as I’ve dug myself a hole here… I’m working on a rather in-depth project (involving Scarface) and keep getting waylaid and peeking at this thread, though there’s work to be done.
Fun as always, though distracting as hell…
Here we go again. De Palma’s talented, but in my opinion he’s yet to apply his talents into a single, fully cohesive work. Same thing with the Coens, once you get past their glib addiction to irony at any price. I don’t know about “Scarface” and “No Country For Old Men”, but I do know that this particular thread is no place for another all-out flamewar over a difference of opinion or two. This is a time to celebrate what Sam, Fish and everyone else has accomplished in the long and short of the year this site has been running. I know everyone might be a little drunk with success right now, but let’s not allow an anniversary party to turn into a ballroom brawl, or else the next festivity we’ll commemorate will have to be a wake for those whose feelings couldn’t survive the last volley of emotional crossfire. I’d suggest we raise a toast to the fine work Sam & Co. have done, but I’d say it’s a fine time to sober up.
Bob, not my intention at all and I think while perhaps a bit terse, I kept the tone civil. Besides, if things get out of hand I can just bring up Jaws & Apocalypse Now and then we’ll be back out the bar pouring drinks and singing old songs, to extend your party metaphor. However, I’m actually kind of glad you stepped in as referee, as now I can actually get myself back to work which I keep telling myself I’m going to do before dropping everything and sneaking a peek back over here!
And anyway, you’re right in that the subject here should remain the great accomplishment of Wonders, rather than a debate over a particular movie (although, in a sense, what better tribute to Wonders than to hijack a thread, which has become a venerable site tradition? I’m only partially kidding…)
I’d like to discuss De Palma, as he’s a filmmaker who’s only grown on me very, very recently, but I’ll refrain except to say that his early work – Greetings and Hi, Mom! – helped me greatly in the process of warming up to him, for whatever that’s worth.
OK, lips zipped.
Without attempting to add fuel to the fire, I concur with Movie Man concerning De Palma… And perhaps most importantly, a “hack” filmmaker does not imbue his pictures with pieces of the fabric of his personality or psychology. De Palma certainly does this, whatever one thinks of the pictures he makes.
“now I can actually get myself back to work which I keep telling myself I’m going to do before dropping everything and sneaking a peek back over here!”
Problem being, of course, it’s not hard to “drop everything” and “sneak away” when a momentary click takes you from work to distraction. Perhaps I should have two computers, one for work, one for play.
Anybody want to donate?
Or maybe I should just unplug my modem and hide it in my kitchen cabient. Yes, I think I’ll do that now. Adieu, farewell, aveedezan (it’s spelled phonetically, right?), see you in the morning when I plug it back in…
(No, I’m actually not kidding. I’m about to hide my modem, from myself, in my kitchen cabinet. It’s worked before…)
Thank you so much for the mention, Sam, and I must say, this is a post to end all posts! Amazing! What a celebration here, and as everyone else has said, Wonders in the Dark is a truly extraordinary, brilliant home for all cinema lovers! Best wishes to all affiliated, who comment or read, at WitD!
Thanks so much for that Alexander, and it’s great to see you around! I am looking forward to reading your upcoming review of INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS! I’ll be nice. Ha!
Wait — it’s been only a year? I feel like Wonders in the Dark has become part of the fabric of my everyday life and has always been here! Sam, I think it was your “WTF, what is your problem, dude?” comment in retaliation to my negative opinion of “Slumdog Millionaire” that first drew me into the web of WitD…and here I happily spend so much of my time, often in agreement, but occasionally, and respectfully in disagreement.
And as far as your tribute to the Wonder that is DeeDee…well, I can only saw we are all happier people thanks to her tireless efforts!
…in honor of DeeDee…I should correct that typo…and say …”well, I can only SAY we are all happier people thanks to her tireless efforts!”
David, I remember that SLUMDOG MILLIONAIRE dialogue as if it were yesterday. But on balance you and i seem to have very similar taste. I agree with you more than just about anybody. What you say there about Dee Dee is so true, and we were forever enriched when you began your prolific run here at WitD. We are eternally grateful, our very good friend!
Congratulations Wonders in the Dark. Not many blogs survive even a month or two but to see you guys are still as big after a year is truly a testament to the hard work, fantastic reviews and endless dedication to acknowledge, respond and even debate with your faithful followers through intense and intellectual discussions in the comment section that are supplied on your site. You guys have put in so much of time and effort into this to update it daily with either a well written piece of criticism, a nice conversational piece or a link to a review with the sites stamp of approval, that it would be a ungrateful on my part not to applaud you. Being the one year anniversary, I can’t help reminiscing the first time entering the site: reading a thoughtful little article on The Aspect Ratio where Ari was promoting Allan’s great countdown to the best films of the 60s and then listing his own top 25. After a full month of following the countdown and building up a little bit rage after seeing Allan list more and more obscure films I’d never heard of over my all time favorites (“High and Low, Red Dessert, Hari Kiri and If… didn’t even crack the top 50!”) I had realized I was hooked. But it was the well written reviews and the great discussions that kept bringing me back for more. Soon I started taking part expressing my own views (i think my first post was for the review of Werner Herzog’s masterpiece The Enigma of Kaspar Hauser were I stated my love for the film and asked why Stroszek was excluded from the list) and after getting a reply from a frequent blogger, dennis, I felt appreciated that my comments were being read. After commenting more on the site and being encouraged by the staff (thanks Sam), I can truly say there’s no film blog I check up as frequently as this and to be mentioned in the Anniversary piece above (even if my name was misspelled) makes me hope this wont be the last time we celebrate another Wonders in the Dark anniversary. Thank You and keep up the good work — AnubhavBist
Anu, that was really quite a comment there. Nothing like an insightful, comprehensive and gracious submission, replete with the personal touch. It really adds so much here! I never knew you started over at The Aspect ration, a place that we are exceedingly indepted to for all sorts of reasons. I assure you your high-quality comments have been greatly appreciated right along. There’s no question that Allan’s countdown has been the lynchpin for inspired discussions here, and it’s true his reservoir of material insures there are daily updates. Few can touch him when it comes to having seen just about every film that has ever been made, at least aside from the garbage he rightly avoids. I know you have visited here continuously and all I can say is thanks a hundred times over. That is the greatest testament a blogsite could experience. Sorry about that spelling error, I will soon rectify it! Thanks again, our very good and insightful friend.
It’s been a while since I visited these hallowed halls, but it’s really an exciting thing to see the celebration that is ongoing. Sam, Allan, Dee Dee and the others responsible here are to be issued the highest praise. You’ve not only achieved a milestone, but you’ve proven that hard work and respect for your fellow bloggers can result in a groundswell of support.
It’s been clear for quite some time that this is the film community’s favorite blogsite.
All the best for continued success.
Bill, you did a lot for us right along, for the very start. All you say there could hardly be contested. Much appreciated.
Congratulations. An accomplishment to be proud of. I was happy to be a small part of it.
Thanks Joanne for being here.
A congrats are in order gents (and Dee Dee too).
But more then anything I want to say thank you. It’s my favorite film site around and talking with all the folks here is a great joy I have. Plus finding films I’ve never seen (and often never even heard of) is a great thrill and a worthwhile resource I didn’t have before.
What did it for me? Simply put I found the site during the 60’s poll and both Sam and Allan had the Bresson donkey as the avatar image. A site that valued a director like Bresson was enough for me. To many here this seems like a no-brainer but travel the internet for great art-film criticism… it’s easier said then done, for every one Bresson there are countless comic book movie entries elsewhere. Finding ‘real’ film fans is something rare in my life, yet you’ve made it almost singularly possible.
A most sincere Thank You.
Jamie–
I had somehow accidentally missed this. God!! This is one of the most subtle yet powerful pieces on this thread. i salute you for these wonderful words. I am moved by them.
That was a very touching tribute Sam to the woman ‘Dee Dee’. She must be a very special person. Good Luck as you begin your second year. You’ve all worked your tails off.
Anyone in the area able to go, don’t forget we have our annual 9-11 tribute at the American Legion Hall on Anderson Avenue. Some refreshments will be served inside. Russell Martin will be playing in the band as usual.
Thanks very much Steve for this vital comment in more ways than one.
Are they serving chicken parm, Sam or Allan?
Jack, I for one am thrilled to have you participating on this site, I have asked Sam time and time again if you checked it, and I think you should not let nefarious charlatans like Dennis dissuade you from commenting.
JACK MARSH?!?!? Who the fuck let this guy on to the WitD address. Here’s an A+ asshole of the highest order. Dee Dee would even have to succumb to hating this slob! I can’t tell you the years of embarrassment He put myself, Schmulee and others through with his cheapness, unwashed body and a voice that could only be described as FUCKIN ANNOYING. When a beloved family member of Sam’s died (and I mean beloved, we all loved this person) Jack was asked to babysit Sam an Lucille’s kids in an emergency. When Sam returned home grief stricken. Mr. Marsh actuall had the balls to charge Sam for the sitting. Every restaurant hated this guy, I remember a buffet place we used to go to would cringe when he walked through the door cause he would wipe out the steam tabler. Please, get some traps and spray and rid this site like the rat-infested pestulance he is. SAM-I WONT GO THROUGH THIS AGAIN. HE’LL DESTROY OUR LIFE. HE’S A LEECH!!!
Isn’t this the pot calling the proverbial kettle black? I recall an incident post-9/11 when you told all of Fairview and Cliffside that Jack and Sam had exploited their political collections to get to the World Trade Center site, and then heaped scraps of dirt into ziploc bags and proceeded to sell them debris on EBAY! We all have our faults and we’ve all committed our follies over the years. Jack is a nice person and his voice isn’t annoying.
“I recall an incident post-9/11”
Speaking of the pot calling the kettle black …
(Not exactly analogous, but this was too easy)
And Sam, don’t you dare bring this slob back into the group. Lucille and I will personally go banana’s over his presence in the house. Don’t even think of it! Trust me, people, this guy is a detriment to anything good we have here. The biggest sleeze bull-shit artist you will ever find is this guy!
Hi! Steve Russo,


Thank-you, for the compliment and reminding me of the remembrance.
DeeDee…
…Hi! Sam Juliano,
Sam, I hope that you don’t mind me sharing this poem that a fellow member in my TT club…shared with the TT members, yesterday…
…on your blog today.
Thanks,
September 11, 2009
A Lit Candle
A Remembrance
Stops Along the Journey
Thursday, September 10, 2009
Silence
Silence.
Silence sits between us on the grey bench seat of granddaddy’s pick up truck, staring at the stream of miles flowing around us. Mmmmmm…the low level hum from the kiss of tires on the asphalt, fills the dead air taunting the…
Silence can be deafening.
Deafening, the words communicated as you softly trace lines across the back of my hands with your fingers, teasing playfully at the curling hairs on my knuckles, measuring his hand on mine. Eyes squinting toward the road ahead, an impish smile dances across your face in contentment in the…
Silence can be peaceful.
Peaceful, your hand under mine, like a blanket sharing warmth, until you decide to see who can keep their hand on top. Slap. Slap. Slap. We battle back and forth, vying for position, then find my hand pinned with all ten fingers, as we travel on in…
Silence can be so hard to find these days.
Days fill with filling the silence. Days fill with seeking the silence. Days to be silent.
9.11.01
Why does it take a tragedy or death for us to take a moment of silence?
Take a moment to be silent today.
Its the only way you will ever really hear…
Silence.
WitD readers, Fellow blogger Brian Miller, is the author of this most moving tribute to those who should always be remembered on 09.11.01
Thank-you! Brian, for letting me share your poem with the readers/ members, here at Wonders in the Dark.
Below is the website where the poem orginated…
http://www.waystationone.com/2009/09/silence.html
This post is why my dear friend, you are simply incomparable. You had me in tears more than once here, especially since I knew two of the victims, and a school teacher in my system, Joan Glick lost here son Jeremy, one of the heroes who stormed teh cockpit in that plane that crashed in in Pa. You have again injected a sobering reminder here that always puts the proper perspective on fleeting mortality.
I just don’t know what to say except to bow my head.
Thanks, Dee Dee. I thought about bringing up 9/11, but wasn’t sure how. This has been by far the least commemorative day for me since 2001. It makes sense, it’s been 8 years, I’m no longer in NYC (though I wasn’t a year ago either), and now that Obama’s president, the immediacy of the day has retreated even further into the past.
That was a post there by Dee Dee to end all posts on 9-11. Thanks, dear lady. And thanks for mentioning Sue and I in a previous post.
Pardon me, but Sam let me know how to send you my Magic Flute stuff.
The art is on the below link
http://picasaweb.google.com/jumel.ny/UMELMagicFlute?authkey=p12hjUGUuO4#
let me have an email to send the rest to. I don’t want to leave it as a reply, it is too long.