By Aaron West
(This article discusses plot points from the film that some might consider spoilers.)
Coming of age stories do not necessarily need to fit into the carefully crafted formula that has been repeated ad nauseum over the last few decades. More often than not, when they deviate from that formula, they can catch honest moments and inject personality into their work. Many of the titles thus far on this list have been the films that break these constraints. I consider My Life as a Dog to be one of these films, but the power is not in it being bold and experimental, but in being subtle and identifiable.
Many children experience hardship, although few suffer nearly the lengths that Ingemar does. The way children deal with hardship is perplexing. Their minds have often not developed or mature enough to handle it well, and as a result they experience denial, cling to a myth, or minimize their misery by comparing their own lives to those much worse. This is the route that Ingemar takes, and he does so in the form of a dog. This materializes in his ruminations about Laika, the space dog that suffered to sacrifice for mankind. It also materializes with Sickan, his lovable canine companion that he is forced to abandon. Finally, it materializes with his own behavior. Rather than face the reality of his emotions, he behaves as if he is a dog. It is not apparent whether he is embodying Laika, Sickan or both, but he is clearly trying to leave Ingemar and his misfortune behind.
Along the way, Ingemar encounters what most kids encounter, the thirst for adventure and confusion over sexuality. From the outside, it may seem heartless for him to finally enjoy life and smile in the small village of Småland, but despite his hardships, this is his first opportunity to actually be a child. This is his first time being free of the oppression of his mother’s illness. He meets several other kids, most notably Saga, who is both a peer and a sexual conundrum since she is a girl who tries to pass off as a boy in order to box and play soccer. He encounters a buxom blonde in the form of Berit, the type of girl that is every child’s (and for that matter, most men’s) ideal, and his curiosity gets the best of him. He is growing up and becoming a man, but the trappings of his familial struggles threaten to lure him away.
The heart of the film comes from Gunnar, the uncle who takes Ingemar in. Gunnar is an endearing fatherly character, and he takes a liking to Ingemar. Since the boy’s real father is working on the other side of the world, the surrogate father is the closest he has to a role model. We can tell that at times Gunnar’s actions are dictated by his knowledge of Ingemar’s troubles. Soon after his introductory scene, we see Gunnar trying to cheer up the young boy, trying to get him to play. Some of the most joyous scenes are those in which they bond together. One example is when they isolate themselves in the summer house and play a song over and over again just to annoy Gunnar’s wife, Ulla. Gunnar has his flaws, but to Ingemar these are invisible. He is both a father figure and a playmate, and the bond between them is enchanting to watch.
The town also has many quirks, such as the obstinate roofer who chooses to take a naked swim in the icy waters. There is a boy who has green hair. One of Ingemar’s house companions asks him to read the text from a lingerie advertisement. These oddities add to the charm of the middle portion of the film, and despite his troubles, we understand why Ingemar settles in so well. The film celebrates the small village and its quaint charm, and many of us would love to live in such a vivacious and energetic community.
What I like best about My Life as a Dog is that we see most everything from Ingemar’s perspective and some things are not explained. We can extrapolate meaning from many scenes, especially those of a sexual nature just based on universal experiences, but we do not get explanations for why people behave in certain ways. Even though we see through Ingemar’s eyes, we do not see inside his head. We have ideas that he is troubled and that may be why he chooses to misbehave, and certainly why he chooses to take the form of a dog. However, we are never told specifically why, and we do not need this information. Ingemar is growing up and dealing with adversity, yet finding his place in the world. Sometimes just observing is a beautiful thing.
We also recorded a podcast about the film a couple weeks ago here:
http://criterionblues.com/2015/08/16/criterion-close-up-2-my-life-as-a-dog-lasse-hallstroms-career/
I think you should make it extremely clear on all your posts that every single one contains huge spoilers. It’s alright looking at a post about a film i know very well but no one should give away so much on a film that no one has seen before.
I have to disagree completely. I didn’t give away any of the major plot points, the ending, or one of the pivotal points of the film. I will include a line saying this may include spoilers, but I think you’re off base here.
It’s not that I don’t think you write well, but you give away so much of a film that unless i’ve seen it and know it, it’s too much to know before a first viewing.
It’s pretty standard practice that if a film is 20 years old, spoilers are fine.
Don’t blame others if you can’t be bothered to do your homework. You only had 2 decades.
Actually three decades, but what’s another ten years to this guy? It’s about the principle .. I should have written a 150 word TV Guide review. Or maybe just these four words: “Good movie. See it.”
I know this film, but i’ve learnt to never ever read a post about a film i’ve never seen. I don’t want to know anything that doesn’t happen in the first 5 minutes really. Thanks.
Did you know that Janet Leigh dies 40 minutes into Psycho while she takes a shower? I hope not since I just spoiled it.
Bahahahaha! That was hilarious.
I do think many modern reviewers spoil new films with carelessly giving away major plot points, but this film is a few decades old. The rules don’t really apply.
I agree on this point too.
I’ve always thought the ‘spoilers’ fixation in current culture to be overblown anyways. I mean a film, especially a great one, envelopes the viewer in many ways; poetic imagery, sublime performance, truthful exposition, heartfelt philosophy, masterful use of filmic grammar—whatever—but often the idea that if a key plot point is spoiled then the experience would greatly suffer isn’t how I, and I bet most cineastes would agree, is had. I mean, take Maurizio’s point on Psycho, I knew Leigh died in the shower part way though before I ever saw the film, and yet Hitchcock’s wonderfully orchestrated use of some 40 cuts made the scene even more than I could have ever imagined. Truly seeing something new and fresh—the power of cinema—is something altogether different than someone ‘spoiling’ it and telling you it happens beforehand.
Very good point Jamie. I think the whole spoiler alert thing is endemic among the Hollywood Blockbuster culture. You’re right, if the success or failure resides on a particular plot point, then that film is D.O.A. anyway.
If you are that spoiler sensitive, then you probably should not read reviews.
I write reviews, but short ones, that you may read in the TV guide before deciding what to watch.
Good film writing is not TV Guide material. Seriously, if you are this spoiler sensitive, then you should simply read Netflix sleeves or IMDB summaries for your “reviews.” I am careful not to be spoiled, but I am also not going to read an in-depth essay on a 30 year old movie and not expect to have some details given away. That is completely ridiculous.
I’m not talking about this film, i’m talking about in general as you have reviewed newer films in the same way. It would be good to say your film reviews contain spoilers that’s all. I don’t know why you’re being so sensitive about this. I meant to say something before but never had the chance.
You are being spoiler sensitive. I’ve only written one other review here and that was a short piece. On my own site I have a spoiler policy that is noted in the About section and nobody has complained about my essays there. If you’ve seen the film, then I don’t see why you are making such a big deal about it.
I’ve been visiting this site for well over six years (maybe longer?) and I’ve yet to come across such a lame argument. Some of Sam’s greatest reviews are plot-heavy, but they are exceptionally well integrated in the reviews, as they are in Aaron West’s piece. Seems to me this quibble was deliberately posed, and the writer is a troll.
What I always found so striking with “My Life is a Dog” is the melancholic undercurrent, consistent with Swedish cinema. Didn’t Bergman say he loved this film?
Great review, Aaron!
And I write mammoth reviews that top 4,000 words regularly. You know what, though? I don’t demand that other people write just like me.
PS, Soylent Green is people.
Aaron, I am not sure I know what this is all about. I just now woke up to this barrage of comments all from a single person, and that person is not a Wonders regular at all. In fact this is the first time this person has EVER left a comment under any of our reviews, ever. I don’t know who he is, and he hasn’t made himself known until now.
Needless to say I am thoroughly disgusted with the entire turn of events, and later this morning when I get up to my school, I am going to delete this entire comment thread. I have worked exceedingly hard to keep positive energy flowing for a project that is surely a labor of love. Jazzylemon, be rest assured you haven’t done us any favors here. And for the record while all this was going on (apparently at around 1:00 A.M.) I was fast asleep.
Sammy, actually this has all been happening in the last hour. The times are off. I published this after 7am our time. This guy is just a troll.
Unbelievable. Your prior review for the countdown was gloriously received as you will recall, but this one just had a bad strain of luck, one that attracted this foolish writer, who knows nothing of the art of writing film reviews.
I’m curious if he is talking about Wonders reviews in general or my previous one. I have a feeling it is the former, which means he probably should not be reading any professional reviews, anywhere. It would be different if we are talking about new releases and just merely giving an opinion. TV guide reviews?
I apologize for backing off of writing here. I thought this was a regular and was representative of the audience. Fortunately he sounds to be an outlier and an idiot.
Aaron, I am not sure in answer to your question. What I do know is that this person has never posted at this site even once prior to this bizarre barrage. His comments are completely useless as they could rightly apply to every review that has been written on this countdown so far. As I say I will be deleting these very shortly. I’m sorry you had endure all this.
EVERY review that has been written for this countdown including all that I have written myself have revealed extensive plot material. It is the manner in which film reviews are written. Professional reviews are much the same.
Funny, but I thought Aaron told the readership there were spoilers at the outset!!
But only in English.
Aaron added his line about spoilers in response to jazzylemon’s complaint; the line wasn’t there originally.
This is correct. I was baffled because I still stand by the fact that I didn’t spoil anything significant, so this was more of a cautionary warning since it irked someone. I’ve re-read the article and stand by that it didn’t not spoil the film. Trust me, I could have given some serious spoilers that would impact your viewing of the film.
Thanks for the support!
Not sure what universe this “JazzyLemon” lives in, but all film reviews cover the narrative. When an author advises the readers beforehand that there are “spoliers” there shouldn’t be subsequent issues.
This is a terrific review of a film I love, and voted for on my countdown ballot. Mr West’s writing is excellent all around, and his thoughtful insights are welcome.
Great review. Never mind the one guy he’s just trolling although a movie review of just the first five minutes would be kind of hilarious. Imagine a review of the first five minutes of The Wizard of Oz: Dorothy falls in pigsty, no idea who this Oz guy is.
“what’s all the hub-bub about this proto-neo realist Black and White Judy Garland vehicle? A musical with no lavish, and no music. A must miss. Two thumbs down”.
That’d be a fun book to write. Call it, “A Trolls Guide to Cinema: Wasting Your Saturday Nights in Lovely Squalor”. Stock all the Walmart shelves.
I think you’ve stumbled onto something genius. First five minute reviews. We could cover the entire Fast and Furious franchise in one fell swoop: “they get cars and drive fast.”
You just wrote the review for every Fast and the Furious, Bullitt, The Driver, Drive, The French Connection, To Live and Die in LA, …
I’ll stop now.
What have I done? I have spoiled the first 5 minutes of hundreds of films.
Also the butler did it.
Does a non-spoiler first five minute review of Sunset Boulevard actually spoil the premise of the movie? God damn it. Jizzylemon isn’t infallible afterall.
LOL. Yes the possibilities are endless. It’s a Wonderful Life: Just a bunch of yadda-yadda about angel wings. Double Indemnity: Bleeding man rambles into dictaphone
LOL.
You should have seen where we took this on Twitter. @Moviessilently had me in tears!
I am the world’s worst troll hunter. I come along and he’s already moved on. Goes back to bed.
I’m not a guy, and i’m not a troll. I’ve got a public profile and have for many years.
I get these emails and finally had a chance to just put in my thoughts and no one has read what I said to start with…
I said
“….I’m not talking about this film…”
(But not one of you picked up on that, you didn’t read it).
I’m also not ‘blaming’ anyone.
This was just a suggestion then everyone got hyper sensitive and blew up about nothing to do with what I said.
I’ll leave you to it. Have fun.
Excuse me for masculinizing you. Maybe it’s just a common practice to consider trolls male. I got your point, as did everyone else in this thread, and it is ludicrous. I have never seen a complaint about spoilers on this site, my site, or any well-written professional review site. This is your problem and yours alone. If you are bothered by potentially being spoiled by an analytical take on a film and have not seen it, then my best advice is not to read the review. If you are trying to take on some noble cause for others who might be spoiled, then let it go. Others don’t care. Like I said, ZERO complaints about spoilers.
My guess is that most people who read this site have seen My Life as a Dog. If not, they’ll wait for the next review in the countdown.
Sixth Sense: Dead the whole friggin’ time.
Your behaviour is very trollish. Why would you bully someone who took time to write anything to your blog? I meant no harm and made a suggestion, but not in a bad way.
I know what it is to be creative and feel like nothing you do is any good even when deep down you know it is, but don’t take it out on me.
What is so wrong with just asking someone to say Spoiler Alert?
I was home working on the computer for my clients and got the email so thought i’d pop off a quick reply. It was rather hasty I’ll admit, and you couldn’t see the way i might have said it, but at least you know I read the blogs, and I complimented you, but you bullied me. Thanks very much.
why not join this conversation http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/are-you-bothered-by-spoilers-in-movie-reviews/
So you trolled me, and then you accuse me of being a troll? I’d say that the overwhelming consensus is in my corner here. Maybe you meant well, but you came off terribly and were completely off-base.
By the way, in that link you shared, the first comment is this:
“I don’t read or watch reviews until after I have seen the film, so I am 100% in for spoilers in reviews. I don’t want to hear someone tell me it’s good when I can figure that out myself, I want them to tell me why they thought it was good.”
I stand behind this statement 100%.
In case anyone is interested, this prompted a blog post:
http://criterionblues.com/2015/08/25/my-life-as-a-troll/
I don’t think you should erase the thread, Sam! It made me giggle.
I’ve had a couple of complaints about spoilers on Noirish, but I’ve got to confess I just tend to ignore them, tra-la. There are times when you can’t sensibly discuss a movie without revealing plot points from its later stages. As Aaron implies in his joke above, it’s easy to conceive of contexts in which a discussion of The Sixth Sense would necessarily include the twist ending.
I’m the guy who’s never seen My Life as a Dog, and Aaron’s account has made me very much more likely to do so than I was before reading it.
Man, I wish my review the other day got this much gab…LOL…seriously though MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING.
At any rate…always liked this film. Charming, melancholy, both cute and dark. And genuinely heartfelt. Love the ending too. Great write-up!
After the initial ire, it’s actually been a blast. My next assignment is YI YI and I may have to spoil it to pieces!
I’m thinking of you and your page views, Sammy!
This comment section is rather entertaining and the idea of the 5 minute review is pretty hilarious in the end. On this film, though, I do understand the appeal and standing of the work, however didn’t vote for it myself. It falls into a category of films about young boys of which there are quite a few and this one doesn’t stand out as much to these eyes. Aaron I appreciate your perspective and write-up though.
From one who knows the film, there’s no real spoilers here. I have spoiled more information in my pieces because to a degree they’re written for people who I assume have a certain exposure to them but you’re always going to get some nutter who comes along during a Psycho review and brings you to task for mentioning that Marion Crane gets done a death in a shower (really, where have you been, planet fucking Zog? You do know Churchill’s dead, too, right?).
You don’t have to give away the full plot, and besides, with such a relatively inconsequential, straightforward coming of age tale as My Life as a Dog, you kind of know what the story’s going to be anyway before you see it, it’s just the details that differ, the destination’s always the same, just maybe a different platform on the station. Really little more than an argument whether you prefer pork or beef sausages. No-one should lose the slightest sleep about this.
Postscript: Sammy, it looks like I have cost you one regular reader. Sorry about that buddy!
No problem Aaron!! 🙂 Our readership is plentiful and resilient and will survive this future snub my friend.
I remember finding this a moving film – great performances by the young boy and uncle, and all the material woven in about the Russian space dog, Laika, and his real-life dog woven. Lasse Hallstrom is very good at getting that small-town loneliness – I remember ‘What’s Eating Gilbert Grape’ also being excellent, as were ‘The Shipping News’ and ‘Cider House Rules’. Enjoyed your piece, Aaron.
Thank you, Judy! I really enjoyed Gilbert Grape as well, although I’m not as high on Shipping News and Cider House Rules. I agree that the performances were terrific and I could have touched on those in my write-up.