Bones and All, Devotion and The Menu on Monday Morning Diary (November 28)
November 27, 2022 by wondersinthedark

by Sam Juliano
I trust that all our stateside readers enjoyed their Thanksgiving Day. Many are now pivoting in the direction of the yuletide season. Activities over the coming weeks will surely intensify, and I am wishing everyone good health and continued safety.
I have taken some baby steps with my third novel, Roses for Saoirse, but mainly to work on a general outline. Still, I have reached the second chapter. Meanwhile, Irish Jesus in Fairview is in possessions of my editors. Our resident film essay writer extraordinaire, Jim Clark has penned another superlative piece, which will be publishing within a half-hour of this MMD’s posting.
Lucille and I saw three new releases in theaters this past week.
Luca Guadagnino’s “Bones and All” Rating: 1.5 of 5.0
(Seen in Ridgefield Park on Saturday evening)
I absolutely get the metaphors and the audacious manner of exploring love in the rural American environs in the dreamy and nightmarish new film by Luca Guadagnino, titled BONES AND ALL, and found it easy to be seduced by the sublime cinematography and extraordinary musical score by a renowned twosome – and who, while watching the film could argue that Timothy Chalamee, Taylor Russell and Mark Rylance aren’t captivating in roles wildly disperate than any they have ever tackled, but the end result for me after watching the film last night, was disgust, revulsion, incredulity and downright anger. I spent over two hours largely being regaled by human depravity and ulra-violent set pieces (one in a cornfield and another in a bathtub that brought back horrifying images of HENRY: PORTRAIT OF A SERIAL KILLER) and sickening domestic scenes right out of CANNIBAL HOLOCAUST which pop up shockingly in a visual scheme patterned on Terence Malick (the film has been compared to BADLANDS by some). Yes, there is a moral compass here for sure, and the film’s fans in the critical ranks have offered up superlative argumants in support of the film’s style, explicitly choreographed passion and metaphorical underpinnings. I respect that absolutely. But as they say, beauty is in the eye of the beholder, and BONES AND ALL sickened me to my core. The price to pay for the exploration of the unthinkable outweighs the vile lengths of this off-putting and tedious experience.
“The Menu” and “Devotion”
Both films rate 3.5 of 5.0 (Seen in Teaneck and Ridgefield Park on Wenesday and Friday evenings)
My guess is that regular diners and inveterate foodies will find much to satiate their taste buds in THE MENU, a film that for me is a blend of Peter Greenaway’s 1989 “The Cook, the Thief, His Wife and Her Lover” and the multiple film adaptations of Agatha Christie’s “And Then There Were None.” To be sure, this black comedy with an ongoing perverse undercurrent (that explodes into full-flavored perversity before all is said and done) showcases a markedly twisted restaurant, located on a secluded island, where tragic events and satiric happenings (a recall of Triangle of Sadness too) bring about the kind of emotion caught between laughter and revulsion. A star-studded cast sustain the affair and the ending is no-holds barred. I can’t deny the fun quotient.
Nothing in the Korean War film DEVOTION, directed by J. D. Dillard, and acted superbly by the two leads, is remarkable, and in some ways it is standard fare. Yet,, whether by design or by the safe presentation of its story of heroism and friendship, it succeeds in moving the viewer, which in these days of multiplex fodder is a substancial return on the time investment. The friendship is based on a real-life story, and it was wonderful to know the families stayed close over generations. I expected something much less that what I got.

Our family spent Thanksgiving at the spacious Butler, New Jersey cul-de-sac home of Lucille’s sister Elaine and her husband Jim Lampmann. This was the 28th consecutive year we spent our Turkey Day there, and it was, like all the others, a memorable day.
Like this:
Like Loading...
I’ll watch “Bones and All” when I don’t have to pay for it. John Waters hilariously calls Chalamet a “butch twink.”
Some musings on the new Sight and Sound poll.
Overcorrection of past omissions.
“Vagabond,” “Wanda,” and “Black Girl” all should have been on the list decades ago. Isn’t racially themed horror like “Night of the Living Dead” superior to “Get Out”?
Literary humanism takes a slight hit. “Greed” and “The Magnificent Ambersons” jettisoned, though adaptations of Krasznahorkis, Moravia, Philip K. Dick, and Arthur C. Clarke remain. Also would have been satisfying to see Fassbinder adaptations of Döblin or Fontane. So where the hell is Lean’s “Great Expectations” or “Dr. Strangelove” (“Red Alert” twisted into the blackest of comedies)?
No Buñuel is a huge blunder; ditto the lack of Griffith.
I’m fine with recency bias e.g., Sciamma and Weerasethakul (“Portrait of a Lady on Fire” and “Uncle Boonmee” both made my personal list).
And if the youngins think “Kane” is boring, wait’ll they get a load of “Jeanne Dielman” (an intentionally slow film that’s hyperconscious of time and the deadening effects of boredom).
I guess I’m a crank but isn’t disagreement part of this decennial exercise?
That’s all.
Tbh, for many years “Wanda” has been almost impossible to screen. However, I can recall Pauline Kael’s wan enthusiasm for it.
If politicization of the canon is the new normal, didn’t voters recognize that “Ivan the Terrible” is about as queer as it gets?
I totally get Maya Deren’s inclusion
but what about Michael Snow? “Wavelength” and “La Région Centrale,” the latter a huge influence on Chantal Akerman!
Now it’s time for me to stop venting and move on.