by Sam Juliano
From the House of the Dead, based on a novel by Dostoyevsky, may well be famed Czechoslovakian composer Leos Janacek’s most extraordinary opera. The rather extreme musical style of the last years of Janacek’s life is complemented here by a dramaturgy in opera that was actually years ahead of its time. This is a stark work with vocal writing that exhibits powerful expressive force. It is the final work from Janacek, and like the three that preceded it- Kata Kabanova, The Cunning Little Vixen and The Makropoulos Case it speaks with a deeply humanitarian voice. The composer aimed here to portray the bleakest suffering, unknowingly creating resonances with historical events and places he would never live to see – notably, the gulags of Soviet Russia and the concentration camps of the Nazi regime. The raw power of the situation itself is paralleled brilliantly in the composer’s style. Janacek’s depiction of the Russian penitentiary is so belligerant, so forceful in its realism that it takes on a kind of white-hot fervor. In fact Janecek once wrote: “You know the terror, the inner feelings of a human being who will never cease to breathe: complete despair which wants nothing and expects nothing. This will be developed in my Dostoyevsky opera.”
Celebrated film director Patrice Chereau, who is equally famed for his Bayreuth Wagner Ring Cycle, acknowledges the results of this development when he asserts that “there are two things that I sometimes hear about From the House of the Dead: that there is no plot, and that there is no love or hope in the story. The title of the opera comes from the novel by Dostoyevsky, who believed these kinds of prisons are made for killing people. In a beautiful passage, he says that every youth, every hope, every future is destroyed in these camps. But then he goes on to tell tell incredibly beautiful stories about a group of fascinating people who are still living and hoping, trying to survive, through tears or anger, in the inferno of the prison. That’s the paradox: the inmates know that there is no hope of ever leaving the prison, but they nevertheless strive to survive. They have enormous energy for surviving, for creating a community, and the prison becomes its own society. Janacek’s music, with its rude, some times violent sound, with its use of ostinato, with its strange and incredibly strong forms, tells us the story of a community that is alive and energetic.”
With From the House of the Dead Janacek has made a kind of collage, assembling elements and placing them one aside the other, like a collection of postage stamps. Over the course of the performance, three people emerge from the huge ensemble and explain how they came to commit murder. Three people – Luka, Skuratov, and Shishkov tell their stories, and from these smaller pieces emerges a single arc and story: the story of this particular humanity, with its stronger characters and weaker ones. Chereau effectively binds everything together to forge a clear destiny for all the characters and to make the story larger than its individual pieces. Hence, love, or the lack of love is at play every day in this prison. Skuratov kills for love and Shishkov kills for lack of it. And at the center of the piece, there are two plays – within-the-play, which the prisoners have probably spent a year preparing, and both of them are about love, (which is basically everywhere in this opera, because that’s what the prisoners miss most.) The life of this group of people is both the plot of From the House of the Dead and their destiny. Janacek, like Dostoyevsky before him do not pass judgement on the murderers, instead urging tolerance and respect.
While the original story of From the House of the Dead unfolds in a prison settlement in Siberia in the 19th century, the action of the Chereau staging is set in an unspecified time and place, much in the tradition of Brecht. The diverse characters represent a rough cross-section of society, including, among others a nobleman, a priest, a drunk, and a commendant and guards who are also, in a sense, victims of their system. Set designer Richard Perduzzi has constructed high concrete walls (seen in picture above) that periodically slide open and closed, and the claustrophobic enclave contains the crowded cast. The rather slovenly, indescript costumes and dingy lighting (not to mention some simulated onstage sex) were also characteristics of another Met production I saw earlier this year – Luc Bondy’s controversial Tosca. Perduzzi designed that one too. But where the avante garde approach clashed with the lavish ornate architecture and aesthetic demand of the Italian opera, the approach here is compellingly effective, and it provides a perfect match for the brutally beautiful score that is noted by an economy of expression that deftly encapsulates thoughts and emotions. It’s music that’s sometimes dissonant, sometimes lyrical, and always inventive. It blends romanticism and modernity, and a vast orchestra is employed. Violin solos are particularly ravishing, while the vocal lines are declamatory and closely follow the speech pattern of the Czech language. And it was quite joyously apparent that Janacek’s love for folk music shines through in the dance tunes that appear in a play-within-the-opera, although these melodies are far beyond exercises in the picturesque; here they are tainted by memories, and the sound is simultaneously beautiful and ominous.
Delivering the opera’s longest soliloquy – almost 20 minutes to some urgent music- Peter Mattei gives a powerful and moving peformance as Shishkov, who commits a “crime of passion.” Stefan Margita in his Met debut, is a tenor who plays Filka (Luka) and he sings a moving monologue about being sent to jail and then murdering a strong-arming officer. Eric Stoklossa, who also makes his first appearance at the opera house, is a winning Alyeya, who is befriended by the comamnding Gorianchikov, who is played by the superb baritone Willard White.
The opera’s biggest pyro-technic moment (and some patrons who spend over $250 for a seat in the front orchestra and first balcony need something to visually excite them) was when a massive load of what appeared to paper and garbage fell onto the stage from above, which was an excellent transitional device, which segued into a stage of dust and smoke.
It’s stagings like this from luminaries like Chereau, and much obscured and underestimated scores, like this one-act work (which is surely one of Janecek’s best,) that allow for the perfect chemisty to create that rarity on the Metropolitan opera house stage. From the House of the Dead is a miracle.
Note: I saw ‘From the House of the Dead’ on Wednesday night (Dec. 2nd) all by my lonesome at the Met. The opera ran only 1 hour and 35 minutes (an unusually short opera) with no intermission. I spent some time before on this rainy but mild evening at a local sandwich shop on Broadway enjoying some tomato rice soup and some blueberries and fruit juice.
Hi! Sam Juliano,
Sam Juliano said, “The composer aimed here to portray the bleakest suffering, unknowingly creating resonances with historical events and places he would never live to see – notably, the gulags of Soviet Russia and the concentration camps of the Nazi regime.”
Wow…what a very descriptive and detailed review of famed Czechoslovakian composer Leos Janacek’s most extraordinary opera…House of the Dead.
Sam Juliano, I must admit that I ‘am not familiar with this opera…(House of the Dead) or Mr. Janacek, but your review and the opera seems interesting.
Thanks, for sharing!
DeeDee 😉 🙂
Sam Juliano said, “The opera ran only 1 hour and 35 minutes (an unusually short opera) with no intermission.”
The opera ran only 1 hour and 35 minutes.
Sam Juliano, How long does an opera usually run.
Sam Juliano said, The opera’s biggest pyrotechnic moment (and some patrons who spend over $250 for a seat in the front orchestra and first balcony need something to visually excite them) was when a massive load of what appeared to paper and garbage fell onto the stage from above, which was an excellent transitional device, which segued into a stage of dust and smoke.”
[Note: Sam Juliano, I “striked” my comment, but yet left it here in order for readers, to understand your response to me.
Because after your explanation (about the Metropolitan Opera House) to me that situation isn’t so funny anymore!]
Omg!…Ha!Ha! (Laughter!)Please excuse me for laughing, but I wonder if their (the patrons) clothing were “riddled” with dirt and dust.
Well Dee Dee, as always this is a flattering and enveloping response, one that brings a smile to my face and the most obliging of demeanors!
The question as to how long an opera runs (or most operas in any case) is extremely pertinent, especially for those just encountering the form. Most operas run at least 3 hours, with many running 3 and a 1/2 to 4. Wagners operas (which are among my favorite of all) run between 4 1/2 and 6 hours including intermissions. (I kid you not!) For those not completely comfortable and/or passionate with the form that can be an excrutiating grind. I can’t even count th enumber of times Lucille has konked out during these marathons in the years when I had partial season tickets at the Met. For some it’s really an endurance test. So when you get an opera like this Janecek woek that’s this brief, in a sense it’s a special treat, though I have experienced enough to prepare for the most demanding evenings.
As far as the dust and smoke stage sequence, the stage hands had everything under control, and the debris did not pass beyond the parameters of the stage, though from the back of the orchestra where I sat (after moving to a seat from standing room in a strategy for those who cannot be paying big bucks at this high-priced institution) it always appears that it goes further.
Even though some of the music here is ‘atonal’ the brevity is well within the tolerance of even those who aren’t opera fans.
Thanks so much again for your must-appreciated response.
A titanic review which (again) shows you at the top of your form with your favorite area of interest. But I am not so sure I think of “lyrical” music with Czechoslovakian opera. It’s the darkest of subjects, with no trace of humor, and murder is part of the the story. And then there’s Dostoyevsky, who isn’t any breezy walk in the park.
Well Fred, thanks as always for the kind words, but I can’t say I agree with you there. Janacek’s JENUFA, KATA KABANOVA and THE CUNNING LITTLE VIXEN are awash with lyricism, and there’s few composers from ANY country who are as ravishingly poetic as Antonin Dvorak, whose RUSALKA is a Pucciniesque work. In fact “Hymn to the Moon,” it’s showcase aria, (featured in DRIVING MISS DAISY–I said that for Allan’s sake! Ha!) is one of the supreme compositions in all of opera. Then there’s the festive THE BARTERED BRIDE by Smetana among others.
Hello Sam,
If you have a moment I would like to share a note and question on my favourite opera.
In an operatic oeuvre that can already seem thin on conventional operatic niceties, in “From the House of the Dead” Janáček goes several steps further along his path towards his vision of artistic truth, stripping the score back to the absolute essentials, paring down his musical language to its strangest, toughest, most intimate, and as it turned out, final iteration. The result can be painfully bare and raw, more so than ever before, and the total lack of sentimentality, sensationalism or pandering to an audience’s need for orchestral exaltation and rapturous vocal catharsis sets him apart from virtually every other great opera composer.
And to a greater degree than any “Verismo” composer, Janáček is committed to putting real characters on the operatic stage; in “From the House of the Dead” by portraying people at their lowest ebb, he creates his ultimate paean to the value and beauty of all human life, in all its difficulty, pain, humour and occasional joy. In this score, moments of softness and wonder are minute and fleeting where in his previous operas he may have offered a sonorous paragraph of beauty (if the drama called for it!) against his oft uncompromising realism.
Some listeners will find it all too much to bear, with too little to sustain them, the wild collage like patch work of the score remaining steadfastly tonal but rarely ingratiating. But the richness and gawky beauty of this oddest of operas is there for any who are open to it and willing to persevere, and I and many others are convinced that it is a very, very great masterpiece.
Question.
Do you agree with Hans Hollander who said that… “in no other work is Janáček’s realism permeated by such lyrical effusion and fervour?
I’ll use the time-worn opera expression of “Bravo!” for this review. But my taste hasn’t developed to the point where I’d appreciate this. It’s no Puccini. Still, it can’t be argued that bringing in new works or stagings is far more exciting than staging the old war horses over and over.
Don’t be too sure Joe. I would wager even money you would find much to appreciate with this. And not every opera of greatness was written by Puccini, as much as I adore him! Thanks for reading as always.
Just what I’d expect from you. You speak of miracles, but this essay is miraculous too. This is not the normal kind of offering there. But I’m more curious to know what Lucille thought of this. Tomato rice soup and blueberries for supper?
I try and be good sometimes Maria, and with NYC prices you’d need to take out a mortgage to buy a sandwich! Lucille did not attend this, I went alone. I loved it, but I suspect if I brought her to this I’d be soon served up with divorce papers.
Thanks again for the compliment.
Sam, I think I’d like to witness this, but the affordable tickets for the two remaining Saturday afternoon matinee performances are sold out. I’d have to do what you did with the standing room.
Anyway, tremendous review and I just read Anthony Tomasini’s New York Times appraisal, which I’m sure you’ve already seen. I copied part of it:
..From the moment Mr. Salonen, who had sneaked into the darkened pit without taking applause, began the eerie opening march, you sensed a milestone in the making. And this sense carried right through the 90-minute performance (without intermission) to the final tableaus, in which a group of tattered, ailing inmates in the prison hospital release a wounded eagle they have nurtured back to health, only to be corralled by guards into a quick march to the work fields.
Mr. Chéreau’s staging is set entirely among three towering concrete walls, the work of Richard Perduzzi (the set designer of the Bondy “Tosca”). It seemed so linked to the arresting musical performance Mr. Salonen drew from the brilliant..
Thanks for that terrific embellishment David, and for the time you expended to do the research. Yes, Mr. Tomasini is quite a great writer (with Christopher Isherwood, he’s the top opera/theatre guy at the Times. And I read that review, where he rightly praises this production to the heavens.
Hi! Sam Juliano,
Sam Juliano said, “As far as the dust and smoke stage sequence, the stage hands had everything under control, and the debris did not pass beyond the parameters of the stage, though from the back of the orchestra where I sat (after moving to a seat from standing room in a strategy for those who cannot be paying big bucks at this high-priced institution) it always appears that it goes further…”
Isn’t that always the case…Sam, this scene remind me of when I went on a trip with my fellow classmates to watch a stage play (not an opera) and we thought that we were going to sit in the first two rows in the theatre, but the first two rows were reserve for another group of students.
(In which my instructor, try to point out to a group of angry students…why it was best to sit in the middle rows in the theatre…sometimes.)
In order to make a long story short…they (the students in the first rows) were wiping stage saw dust off their clothes all evening.
DeeDee 😉
LOL Dee Dee!!! Thanks for that funny anecdote, and I’m sure that there have been a number of instances where theatrical excesses have spilled over into the front rows. I remember I was amazed last year when that famous “rain scene” in MARY STUART, where water cascaded down from the rafters, somehow managed to spare the front row theatre goers of getting drenched. But the Metropolitan Opera House is a multi-million dollar operation. They would never allow anything less than full control.
One more thing. The Met staged Janacek’s “The Makropoulos Case” several years ago, and the response was nothing like what greeted this new staging and opera. I think that one was even more minimalist.
I read that in real life Janacek was not the most pleasant of persons.
David: I saw MAKROPOULOS and have a fine DVD version performed at another opera house. You’re not kidding when you say minimalist. Some production go with just a few chairs! Ha! In any case, it’s one of Janacek’s less interesting works, and can’t compete with FROM THE HOUSE OF THE DEAD, which is a flat out masterpiece.
Janacek was supposedly a very difficult person from what I read. But as an artist he’s of the first-rank.
Sam, I have to congratulate you on being able to capture in words, the joys that reside in Janacek’s operas! I hope to have a chance in the future to see this impressive sounding production.
I’ve told you before that I think Janecek is something of a “special case” – a composer who came to writing opera late in his career and who was hardheaded enough to imagine a music theater that sounded like nothing that came before. Reportedly, he carried a notebook around to notate the “speech music” he heard in daily life. His vocal lines become inflected instruments in his through-composed symphonic scores.
Much like, I suppose, the very distinct vision of a renegade movie director, the final product is a very different object than what most audiences are trained to expect. That difference makes it all the more important that seldom staged operas such as Janacek’s “From the House of the Dead” receive vivid presentations. From your review, it sounds like Chereau, et al., have served this unfamiliar Janacek object well.
Robert it is always a special treat (and an honor) to have you comment under WitD’s opera reviews, especially in view of your vast expertise and passion for the form. (Robert of course is the President of the Topeka, Kansas Opera society, and has travled far and wide to catch so many of the greatest productions). As far as this production goes, I’m sure you are well aware that the Chereau production – with Pierre Boulez as the conductor – was filmed at another European location in July 2007, and truthfully, while Boulez can’t quite equal Mackarras with this score, he comes real close, and this DVD is nearly as good as what you would see at the Met, as it’s the same Chereau production.
That’s a fascinating point you make about Janacek carrying around a notebook to monitor the speech patterns in everyday life! He was a meticulous composer in every sense of the word. I’ve always loved JENUFA and CUNNING LITTLE VIXEN, but I dare say this could be his masterpiece.
Thanks again!
What a great honor to have Mr. Webb share his expertise. And opera is alive and well in the midlands.
While I’m beginning to snicker about how august the Topeka Opera Society is in the scheme of things, the recent National Opera Week showed that opera is alive and well throughout the nation. (In case you missed it, it was 11/14 -20, the first one ever.) Regional opera companies, opera training programs and community groups help make it a vital art form that is accessible to a wide audience.
Well Robert, that just goes to show you that I am out of it in a sense, as I wasn’t even aware that 11/14 till 11/20 was ‘National Opera Week,’ though you do note it’s the first such venture. Yep i must definitely agree with you that those three groups are what set the groundwork for late-life attendance and appreciation. But as far as your rold at Topeka opera overseer, I’ll always remember that you were not only familiar with, but had actually seen in other cities work by Thomas Ades, one of the most obscure of composers, albeit a most talented figure.
Sam Juliano, “But the Metropolitan Opera House is a multi-million dollar operation. They would never allow anything less than full control…”
Right you are…because that was a local theatre that we (my classmates and me) attended.
Sam Juliano, I have never visited the Metropolitan Opera House before, but I can tell from the screen shot that “money” is invested in the Metropolitan Opera House. (Productions)
DeeDee 😉 🙂
Oh that’s for sure Dee Dee! Lucille and I would be honored to escort you to an opera there on your first visit to NYC! I look forward to it greatly, my excellent friend.
An ABSOLUTELY FABULOUS, TITANIC, EXTRAORDINARY and ALTOGETHER SUPERLATIVE REVIEW!!!! I was enraptured during the reading of this fine essay. I dare say, our own Schmulee could best the biggest and brightest in the music criticism field. This is a tremendous essay that comes hot on the heals of his gargantuan and emmaculate review for Von Triers ANTI-CHRIST. I have always said that Sam is really on top of his game when Opera or Classical Music is the subject. This essay just lends more fuel to my statements. I’m dying to see this production because of this review. Take a bow, Sam!!!!!!
This may be the most extravagent praise I have ever received at this site, but I don’t think I’ll make many friends after it’s read. Some may think you are on commision, especially with my well-known political leanings. Anyway, you and I are apparently alike in the way we describe things!
Thanks my very good friend!
Don’t be too hard on Dennis, Sam. He’s not too far off the mark. I know how much you love this kind of thing, so it’s unsurprisingly that it illicits your strongest writing. All the reviews of this have been outstanding-as we’ve discussed-and it’s just the right length to fully appreciate. This is one of those productions that should be seen for the director alone, similar to what the Met did with the Anthony Minghella production of ‘Madama Butterfly.’
Excellent point Peter, comparing the high-profile direction with that of the Minghella BUTTERFLY.
This sounds fantastic on a number of levels. Sam, do you know if this production will see a dvd release in the future? I’d love to see it.
Jamie, it truly was a spectacular experience, as I tried to convey in the review. This exact same Chereau production (staged in Europe) is now available on DVD!!! I will be ordering it this week, and you know what that means as far as you are concerned.
Here it is:
http://www.amazon.com/Leos-Janacek-Chereau-Festival-Aix-en-Provence/dp/B0012LH82Y/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=music&qid=1260319748&sr=8-1
Oh Sam I just looked that up (on your link), and I see netflix has this. I will rent it, and (shhhhh) copy. So don’t worry, thanks for the heads up though.
Can’t wait… DVD reviews seem in the positive.